Abstract
This chapter demonstrates how the knowledge of conceptual challenges that characterised European interactions with the ‘unknown’ became a requisite for the renewal, recasting, and the remake of political theory. The manifestation of ‘order’ and the avenues adopted to legitimise this ‘order’, by the European conquerors evidences the acute obsession that political theorists like Plato and Hobbes have had in enabling those in power to ‘justify’ their method of accomplishment. The value that lies in justification, has the potential of shaping international contemporary world order. Recognizing this value, history has long been a testament to attempts made at constructing a series of ‘justifications’ that ensure the sustained survival of the newly-created world order. This chapter covers aspects of this history, from the end of the Christian Crusades in 1492, to the evolution of Grotian and Lockean theories of natural law in the seventeenth century. As such, this chapter maps the dialogue about the possibilities and limitations of natural law in formulating arguments for interventionism and a shift from the Christian world order. This is done through three important vectors of ‘infidel rights,’ the ‘right to missionary wars’ and the ‘right to colonise,’ to explain how ex-post-facto rationalisations have attempted to make sense of human imagination and the moral paradigms under which this imagination functioned. This exploration primarily has two motivations: the first is to grapple with the political, social, and legal underpinnings of these conceptual challenges, and secondly highlight the ‘fluidity’ of these imaginations due to the continuing reaffirmation of our moral compass as outlined in the Sépulvidan-Las Casas discourse. Furthermore, the semantical connotation attached to the term “by what right” is emblematic of the power of our imagination and the incessant drive to expand and constrain it. Keeping this crucial caveat in mind, the chapter conclusively ties the notion of imagination back to the ideological crux of its core argument: why a drive for the investigation of ‘Europeanisation’ is quintessential for the ideological flourishment of international political theory as a critical mode of inquiry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
I am indebted to both David Boucher and Hari Nair for this reference.
- 2.
- 3.
I am indebted to David Lantigua for further clarifying this point.
- 4.
There is some scholarly debate about this point. See Fernández-Santamaria (1975).
- 5.
Mills ultimately claims ‘that a nonideal approach is also superior to an ideal approach in being better able to realise the ideals, by virtue of realistically recognising the obstacles to their acceptance and implementation’ (2005, 181).
References
Adorno, Rolena. 2007. The Polemics of Possession in Spanish American Narrative. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Aguilar, Jose Manuel, and de. 1946. The Law of Nations and the Salamanca School of Theology. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review 9: 186–221.
Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bain, William. 2013. Saving the Innocent, Then and Now: Vitoria, Dominion and World Order. History of Political Thought 34: 588–613.
Boisen, Camilla, and David Boucher. 2017. Medieval and Early Modern legacy of rights. In Medieval Foundations of International Relations, Ed. William Bain, 148–165. London: Routledge.
Boucher, David. 2009. The Limits of Ethics in International Relations: Natural Law, Natural Rights and Human Rights in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bushnell, David, and Lyle N. McAlister. 1988. An Interview with Lewis Hanke. The Hispanic American Historical Review. 68 (4): 653–674.
Casas, Las, and Bartolomé de. 2004. A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies. London: Penguin.
———. 1992. In Defense of the Indians. Trans. Stafford Poole. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
———. 1967. Apologetica Historia Sumaria. 2 Volumes. Ed. Edmundo O'Gorman. México City: Universidad Nacional Autónomia de México.
Faudree, Paja. 2013. How to Say Things with Wars: Performativity and Discursive Rupture in the Requerimiento of the Spanish Conquest. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 22: 182–200.
Fernández-Santamaria, José A. 1975. Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda on the Nature of the American Indians. The Americas 31 (4): 434–451.
Gentili, Alberico. 1933 [1612]. Three Books on the Law of War. Trans. John C. Rolfe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Green, L.C., and Olive P. Dickason. 1993. The Law of Nations and the New World. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.
Hanke, Lewis. 1959. Aristotle and the American Indians: A Study in Race Prejudice in the Modern World. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.
Hanke, Lewis. 1994. All Mankind is One: A Study of the Disputation Between Bartolome De Las Casas and Juan Gines De Sepúlveda on the Religious and Intellectual Capacity of the American Indians. DeKalb IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
Hegel, Friedrich. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Ed. Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lantigua, David. 2020. Infidels and Empires in a New World Order—Early Modern Spanish Contributions to International Legal Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Lantigua, David. 2019. Religion within the Limits of Natural Reason: The Case of Human Sacrifice. In Bartolomé de las Casas, O.P.: History, Philosophy, and Theology in the Age of European Expansion, Eds. David Thomas Orique O.P. and Rady Roldán-Figueroa, 280–309. Leiden: Brill.
Lebovics, Hernan. 1986. The Uses of America in Locke’s Second Treatise of Government. Journal of the History of Ideas 47: 567–581.
Locke, John. 2002. Second Treatise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lupher, David. 2003. Romans in a New World: Classical Models in Sixteenth-Century Spanish America. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
Mills, Charles W. 2005. “Ideal Theory” as Ideology.” Hypatia 20 (3) (Summer): 165–184: 166.
Muldoon, James. 1980. John Wyclif and the Rights of the Infidels: The Requeriminto Re-Examined. The Americas 36 (3): 301–316.
Pagden, Anthony. 1982. The Fall of Natural Man: The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pagden, Anthony. 1987. Dispossessing the Barbarian: The Language of Spanish Thomism and the Debate Over the Property Rights of the American Indians. In The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, Ed. Anthony Pagden, 79–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peters, F. E. 2005. The Monotheists: Jews, Christians, and Muslims in Conflict and Competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pufendorf, Samuel von. 1934. Of the Law of Nature and Nations. Trans. C. H. Oldfather and W. A. Oldfather. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sepúlveda, Juan Ginés de. 1973. Apology for the Book on the Just Causes of War: Dedicated to the Most Learned and Distinguished President, Antonio Ramirez, Bishop of Segovia. Trans. Lewis D. Epstein (unpublished manuscript). Bowdoin College.
———. 1984. Democrates Segundo: o de las Justas causas de la guerra contra los indios. Trans. Angel Losada. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicos.
Tierney, Brian. 2001. The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law, and Church Law, 1150–1625. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Vattel, Emer de. 2008. The Law of Nations. Or the Principles of Natural Law, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, with Three Early Essays on The Origin and Nature of Natural Law and Luxury. Eds. Béla Kapossy and Richard Whatmore. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Vitoria, Francisco. 1991. Political Writings. Eds. Anthony Pagden and Jeremy Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waldron, Jeremy. 1988. The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2002. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke’s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, Max. 1949. On the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Trans. and Ed. Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. Chicago: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Wolff, Christian. 1934. The Law of Nations Treated According to Scientific Method in which the Natural Law of Nations is Carefully Distinguished from that which is Voluntary, Stipulative and Customary. Trans. Joseph H. Drake. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boisen, C. (2023). The Conceptual Challenge: Europe and the New World. In: Williams, H., Boucher, D., Sutch, P., Reidy, D., Koutsoukis, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of International Political Theory. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36111-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36111-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36110-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36111-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)