Abstract
A wave of legislative and regulatory crackdown on international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) has constricted the legal environment for foreign advocacy groups interested in influencing domestic and global policy. Although the legal space for advocacy is shrinking, many INGOs have continued their work and found creative ways to adapt to these restrictions, sometimes even reshaping the regulatory environments of their target countries in their favor. This chapter explores what enables INGOs to cope with and reshape their regulatory environments by bridging international relations and interest group studies to examine the interaction between INGO resource configurations and institutional arrangements. Building on the theoretical framework in this volume, it argues that the interaction between resources and institutions provide organizations with ‘programmatic flexibility’ that enables them to adjust their strategies without changing their core mission. This argument is illustrated with case studies of Article 19 and AMERA International, and demonstrates how organizations with high programmatic flexibility can navigate regulations and shape policy in their target country, while those without this flexibility are shut out of policy discussions and often the target country itself. It concludes by exploring how the interaction between internal characteristics and institutional environments shapes and constrains the effects of interest groups in global governance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AbouAssi, Khaldoun. 2013. Hands in the Pockets of Mercurial Donors: NGO Response to Shifting Funding Priorities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 42 (3): 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012439629.
AMERA International. 2015. Report of the Trustees and Unaudited Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 January 2016. Reading: AMERA International.
AMERA UK. 2008. Reports and Accounts for the Year Ended 31 January 2008. Reading: AMERA UK.
———. 2009. Reports and Accounts for the Year Ended 31 January 2009. Reading: AMERA UK.
———. 2011. Reports and Accounts for the Year Ended 31 January 2011. Reading: AMERA UK.
———. 2012. Reports and Accounts for the Year Ended 31 January 2012. Reading: AMERA UK.
———. 2013. Reports and Accounts for the Year Ended 31 January 2013. Reading: AMERA UK.
———. 2014. Reports and Accounts for the Year Ended 31 January 2014. Reading: AMERA UK.
Article 19. 2005a. Annual Review 2004. London.
———. 2005b. Report and Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31st December 2004. London.
———. 2006. 2005 Annual Implementation Report. London.
———. 2008. 2007 Annual Report. London.
———. 2009. 2008 Annual Report. London.
———. 2013. Implementation Report for 2012. London.
———. 2015. Protecting Civic Space: Annual Report 2014. London.
Barry, Colin M., K. Sam Bell, Chad Clay, Michael E. Flynn, and Amanda Murdie. 2015. Choosing the Best House in a Bad Neighborhood: Location Strategies of Human Rights INGOs in the Non-Western World. International Studies Quarterly 59 (1): 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12172.
Berliner, Daniel. 2016. Transnational Advocacy and Domestic Law: International NGOs and the Design of Freedom of Information Laws. The Review of International Organizations 11 (1): 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9228-6.
Bloodgood, Elizabeth A., Joannie Tremblay-Boire, and Aseem Prakash. 2014. National Styles of NGO Regulation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 (4): 716–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013481111.
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2015. The Taming of Democracy Assistance: Why Democracy Promotion Does Not Confront Dictators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107706934.
Chaudhry, Suparna, and Andrew Heiss. 2019. Charity During Crackdown: Analyzing the Impact of State Repression of NGOs on Philanthropy. Working Paper.
CIVICUS. 2017. People Power Under Attack: Findings from the CIVICUS Monitor. CIVICUS.
Dellmuth, Lisa M., and Jonas Tallberg. 2017. Advocacy Strategies in Global Governance: Inside Vs. Outside Lobbying. Political Studies 65 (3): 705–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716684356.
Heiss, Andrew. 2017. Amicable Contempt: The Strategic Balance Between Dictators and International NGOs. PhD thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC.
———. 2019. NGOs and Authoritarianism. In Routledge Handbook of NGOs and International Relations, ed. Thomas Davies. London: Routledge.
Heiss, Andrew, and Tana Johnson. 2016. Internal, Interactive, and Institutional Factors: Towards a Unified Theory of INGO Behavior. International Studies Review 18 (3): 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv014.
Heiss, Andrew, and Judith G. Kelley. 2017. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: International NGOs and the Dual Pressures of Donors and Host Governments. Journal of Politics 79 (2): 732–741. https://doi.org/10.1086/691218.
Herman, Robert D., and David O. Renz. 2004. Doing Things Right: Effectiveness in Local Nonprofit Organizations, A Panel Study. Public Administration Review 64 (6): 694–704. 10.111 1/j.1540-6210.2004.00416.x.
IFEX Tunisia Monitoring Group. 2005. Tunisia: Freedom of Expression Under Siege. https://www.ifex.org/tunisia/2010/02/16/tmg_report_feb_05_free_expression_under_seige_en.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2019.
———. 2010. Behind the Façade: How a Politicised Judiciary & Administrative Sanctions Undermine Tunisian Human Rights. https://www.ifex.org/tunisia/2010/06/18/ifextmgmissionreport_june2010.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2019.
International Refugee Rights Initiative. 2015. Reports and Accounts for the Year Ended 31 January 2015. Reading: International Refugee Rights Initiative.
Kerlin, Janelle. 2006. U.S.-based International NGOs and Federal Government Foreign Assistance: Out of Alignment? In Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict, ed. Elizabeth T. Boris and C. Eugene Steuerle, 373–398. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Kim, Mirae, and Gregg G. Van Ryzin. 2014. Impact of Government Funding on Donations to Arts Organizations: A Survey Experiment. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 (5): 910–925. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013487800.
Landman, Todd, and Meghna Abraham. 2004. Evaluation of Nine Non-Governmental Human Rights Organisations. IOB Working Document, Inspectie Ontwikkelingssamenwerking en Beleidsevaluatie (IOB), The Hague.
Oster, Sharon M. 1992. Nonprofit Organizations as Franchise Operations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership 2 (3): 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130020303.
Pallas, Christopher L., and Lan Nguyen. 2018. Transnational Advocacy Without Northern NGO Partners: Vietnamese NGOs in the HIV/AIDS Sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 47 (4S): 159S–176S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018758462.
Renz, David O. 2004. Governance of Nonprofits. In Philanthropy in America: A Comprehensive Historical Encyclopedia, ed. Dwight F. Burlingame, 191–199. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Stiles, Kendall W. 2002. Civil Society by Design: Donors, NGOs, and the Intermestic Development Circle in Bangladesh. Westport: Praeger.
Stroup, Sarah S. 2012. Borders Among Activists: International NGOs in the United States, Britain, and France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801464256.
Tallberg, Jonas, Lisa M. Dellmuth, Hans Agné, and Andreas Duit. 2018. NGO Influence in International Organizations: Information, Access and Exchange. British Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341500037X.
Watson, Mary R., and Rikki Abzug. 2010. Recruitment and Retention in Nonprofit Organizations. In The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management, ed. David O. Renz, 3rd ed., 669–708. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Witesman, Eva, and Andrew Heiss. 2016. Nonprofit Collaboration and the Resurrection of Market Failure: How a Resource-Sharing Environment Can Suppress Social Objectives. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9684-5.
Wong, Wendy H. 2012. Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801466069.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heiss, A. (2023). Taking Control of Regulations: How International Advocacy NGOs Shape the Regulatory Environments of Their Target Countries. In: Dellmuth, L.M., Bloodgood, E.A. (eds) Advocacy Group Effects in Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27864-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27864-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27863-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27864-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)