Skip to main content

What Can Beast Fables Do in Literary Animal Studies? Ben Jonson’s Volpone and the Prehumanist Human

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Animal Satire

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

  • 209 Accesses

Abstract

John Simons, Jacques Derrida, and others argue that beast fables such as those ascribed to Aesop, being based on centuries of convention rather than on an understanding of specific species, have little to tell us about human–animal relations, and for this reason can be evacuated from literary animal studies. This chapter will challenge this perspective by turning to one of the English Renaissance’s most well-known beast fables: Ben Jonson’s play Volpone (1606). It will read it alongside contemporary work by Erasmus, John Donne, Robert Burton, and John Davies, among others, and argue that all these writers make visible a conception of humans that means that the beast fable can be read as having a role to play in understanding not just human perceptions of animals, but also human perceptions of being human. Through a reading of Jonson’s play this chapter aims to make a case for the need to rethink the place and meaning of beast fables both in the past and today. To underline this it turns briefly at the end of the chapter to look beyond the early modern period to posthumanist ideas as a way of thinking through how the historical analysis might also impact upon contemporary literary studies that attend to what Cary Wolfe has called “the question of the animal”.

Throughout this chapter the spelling and literation of original early modern sources have been silently modernised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Simons, Animal Rights, 119.

  2. 2.

    Derrida, The animal, 405.

  3. 3.

    Wolfe, Animal Rites, 44.

  4. 4.

    Kurke, Aesopic Conversations, 156.

  5. 5.

    Mann, From Aesop to Reynard, 5–6.

  6. 6.

    Erasmus, The Education, 12.

  7. 7.

    White, The Book of Beasts, 53–4.

  8. 8.

    Harrison, The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science, 269.

  9. 9.

    White, Book of Beasts, 54.

  10. 10.

    Jonson, Volpone, 1.2.87–90.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., 1.2.92–6.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., 2.6.35 and 28.

  13. 13.

    Greenblatt, The false ending, 91.

  14. 14.

    Jonson, Volpone, 5.11.1–2.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., Epistle, 39.

  16. 16.

    Whitaker, Good Newes from Virginia, 24.

  17. 17.

    Morgan, The Perfection of Horse-manship, 5–6.

  18. 18.

    Donne, To Sir Edward Herbert, lines 33–4.

  19. 19.

    Davies, Nosce Teipsum, 8.

  20. 20.

    Burton, The Anatomy of Melancholy, 5.

  21. 21.

    Fudge, Brutal Reasoning, 8–13.

  22. 22.

    Gascoigne, A delicate Diet, for daintiemouthde Droonkardes, 6.

  23. 23.

    Donne, To Sir Edward Herbert, lines 9–10.

  24. 24.

    Shakespeare, Hamlet, 1.2.150–1.

  25. 25.

    Schiesari, Rethinking humanism, 61.

  26. 26.

    Darwin, On the Origin of Species, 346 and 154.

  27. 27.

    Herbert, Providence, lines 135–6, 13 and 18–20.

  28. 28.

    Wolfe, What is Posthumanism?, xv.

  29. 29.

    Derrida, The animal, 402.

  30. 30.

    Descartes, Discourse on the Method, 141.

  31. 31.

    Derrida, The animal, 400.

  32. 32.

    See Fudge, The animal face, 177–198; essays in Feerik and Nardizzi, ed., The Indistinct Human in Renaissance Culture; and Campana Scott Maisano, Introduction: Renaissance Posthumanism, 1–36.

  33. 33.

    Wolfe, What is Posthumanism?, xxv.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., 47.

  35. 35.

    See, for example, Pick, Creaturely Poetics.

  36. 36.

    McHugh, Animal Farm’s lessons, 29.

  37. 37.

    See Brunsdale, Student Companion, 128–9 for such an analysis.

  38. 38.

    Danta, Animal Fables after Darwin, 3.

  39. 39.

    Ibid., 2.

  40. 40.

    Ibid., 19.

Works Cited

  • Boehrer, Bruce. 2010. Animal Characters: Nonhuman Beings in Early Modern Literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdale, Mitzi M. 2000. Student Companion to George Orwell. London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Peter. 1997. Fables of the bees: A case-study in views of nature and society. In Nature and Society in Historical Context, ed. Mikuláš Teich, Roy Porter, and Bo Gustafsson, 112–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, Robert. 1624. The Anatomy of Melancholy. Oxford: Henry Cripps.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana, Joseph, and Scott Maisano. 2016. Introduction: Renaissance posthumanism. In Renaissance Posthumanism, ed. J. Campana and S. Maisano, 1–36. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danta, Chris. 2018. Animal Fables after Darwin: Literature, Speciesism and Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. (1859) 2008. On the Origin of Species. Edited by Gillian Beer. Reprint, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, John. 1599. Nosce Teipsum. London: Richard Field.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2002. The animal that therefore i am (more to follow). Critical Inquiry 28 (2): 369–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. (1637) 1985. Discourse on the method. In The Philosophical Writings of René Descartes, ed. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donne, John. (1610) 2000. To Sir Edward Herbert, at Juliers. In John Donne: The Major Works, ed. John Carey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erasmus, Desiderius. (1513) 1997. The Education of a Christian Prince. Translated by Neil M. Cheshire and Michael J. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feerik, Jean E., and Vin Nardizzi, eds. 2012. The Indistinct Human in Renaissance Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, Erica. 2000. Perceiving Animals: Humans and Beasts in Early Modern English Culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Brutal Reasoning: Humans, Rationality and Humanity in Early Modern Thought. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The animal face of early modern England. Theory, Culture and Society 30 (7): 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascoigne, George. 1576. A Delicate Diet, for Daintiemouthde Droonkardes. London: Richard Jhones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, Stephen J. 1976. The false ending in Volpone. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 75: 90–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Peter. 1998a. Reading the passions: The fall, the passions, and dominion over nature. In The Soft Underbelly of Reason: The Passions in the Seventeenth Century, ed. Steven Gaukroger, 49–78. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998b. The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, George. (1633) 2015. Providence. In George Herbert: The Complete Poetry, ed. John Drury and Victoria Moul, 111–115. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfele, Andreas. 2011. Stage, Stake and Scaffold: Humans and Animals in Shakespeare’s Theatre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jonson, Ben. (1606) 1999. Volpone. Edited by Brian Parker and David Bevington. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurke, Leslie. 2011. Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Jill. 2009. From Aesop to Reynard: Beast Literature in Medieval Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, Susan. 2009. Animal farm’s lessons for literary (and) animal studies. Humanimalia: A Journal of Human/Animal Interface Studies 1 (1): 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Nicholas. 1609. The Perfection of Horse-manship, drawne from Nature; Arte, and Practise. London: Edward White.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, Anat. 2011. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiesari, Juliana. 2013. Rethinking humanism: Animals and the analogic imagination in the Italian Renaissance. Shakespeare Studies 41: 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. (c.1601) 2006. Hamlet. Edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor. London: Arden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, Laurie. 2013. The Accommodated Animal: Cosmopolity in Shakespearean Locales. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, John. 2002. Animal Rights and the Politics of Literary Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, Alexander. 1613. Good Newes from Virginia. London: F. Kyngston.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T.H. (1954) 1992. The Book of Beasts: Being a Translation from a Latin Bestiary of the Twelfth Century. Reprint, Stroud: Alan Sutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Cary. 2003. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fudge, E. (2023). What Can Beast Fables Do in Literary Animal Studies? Ben Jonson’s Volpone and the Prehumanist Human. In: McKay, R., McHugh, S. (eds) Animal Satire. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24872-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics