Abstract
As we take stock of all aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic history, one important lesson to be learned concerns government behavior. While defense by immunity was in the works in vaccine research labs, defense by government action took the front seat, and political incumbents in every country and locale became "doctors to the public.” Did some governments perform better than others? Were there any predictable or explainable shortcomings in their crisis responses? Will governments and countries that underperformed in this crisis fall short in other crises where responsible leadership might be required? The contributors to this volume compare and contrast what governments around the world did and did not do when they were called upon to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the synchronicity of the threat and all governments’ initially similar helplessness in the face of the virus, their actions differed greatly around the world. The speed of the responses also varied from country to country, even when we account for the variable time frames on which the virus was initially detected. Importantly, the stringency of the enacted nonmedical interventions (NMIs) varied significantly as well. Arguably, these differences at least partially determined the variation in health outcomes seen in different countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M., 2004. Blind retrospection: Electoral responses to drought, flu, and shark attacks. Estudio/Working Paper 2004/199.
Adeel, A.B., & Zhirnov, A. (2023). COVID-19 response in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh: Shared history, different processes. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature
Ajana, B., 2021. Immunitarianism: defence and sacrifice in the politics of Covid-19. History and philosophy of the life sciences, 43(1), pp.1–31.
Bayar, M.C., Seyis, D. (2023). Populist responses to COVID-19: The cases of Turkey and Israel as examples of pro-science populism and the cases of the United States and Brazil as examples of science-skeptic populism. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature
Bayrali, O.G. (2023). Center-regional political risk sharing in COVID-19 public health crisis: Nigeria and South Africa. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature
Benoît, C. and Hay, C., 2022. The antinomies of sovereigntism, statism and liberalism in European democratic responses to the COVID-19 crisis: a comparison of Britain and France. Comparative European Politics, pp.1–21.
Benz, A. and Sonnicksen, J. 2017. “Patterns of federal democracy: tensions, friction, or balance between two government dimensions.” European Political Science Review, 9(1): 3–25.
Carey. J.M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Catalano, M., Chan, A. (2023). Common law systems and COVID-19 policy response: protective public health policy in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016. “The Continuum of Pandemic Phase.” National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/planning-preparedness/global-planning.html.
Chu, H. (2023). The Visegrad populist leaders’ responses to the pandemic in 2020. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature
Daher-Nashif, S., 2022. In sickness and in health: The politics of public health and their implications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sociology Compass, 16(1), p.e12949.
Daoust, J.F., Bélanger, É., Dassonneville, R., Lachapelle, E. and Nadeau, R., 2022. Is the Unequal COVID–19 Burden in Canada Due to Unequal Levels of Citizen Discipline across Provinces?. Canadian Public Policy, 48(1), pp.124–143.
Easton, M., De Paepe, J., Evans, P., Head, B., and Yarnold, J., 2022. Embedding expertise for policy responses to COVID-19: comparing decision-making structures in two federal democracies. Public Organization Review
Flores, A. Q., & Smith, A., 2013. Leader survival and natural disasters. British Journal of Political Science, 43(4): 821–843.
da Fonseca, E.M., Shadlen, K.C. and Bastos, F.I., 2021. The politics of COVID-19 vaccination in middle-income countries: Lessons from Brazil. Social Science & Medicine, 281, p.114093.
Gasulla, Ó., Bel, G. and Mazaira-Font, F.A., 2022. Ideology, political polarisation and agility of policy responses: was weak executive federalism a curse or a blessing for COVID-19 management in the USA?. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society.
Greer, S.L., King, E.J., da Fonseca, E.M. and Peralta-Santos, A., 2020. The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses. Global public health, 15(9), pp.1413–1416.
Greer, S.L., King, E., Massard da Fonseca, E. and Peralta-Santos, A., 2021. Coronavirus politics: The comparative politics and policy of COVID-19 (p. 663).
Hale, T., Webster, S., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., and Kira, B., 2020. Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker, Blavatnik School of Government. Available at https://covidtracker.bsg.ox.ac.uk/
Hale, Thomas, et al. “What have we learned from tracking every government policy on COVID-19 for the past two years.” BSG Research Note (2022).
Healy, A., and Malhotra, N., 2009. Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. American Political Science Review, 103(3): 387–406.
Heersink, B., Peterson, B. D., and Jenkins, J. A., 2017. Disasters and elections: Estimating the net effect of damage and relief in historical perspective. Political Analysis, 25(2): 260–268
Heller, W.B., Muftuoglu, E., Rosenberg, D. (2023). The institutional underpinnings of policy-making in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature
Hsiang, S., Allen, D., Annan-Phan, S. et al., 2020. The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8
Iverson, T. and Barbier, E., 2021. National and sub-national social distancing responses to COVID-19. Economies, 9(2), p.69.
Jasanoff, S., Hilgartner, S., Hurlbut, J.B., Ozgode, O. and Rayzberg, M., 2021. Comparative Covid response: crisis, knowledge, politics. Ithaca: CompCoRe Network, Cornell University
Kukovič, S., 2022. How Novel Coronavirus has Shaken Public Trust in Decision-Making Institutions: Comparative Analysis of Selected European Union Members. Journal of Comparative Politics, 15(1), pp.9–19.
Ladi, S. and Wolff, S., 2021. The EU Institutional Architecture in the Covid-19 Response: Coordinative Europeanization in Times of Permanent Emergency. Journal of Common Market Studies.
León, S., 2012. How do citizens attribute responsibility in multilevel states? Learning, biases and asymmetric federalism. Evidence from Spain. Electoral Studies 31(1):120–130.
Lipscy, P.Y., 2020. COVID-19 and the Politics of Crisis. International Organization, 74(S1), pp.E98–E127.
Malhotra, N., and Kuo, A. G., 2008. Attributing blame: The public’s response to Hurricane Katrina. The Journal of Politics, 70(1): 120–135.
McMann, K.M. and Tisch, D., 2021. Democratic regimes and epidemic deaths. V-Dem Working Paper, 126.
Powell, G. Bingham (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy. Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Pueyo, T., 2020. “Coronavirus: Why you must act now. Politicians, community leaders and business leaders: what should you do and when.” Medium. March 10, 2020. https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca
Shvetsova, Olga; Zhirnov, Andrei; VanDusky-Allen, Julie; Adeel, Abdul Basit; Catalano, Michael; Catalano, Olivia; Giannelli, Frank; Muftuoglu, Ezgi; Riggs, Tara; Sezgin, Mehmet Halit; Tahir, Naveed; Zhao, Tianyi. 2020. Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy. Vol. 1: No. 4, pp 585–613. https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000023
Shvetsova, O., VanDusky-Allen, J., Zhirnov, A., Adeel, A.B., Catalano, M., Catalano, O., Giannelli, F., Muftuoglu, E., Rosenberg, D., Sezgin, M.H. and Zhao, T., 2021. Federal Institutions and Strategic Policy Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, p.66.
Shvetsova, O., Zhirnov, A., Giannelli, F.R., Catalano, M.A. and Catalano, O., 2022a. Governor’s party, policies, and COVID-19 outcomes: further evidence of an effect. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 62(3), pp.433–437.
Shvetsova, O., Zhirnov, A., Giannelli, F., Catalano, M. and Catalano, O., 2022b. Can Correlation Between Governor’s Party and COVID-19 Morbidity Be Explained by the Differences in COVID-19 Mitigation Policies in the States?. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 62(6), pp.e381–e383.
Shvetsova, O., Zhirnov, A., Adeel, A.B., Bayar, M.C., Bayrali, O.G., Catalano, M., Catalano, O., Chu, H., Giannelli, F., Muftuoglu, E. and Rosenberg, D., 2022c. Protective Policy Index (PPI) global dataset of origins and stringency of COVID 19 mitigation policies. Scientific Data, 9(1), p.319.
Strand, M.A., Shyllon, O., Hohman, A., Jansen, R.J., Sidhu, S. and McDonough, S., 2022. Evaluating the Association of Face Covering Mandates on COVID-19 Severity by State. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 13, p.21501319221086720.
Strøm, K. Parliamentary Democracy and Delegation. In Eds. Kaare Strøm, K., Muller, W.C. & Bergman, T. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 55–106. (2004).
Troisi, R. and Alfano, G., 2021. Is regional emergency management key to containing COVID-19? A comparison between the regional Italian models of Emilia-Romagna and Veneto. International Journal of Public Sector Management.
Van der Ven, Hamish, and Yixian Sun. “Varieties of crises: Comparing the politics of COVID-19 and climate change.” Global Environmental Politics 21.1 (2021): 13–22.
VanDusky-Allen, J. (2023). An Analysis of Government Responses to COVID-19 in Latin America’s Three Federations. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature
Weaver, R.K. 1986. “The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of public policy 6(4), pp.371–398.
Zahariadis, N., Petridou, E. and Oztig, L.I., 2020. Claiming credit and avoiding blame: political accountability in Greek and Turkish responses to the COVID-19 crisis. European Policy Analysis, 6(2), pp.159–169.
Zhao, T. (2023). Pick your poison: Political expediencies, economic necessities, and COVID-19 response in Malaysia and Indonesia. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shvetsova, O. (2023). What the World has Learned About Their Governments During the COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Shvetsova, O. (eds) Government Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30844-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30844-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30843-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30844-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)