Abstract
To which ontological category do quantum systems belong? Although we usually speak of particles, it is well known that these peculiar items defy several traditional metaphysical principles. In the present chapter these challenges will be discussed in the light of certain distinctions usually not taken into account in the debate about the ontological nature of quantum systems. On this basis, it will be argued that an ontology of properties without individuals, framed in the algebraic formalism of quantum mechanics, provides adequate answers to the ontological challenges raised by the theory.What kind of item is a quantum system? In the practice of physics it is common to speak of quantum particles, as if they were items of a similar nature to classical items, but obeying different laws of motion. However, as is well known, quantum systems have such peculiar features that they challenge certain ontological principles and categories as understood in traditional metaphysics. In general, these features are analyzed in the context of the so-called problem of indistinguishability, which is a consequence of the particular statistical behavior of quantum systems. But the fact that certain items are “indistinguishable” is not the only difficulty to be overcome in order to elucidate the ontological category of quantum systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardenghi, J. S., Castagnino, M., & Lombardi, O. (2009a). Quantum mechanics: Modal interpretation and Galilean transformations. Foundations of Physics, 39, 1023–1045.
Ardenghi, J. S., Castagnino, M., & Lombardi, O. (2009b). Modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics and Casimir operators: The road to quantum field theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 50, 774–791.
Armstrong, D. M. (1989). Universals: An opinionated introduction. Westview.
Armstrong, D. M. (1993). A world of states of affairs. Philosophical Perspectives, 7, 429–440.
Ballentine, L. (1998). Quantum mechanics: A modern development. World Scientific.
Beltrametti, E., & Cassinelli, G. (1981). The logic of quantum mechanics. Addison-Wesley.
Ben-Menahem, Y. (2018). Causation in science. Princeton University Press.
Benovsky, J. (2008). The bundle theory and the substratum theory: Deadly enemies or twin brothers? Philosophical Studies, 141, 175–190.
Berkovitz, J. (2016). Action at a distance in quantum mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/qm-action-distance/
Bernoulli, J. (1713). Ars Conjectandi, Opus Posthumum. Accedit Tractatus de Seriebus Infinitis, et Epistola Gallice Scripta de Ludo Pilae Reticularis. Thurneysen.
Black, M. (1952). The identity of indiscernibles. Mind, LXI, 153–164.
Bohm, A., & Gadella, M. (1989). Dirac Kets, Gamow Vectors and Gel’fand Triplets. In The rigged Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics (Springer lecture notes in physics) (Vol. 348). Springer.
Bub, J., & Clifton, R. (1996). A uniqueness theorem for interpretations of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 27, 181–219.
Calosi, C., & Mariani, C. (2021). Quantum indeterminacy. Philosophy Compass., 2021, 1–15.
Calosi, C., & Wilson, J. (2019). Quantum metaphysical indeterminacy. Philosophical Studies, 176, 2599–2627.
Campbell, K. (1990). Abstract Particulars. Basil Blackwell.
da Costa, N., & Krause, D. (1999). Set-theoretical models for quantum systems. In M. L. Dalla Chiara, R. Giuntini, & F. Laudisa (Eds.), Language, Quantum, Music (pp. 171–181). Kluwer.
da Costa, N., & Lombardi, O. (2014). Quantum mechanics: Ontology without individuals. Foundations of Physics, 44, 1246–1257.
da Costa, N., Lombardi, O., & Lastiri, M. (2013). A modal ontology of properties for quantum mechanics. Synthese, 190, 3671–3693.
Davidson, D. (1967). Truth and meaning. Synthese, 17, 304–323.
Dieks, D. (2005). Quantum mechanics: An intelligible description of objective reality? Foundations of Physics, 35, 399–415.
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghì, N. (2013). Quantum physics without quantum philosophy. Springer.
Earman, J. (2015). Some puzzles and unresolved issues about quantum entanglement. Erkenntnis, 80, 303–337.
Esfeld, M. (2019). Individuality and the account of nonlocality: The case for the particle ontology in quantum physics. In O. Lombardi, S. Fortin, C. López, & F. Holik (Eds.), Quantum worlds: Perspectives on the ontology of quantum mechanics (pp. 222–244). Cambridge University Press.
Fortin, S., & Lombardi, O. (2022). Entanglement and indistinguishability in a quantum ontology of properties. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 91, 234–243.
Fortin, S., Lombardi, O., & Martínez González, J. C. (2018). A new application of the modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics: The problem of optical isomerism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 62, 123–135.
French, S. (1989). Identity and individuality in classical and quantum physics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 67, 432–446.
French, S. (2019). Identity and individuality in quantum theory. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/qt-idind/
French, S., & Krause, D. (2006). Identity in physics a historical, philosophical, and formal analysis. Clarendon Press.
Friebe, C. (2014). Individuality, distinguishability, and (non-)entanglement: A defense of Leibniz’s principle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 48, 89–98.
Gallois, A. (2016). Identity over time. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/identity-time/
Gelfand, I., & Naimark, M. (1943). On the imbedding of normed rings into the ring of operators in Hilbert space. Matematicheskii Sbornik, 54, 197–217.
Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1986). Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Physical Review D, 34, 470–491.
Ghirardi, G. C., Grassi, R., & Benatti, F. (1995). Describing the macroscopic world: Closing the circle within the dynamical reduction program. Foundations of Physics, 25, 5–38.
Haack, S. (1974). Deviant logic. Cambridge University Press.
Haack, S. (1978). Philosophy of logics. Cambridge University Press.
Harshman, N. L. (2012). Observables and entanglement in the two-body system. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1508, 386–390.
Harshman, N. L., & Ranade, K. S. (2011). Observables can be tailored to change the entanglement of any pure state. Physical Review A, 84, 012303.
Healey, R. & Gomes, H. (2022). Holism and nonseparability in physics. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/physics-holism/
Holik, F., Jorge, J. P., Krause, D., & Lombardi, O. (2022). Quasi-set theory for a quantum ontology of properties. Synthese, 200, #401.
Iguri, S., & Castagnino, M. (1999). The formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of nuclear algebras. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38, 143–164.
Jauch, J. M., & Piron, C. (1969). On the structure of quantal propositional systems. Helvetica Physica Acta, 42, 842–848.
Kant, I. (1902–). Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Herausgegeben von der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Bde. 1–22), der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Bd. 23), und der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (Bde. 24, 25, 27–29).
Kaplan, D. (1975). How to Russell a Frege-Church. The Journal of Philosophy, 72, 716–729.
Keinänen, M., & Hakkarinen, J. (2014). The problem of trope individuation: A reply to Lowe. Erkenntnis, 79, 65–79.
Kochen, S., & Specker, E. (1967). The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59–87.
Krause, D. (1992). On a quasi-set theory. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 33, 402–411.
Kuhlmann, M. (2010). The ultimate constituents of the material world – In search of an ontology for fundamental physics. Ontos-Verlag.
Laycock, H. (2010). Object. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/object/
Lewowicz, L. (2005). Del Relativismo Lingüístico al Relativismo Ontológico en el Último Kuhn. Departamento de Publicaciones de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de la República.
Lewowicz, L., & Lombardi, O. (2013). Stuff versus individuals. Foundations of Chemistry, 15, 65–77.
Lombardi, O., & Ardenghi, J. S. (2022). How different interpretations of quantum mechanics can enrich each other: The case of the relational quantum mechanics and the modal-Hamiltonian interpretation. Foundations of Physics, 52, #64.
Lombardi, O., & Castagnino, M. (2008). A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39, 380–443.
Lombardi, O., & Dieks, D. (2016). Particles in a quantum ontology of properties. In T. Bigaj & C. Wüthrich (Eds.), Metaphysics in contemporary physics (pp. 123–143). Brill-Rodopi.
Lombardi, O., Castagnino, M., & Ardenghi, J. S. (2010). The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation and the Galilean covariance of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 93–103.
Lombardi, O., Fortin, S., & Pasqualini, M. (2022). Possibility and time in quantum mechanics. Entropy, 24, #249.
Loux, M. (1998). Metaphysics. A contemporary introduction. Routledge.
MacLeod, M. & Rubenstein, E. (2006). Universals. In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (eds.), The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/universa/
Maurin, A.-S. (2018). Tropes. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/tropes/
McKay, T. (2008). Critical notice of words without objects. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 38, 301–323.
Menzel, C. (2022). The possibilism-actualism debate. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/possibilism-actualism/
Messiah, A. M. L., & Greenberg, O. W. (1964). Symmetrization postulate and its experimental foundation. Physical Review B, 136, 248–267.
Muller, F. A. & Saunders, S. (2008). Discerning fermions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59, 499–548.
Noonan, H. & Curtis, B. (2022). Identity. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/identity/
O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. (1995). The bundle theory of substance and the identity of indiscernibles. Analysis, 55, 191–196.
Orilia, F. & Paolini Paoletti, M. (2022). Properties. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/properties/
Pelletier, F. J. (Ed.). (1979). Mass terms: Some philosophical problems. Reidel Publishing Company.
Piron, C. (1976). Foundations of quantum physics. W. A. Benjamin.
Post, H. (1963). Individuality and physics. The Listener, 70, 534–537.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. MIT Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1976). Whither physical objects? In R. S. Cohen, P. Feyerabend, & M. Wartofsky (Eds.), Essays in memory of Imre Lakatos (pp. 497–504). Reidel.
Quine, W. V. O. (1990). The pursuit of truth. Harvard University Press.
Rettler, B. & Bailey, A. M. (2022). Object. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/object/
Russell, B. (1914). Our knowledge of the external world. Allen and Unwin.
Russell, B. (1940). An inquiry into meaning and truth. Allen and Unwin.
Saunders, S. (2003). Physics and Leibniz’s principles. In K. Brading & E. Castellani (Eds.), Symmetries in physics: Philosophical reflections (pp. 289–307). Cambridge University Press.
Schaffer, J. (2001). The individuation of tropes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79, 247–259.
Segal, I. E. (1947). Irreducible representations of operator algebras. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 53, 73–88.
Tarski, A. (1941). On the calculus of relations. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 6, 73–89.
Tegtmeier, E. (2000). Events as facts. In J. Faye, U. Scheffler, & M. Urchs (Eds.), Things, facts, and events (pp. 219–228). Rodopi.
Teller, P. (1998). Quantum mechanics and haecceities. In E. Castellani (Ed.), Interpreting bodies: Classical and quantum objects in modern physics (pp. 114–141). Princeton University Press.
Terra Cunha, M. O., Dunningham, J. A., & Vedral, V. (2007). Entanglement in single-particle systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 463, 2277–2286.
Thomason, S. K. (1989). Free construction of time from events. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 18, 43–67.
Tugendhat, E. (1982). Traditional and analytical philosophy: Lectures on the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Tumulka, R. (2006). A relativistic version of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber model. Journal of Statistical Physics, 125, 821–840.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1985). Statistical behaviour of indistinguishable particles: Problems of interpretation. In P. Mittelstaedt & E.-W. Stachow (Eds.), Recent developments in quantum logic (pp. 161–187). Cologne.
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. An essay in cosmology. Macmillan.
Wigner, E. P. (1939). On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group. Annals of Mathemathics, 40, 149–204.
Wilson, N. L. (1974). Facts, events, and their identity conditions. Philosophical Studies, 25, 303–321.
Wilson, J. (2022). Determinables and determinates. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, (Winter 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/determinate-determinables/
Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung, Annalen der Naturphilosophische, XIV(3/4). English translation: C. K. Ogden (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wolff, Ch. (1728). Philosophia Rationalis Sive Logica. Reprint of the 1740 edition with introduction, notes and index in (1980) by Jean École (Ed.). Georg Olms.
Zanardi, P. (2001). Virtual quantum systems. Physical Review Letters, 87, #077901.
Zanardi, P., Lidar, D. A., & Lloyd, S. (2004). Quantum tensor product structures are observable induced. Physical Review Letters, 92, #06042.
Zurek, W. H. (1982). Environment-induced superselection rules. Physical Review D, 26, 1862–1880.
Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(715), 776.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grant PICT-04519 of the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT) of Argentina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lombardi, O. (2023). Not Individuals, Nor Even Objects: On the Ontological Nature of Quantum Systems. In: Arenhart, J.R.B., Arroyo, R.W. (eds) Non-Reflexive Logics, Non-Individuals, and the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Synthese Library, vol 476. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31840-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31840-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31839-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31840-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)