Abstract
In this contribution, I show that Jean Gayon’s work operates an original synthesis between the history of science, the philosophy of science and the life sciences. I propose that the philosophy of biology as it has been constructed since the 1970s could usefully draw inspiration from this synthesis to develop a much richer and more open analysis of current biological sciences. While the philosophy of biology is very strongly dominated by the biology of evolution, the history of biology has opened up to practically all the major fields of contemporary biology (for example, cell biology, molecular biology, or virology, among many others). Perhaps Jean Gayon’s work is an invitation to draw inspiration from this thematic diversity to construct a new philosophy of biology and, beyond that, a new synthesis between philosophy, history, and biology.
Translated from Pradeu (2018).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Among the other journals that publish work in the philosophy of biology, some are devoted to both historical and philosophical approaches to the life sciences (Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, for example), while others publish research that is relevant to the philosophy of science as a whole (Philosophy of Science or The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, for example).
- 2.
At this point, I would like to mention two potential conflicts, which may distort my judgment. First, I have been Associate Editor of the journal Biology and Philosophy since January 2017 (the mission of the Editor-in-Chief and Associate Editors is to receive submissions, select reviewers according to a “double-blind” procedure, and make the final decision whether to publish the submitted article). There is therefore perhaps a risk that I overestimate the importance of the journal Biology and Philosophy relative to other journals. Second, my own research in philosophy of biology has focused on the philosophy of immunology, a field that is not primarily evolutionary. There is therefore perhaps a risk that I overestimate the importance of non-evolutionary approaches in the philosophy of biology.
- 3.
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) is the official journal of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, published since 1915.
- 4.
More specifically, I have used the PNAS thematic classification, which I have applied to articles published in Biology and Philosophy. This was the best way for me to produce a satisfactory comparison between the two journals. An obvious consequence of this method is the multiplication of “0%” mentions in the representation of biological fields as it appears in Biology and Philosophy (Fig. 5.1).
- 5.
In a fascinating study, Christophe Malaterre and his colleagues have enriched and challenged Jean Gayon’s and my conclusions. Using a different and increasingly popular method, namely text mining, they conclude that although evolution by natural selection has been a much prevalent and relatively stable topic in Biology and Philosophy, a much broader diversity of topics has in fact been addressed in this journal (Malaterre et al., 2020).
- 6.
In my 2017 article, I examine and reject several often-advanced explanations for the dominance of evolutionary biology in philosophy of biology, namely the idea of a simple historical contingency, that of a higher degree of theorization in evolutionary biology, and finally that of a greater intrinsic philosophical interest in evolution. I refer the interested reader to this article.
- 7.
The Journal of the History of Biology was founded by Everett Mendelsohn in 1968. Mendelsohn was Editor-in-chief for thirty-one years, until 1999. Until December 2017, the Editor-in-Chief was Michael Dietrich (Dartmouth College, then Pittsburgh University); since January 2018, the Editors-in-Chief are Karen Rader (Virginia Commonwealth University) and Marsha Richmond (Wayne State University). The Journal of the History of Biology is unanimously considered to be one of the major journals, if not the major journal, in the history of biology.
- 8.
- 9.
In 2016, John Dupré, Gladys Kostyrka, and I edited what is, to our knowledge, the first edited volume devoted specifically to the philosophy of virology (Pradeu et al., 2016). It includes the contributions of Gregory J. Morgan (Stevens Institute of Technology), Maureen O’Malley (then at the University of Bordeaux), Thomas Pradeu (CNRS & University of Bordeaux), Jean-Michel Claverie and Chantal Abergel (Université Aix-Marseille), Patrick Forterre (Institut Pasteur & Paris-Sud University), John Dupré and Stephan Guttinger (University of Exeter), Marc van Regenmortel (CNRS & University of Strasbourg), Eugene Koonin (NIH) et Petro Starokadomskyy (UT Southwestern Medical Center), Gladys Kostyrka (IHPST, CNRS & Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne University), and Pierre-Olivier Méthot (Laval University).
- 10.
On Morange, see Loison and Pradeu (2021).
References
Barrangou, R., Fremaux, C., Deveau, H., Richards, M., Boyaval, P., Moineau, S., et al. (2007). CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science, 315(5819), 1709–1712.
Barrangou, R., & Marraffini, L. A. (2014). CRISPR-Cas systems: Prokaryotes upgrade to adaptive immunity. Molecular Cell, 54(2), 234–244.
Baxter, J. (2019). CRISPR-Cas changing biology? Biology & Philosophy, 34, 15–15.
Bitbol, M., & Gayon, J. (Eds.). (2006). L’épistémologie française, 1830–1970 (1re éd.). Presses Universitaires de France.
Bondy-Denomy, J., Pawluk, A., Maxwell, K. L., & Davidson, A. R. (2013). Bacteriophage genes that inactivate the CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system. Nature, 493(7432), 429–432.
Bos, L. (2000). 100 years of virology: From vitalism via molecular biology to genetic engineering. Trends in Microbiology, 8(2), 82–87.
Burian, R. M., & Gayon, J. (1999). The French school of genetics: From physiological and population genetics to regulatory molecular genetics. Annual Review of Genetics, 33, 313–349.
Burian, R. M., Gayon, J., & Zallen, D. (1988). The singular fate of genetics in the history of French biology, 1900–1940. Journal of the History of Biology, 21(3), 357–402.
Charpentier, E., & Doudna, J. A. (2013). Biotechnology: Rewriting a genome. Nature, 495(7439), 50–51.
Claverie, J.-M., & Abergel, C. (2010). Mimivirus: The emerging paradox of quasi-autonomous viruses. Trends in Genetics: TIG, 26(10), 431–437.
Claverie, J.-M., & Abergel, C. (2016). Les virus géants - État des connaissances, énigmes, controverses et perspectives. Médecine/sciences, 32(12), 1087–1096.
Creager, A. N. H. (2002). The life of a virus: Tobacco mosaic virus as an experimental model, 1930–1965. University of Chicago Press.
Forterre, P. (2016). To be or not to be alive: How recent discoveries challenge the traditional definitions of viruses and life. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part c: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 59, 100–108.
Gayon, J. (2003). Bachelard et l’histoire des sciences. In J.-J. Wunenburger (Ed.), Bachelard et l’épistémologie française (pp. 51–113). Presses Universitaires de France.
Gayon, J. (2009). Philosophy of biology: An historico-critical characterization. In A. Brenner & J. Gayon (Eds.), French studies in the philosophy of science: Contemporary research in France (pp. 201–212). Springer.
Gayon, J., & Burian, R. M. (2004). National traditions and the emergence of genetics: The French example. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(2), 150–156.
Guttinger, S. (2018). Riding the wave into a crisper future? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part c: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 67, 32–35.
Horvath, P., & Barrangou, R. (2010). CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science, 327, 167–170.
Hull, D. L. (1969). What philosophy of biology is not. Synthese, 20(2), 157–184.
Hull, D. L. (1974). Philosophy of biological science. Prentice-Hall.
Hull, D. L. (2008). The history of the philosophy of biology. In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of biology (pp. 11–33). Oxford University Press.
Jablonka, E. (2019). Lamarckian realities: The CRISPR-Cas system and beyond. Biology & Philosophy, 34(1), 1–5.
Koonin, E. V. (2019a). CRISPR: A new principle of genome engineering linked to conceptual shifts in evolutionary biology. Biology & Philosophy, 34(1), 1–30.
Koonin, E. V. (2019b). Lamarckian or not, CRISPR-Cas is an elaborate engine of directed evolution. Biology & Philosophy, 34(1), 1–6.
Koonin, E. V., & Dolja, V. V. (2013). A virocentric perspective on the evolution of life. Current Opinion in Virology, 3(5), 546–557.
Koonin, E. V., Makarova, K. S., & Zhang, F. (2017). Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 37, 67–78.
Lander, E. S. (2016). The heroes of CRISPR. Cell, 164(1), 18–28.
Ledford, H. (2015). CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature News, 522(7554), 20–25.
Ledford, H. (2016). CRISPR: Gene editing is just the beginning. Nature News, 531(7593), 156–159.
Ledford, H. (2017). Five big mysteries about CRISPR’s origins. Nature News, 541(7637).
Loison, L. (2010). Qu’est-ce que le néolamarckisme? les biologistes français et la question de l’évolution des espèces, 1870–1940. Vuibert.
Loison, L., Gayon, J., & Burian, R. M. (2017). The contributions—and collapse—of Lamarckian heredity in Pasteurian molecular biology: 1. Lysogeny, 1900–1960. Journal of the History of Biology, 50(1), 5–52.
Loison, L., & Pradeu, T. (Eds.). (2021). La biologie au défi de l’histoire. Mélanges offerts à Michel Morange. Éditions Matériologiques.
Lustig, A., & Levine, A. J. (1992). One hundred years of virology. Journal of Virology, 66(8), 4629–4631.
Makarova, K. S., Grishin, N. V., Shabalina, S. A., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2006). A putative RNA-interference-based immune system in prokaryotes: Computational analysis of the predicted enzymatic machinery, functional analogies with eukaryotic RNAi, and hypothetical mechanisms of action. Biology Direct, 1(1), 1–26.
Malaterre, C., Pulizzotto, D., & Lareau, F. (2020). Revisiting three decades of Biology and Philosophy: A computational topic-modeling perspective. Biology & Philosophy, 35(1), 1–25.
Mayr, E. (1969). Footnotes on the philosophy of biology. Philosophy of Science, 36(2), 197–202.
Mojica, F. J. M., Díez-Villaseñor, C., García-Martínez, J., & Soria, E. (2005). Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 60(2), 174–182.
Morange, M. (2015a). What history tells us XXXVII. CRISPR-Cas: The discovery of an immune system in prokaryotes. Journal of Biosciences, 40(2), 221–223.
Morange, M. (2015b). What history tells us XXXIX. CRISPR-Cas: From a prokaryotic immune system to a universal genome editing tool. Journal of Biosciences, 40(5), 829–832.
Morgan, G. J. (2001). Bacteriophage biology and Kenneth Schaffner’s rendition of developmentalism. Biology and Philosophy, 16(1), 85–92.
Morgan, G. J. (2006). Why there was a useful plausible analogy between geodesic domes and spherical viruses. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 28(2), 215–235.
Morgan, G. J. (2010). Laws of biological design: A reply to John Beatty. Biology & Philosophy, 25(3), 379–389.
Morgan, G. J., & Pitts, W. B. (2008). Evolution without species: The case of mosaic bacteriophages. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59(4), 745–765.
Pourcel, C., Salvignol, G., & Vergnaud, G. (2005). CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. Microbiology (reading, England), 151(3), 653–663.
Pradeu, T. (2009). Les limites du soi: Immunologie et identité biologique. Presses Universitaires de Montréal.
Pradeu, T. (2017). Thirty years of Biology & Philosophy: Philosophy of which biology? Biology & Philosophy, 32(2), 149–167.
Pradeu, T. (2018). Jean Gayon, l’histoire, la philosophie et la biologie: Une synthèse moderne. In F. Merlin & P. Huneman (Eds.), Philosophie, histoire, biologie: Mélanges offerts à Jean Gayon (pp. 89–102). Éditions Matériologiques.
Pradeu, T. (2019). Philosophy of CRISPR-Cas: Introduction to Eugene Koonin’s target paper and commentaries. Biology & Philosophy, 34(1), 1–5.
Pradeu, T., Kostyrka, G., & Dupré, J. (2016). Understanding viruses: Philosophical investigations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part c: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 59, 57–63.
Pradeu, T., & Moreau, J.-F. (2019). CRISPR-Cas immunity: Beyond nonself and defence. Biology & Philosophy, 34(1), 1–6.
Raoult, D., & Forterre, P. (2008). Redefining viruses: Lessons from Mimivirus. Nature reviews. Microbiology, 6(4), 315–319.
Ruse, M. (1973). The philosophy of biology. Hutchinson.
Summers, W. C. (2014). Inventing viruses. Annual Review of Virology, 1(1), 25–35.
van Helvoort, T. (1994a). The construction of bacteriophage as bacterial virus: Linking endogenous and exogenous thought styles. Journal of the History of Biology, 27(1), 91–139.
van Helvoort, T. (1994b). History of virus research in the twentieth century: the problem of conceptual continuity. History of Science; an Annual Review of Literature, Research and Teaching, 32(2), 185–235.
Veigl, S. J. (2019). A use/disuse paradigm for CRISPR-Cas systems. Biology & Philosophy, 34(1), 1–4.
Wideman, J. G., Inkpen, S. A., Doolittle, W. F., & Redfield, R. J. (2019). Mutationism, not Lamarckism, captures the novelty of CRISPR–Cas. Biology & Philosophy, 34(1), 1–6.
Woolley, S., Parke, E. C., Kelley, D., Poole, A. M., & Ganley, A. R. D. (2019). Striving for clarity about the “Lamarckian” nature of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biology & Philosophy, 34(1), 1–5.
Acknowledgements
I want to thank Jean Gayon for his constant trust and friendship. He was a model of strength and honor. Being his friend and learning from him has been one of the most important experiences of my life. Thanks to the École normale supérieure, the IHPST and Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne University for allowing me to write my thesis under the direction of Jean Gayon. My research is supported by the European Research Council (ERC; European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme—Grant agreement n° 637647—IDEM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pradeu, T. (2023). Jean Gayon, History and Philosophy of Biology: A New Synthesis. In: Méthot, PO. (eds) Philosophy, History and Biology: Essays in Honour of Jean Gayon. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28157-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28157-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28156-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28157-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)