Skip to main content

A Comparison of the Use of Force by Police: New Zealand and England & Wales

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Police Use of Force
  • 525 Accesses

Abstract

The use of force by the police is a distinguishing aspect of their role. Research indicates however, that the use of force by the police is infrequent and is based on a number of factors that include the subject’s resistance to requests made by an officer and whether weapons are present at the event. This chapter examines and compares the use of force by the police in England and Wales with that of the New Zealand Police in 2017. The police in both of these countries do not routinely carry firearms, although they do have ready access to firearms. The examination found that the English and Welsh police use force more often than the New Zealand Police, but the New Zealand Police use the TASER™ more frequently than the English and Welsh police. The results of an analysis also suggest that the English and Welsh police are confronting a larger number of violent or potentially violent subjects and that the New Zealand Police are confronting lesser numbers, but more violent subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, G. & Zayed, Y. (2019, 31 July). Police service strength. Briefing paper number 00634. House of Commons Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. (1999). The force factor: Measuring and assessing police use of force and suspect resistance. In National Institute of Justice (Ed.), Use of force by the police: Overview of national and local data (pp. 45–60). National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. (2004). Understanding police use of force: Officers, suspects, and reciprocity. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ariel, B., Farrar, W., & Sutherland, A. (2015). The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(3), 509–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, D., & Garofalo, J. (1989). The management of violence by police patrol officers. Criminology, 27(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazley, T., Lersch, K., & Mieczkowski, T. (2007). Officer force versus suspect resistance: A gendered analysis of patrol officers in an urban police department. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(2), 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, E. (1970). The functions of the police in modern society. National Institute of Mental Health, Center for Studies of Crime and Delinquency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, R. (2017). Correlates of subject(ive) resistance in police use of force situations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(4), 719–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, C. (2015). Just following orders: A meta-analysis of the correlates of American police officer use of force decisions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 466–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevigny, P. (1969). Police power: Police abuses in New York city. Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, E. (1985). Police use of force: An empirical analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, R. (1980). Police use of force: Individuals, situations, and organizations. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, J., Maxwell, C., & Heraux, C. (2002). Characteristics associated with the prevalence and severity of force used by the police. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 705–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. (2018). Measurement issues in police use of force: A state-of-the-art review. Policing: An International Journal, 41(6), 844–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2018, 13 December). Police use of force statistics, England and Wales: April 2017 to March 2018. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kania, R., & Mackey, W. (1977). Police violence as a function of community characteristics. Criminology, 15(1), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klahm, C., & Tillyer, R. (2010). Understanding police use of force: A review of the evidence. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 7(2), 214–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klahm, C., Frank, J., & Liederbach, J. (2014). Understanding police of use of force: Rethinking the link between conceptualization and measurement. Policing: An international Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 37(3), 558–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, D. (1995). The micro-structure of nonlethal force: Baseline data from and observational study. Criminal Justice Review, 20(2), 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, P., Greenfeld, L., Smith, S., Durose, M., & Levin, D. (2001). Police and the public: Findings from the 1999 national survey. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langworthy, R., & Travis, L. (1999). Policing in America: A balance of forces (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. (2012). Story: Political values. Retrieved from: https://teara.govt.nz/en/political-values

  • Lindberg, D. (2012). Police use of force: A review of the literature. Criminology and Criminal Justice Senior Capstone Project. Paper 6. Retrieved from: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=ccj_capstone

  • Locker, J. (2010). New Zealand police use of force annual report 2007. New Zealand Police.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundstrom, R., & Mullan, C. (1987). The use of force: One department’s experience. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 56(1), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrofski, S., Ritti, R., & Hoffmaster, D. (1987). Organizational determinants of police discretion: The case of drinking driving. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15(5), 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, V. (1992). Police and the use of force: The Savannah study. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morabito, M., Kerr, A., Watson, A., Draine, J., Ottati, V., & Angell, B. (2012). Crisis intervention teams and people with mental illness: Exploring the factors that influence the use of force. Crime and Delinquency, 58(1), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morabito, M., Socia, K., Wik, A., & Fisher, W. (2017). The nature and extent of police use of force in encounters with people with behavioral health disorders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 50, 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Consensus Policy on Use of Force. (2017, October). National consensus policy and discussion paper on use of force. Retrieved from: https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/2018-08/National_Consensus_Policy_On_Use_Of_Force.pdf

  • National Institute of Justice. (1999). Use of force by police: Overview of national and local data. US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Justice. (2012). Police use of force. Retrieved from http://www.nij.gov/topics/law-enforcement/officer-safety/use-of-force/Pages/welcome.aspx

  • Police Executive Meeting. (2007). Tactical options report database: Activity update and resource implications. New Zealand Police.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajakaruna, N., Henry, P., Cutler, A., & Fairman, G. (2017). Ensuring the validity of police use of force training. Police Practice and Research, 18(5), 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. (1971). The police and the public. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Response and Operations: Research and Evaluation. (2018). New Zealand police annual tactical options research report #6. New Zealand Police.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, P., & Binder, A. (1983). The badge and the bullet: Police use of deadly force. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. (1980). Perspectives on police and violence. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1986). The neighborhood context of police behaviour. In A. Reiss & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime (pp. 313–341). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, P., Birkbeck, C., Adang, O., Baker, D., Feltes, T., Gabaldon, G., Haberfield, M., Machado, E., & Waddington, P. (2009). Researching the use of force: The background to the international project. Crime, Law and Social Change, 52(2), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, I., Payne, B., & Wu, Y. (2008). The impact of situational factors, officer characteristics, and neighbourhood context on police behaviour: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrill, W. (2003). Police use of force and suspect resistance: The micro process of the police-suspect encounter. Police Quarterly, 6(1), 51–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrill, W. (2009). The elusive nature of reasonableness. Criminology and Public Policy, 8(1), 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrill, W. (2014). Police coercion. In M. Reisig & R. Kane (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on police and policing (pp. 260–279). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrill, W., & Mastrofski, S. (2002). Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), 215–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrill, W., & Reisig, M. (2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(3), 291–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrill, W., Ingram, J., Somers, L., & Paoline, E. (2018). Examining police use of force and citizen complaints. Policing: An International Journal, 41(4), 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, R., Mesloh, C., Henych, M., & Thompson, F. (2009). Police use of force and the cumulative force factor. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 32(4), 739–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden, R. (1995). The ‘causes’ of police brutality: Theory and evidence on police use of force. In W. Geller & H. Toch (Eds.), And justice for all: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (pp. 31–60). Police Executive Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

den Heyer, G. (2023). A Comparison of the Use of Force by Police: New Zealand and England & Wales. In: Albrecht, J.F., den Heyer, G. (eds) Police Use of Force. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22705-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22705-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22704-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22705-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics