Skip to main content

Reclaiming Everyday Peace in the Micro-Spaces in Burundi

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Religion, Peacebuilding, and Development in Africa
  • 160 Accesses

Abstract

This study uses the bottom-up peacebuilding approach and the notion of everyday peace to assess the impact of peacebuilding interventions in Burundi, which the Conseil Inter-Confessionnel du Burundi (CICB) implemented from October 2018 to December 2019. Specifically, the chapter explores two themes as indicators of everyday peace: the transformation of group relations and conflict resolution in micro-spaces in four provinces. After analysing empirical data from the field, the study finds that CICB utilised a pathway for change that empowered lower-level religious leaders as agents of everyday peace. The organisation then deployed them to improve relations between ethnic, political, and religious communities through changing individual perceptions and group attitudes towards the ‘other’ and resolving conflicts in micro-spaces. Further, the study finds that CICB combined technical aspects of peacebuilding, including dialogue forums, local peace committees, and citizen-to-citizen engagements, with religious values, symbols, and language to promote everyday peace. The chapter concludes that CICB’s strategy has universal utility because its logic of micro-solidarities possesses the potential to transform conflict narratives, end the cycles of violence, build peace from the bottom, and be the building blocks of peace formation at the national level. As such, the logic is consistent with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 16, which calls for the reduction of all forms of violence at all levels of society.

The Communities Richer in Diversity (CRID) consortium published a simplified general readers’ version of this study using parts of the evidence cited in this chapter as Case Study Series No. 4 in April 2022, which is available here: https://www.faithtoactionetwork.org

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A group of religious leaders, comprising Catholics, Methodists, Anglicans, the Evangelical Church of Burundi, Muslims, and Lutherans, founded CICB in June 2008 as an inter-religious organisation to implement peacebuilding programmes because the country had just emerged from a protracted 12-year civil war. With financial support from international funders, CICB has over the years implemented a wide range of peacebuilding interventions and programmes.

  2. 2.

    The way notions of ethnic, cultural, and ‘tribal’ identities are understood in Burundi and Rwanda is very different from the way they are understood in the other Eastern and Central African countries such as Tanzania, Uganda, Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), South Sudan, and Ethiopia. In Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, DRC, Ethiopia, and South Sudan, the concepts ‘tribal’ identity and ethnic identity are synonymous and are widely understood to mean language-based cultural identity. Burundi and Rwanda are different. In the sense of anthropological language-based cultural identity, Burundi has only one ethnic group, Barundi, which has the same culture and the same language, Kirundi. However, colonial and post-colonial political and administrative practices divided the Barundi ethnic group into four ‘tribal’ identities: Baganwa, Tutsi, Hutu, and Twa. Scholarly studies show that the military regimes of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s forcefully assimilated Baganwa, the former ruling group from the pre-colonial Kingdom up to 1966, into the Tutsi category. Similarly, Rwanda has only one anthropological ethnic group, Banyarwanda, that has the same culture and the same language, Kinyarwanda, but political and administrative practices of the last 100 years divided the same ethnic group into three ‘tribes’: Tutsi, Hutu, and Twa.

  3. 3.

    The Arusha peace process was based on four points of agreement.

    1. 1.

      A power-sharing formula, based on an agreed formula of ethnic quotas in politics.

    2. 2.

      Representation of all parties in the state bureaucracy

    3. 3.

      Constitutional restrictions to prevent any single party from becoming excessively powerful.

    4. 4.

      Pathways to integrate former rebels and minority groups in the Burundian armed forces.

    The 2005 indirect presidential elections occurred on 19 August 2005, when Members of the National Assembly and Senate chose the new President of the Republic for a five-year term. The sole candidate, Pierre Nkurunziza of the Conseil National Pour la Défense de la Démocratie – Forces pour la Défense de la Démocratie (CNDD–FDD), attained 151 yes votes. While nine voted against him, one vote was invalid. He was sworn in on 26 August 2005. The election was held using multiple round systems. To win in the first round of voting, Nkurunziza was required to receive at least two-thirds of the vote (108 votes).

  4. 4.

    A report by the Commission of Inquiry on Burundi, which the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) appointed in September 2016, lists the armed groups as follows. Forces Nationales pour la Libération (FNL), which is a splinter group from the original PALIPEHUTU-FNL and is led by General Aloys Nzabampema; Forces Républicaines du Burundi (FOREBU), which emerged in 2015 and is led by General Godefroid Niyombare and other soldiers who led the May 2015 coup attempt; and Résistance pour un Etat de Droit (RED-Tabara) that emerged in January 2016. Other armed groups that emerged in December 2015, but there was no sufficient information about them during the field research, are Mouvement de la Résistance Populaire (MRP); Union des Patriotes pour la Révolution (UPR); Force de Libération de la Démocratie au Burundi (FLDB); Mouvement Patriote Chrétien (MPC); and MALIBU-Front Patriotique du Salut (MALIBU-FPS).

  5. 5.

    Parts of this evidence and others cited in this chapter were in the CRID general readers’ version produced as Case Study Series No. 4 in April 2022, which is available here: https://www.faithtoactionetwork.org/interfaith-peacebuilding-from-below-in-burundi-building-everyday-peace-in-the-lower-stratacrid-case-study-series-4/case-study-series-no-4/.Â

  6. 6.

    Parts of this evidence and others cited in this chapter were in the CRID general readers’ version produced as Case Study Series No. 4 in April 2022, which is available here: https://www.faithtoactionetwork.org/interfaith-peacebuilding-from-below-in-burundi-building-everyday-peace-in-the-lower-stratacrid-case-study-series-4/case-study-series-no-4/.Â

  7. 7.

    Parts of this evidence and others cited in this chapter were in the CRID’s general readers’ version produced as Case Study Series No. 4 in April 2022, which is available here: https://www.faithtoactionetwork.org/interfaith-peacebuilding-from-below-in-burundi-building-everyday-peace-in-the-lower-stratacrid-case-study-series-4/case-study-series-no-4/.Â

References

  • Agencies in Bujumbura. (2015, May 15). Failed Burundi Coup Plotters Arrested as President Returns from Tanzania. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/15/burundi-army-dead-radio-station-battle-coup-leaders-arrested

  • Amnesty International. (2016). Burundi Report 2015/16. Amnesty International Annual Report. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2016/02/annual-report-2015/16/

  • Amnesty International. (2017). Conform or Flee: Repression and Insecurity Pushing Burundians into Exile. Amnesty International Report, Index Number: AFR 16/7139/2017. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/afr16/7139/2017/en/

  • Appleby, R. S. (2000). The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC Reporter. (2015, May 13). Burundi President Nkurunziza Faces Attempted Coup. BBC World News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-32724083

  • Bercovitch, J., & Kadayifci-Orellana, S. A. (2009). Religion and Mediation: The Role of Faith-based Actors in International Conflict Resolution. International Negotiation, 14(1), 175–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berents, H. (2018). Young People and Everyday Peace: Exclusion, Insecurity and Peacebuilding in Colombia. Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bigirimana, S. (2021). The Meaning of Violence and the Violence of Meaning: The Politics of Knowledge in Burundi. In B. Jones & U. Lühe (Eds.), Knowledge for Peace: Transitional Justice and the Politics of Knowledge in Theory and Practice (pp. 214–244). Warwick Interdisciplinary Research Centre for International Development (WICID).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. D., Higgins, G. L., & Teeney, F. (2010). Religion and Peacemaking: A Conceptualization. Sociology, 44(6), 1019–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burundi Crisis Deepens as General Claims President Ousted. (2015, May 13). France 24 World News. https://www.france24.com/en/20150513-live-burundi-coup-attempt-president-nkurunziza

  • Daley, P., & Popplewell, R. (2016). The Appeal of Third Termism and Militarism in Burundi. Review of the African Political Economy, 43(150), 648–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, H. (2008). Religion and Peacebuilding: An Ambivalent Yet Vital Relationship. Journal of Religion, Conflict and Peace, 1(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopin, M. (2009). To Make the Earth Whole: The Art of Citizen Diplomacy in an Age of Religious Militancy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, J. (1976). Ethnic Discrimination in Rwanda and Burundi. In W. A. Veenhoven (Ed.), Case Studies in Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: A World Survey (Vol. 4, pp. 93–133). Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruchy, J. W. (2022). Reconciliation and Non-violent Transformation in South Africa: At the Interface of Theology and Secular Politics. In J. Mitchell, S. R. Millar, F. Po, & M. Percy (Eds.), Religion and peace (pp. 155–163). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamber, B. (2007). Forgiveness and Reconciliation: Paradise Lost or Pragmatism? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13(1), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, J. (2015, August 4). Church vs State: A Worrying Dynamic for Burundi. IRIN News. http://www.irinnews.org/report/101824/church-v-state-worrying-dynamic-burundi

  • Human Rights Watch. (2018). “We Will Beat You to Correct You”: Abuses Ahead of Burundi’s Constitutional Referendum. Human Rights Watch Report. https://www.hrw.org/node/317989/printable/print

  • Human Rights Watch. (2019). Burundi: 15 Years On, No Justice for Gatumba Massacre. Human Rights Watch Report. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/08/13/burundi-15-years-no-justice-gatumba-massacre

  • Kang, H. (2022). Enforced Silence or Mindful Non-violent Action? Everyday Peace and South Korean Victims of Civilian Massacres in the Korean War. Peacebuilding, 10(3), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kew, D., & Kwaja, C. M. A. (2022). Religion and Peacebuilding in Nigeria. In J. Mitchell, S. R. Millar, F. Po, & M. Percy (Eds.), Religion and Peace (pp. 143–154). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, R. (1994). Burundi: Ethnic Conflict and Genocide. Woodrow Wilson Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, R. (1998). Genocide in the Great Lakes: Which Genocide? Whose Genocide? African Studies Review, 41(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, R. (2008a). The Dynamics of Violence in Central Africa. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, R. (2008b, June 27). The Burundi Killings of 1972: Mass Violence and Résistance. [Online publication]. http://bo-k2s.sciences-po.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/en/document/burundi-killings-1972, ISSN 1961-9898.

  • Little, D., & Appleby, S. (2004). A Moment of Opportunity? The Promise of Religious Peacebuilding in an Era of Religious and Ethnic Conflicts. In H. Coward & G. S. Smith (Eds.), Religion and Peacebuilding (pp. 69–92). State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2010). Hybrid Peace: Interaction between Top-down and Bottom-up Peace. Security Dialogue, 41(4), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Everyday Peace: Bottom-up and Local Agency in Conflict-Affected Societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2015). Where Is the Local? Critical Localism and Peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 840–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2017). Everyday Social Practices and Boundary-Making in Deeply Divided Societies. Civil Wars, 19(1), 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2021). Everyday Peace: How So-called Ordinary People Can Disrupt Violent Conflict. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R., & Firchow, F. (2016). Top-down and Bottom-up Narratives of Peace and Conflict. Politics, 36(3), 308–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. (2013). The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 763–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkki, L. H. (1995). Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory, and National Cosmology among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marijan, B. (2017). The Politics of Everyday Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Northern Ireland. Peacebuilding, 5(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J., Millar, S. R., Po, F., & Percy, M. (2022). Religion and Peace. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montville, J. (1990). The Arrow and the Olive Branch: A Case for Track Two Diplomacy. In D. V. Vamik et al. (Eds.), The Psychodynamics of International Relationships (pp. 161–175). Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montville, J. (1993). The Healing Function in Political Conflict Resolution. In D. Sandole & H. van der Merwe (Eds.), Conflict Resolution Theory and Practice: Integration and Application (pp. 112–128). Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montville, J. (2009). Track Two Diplomacy: The Work of Healing History. The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 7(2), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nshimirimana, F. (2020). Managing Ethnic Conflicts, Militarisation, and Democratic Failure in the Post-Arusha Burundi. African Journal of Democracy and Governance, 7(3/4), 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, D. (2021). Everyday Peace and Conflict: (Un)privileged Interactions in Kirkuk, Iraq. Third World Quarterly, 42(10), 2227–2246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omer, A. (2012). Religious Peacebuilding: The Exotic, the Good, and the Theatrical. Practical Matters Journal. http://practicalmattersjournal.org/?p=241.

  • Omer, A. (2021). Religion and the Study of Peace: Practice without Reflection. Religions, 12(12), 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12121069. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/12/1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, T. (2015). Unpacking the Local Turn in Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment Towards an Agenda for Future Research. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 857–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2002). International Peacebuilding and the ‘Mission Civilisatrice’. Review of International Studies, 28(4), 637–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2007). At War’s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2010). Saving Liberal Peacebuilding. Review of International Studies, 36(2), 337–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (2001). A Theology of Forgiveness. In R. Helmick & R. Petersen (Eds.), Forgiveness and Reconciliation: Religion, Public Policy, and Conflict Transformation (pp. 3–26). Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, G. F. (2010). Religion and Peacebuilding. In D. Philpot & G. F. Powers (Eds.), Strategies for Peace: Transforming Conflict in a Violent World (pp. 317–352). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Qurtuby, S. (2022). Grassroots Peacebuilding in Contemporary Indonesia. In J. Mitchell, S. R. Millar, F. Po, & M. Percy (Eds.), Religion and Peace (pp. 112–123). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randazzo, E. (2017). Beyond Liberal Peacebuilding: A Critical Exploration of the Local Turn. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Randazzo, E. (2021). The Local, the ‘Indigenous’ and the Limits of Rethinking Peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 15(2), 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2001). Rethinking Conflict Resolution: The Linkage Problematic between ‘Track I’ and ‘Track II’. Journal of Conflict Studies, 21(2), 109–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2006). The Problem of Peace: Understanding the ‘Liberal Peace’. In A. Swain, R. Amer, & J. Ojendal (Eds.), Globalisation and Challenges to Building Peace (pp. 17–38). Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2007). Emancipatory Forms of Human Security and Liberal Peacebuilding. International Journal, 62(3), 459–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2009a). A Post-Liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday. Review of International Studies, 35(3), 557–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2009b). Becoming Liberal, Unbecoming Liberalism: Liberal-Local Hybridity via the Everyday as a Response to the Paradoxes of Liberal Peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 3(3), 324–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2011). De-romanticising the Local, De-mystifying the International: Hybridity in Timor Leste and the Solomon Islands. The Pacific Review, 24(1), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O., & Franks, J. (2009). Liberal Peace Transitions: Between Statebuilding and Peacebuilding. Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O., & Mac Ginty, R. (2019). Mobilities and Peace. Globalizations, 16(5), 606–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Human Rights Council. (2017a). Detailed Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Burundi. UN Human Rights Council Report, September 2017. https://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/hrc/ coiburundi/pages/coiburundi.aspx

  • UN Human Rights Council. (2017b). Burundi Situation Report 2017. https://www.unhcr.org/59244aa77.pdf

  • Ware, A., Ware, V. A., & Kelly, L. M. (2022). Strengthening Everyday Peace Formation after Ethnic Cleansing: Operationalising a Framework in Myanmar’s Rohingya Conflict. Third World Quarterly, 43(2), 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (2015). Everyday Peace? Politics, Citizenship and Muslim Lives in India. Wiley Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mbugua, P.K. (2023). Reclaiming Everyday Peace in the Micro-Spaces in Burundi. In: Kilonzo, S.M., Chitando, E., Tarusarira, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Religion, Peacebuilding, and Development in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36829-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics