Abstract
John Simons, Jacques Derrida, and others argue that beast fables such as those ascribed to Aesop, being based on centuries of convention rather than on an understanding of specific species, have little to tell us about human–animal relations, and for this reason can be evacuated from literary animal studies. This chapter will challenge this perspective by turning to one of the English Renaissance’s most well-known beast fables: Ben Jonson’s play Volpone (1606). It will read it alongside contemporary work by Erasmus, John Donne, Robert Burton, and John Davies, among others, and argue that all these writers make visible a conception of humans that means that the beast fable can be read as having a role to play in understanding not just human perceptions of animals, but also human perceptions of being human. Through a reading of Jonson’s play this chapter aims to make a case for the need to rethink the place and meaning of beast fables both in the past and today. To underline this it turns briefly at the end of the chapter to look beyond the early modern period to posthumanist ideas as a way of thinking through how the historical analysis might also impact upon contemporary literary studies that attend to what Cary Wolfe has called “the question of the animal”.
Throughout this chapter the spelling and literation of original early modern sources have been silently modernised.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Simons, Animal Rights, 119.
- 2.
Derrida, The animal, 405.
- 3.
Wolfe, Animal Rites, 44.
- 4.
Kurke, Aesopic Conversations, 156.
- 5.
Mann, From Aesop to Reynard, 5–6.
- 6.
Erasmus, The Education, 12.
- 7.
White, The Book of Beasts, 53–4.
- 8.
Harrison, The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science, 269.
- 9.
White, Book of Beasts, 54.
- 10.
Jonson, Volpone, 1.2.87–90.
- 11.
Ibid., 1.2.92–6.
- 12.
Ibid., 2.6.35 and 28.
- 13.
Greenblatt, The false ending, 91.
- 14.
Jonson, Volpone, 5.11.1–2.
- 15.
Ibid., Epistle, 39.
- 16.
Whitaker, Good Newes from Virginia, 24.
- 17.
Morgan, The Perfection of Horse-manship, 5–6.
- 18.
Donne, To Sir Edward Herbert, lines 33–4.
- 19.
Davies, Nosce Teipsum, 8.
- 20.
Burton, The Anatomy of Melancholy, 5.
- 21.
Fudge, Brutal Reasoning, 8–13.
- 22.
Gascoigne, A delicate Diet, for daintiemouthde Droonkardes, 6.
- 23.
Donne, To Sir Edward Herbert, lines 9–10.
- 24.
Shakespeare, Hamlet, 1.2.150–1.
- 25.
Schiesari, Rethinking humanism, 61.
- 26.
Darwin, On the Origin of Species, 346 and 154.
- 27.
Herbert, Providence, lines 135–6, 13 and 18–20.
- 28.
Wolfe, What is Posthumanism?, xv.
- 29.
Derrida, The animal, 402.
- 30.
Descartes, Discourse on the Method, 141.
- 31.
Derrida, The animal, 400.
- 32.
See Fudge, The animal face, 177–198; essays in Feerik and Nardizzi, ed., The Indistinct Human in Renaissance Culture; and Campana Scott Maisano, Introduction: Renaissance Posthumanism, 1–36.
- 33.
Wolfe, What is Posthumanism?, xxv.
- 34.
Ibid., 47.
- 35.
See, for example, Pick, Creaturely Poetics.
- 36.
McHugh, Animal Farm’s lessons, 29.
- 37.
See Brunsdale, Student Companion, 128–9 for such an analysis.
- 38.
Danta, Animal Fables after Darwin, 3.
- 39.
Ibid., 2.
- 40.
Ibid., 19.
Works Cited
Boehrer, Bruce. 2010. Animal Characters: Nonhuman Beings in Early Modern Literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Brunsdale, Mitzi M. 2000. Student Companion to George Orwell. London: Greenwood Press.
Burke, Peter. 1997. Fables of the bees: A case-study in views of nature and society. In Nature and Society in Historical Context, ed. Mikuláš Teich, Roy Porter, and Bo Gustafsson, 112–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burton, Robert. 1624. The Anatomy of Melancholy. Oxford: Henry Cripps.
Campana, Joseph, and Scott Maisano. 2016. Introduction: Renaissance posthumanism. In Renaissance Posthumanism, ed. J. Campana and S. Maisano, 1–36. New York: Fordham University Press.
Danta, Chris. 2018. Animal Fables after Darwin: Literature, Speciesism and Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, Charles. (1859) 2008. On the Origin of Species. Edited by Gillian Beer. Reprint, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, John. 1599. Nosce Teipsum. London: Richard Field.
Derrida, Jacques. 2002. The animal that therefore i am (more to follow). Critical Inquiry 28 (2): 369–418.
Descartes, René. (1637) 1985. Discourse on the method. In The Philosophical Writings of René Descartes, ed. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donne, John. (1610) 2000. To Sir Edward Herbert, at Juliers. In John Donne: The Major Works, ed. John Carey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erasmus, Desiderius. (1513) 1997. The Education of a Christian Prince. Translated by Neil M. Cheshire and Michael J. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feerik, Jean E., and Vin Nardizzi, eds. 2012. The Indistinct Human in Renaissance Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fudge, Erica. 2000. Perceiving Animals: Humans and Beasts in Early Modern English Culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
———. 2006. Brutal Reasoning: Humans, Rationality and Humanity in Early Modern Thought. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
———. 2013. The animal face of early modern England. Theory, Culture and Society 30 (7): 177–198.
Gascoigne, George. 1576. A Delicate Diet, for Daintiemouthde Droonkardes. London: Richard Jhones.
Greenblatt, Stephen J. 1976. The false ending in Volpone. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 75: 90–104.
Harrison, Peter. 1998a. Reading the passions: The fall, the passions, and dominion over nature. In The Soft Underbelly of Reason: The Passions in the Seventeenth Century, ed. Steven Gaukroger, 49–78. London and New York: Routledge.
———. 1998b. The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herbert, George. (1633) 2015. Providence. In George Herbert: The Complete Poetry, ed. John Drury and Victoria Moul, 111–115. London: Penguin.
Höfele, Andreas. 2011. Stage, Stake and Scaffold: Humans and Animals in Shakespeare’s Theatre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jonson, Ben. (1606) 1999. Volpone. Edited by Brian Parker and David Bevington. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kurke, Leslie. 2011. Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Mann, Jill. 2009. From Aesop to Reynard: Beast Literature in Medieval Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McHugh, Susan. 2009. Animal farm’s lessons for literary (and) animal studies. Humanimalia: A Journal of Human/Animal Interface Studies 1 (1): 24–39.
Morgan, Nicholas. 1609. The Perfection of Horse-manship, drawne from Nature; Arte, and Practise. London: Edward White.
Pick, Anat. 2011. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schiesari, Juliana. 2013. Rethinking humanism: Animals and the analogic imagination in the Italian Renaissance. Shakespeare Studies 41: 54–63.
Shakespeare, William. (c.1601) 2006. Hamlet. Edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor. London: Arden.
Shannon, Laurie. 2013. The Accommodated Animal: Cosmopolity in Shakespearean Locales. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Simons, John. 2002. Animal Rights and the Politics of Literary Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Whitaker, Alexander. 1613. Good Newes from Virginia. London: F. Kyngston.
White, T.H. (1954) 1992. The Book of Beasts: Being a Translation from a Latin Bestiary of the Twelfth Century. Reprint, Stroud: Alan Sutton.
Wolfe, Cary. 2003. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
———. 2010. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fudge, E. (2023). What Can Beast Fables Do in Literary Animal Studies? Ben Jonson’s Volpone and the Prehumanist Human. In: McKay, R., McHugh, S. (eds) Animal Satire. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24872-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24872-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24871-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24872-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)