Abstract
This chapter explores how power, parties and politics take place in the region liminal region of Gilgit-Baltistan. It is treated as a liminal space in Pakistan because it is a constitutional part of Pakistan. Employing Victor Turner’s notion of liminality, the essay takes stock of the processes and political dispensations in the region that squeeze space for local political movements and parties to perpetuate the monolithic narrative of the state. That is why analyses of liminality entail factors and actors that contribute to the emergence of different political movements in the region. This chapter brings the disparate local political developments within the theoretical framework to show the process of gradual weakening of the local political actors. The existing state of constitutional limbo and presence of weak local political base in Gilgit-Baltistan clearly shows that the passage from colonial to postcolonial period is marked by gradual disappearance of power in the region. This chapter encapsulates the processes that contributed to the creation of liminal state of Gilgit-Baltistan by weakening internalities and strengthening the externalities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Works Cited
Ahsan, Aitzaz. 1996. The Indus Saga and the Making of Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
Ali, Nosheen. 2021. “‘Stranger, Enemy’: Anti-Shia Hostility and Annihilatory Politics in Pakistan.” In Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism, edited by Karen Barkey, Sudipta Kaviraj, and Vatsal Naresh, 322–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. 2007. Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.
Fanon, Frantz. 2004. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Richard Philcox. New York: Grove Press.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Edited by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York: International Publishers.
Mato-Bouzas, Antía. 2017. “Territorialisation, Ambivalence, and Representational Spaces in Gilgit-Baltistan.” Transcultural Studies 1: 197–223.
Sökefeld, Martin. 1997. “Jang Azadi: Perspectives on a Major Theme in Northern Areas’ History.” In The Past in the Present: Horizons of Remembering in the Pakistan Himalaya, edited by Irmtraud Stellrecht, 61–81. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
Sökefeld, Martin. 2005. “From Colonialism to Post-Colonial Colonialism.” The Journal of Asian Studies 64 (4): 939–73.
Talbot, Ian. 2014. Pakistan: A New History. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
Turner, Victor W. 1979. “Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites De Passage.” In Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological Approach, edited by Armand Lessa William and Evon Z. Vogt. New York: Harper & Row.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dad, A.A. (2023). Power, Parties and Politics in the Liminal Space of Gilgit-Baltistan. In: Duschinski, H., Bhan, M., Robinson, C.d. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of New Directions in Kashmir Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28520-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28520-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28519-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28520-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)