Skip to main content

Indigenous Sacrifice in the Christian Language Among the Communities of the Northern Mixteca of Oaxaca, Mexico

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ritual Human Sacrifice in Mesoamerica

Part of the book series: Conflict, Environment, and Social Complexity ((CESC))

  • 163 Accesses

Abstract

Traditions of human sacrifice among the peoples of the Northern Mixteca survived the Spanish Conquest. The Postclassic period’s emphasis on warrior patron deities and militarism found new venues for expression and identity within the rich repertoire of Christian imagery with its martyrdom of saints. Christianity succeeded because the individuals who introduced it manifested spiritual and material superiority and power indicative of their god’s omnipotence. By presenting the challenges and suffering encountered in daily living as necessary for achieving salvation, indigenous ideas of an afterlife were augmented because the Spanish negotiated with their god and the saints as avatars. The natives were overwhelmed by Spanish technology: wooden houses that floated on water (ships), huge animals that carried and obeyed the commands of their masters, animals that could be raised for food, impervious metal skin and terrible weapons that spat fire. Although the new god shared some roles that were familiar to the Indians, his greatness was made manifest in the greater powers exhibited by the faithful who served him.The ideas related to human sacrifice were readily understood because the Indian gods, like Christ, also died and were resurrected. Invoking Christ’s Passion and death during Mass aligned with indigenous beliefs in divine intervention and hence, were linked to propitiatory rituals aimed at alleviating life’s hardships resulting from recurrent drought, food scarcity, excessive tribute and labor demands, disease, and death. Through their calendarized feast days, Christ and the saints supplanted the ancient gods as guarantors of sustenance. As in pre-Hispanic times, the nobility continued to oversee the ritual life of their subjects. To maintain their highly visible roles and social position as leaders in their community, the elite first had to divulge aspects of the ancestral beliefs to the Spanish. They also needed to merge aspects of ritual life, in the context of the new religion, to perpetuate their ascendancy. The introduction of livestock transformed traditional agriculturalists into pastoralists aligning them more closely with Biblical lifeways and the ideology of Christian sacrifice. While sheep and goats were a valuable source of food in this drought prone area and a convenient substitute for human beings as offerings, they satisfied the central themes related to subsistence and obligatory reciprocity. The elites who controlled the mercantile economy and much of the livestock continued to patronize artisans to produce ornaments for the churches and provide materials required by the liturgy. To this day, they organize and subsidize expenses for feasts honoring the patron saints, encouraging participation in holy festivities to promote social cohesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Mixteca Poblana is the area of the Mixteca within the modern state of Puebla, that was comprised of a number of realms stretching along a corridor from the East Puebla Basin to the Tehuacan Valley, from Itzocan (sic Izúcar or Segura de la Frontera) in the west, eastward to Tepexi, Cuauhtinchan, Tepeaca, Tecamachalco, Tehuacan, and Coxcatlan (see Fig. 4.2 in this volume).

  2. 2.

    See Gruzinski (1991) and Ricard (1966) for a more detailed discussion of this aspect of the Conquest.

  3. 3.

    The Storm God’s four aspects or identities are related to certain activities he personified reflecting the quadripartite organization of the cosmos, its associated trees and colors with each cardinal direction (Nielsen and Helmke 2017: 138–143).

  4. 4.

    It may be that the heads symbolize beheaded ancestral individuals whose blood has been spilled and are ritually sown as seeds.

  5. 5.

    The account written in 1995 by Mr. Juan Cruz, San Miguel Tequixtepec’s local historian, was published in Romero Frizzi (1996: 171). In other areas of the Mixteca these stone heads are regarded as people from a primordial time turned into stone by the rising sun (Byland and Pohl 1994: 114, 118–119, Fig. 51).

  6. 6.

    The general use of the Spanish term “gentiles” in Southern Puebla and Northern Oaxaca refers to the people who died prior to the arrival of the Christian faith. Xantil is the Nahuatl rendition of this Spanish word used in reference to both the departed gentiles and saints and applied specifically to a broad class of votive ceramic anthropomorphic figures used as censers that represent deities.

  7. 7.

    Hemorrhagic fevers were reported as the cause of death, a disease the natives called “cocolistle.” It is probable that a combination of etiological agents caused the population to collapse. Two primary suspects have been proposed: a Hanta virus transmitted by rodents especially after a period of drought followed by high rainfall as reported for 1545 (Acuna-Soto et al. 2002, 2004), or by Salmonella enterica, a bacterium that causes typhoid and paratyphoid as studies conducted on skeletons from neighboring Teposcolula suggest (Vågene et al. 2018).

  8. 8.

    Ocelot is the Nahuatl word for the great feline more commonly known as “jaguar,” derived from Tupí-Guaraní languages of Paraguay, Bolivia, Argentina, and Brazil via the Portuguese. Yaguara in Guaraní, means “the beast that kills with one leap.”

  9. 9.

    A remarkable court case of 1552–1557 the Northern Basin of Mexico captures the fear natives felt towards the nobility because of their ability to transform themselves into predator nahuales (animal doubles). Judge Maldonado, a noble appointed by the Real Audiencia to look into a case of abuse and corruption was himself accused of the same by the plaintiffs. He threatened to devour and consume them by transforming and awakening the lion (cougar), tiger (ocelot), and snake forms that he would turn himself into (Archivo General de la Nación-México, painting #1799, Tierras 2719, exp. 8; Brotherston and Gallegos 1988; Ruíz Medrano 2008: 461, 2011: 40–41).

  10. 10.

    The Nguiwa, the original inhabitants supplanted by the Nahua, spoke a tonal language probably harder to understand and learn than Nahuatl for speakers of nontonal European languages.

  11. 11.

    Additional characteristics of Indo-European societies that seem to parallel the indigenous culture of the Northern Mixteca include: “the individual as the basic unit of society, recognition of three social classes, a pantheon of deities ruling human fates, but amenable to petition”; … . high tolerance for risk natural and social, and for violence; “an ethos of ostentatious generosity because wealth is fragile” (Kehoe 2018: 11–12).

  12. 12.

    According to the on-line Merriam Webster Dictionary, a cofradía is a group or organization of Roman Catholic laymen in Mexico and Central America responsible for the material care of religious images, pilgrimages, and ceremonies. Among its obligations, was the celebration of the patron saint’s feasts. Mayordomías substituted cofradías in the eighteenth century (Mendoza García 2011: 169–173). A feast sponsor, known as a mayordomo, was usually someone who had made a promise to repay a saint or the Virgin for a favor or miracle granted.

  13. 13.

    This statement underscores ideas contemplated in Chap. “Portals to the Gods: Reciprocity, Sacrifice, and Warfare in the Northern Mixteca” regarding the Creation myth. We consume the fruits of the earth while alive and the earth eats us upon our death (Monaghan 1990: 562–563; Carrasco 1995: 435).

  14. 14.

    This document and other primary sources mentioned in the text are listed under the section of Primary Sources in Chap. 4 of this volume.

  15. 15.

    Several art historians have provided interpretations of the iconographic elements of the decorated frieze of the open-air chapel of Coixtlahuaca include Toussaint (1931: 184) heads of dragons and pelicans, McAndrew (1965

    : 490) dragons and pelicans associated with Quetzalcoatl, an idea shared in part by Müllen (1994: 94), who instead of gentle pelicans sees pagan eagles. Vences Vidal (2000: 101, 203) refers to the serpents as dolphins and as dolphin-serpents.

  16. 16.

    Though consistently misspelled, the letters INRI stand for Iesus Nazarenus Rex Judem in Latin which was the sign placed at the top of the cross on which Christ was crucified. The letter “N” is also reversed.

  17. 17.

    My interpretation was based on a photograph in which Christ’s head appeared skull-like. A set of photos taken with a more powerful telephoto lens in 2013 provides a better understanding of the image which portrays a bearded man in profile.

  18. 18.

    Müllen (1994: 110) likened the representation to a Mixtec codex.

  19. 19.

    In the Coixtlahuaca Basin and its immediate vicinity there are three villages named after Saint Michael (Tequixtepec, Tulancingo, and Aztatla), four named after St. James (Santiago; Ihuitlan, Tepetlapa, Teotongo, Apoala). The villages closest to Torrecillas, the primordial place where the Earth was tethered at Creation and ancestral Mountain of Sustenance, are Tepelmeme, Concepción Buenavista, and San Antonio Nguicutnáa (Acutla). The former was named after Saint Dominic, founder of the Dominican order whose priests were in charge of converting the natives. The latter was named for the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary, commonly confused with the conception and virgin birth of Jesus. San Antonio Abad lived as a hermit in the wilderness and was subjected to supernatural temptation. Concepción was founded by the inhabitants of Dagazee, a barrio of Coixtlahuaca who migrated northward and settled there. The migration is depicted with footprints leading from Coixtlahuaca to Tepelmeme and Concepción on the painted map in Fig. 33 of Chap. 4 in this volume (see also Rincón Mautner 2012a: 263–265, Fig. 4g). 

  20. 20.

    According to Doesburg and Swanton (2008), this manuscript is a translation of a Doctrina Cristiana en Lengua Mixteca.

  21. 21.

    Reports of colonial period sacrifices lack references to the careful observance of liturgical preparation and subsequent distribution of the victim’s body parts for consumption giving the reader the impression that these were conducted in a rush. For a contrast during the pre-Hispanic period, see Declerq (2020).

  22. 22.

    Doesburg (2002: 54–55, 68, 74) published a transcription of documents including a letter written by Francisco Gutierrez alerting authorities on the practice of idolatries which came to light because of a rift between two brothers, who had been Coixtlahuaca’s regent rulers. These noblemen were responsible for the loss of two hamlets that had belonged to Coixtlahuaca’s royal patrimony. During the dispute over the hamlets involving Tequixtepec, Tamazulapan, and Coixtlahuaca, Gutierrez acted as a scribe to which Coixtlahuaca objected, accusing him of bias and prejudice.

  23. 23.

    The anonymously published transcript of a “fragment” of the process, was reported in the Boletín del Archivo General de la Nación México 1934, as a bunch of loose-leaf pages, placed in the year 1546 which coincides with the disruption caused by the dispute between Coixtlahuaca, Tequixtepec, and Tamazulapan rulers over possession of certain estancias (hamlets) where flocks of sheep and goats were kept. The fragment was subsequently classified as Inquisition vol. 37, exp.11 bis. It seems likely that because of the controversial and delicate nature of the subject matter regarding anthropophagy, the manuscript was published anonymously.

  24. 24.

    From Nahuatl temazcal-a-ten-go < temazcal(li), sweat bath; a(tl)-ten, water’s edge; −co place. That is, “Place at the Edge of the Water of the Sweat Bath” and “Ribera del Río Temazcal” in Spanish. Karttunen (1983: 13) lists “aten-tli, edge of a body of water; ribera de río o de mar.”

  25. 25.

    From Nahuatl temazcal-apan < temazcal(li), sweat bath; −a(tl) water; −pan place. That is, Temazcal River.

  26. 26.

    In describing the cardiectomy procedures used in ritual sacrifice Robicsek and Hales (1984: 80–82) mention colonial period sources for the Maya area that indicate that the left anterior thoracotomy, an intercostal approach, was commonly used as the quickest and simplest way to access the heart. Recent research suggests that the heart extraction from below the ribcage through the diaphragm was the easiest, more customary approach among Classic period Maya (see Tiesler and Cucina, 2006, 2007). More recently, evidence for an intercostal approach between two ribs on the left side of the chest has been validated (Tiesler and Olivier 2020: Table 1).

  27. 27.

    Document 51 (AAT-23) in the archive of the village of San Miguel Tequixtepec transcribed by van Doesburg (2002: 241–291).

  28. 28.

    The letter in the archive of the village of San Miguel Tequixtepec, catalogued as Document 53 (AAT-42), was transcribed and translated from Nahuatl to Spanish by van Doesburg (2002: 293–300).

  29. 29.

    The 1572 Lienzo of Tlapiltepec also portrays Lord 3 Dog as a conqueror with his spouse within a bounded area corresponding to Tequixtepec (Rincón Mautner 1999: 475, Fig. 98). He may have had a legitimate claim to this property because his father, Lord 5 Rabbit, in second nuptials, had married his mother, Lady 6 Rain, a noble woman from Tequixtepec.

  30. 30.

    Document 11 (AAT-180) in the village archive of Tequixtepec, transcribed by van Doesburg (2002: 134).

  31. 31.

    Indigenous rulers took advantage of the concession of land grants to expand their possessions and wealth. They had enough wealth to not only own large livestock herds, but to rent lands for grazing, especially those which were least productive, either because of the aridity or because the hand labor had dwindled so dramatically that growing crops was increasingly a difficult and risky enterprise. Herding was so much more reliable than cultivation especially in the Mixteca, an area prone to frequent drought, crop failure, resulting in famine.

  32. 32.

    Votive offerings given by the faithful in fulfillment of a vow to a saint or divinity. They are objects that represent the acknowledgment that what a person requested was fulfilled by the supernatural.

  33. 33.

    Black Christ images are associated with the earth and caves and by extension with rain (Josserand and Hopkins 2007).

  34. 34.

    The original image of the Virgin of Candelaria is black and was found in a cave on Tenerife. In Mesoamerican context, these characteristics would suggest an identification with the Earth Goddess (see note 32). Coincidentally, the candle is reminiscent of the fire lighting ritual on the summit of Ndaga.

  35. 35.

    Tradition regarding town foundations resulting from the excessive weight of the divine patron image being carried has been documented by the author for Concepción Buenavista, and Tepelmeme. According to the legend recorded by Barabas (2006: 203), the image of the Virgin and Child venerated in Nativitas, south of Coixtlahuaca, first appeared to a shepherd girl on the “Llano de la Virgen” (Meadow of the Virgin). News of Our Lady’s miracles reached Coixtlahuaca’s mestizos, who went looking for her. She would make herself invisible or too heavy to lift. She only allowed those from Nativitas to carry her to the new church where she is venerated to this day. A similar story is told about the Lord of the Three Falls, who first appeared in Puebla (Barabas 2006: 203). People from different towns came to carry the image back with them, but it was too heavy. Nobody it seemed would be able to take it or care for it until the natives of Santa María Ixcatlan showed up. They transported the image back to their village sheltering it in a large, especially built church where each year pilgrims from all over the state seek out the benefit of its miracles.

  36. 36.

    Account compiled by Dan Yael Cabrera in 2016, and broadcast on Oaxaca Paranormal, a radio program in August 2019. Translated by author.

  37. 37.

    The most abundant evidence of individual sacrificial ritual behavior is the presence of obsidian blade fragments. It was customary to use the blades and maguey spines as bloodletters in auto sacrifice (Acosta 1978: 44). While maguey thorns could be obtained locally, obsidian, for which there was much demand was supplied via trade networks: green obsidian from the Cerro de las Navajas near Pachuca, Hidalgo, and gray to transparent obsidian from the area of the Pico de Orizaba (Citlaltepetl).

References

  • Abrego, Fray Miguel. 1994 [1778]. Noticias que mandadas Por Reales e Ymas. Ordenes relacionar se emiten de este Curato de San Juan Baptista Coixtlahuac.... In Relaciones Geográficas de Oaxaca 1777-1778, ed. Manuel Esparza, 90–106. México, City: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social, e Instituto Oaxaqueño de las Culturas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acuna-Soto, Rodolfo, David W. Stahle, Malcolm K. Cleaveland, and Matthew D. Therrell. 2002. Megadrought and Megadeath in 16th Century Mexico. Emerging Infectious Diseases 8 (4): 360–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acuna-Soto, Rodolfo, David W. Stahle, Matthew D. Therrell, Richard D. Griffin, and Malcolm K. Cleaveland. 2004. When Half of the Population Died: The Epidemic of Hemorrhagic Fevers of 1576 in Mexico. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 240: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archivo General de la Nación-México. 2002. Proceso del Santo Oficio contra Martin Ucelo, indio, por idólatra y hechicero. In Procesos de indios idólatras y hechiceros, 17–36. Facsimile Reprint of a Collection of 16th Century Proceedings of the Mexican Inquisition Against Native Mexicans, Published in 1912. In Spanish. Public Domain. Accessed from https://archive.org/details/ProcesosDeIndiosIdolatrasYHechiceros/page/n275/mode/2up?

  • Arnold, Philip P. 1999. Eating Landscape: Aztec and European Occupation of Tlalocan. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabas, Alicia. 2006. Dones, dueños y santos. Ensayo sobre religiones en Oaxaca. México City: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boletín del Archivo General de la Nación-México. 1934. Fragmento de un Proceso de Indios Antropófagos (1546?). Boletín del AGN (Archivo General de la Nación) 5 (2): 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broda, Johanna. 1987. The Provenience of the Offerings: Tribute and Cosmovision. In The Aztec Templo Mayor: A Symposium at Dumbarton Oaks, 8th and 9th October 1983, ed. Elizabeth H. Boone, 211–256. Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotherston, Gordon, and Ana Gallegos. 1988. The Newly-Discovered Tepotzotlan Codex: A First Account. In Recent Studies in Pre-Columbian Archaeology, ed. Nicholas Saunders and O. de Montmollin, 205–227. Oxford: BAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Jordan N., Rodolfo Acuña-Soto, and David W. Stahle. 2014. Drought and Epidemic Typhus Central Mexico, 1655-1988. Emerging Infectious Diseases 20 (3): 442–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byland, Bruce E., and John M.D. Pohl. 1994. In the Realm of 8 Deer: The Archaeology of the Mixtec Codices. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, David. 1995. Cosmic Jaws: We Eat the Gods and the Gods Eat Us. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 63 (3): 429–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Acosta, Fray Joseph. 1954. Historia Natural y Moral de las Indias. Madrid: Ediciones Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. Vida Religiosa y Civil de los Indios [libros V y VI]. Prólogo y selección: Edmundo O’Gorman. México City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Burgoa, Francisco. 1989 [1679]. Palestra historial de virtudes y exemplares apostólicos. México City: Editorial Porrúa.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sahagún, Fray Bernardino 1989 [1577]. Historia General de las cosas de Nueva España. In Introducción, Paleografía, Glosario y Notas por Josefina García Quinta y Alfredo López Austin, 2 vols, México City: CONACYT.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Torquemada, Fray Juan. 1975. Monarquía Indiana. Mexico City: Editorial Porrúa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Declerq, Stan. 2020. Del Templo Mayor al calpulli: una tipología de “complejos rituales” caníbales. Cuicuilco Revista de Ciencias Antropológicas número 78: 119–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durán, Fray Diego. 1994. The History of the Indies of New Spain. Translated, Annotated and with an Introduction by Doris Heyden. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalante Gonzalbo, Pablo. 1997. El Patrocinio del Arte Indocristiano en el Siglo XVI. La Iniciativa de las Autoridades Indígenas en Tlaxcala y Cuauhtinchan. In Patrocinio, colección y circulación de las artes, XX Coloquio Internacional de Historia del Arte, ed. Gustavo Curiel, 215–235. México City: Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Nicholas. 2017. Sacred Dialogues: Christianity and the Native Religions in the Colonial Americas (1492-1700). Morrisville, NC: Lulu Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruzinski, Serge. 1991. La Colonización de lo Imaginario, Sociedades Indígenas y Occidentalización en el México Español, Siglos XVI-XVIII. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, Ángel Iván Rivera, and Nadia Romero Vargas. 2013. Las Cabezas de Piedra de La Mixteca: un Estudio Arqueológico. In El Árbol de Apoala, ed. Reina Ortíz Escamilla, 117–146. Huajuapan de León: Universidad Tecnológica de la Mixteca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, Fray Benito. 1567. Doctrina Cristiana en Lengua Mixteca. México City: Pedro Ocharte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández. [ca. 1580]. Doctrina Christiana en Lengua Chochona de Coixtlahuaca, Manuscript, 220 p. México City: Sociedad Mexicana de Geografía y Estadística.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaen, Medina, Norma G. Miguel, Peñaflores Medina, and Ángel Iván Rivera Guzmán. 2013. Rituales de Petición en las Cuevas de El Calvario y Siete Puertas, Cuenca de Coixtlahuaca, Oaxaca. In Convocar a los Dioses: “Ofrendas Mesoamericanas”, ed. Johanna Broda, 465–522. Veracruz: Instituto Veracruzano de la Cultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Moreno, Wigberto, and Salvador Mateos Higuera. 1940. Códice de Yanhuitlan. México City: Museo Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Santos, Perla Miriam. 2013. Don Miguel de Mendoza, Pintor Indio, Cacique, Catálogo e Itinerario Artístico. Master’s Thesis, Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josserand, J. Kathryn, and Nicholas A. Hopkins. 2007. Tila y su Cristo Negro: historia, peregrinación y devoción en Chiapas, México. Mesoamérica 49: 82–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Frances. 1983. An Analytical Dictionary of Nahuatl. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, Alice. 2018. Militant Christianity: An Anthropological History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroger, Joseph, and Patrizia Granziera. 2012. Aztec Goddesses and Christian Madonnas: Images of the Divine Feminine in. Mexico City: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lara, Jaime. 2008. Christian Texts for Aztecs: Art and Liturgy in Colonial Mexico. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado Dorantes, Yunuen Lizu. 2016. El Retablo de La Virgen de Guadalupe.Un Ejemplo de Creación y Devoción en Santiago Tejupan, Oaxaca. Master’s thesis, Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, John. 1965. The Open-Air Churches of Sixteenth Century Mexico: Atrios, Posas, Open Chapels, and Other Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza García, J. Edgar. 2011. Municipios, Cofradías, y Tierras Comunales: Los Pueblos Chocholtecos de Oaxaca en el Siglo XIX. Tlalpan: CIESAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, Susan. 2013. Heaven and Earth in Ancient Mexico: Astronomy and Seasonal Cycles in the Codex Borgia. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, John. 1990. Sacrifice, Death and the Origins of Agriculture in the Codex Vienna. American Antiquity 55: 559–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouat, Andrew C. 1980. Los Chiveros de la Mixteca Baja. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, Robert J. 1994. La Arquitectura y La Escultura de Oaxaca: 1530s-1980s.Vol. II El Estado, Primera Parte. México City: Codex Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Jesper, and Christophe Helmke. 2017. The Storm God: Lord of Rain and Ravage. In Teotihuacan: City of Water, City of Fire, ed. Matthew Robb, 138–143. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, Guilhem. 1998. Tepeyóllotl, “Corazón de la Montaña” y “Señor del Eco”: El Dios Jaguar de los Antiguos Mexicanos. Estudios de Cultura Nahuatl 28: 99–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Tezcatlipoca: Burlas y metamorfósis de un dios azteca. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Sacred Bundles, Arrows and New Fire. In Cave City and Eagle’s Nest, ed. David Carrasco and Scott Sessions, 281–313. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, Rodolfo. 1987. Campesinos y Reformas: la Mixteca 1700-1856. México City: Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restall, Matthew, Lisa Sousa, and Kevin Terraciano. 2005. Mesoamerican Voices: Native-Language Writings from Colonial Mexico, Oaxaca, Yucatan, and Guatemala. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, Fray Antonio de los. 1976 [1593]. Arte en Lengua Mixteca. Publications in Anthropology 14. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes Gómez, Felix. 2009. Historia de Villa de Tamazulápam del Progreso, Oaxaca. 3rd ed. Oaxaca: Proveedora Gráfica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricard, Robert. 1966. The Spiritual Conquest of Mexico: An Essay on the Apostolate and Evangelizing Methods of the Mendicant Orders in New Spain 1523-1572. Translated by Leslie Byrd Simpson, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincón Mautner, Carlos. 1999. Man and the Environment in the Coixtlahuaca Basin of Northwestern Oaxaca Mexico: Two Thousand Years of Historical Ecology. Doctoral Dissertation. Austin: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincón Mautner, Carlos. 2007. Donde Ataron a Nuestra Madre: la Diosa de la Tierra y el Coatepec de la Mixteca. In Iconografía mexicana: volumen VII. Atributos de las deidades femeninas, Homenaje a la Maestra Noemí Castillo Tejero, ed. Beatriz Barba Ahuatzin, Alicia Blanco Padilla, and (coordinators)., 155–171. México D.F: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012a. “Cave, Mountain and Ancestors: Weaving History and Cartography in the Preservation of Native Dominions of the Early Colonial Mixteca of Oaxaca, Mexico”, Chapter 13: 249-276. In Mesoamerican Memory: Comparative Studies in Systems of Remembrance, ed. Amos Megged and Stephanie Wood. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. “Linajes y casas señoriales de los Tolteca-Chichimeca de Coixtlahuaca en la Mixteca de Oaxaca”. Chapter 4: 115-172. In El Poder Compartido: Ensayos sobre la Arqueología de Organizaciones Políticas Segmentarias y Oligárquicas, ed. Annick Daneels and Gerardo Gutierrez. México: CIESAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Colonial Period Pictographic Dedicatory Inscriptions from the Mixteca Popoloca Nahua Region: The Tehuacan Valley and Coixtlahuaca Basin. Mexicon XXXVI 6: 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Seeking the Imprimatur Dei: Coixtlahuaca’s 1571–1575 Boundary Dispute with Zapotitlán. In On the Mount of Intertwined Serpents: Lienzo Seler II’s Pictorial History of Power, Rule and Land, ed. Viola König, 109–119. Berlin: Staatliche Museum zu Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincón Mautner, Carlos. 2020. Re-signifying Identity in an 18th Century Antiphonary from Coixtlahuaca. Mexicon XLII 2 (25–29): 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robicsek, Francis, and Donald Hales. 1984. Maya Heart Sacrifice: Cultural perspective and Surgical Technique. In Ritual Human Sacrifice in Mesoamerica: A Conference at Dumbarton Oaks, ed. Elizabeth H. Boone, 49–87. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero Frizzi, María de los Angeles. 1990. Economía y Vida de los Españoles en la Mixteca Alta: 1519-1720. México City: Colección Regiones de México I.N.A.H.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. El Sol y la Cruz: Los Pueblos Indios de Oaxaca Colonial. Tlalpan: CIESAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruíz Medrano, Ethelia. 2008. El Universo y Nosotros: Ejemplos de Símbolos de Poder entre los pueblos Indios. In Símbolos de Poder en Mesoamérica, ed. Guilhem Olivier, 443–474. México City: Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Mexico’s Indigenous Communities: Their Lands and Histories, 1500-2010. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepúlveda y Herrera, María Teresa. 1999. Procesos por Idolatría al Cacique, Gobernadores, y Sacerdotes de Yanhuitlan 1544-1546. Colección Científica. México City: Instituto Nacional de Antropología.e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spores, Ronald. 1984. The Mixtecs in Ancient and Colonial Times. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahle, David W., José Villanueva Diaz, Dorian J. Burnette, Julián Cerano Paredes, R.R. Heim Jr., Falko K. Fye, Rodolfo Acuna Soto, Matthew D. Therrell, Malcolm K. Cleaveland, and Daniel K. Stahle. 2011. Major Mesoamerican Droughts of the Past Millennium. Geophysical Research Letters 38 (5): L05703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez de Peralta, Juan. 1990 [1589]. Tratado del Descubrimiento de las Indias (Noticias Históricas de Nueva España). Estudio preliminar y notas por Teresa Silva Tena. México City: CONACULTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Thelma D. 1965. A Prayer to Tlaloc. Estudios de Cultura Nahuatl 5: 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavárez, David. 2011. The Invisible War: Indigenous Devotions, Discipline, and Dissent in Colonial Mexico. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Terraciano, Kevin. 2001. The Mixtecs of Colonial Oaxaca: Nudzahui History, Sixteenth Through Eighteenth Centuries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therrell, Matthew D., David W. Stahle, and Rodolfo Acuna-Soto. 2004. Aztec Drought and the “Curse of One Rabbit”. Bulletin of the American Metereological Society 85: 1263–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therrell, Matthew D., David W. Stahle, José Villanueva Diaz, Eladio H. Cornejo Oviedo, and Malcolm K. Cleaveland. 2006. Tree-Ring Reconstructed Maize Yield in Central Mexico: 1474–2001. Climatic Change 74: 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera, and Andrea Cucina. 2006. Procedures in Human Heart Extraction and Ritual Meaning: A Taphonomic Assessment of Anthropogenic Marks in Classic Maya Skeletons. Latin American Antiquity 17 (4): 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. El sacrificio humano por extracción de corazón: Una evaluación osteotafonómica de violencia ritual entre los mayas del Clásico. Estudios de Cultura Maya 30: 57–78. Recuperado en 03 de marzo de 2020, de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-25742007000200003&lng=es&tlng=es.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiesler, Vera, and Guilhem Olivier. 2020. Open Chests and Broken Hearts Ritual Sequences and Meanings of Human Heart Sacrifice in Mesoamerica. Current Anthropology 61: 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres Rodriguez, Alfonso. 2002. El Escorpión Celeste: un Marcador del Inicio y fin de la Época de Lluvias en Mesoamérica. In Iconografía MexicanaIII: Las Representaciones de los Astros, ed. Beatriz Barba de Piña Chán, 115–158. México City: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint, Manuel. 1931. Paseos Coloniales: Coixtlahuaca. Revista de la Universidad de México 1 (3): 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vågene, Åshild J., Alexander Herbig, Michael G. Campana, Nelly M. Robles, Christina Warinner García, Susanna Sabin, Maria A. Spyrou, Aida Andrades Valtueña, Daniel Huson, Noreen Tuross, Kirsten I. Bos, and Johannes Krause. 2018. Salmonella enterica Genomes from Victims of a Major Sixteenth-Century Epidemic in Mexico. Nature Ecology and Evolution 2: 520–528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0446-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Doesburg, Bas. 2002. Documentos Antiguos de San Miguel Tequixtepec, Oaxaca: Los Primeros Cien Años de la Colonia (1533-1617). Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies (CNWS), Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Doesburg, Bas, and Michael Swanton. 2008. La Traducción de la Doctrina Cristiana en Lengua Mixteca de Fray Benito Hernández al Chocholteco (Ngiwa). In Memorias del Coloquio Francisco Belmar, ed. Ausencia López Cruz and Michael Swanton, 81–117. México City: Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargaslugo de Bosch, Elisa. 2005. El indio como donante de obras pías. In Imágenes de los naturales en el arte de la Nueva España, siglos XVI al XVIII, 247–287. México: Banamex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velázquez de Lara, Gonzalo. 1984 [1579]. Relación de Ixcatlan, Quiotepec y Tecomahuaca. In Relaciones Geográficas del Siglo XVI: Antequera, ed. René Acuña, Vol. 2, 223–241. México City: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vences Vidal, Magdalena. 1990. Fundaciones, Aceptaciones y Asignaciones en la Provincia Dominicana de Santiago de México. Siglo XVI (Primera Parte). Archivo Dominicano XI: 119–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Evangelización y arquitectura dominicana en Coixtlahuaca, Oaxaca, México. Salamanca: Editorial San Esteban.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Joseph, Oliver Sheehan, Joseph Bulbulia, Russell D. Gray, and Quentin D. Atkinson. 2018. Christianity Spread Faster in Small, Politically Structured Societies. Nature Human Behavior 2: 559–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoneda, Keiko. 1991. Los Mapas de Cuauhtinchan y la Historia Cartográfica Prehispánica. Serie: Puebla. 2nd ed. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This essay is dedicated to the memory of Ruth Gubler and Josefina Salazar. In the process of completing this essay, I learned of the spread of Covid-19 throughout communities in the Northern Mixteca, and that my dear friend, Gustavo Salazar, and his family were stricken. His wife Josefina is gone, while he and his daughter recovered. The Salazar’s have been my adopted family for close to 40 years of visiting Coixtlahuaca; always opening their home and hearts with joy. I am deeply saddened by so much suffering and loss of life. I am forever in debt for their generous support through the years. I am also grateful for having so many people contribute to the success of this essay. Special thanks to Rubén Mendoza, Linda Hansen, Osiel Villegas Clemente, Felix Reyes Gómez, Galileo Cruz Sánchez, H. Daniel Santiago Reyes, José R. Martínez, Diana Cruz Clemente, David García Martínez, Ruth Gubler, Martha Ehrlich, Robert H. Jackson, Yunuen Maldonado Dorantes, Juan Hernández (current President of the Comité del Señor del Desmayo “Peregrino”), Manuel Sierra, Nick Hopkins, James “Barry” Kiracofe, Carl Johnson, Nahúm Guzmán, and Dan Yael Cabrera.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rincón Mautner, C. (2024). Indigenous Sacrifice in the Christian Language Among the Communities of the Northern Mixteca of Oaxaca, Mexico. In: Mendoza, R.G., Hansen, L. (eds) Ritual Human Sacrifice in Mesoamerica. Conflict, Environment, and Social Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36600-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36600-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36599-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36600-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics