Skip to main content

Introduction: Electoral Cycles, Continuity, and Change in Latin American Politics: A Framework for Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Latin America’s Pendular Politics

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

  • 232 Accesses

Abstract

An electoral cycle arises in a region when in a short time span a group of countries holds elections with a pattern of similar outcomes. Since the transitions to democracy in the 1980s, Latin America has experienced three and perhaps even four cycles the literature generally describes in terms of shifts to the left or to the right.

Several fine young scholars have contributed to the preparation of this introduction. I warmly thank the research assistantship of Luisa Cajamarca (Université libre de Bruxelles), Roman Perdomo (Sciences Po), Julia Mensa (Universidad católica de Córdoba, Argentina), Mariana Duque (Universidad católica de Medellín, Colombia), Salomé Garnier (Harvard University), and Mariana Chaise (Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sciences Po’s Political Observatory of Latin America and the Caribbean (www.sciencespo.fr/opalc).

  2. 2.

    Among the abundant production, it is worth pointing out the contributions of the “Salamanca school” led by Professor Manuel Alcántara (2018, 2020).

  3. 3.

    See the discussion in Dabène (2012).

  4. 4.

    LAPOP (2010).

  5. 5.

    See for instance these different categories of elections: consolidation, deviation, realignment, reestablishment, coined by Pelletier and Crête (1988).

  6. 6.

    Using Sartori’s classical typology revisited by Peter Mair (alternation can be complete, partial, or absent).

  7. 7.

    To compare all the countries, this research considers three types of elections: presidential, legislative, and local (municipal or governors in federal systems).

  8. 8.

    In Table 1.1, they account for half a point.

  9. 9.

    Chapter 14 of this volume.

  10. 10.

    https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu.

  11. 11.

    Nicaragua (2009), Honduras (2015) and Bolivia (2017). In 2022, Bukele (Salvador) announced he would run in 2024.

  12. 12.

    In addition to legislative and local elections.

  13. 13.

    https://www.electoralintegrityproject.com

  14. 14.

    https://www.electoralintegrityproject.com

  15. 15.

    Hence, it is classified as an alternation in the database.

  16. 16.

    A report from the Organization of American states (OAS) mentioned “serious irregularities” that casted doubt on the results. Two separate studies reached an opposite conclusion. See all the documents in OPALC’s website. https://www.sciencespo.fr/opalc/content/crise-en-bolivie-2019.html. Regardless of the alleged fraud, the fact that Morales was “invited” by the army to resign when he had just proposed a re-run of the election justifies his case being included in the category of “destitution”.

  17. 17.

    Reelections: Brazil 2006 (Lula), Colombia 2006 (Uribe), Venezuela 2006 (Chavez), Argentina 2011 (Kirchner), Bolivia 2009 (Morales), Ecuador 2009 (Correa), Nicaragua 2011(Ortega), Venezuela 2012 (Chavez), Bolivia 2014 (Morales), Brazil 2014 (Rousseff), Colombia 2014 (Santos), Ecuador 2013 (Correa), Honduras 2017 (Hernandez), Nicaragua 2016 (Ortega), Venezuela 2018 (Maduro), Bolivia 2019 (Morales). Exception: Argentina 2019 (Macri).

  18. 18.

    All the figures are available on OPALC’s website.

  19. 19.

    They were more present in social medias, a dimension that is neglected by the Manifesto project. See Guevara (2020).

  20. 20.

    On a scale from 0 to 10, share of respondents self-positioning themselves on 0 (extreme left) or 10 (extreme right). Source World Value Survey.

  21. 21.

    The election of Gabriel Boric is a game changer: the social movements managed to have one of their leaders elected president, (momentarily?) closing the gap between the ballot and the street.

  22. 22.

    Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, Nicaragua, Chile, Honduras, Costa Rica, Colombia, and Brazil.

  23. 23.

    See for instance Gerardo Lissardy, “Porqué la idea de que América Latina gira hacia la derecha o izquierda perdió sentido en 2019”, BBC News Mundo, 30 december 2019, available at: https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-50818892 (accessed August 8th 2022).

References

  • Alcántara, Manuel (editor) (2018), Elecciones y partidos politicos en América Latina, CIS

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, Manuel (editor) (2020), América Latina vota (2017–2019), Tecnos

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Andy & Kenneth Green (2011), “The Latin American Left’s Mandate: Free-market policies and issue voting in new democracies”, World Politics 63(1), 43–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, Allyson Lucinda (2005), “Dissatisfied democrats or retrospective voters. Economic hardship, political institutions and voting behavior in Latin America”, Comparative Political Studies 38(4), 417–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, Richard (2018), “What is conservatism? History, ideology, and party”, European Journal of Political Theory, 17(4), 449–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burity, Joanildo (2021), “The Brazilian conservative wave, the Bolsonaro administration and religious actors”, Brazilian Political Science Review, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202100030005

  • Carreirão, Yan (2004), “A eleição presidencial de 2002: uma análise preliminar do processo e dos resultados eleitorais”, Revista de Sociologia e Política, pp. 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782004000100013

  • Carreras, Miguel & Igor Acácio (2019), “Electoral volatility in Latin America”, Oxford Research Encyclopedias

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrales, Javier, “A perfect marriage: evangelicals and conservatives in Latin America”, The New York Times, 17 Janvier 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabène, Olivier (editor) (2012), La Gauche en Amérique Latine, Presses de Sciences Po

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Federico Estévez and Beatriz Magaloni (2017), The Political Logic of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David (1965), A systems analysis of political life, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Edward (2005), “Boundary control: subnational authoritarianism in democratic countries”, World Politics 58(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes Mendonça Ferreira, Matheus and Mario Fuks (2021), “O hábito de frequentar cultos como mecanismo de mobilização eleitoral: o voto evangélico em Bolsonaro em 2018”, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2021.34.238866

  • Guevara, Erica (2020), “Redes sociales y ‘polarización’ : una mirada comparada de las elecciones de 2018 en Brasil, Colombia, Costa Rica y México”, 251–288 in Democracia en digital : Facebook, comunicación y política en Costa Rica, Ignacio Siles González (editor), San José, Centro de investigación en comunicación

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbers, Imke (2010), “Decentralization and the development of nationalized party systems in new democracies: evidence from Latin America”, Comparative Political Studies 43(5), 606–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert (1991), The Rhetoric of Reaction. Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy, Harvard University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LAPOP (2010), AmericasBarometer Insights n°38, edited by Elizabeth Zechmeister & Margarita Coral

    Google Scholar 

  • Louault, Frédéric and Cédric Pellen (2019), La défaite électorale. Productions, appropriations, bifurcation, PUR

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, Juan Pablo and Cristóbal Kaltwasser (2014) The resilience of the Latin American right, Johns Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupu, Noam (2014), “Brand dilution and the breakdown of political parties in Latin America”, World Politics 66(4), p561–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott & Edurne Zoco (editors) (1995), Building Democratic Institutions. Party Systems in Latin America, Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott (editor) (2018), Party systems in Latin America. Institutionalization, decay and collapse, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Pierre (2017), “Le temps des élections”, p855–905 in Études électorales, edited by Yves Deloye and Nonna Mayer, Bruyland

    Google Scholar 

  • Matland, Richard and Donley Studlar (2004), “Determinants of legislative turnover: a cross-national analysis”, British Journal of Political Science 34(1), p87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, M. Victoria, Virginia Oliveros & Milan Vaishnav (2010), “Electoral revolution or democratic alternation? Latin American Research Review, 45(3), p87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, Victoria and Giancarlo Visconti (2017), “Economic performance and incumbents’ support in Latin America”, Electoral studies 45, p180–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, María Victoria, Julia Maria Rubio and Jorge Mangonnet (2016), “Argentina : el protagonismo de los votantes y la alternancia electoral”, Revista de Ciencia Política, 36(1), p3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolau, Jairo and Victor Peixoto (2007), “As bases municipais da votação de Lula em 2006”, Cadernos do Fórum Nacional [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/1863106/As_bases_municipais_da_vota%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_Lula_em_2006 (Accessed: 24 July 2022)

  • Nupia, Oscar (2011) Anti-Poverty Programs and Presidential Election Outcomes: Familias en Acción in Colombia, Documentos CEDE. Universidad de los Andes. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000089/008743.html (Accessed: 17 July 2022).

  • Pelletier, Réjean and Jean Crête (1988) in “Réalignements électoraux et transformations du personnel politique”, Revue canadienne de science politique, 21(1), p3–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal (2007), Crisis without breakdown. Presidential impeachment and the new political instability in Latin America, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam (2015), “Acquiring the habit of changing governments through elections”, Comparative Political Studies 48(1), p101–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queirolo, Rosario (2010) “El rol de las transferencias monetarias en la reelección del Frente Amplio en 2009”, in Daniel Buquet and Niki Johnson, Del cambio a la continuidad. Ciclo electoral 2009–2010 en Uruguay. Montevideo: Editorial Fin de Siglo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmer, Karen (2012), “The rise of leftist-populist governance in Latin America: the roots of electoral change”, Comparative political studies, 45(8), 947–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Kenneth (2014), Changing course in Latin America. Party systems in the neoliberal era (2014), Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1976), Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanto Iyengar and alii (2019), “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States”, Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 2019, 29–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Susan (2001), Mandates and democracy. Neoliberalism by surprise in Latin America, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Torcal Loriente, Mariano (editor) (2015), Sistemas de partidos en América latina: causas y consecuencias de su equilibrio inestable, Anthropos Ediciones UNL

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdini, Melody and Michael Lewis-Beck (2018), “Economic voting in Latin America: rules and responsibility”, American journal of political science 47(12), 1707–1737

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister, Elizabeth (2015), “Left-right identifications and the Latin American voter”, p196 in The Latin American Voter. Pursuing representation and accountability in challenging contexts, Ryan Carly, Matthew Singer et Elizabeth Zechmeister (editors), University of Michigan Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zovatto, Daniel and alii (2018) “El súper ciclo electoral latinoamericano. Las elecciones del enojo”, Iberoaméricana, XVII, 69, 227–254.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Dabène .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dabène, O. (2023). Introduction: Electoral Cycles, Continuity, and Change in Latin American Politics: A Framework for Analysis. In: Dabène, O. (eds) Latin America’s Pendular Politics. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26761-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics