Skip to main content

U-Factor: Russia’s War on Ukraine and the Deterrence vs. Disarmament Discussion. Pragmatic Internationalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Russia’s War on Ukraine

Part of the book series: Contributions to Political Science ((CPS))

Abstract

Russia’s offensive war against Ukraine, led by explicit and implicit nuclear threats, exposed many core international challenges in the nuclear realm. A powerful yet dangerous message is out: security assurances failed, international security instruments failed, while nuclear deterrence works. Russia’s coercive applications of nuclear threats, continued reliance on nuclear weapons by the whole P5 against the spirit and obligations according to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), as well as solid opposition to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) as a legally binding disarmament mechanism incentivize proliferation and create additional risks. To avoid the complete erosion of the nonproliferation norm, expansion of the number of nuclear weapons possessors, and repeated invasive wars under nuclear threats, the international community should recognize the TPNW’s complementarity to the NPT and come to realistic and pragmatic gradual nuclear arms reductions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is also an option that its mandate reduces solely to minimally questionable humanitarian functions.

  2. 2.

    Compellence is a form of coercion that attempts to get an actor to change his behavior through threats to use force or the actual use of limited force.

  3. 3.

    For example, how Ukraine was pressured and incentivized to disarm both from the East and from the West.

  4. 4.

    For example, India–Pakistan and India–China clashes demonstrate that it is possible indeed.

  5. 5.

    A “broken arrow” is defined as an unexpected event involving nuclear weapons that results in the accidental launching, firing, detonating, theft, or loss of the weapon (Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, n.d.). For examples, please consult https://www.kas.de/en/web/multilateraler-dialog-wien/to-the-third-nuclear-age-a-timeline.

  6. 6.

    In this context, deterrence means to prevent challenging the status quo, while compellence means to challenge the status quo.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hesse, V. (2023). U-Factor: Russia’s War on Ukraine and the Deterrence vs. Disarmament Discussion. Pragmatic Internationalism. In: Vicente, A., Sinovets, P., Theron, J. (eds) Russia’s War on Ukraine. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32221-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics