Abstract
Recent advances in anthropology, in a general sense, and, more specifically, in laboratory anthropology, have encouraged proposals for metaphysical renovation, which deviates from the modern idea of an absolute and permanent separation between nature and society. Anthropologists such as Eduardo Viveiros de Castro and Phelippe Descola have shown how different groups enable the existence of not only different cultures, but also different natures, which rather than simply denoting multiculturalism, also describes multinaturalism. Likewise, science studies – especially Bruno Latour’s studies on laboratory anthropology – have also indicated the possibility of a metaphysical conception in which ontology, epistemology, and politics are not separated a priori. These insights point at the existence of cosmopolitics, in which several human and nonhuman actors take part in shaping reality – a notion coined by philosopher Isabelle Stengers. This is a conception that defies conventional metaphysical guise and the very divisions of philosophy (ontology, epistemology, and politics), which holds serious repercussions on how history of science can be narrated, and on history itself. This chapter intends to provide an overview of the ontological turn of anthropology to carry out a historiographical analysis of research studies built on cosmopolitical theory – that is, how it impacts on their conceptualization, narrative structures, and methodological choices. To this end, historical studies by Bruno Latour, Isabelle Stengers, and Dipesh Chakrabasty are analyzed and interpreted together to indicate methodological guidelines for composing historical narratives from a cosmopolitical point of view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blaser M (2018) Uma Outra Cosmopolítica é Possível? Revista de Antropologia Da UFSCar 31(4):14–42
Bloor D (1991) Knowledge and social imagery. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Callon M (1984) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint-Brieuc Bay. Sociol Rev 32:196–233. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-2-49-90
Chakrabarty D (2009) The climate of history: four theses. Crit Inq 35(2):197–222
Chakrabarty D (2014) Climate and capital: on conjoined histories. Crit Inq 41(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/678154
de Castro EV (1996) Os Pronomes Cosmológicos e o Perspectivismo Ameríndio. Mana 2(2):115–144. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-93131996000200005
de Castro EV (2018) Metafísicas Canibais: Elementos Para Uma Antropologia Pós-Estrutural. Ubu, São Paulo
Descola P (2016) Outras Naturezas, Outras Culturas. Editora, São Paulo, p 34
Holbraad M, Pedersen MA, Vi Castro E (2014) The politics of ontology: anthropological positions. Fieldsights. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions
Jasanoff S et al (2001) Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage, New York
Kant I (2009) An answer to the question: ‘what is enlightment?’. Penguin, London
Knor-Cetina K (1981) The manufacture of knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. In: Science observed: perspectives on the study of science. Sage, London
Kohn E (2015) Anthropology of ontologies. Annu Rev Anthropol 44(1):311–327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014127
Krenak A (2019) Ideias Para Adiar o Fim Do Mundo. Companhia das Letras, São Paulo
Latour B (1988a) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Latour B (1988b) The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Latour B (1999a) From fabrication to reality – pasteur and his lactic acid ferment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Latour B (1999b) Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Latour B (1999c) Science’s Bloof flow: an example from Joliot’s scientific Inteligence. In: Pandora’s Hope. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Latour B (1999d) The historicity of things. In: Pandora’s Hope. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 145–173
Latour B (2001) Gabriel Tarde and the end of sociocultural. In: Joyce P (ed) The social in question. New bearings in history and the social sciences. Routledge, London, pp 117–132
Latour B (2004a) Politics of nature: how to bring science into democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Latour B (2004b) Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics? Common Knowledge 10(3):450–462
Latour B (2004c) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Crit Inq 30(2):225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor network theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Latour B (2016) Cogitamus: Seis Cartas Sobre as Humanidades Científicas, vol 34. Editora, São Paulo
Latour B (2020a) Diante de Gaia – Oito Conferências Sobre a Natureza No Antropoceno. Editora Ubu, São Paulo
Latour B (2020b) Onde Aterrar? Como Se Orientar Politicamente No Antropoceno? Bazar do Tempo, Rio de Janeiro
Latour B, Woolgar S (1986) Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Latour B, Jensen P, Venturini T, Grauwin S, Boullier D (2012) ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’ – a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. Br J Sociol 63(4):590–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x
Mcintyre L (2018) Post-truth. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Prigogie I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Verso, London
Santos B d S (2019) O Fim Do Império Cognitivo – A Afirmação Das Epistemologias Do Sul. autêntica, Belo Horizonte
Stengers I (1996) Cosmopolitiques. Tome 1: La Guerre Des Sciences. La Découverte-Les Empêcheurs de Penser en Rond, Paris
Stengers I (2010) Cosmopolitics I. University of Minesota Press, Minneapolosi
Stengers I (2011) Cosmopolitics II. University of Minesota Press, Minesota
Stengers I (2018) A Proposição Cosmopolítica. Revista Do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros 69:442–464
Venturini T (2010) Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Underst Sci 19(3):258–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509102694
Videira AAP (2007) Historiografia e História Da Ciência. Revista Da Fundação Casa Rui Barbosa 1:111–158
Vrieze J (2017) Bruno Latour, a veteran of the ‘science wars,’ has a new mission. Science, October. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1805
Whitehead AN (1925) Science and the modern world. Pelican Mentor Book, New York
Whitehead AN (1978) Process and reality: an essay in cosmology. The Free Press, New York
Woolgar S (1982) Laboratory studies: a comment on the state of the art. Soc Stud Sci 12:481–498
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the Brazilian National Council of Research (CNPq) for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lima, N.W. (2023). Cosmopolitical Propositions: A Historiographic Analysis of Contemporary Anthropological Perspectives on Sciences. In: Condé, M.L., Salomon, M. (eds) Handbook for the Historiography of Science. Historiographies of Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27510-4_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27510-4_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27509-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27510-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities