Skip to main content

Technologies of Human Rights Protection, Sovereignty, and Freedom

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of African Philosophy

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Philosophy ((HP))

  • 232 Accesses

Abstract

Whereas technology promises to advance freedom through strengthening human rights protection, the policies enacted to control access to technology infrastructure claim to protect the sovereignty of states. Could these divergent claims be reconciled? In this chapter, an account of technology governance that can accommodate the claims of freedom and sovereignty is provided. The starting point of this account is a reconstruction of the central claims of the two approaches to technology governance. It is argued that the two perspectives are severely limited, hence the need for a third way. To transcend the claims of digital sovereignty and digital freedom, it is imperative to take a standpoint that is political. Adopting an approach or a mode of reading that is political requires that the theory of technology governance answers the question: what does it mean for the experience of (un)freedom to say that human rights or sovereignty requires one to act in one way or another?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, S. (2019). How big data Swung Senegal’s vote. Mail and Guardian. Available online at: https://mg.co.za/article/2019-09-06-00-how-big-data-swung-senegals-vote/. Accessed 04 Feb 2023.

  • Bergere, C. (2019). “Don’t tax my megabytes”: Digital infrastructure and the regulation of Citizenship in Africa. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4309–4326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussiek, H. (2022). Digital rights are human rights: An introduction to the state of affairs and challenges in Africa, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung – Fesmedia Africa. Available online at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/africa-media/19082-20220414.pdf. Accessed 04 Apr 2023.

  • European Parliament Briefing, EPRS Ideas Paper – Towards a More Resilient EU. (2020). Digital Sovereignty for Europe. Available online at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/651992/EPRS_BRI(2020)651992_EN.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2023.

  • Goldsmith, J. L. (1998a). Against cyberanarchy. The University of Chicago Law Review, 65(4), 1199–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, J. L. (1998b). The Internet and the abiding significance of territorial sovereignty. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 5(2), 475–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. A. (2020). Sovereignty and the evolution of Internet ideology, Center for Strategic and International Studies Report, Oct 2020. Available online at: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/201030_Lewis_Sovereignty_Evolution_Internet_Ideology_1.pdf. Accessed 04 Apr 2023.

  • Madenga, F. (2021). From transparency to opacity: Storytelling in Zimbabwe Under State Surveillance and the Internet Shutdown. Information, Communication and Society, 24(3), 400–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, K., & Cohen, M. S. (2021). Salary, suppression, and spies: Journalistic challenges in Uganda. Journalism Studies, 22(2), 243–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckune, S., & Ahmed, S. (2018). The contestation and shaping of cyber norms through China’s Internet sovereignty agenda. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3835–3855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, D. (2009). Citizen journalism and the parallel market of information in Zimbabwe’s 2008 election. Journalism Studies, 10(4), 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perritt, H. H., Jr. (1998). The Internet as a threat to sovereignty? Thoughts on the Internet’s role in strengthening national and global governance. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 5(2), 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, R. A. (2018). Digital sovereignty or digital colonialism? Sur International Journal on Human Rights, 15(27), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohle, J., & Thiel, T. (2020). Digital sovereignty. Journal on Internet Regulation, 9(4), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selnes, F. N. (2021). Internet restrictions in Uganda: Examining their impact on journalism. Information, Communication and Society, 24(3), 490–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. S. (1997). Cyberspace and sovereignty – The Internet and the international system. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 10(3), 647–666.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uchenna Okeja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Okeja, U. (2023). Technologies of Human Rights Protection, Sovereignty, and Freedom. In: Imafidon, E., Tshivhase, M., Freter, B. (eds) Handbook of African Philosophy. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25149-8_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics