Abstract
This chapter considers the epistemological and theoretical foundations of critical empirical approaches in language policy and planning (LPP) research. Developments in the 1980s and 1990s reflected a broader trend in sociolinguistics, and the language sciences more generally, towards critical conceptualisations that focused on power in language, language learning, and language policy processes. This critical perspective was influential for a new generation of LPP scholars in the 2000s and 2010s. Much of this work has focused on how language policies impact educational opportunity and equity for speakers of minority languages. After the historical overview of the epistemological and theoretical foundations, this chapter considers findings from ethnographic and discourse analytic studies and the value of these contributions to the field. Finally, the chapter considers the future role of critical empirical approaches in the field of LPP. In particular, debates about agency and structure, the macro-micro dialectic as a theoretical took, and researcher positionality are considered, in the light of theoretical developments and empirical findings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agha, A. (2003). The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication 23, pp. 231–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0
Alexander, N. (1989). Language Policy and National Unity in South Africa/Azania. Cape Town: Buchu Books.
Archer, M. (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, R. (2002). Education policy and realist social theory: Primary teachers, child-centered philosophy and the new managerialism. Routledge.
Barakos, E. (2016). Language policy and governmentality in businesses in Wales: A continuum of empowerment and regulation. Multilingua, 34 (4), pp. 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0007
Barakos, E., and Unger, J. W. (Eds.). (2016). Discursive approaches to language policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bonacina, F. (2010). A conversation analytic approach to practiced language policies: The example of an induction classroom for newly-arrived immigrant children in France. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Edinburgh.
Bouchard, J., and Glasgow, G. P. (eds.) (2019). Agency in Language Policy and Planning: Critical Inquiries. London: Routledge.
Canagarajah, S., and Stanley, P. (2015). Ethical considerations in language policy research. In F. M. Hult and D. C. Johnson (eds.), Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.
Chimbutane, F. (2011). Rethinking Bilingual Education in Postcolonial Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cincotta-Segi, A. (2009). ‘The big ones swallow the small ones.’ Or do they? The language policy and practice of ethnic minority education in the Lao PDR: A case study from Nalae. Ph.D. Thesis. Canberra: The Australian National University.
Cincotta-Segi, A. (2011). ‘The big ones swallow the small ones’. Or do they? Language-in-education policy and ethnic minority education in the Lao PDR. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32 (1), pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2010.527343
Cobarrubias, J. (1983). Ethical issues in status planning. In J. Cobarrubias and J. A. Fishman (eds.), Progress in Language Planning: International Perspectives, pp. 41–86. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter & Co.
Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language Planning and Social Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London: Sage.
Davis, K. (1994). Language planning in multilingual contexts: Policies, communities, and schools in Luxembourg. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Davis, K. A. (1999). Dynamics of indigenous language maintenance. In T. Huebner and K. A. Davis (eds.), Sociopolitical Perspectives on Language Policy and Planning in the USA, pp. 67–98. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
De Costa, P. (2014). Making ethical decisions in an ethnographic study. TESOL Quarterly, 48 (2), pp. 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.163
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd Edition. Harlow, England: Pearson.
Fishman, J. A. (1994). Critiques of language planning: A minority languages perspective. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 15 (2–3), pp. 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1994.9994559
Fishman, J., Ferguson, C. A., and Das Gupta, J. (eds.) (1968). Language Problems of Developing Nations. New York: Wiley.
Flores, N., and Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85 (2), pp. 149–171.
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8 (4), pp. 777–795.
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., and Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routlege and Kegan Paul.
Freeman, R. D. (1998). Bilingual Education and Social Change. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
García, O., and Menken, K. (2010). Stirring the onion: Educators and the dynamics of language Education policies (looking ahead). In K. Menken and O. García (eds.), Negotiating Language Policies in Schools: Educators as Policymakers, pp. 249–261. London and New York: Routledge.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. New York: Pearson.
Gorton, M. (2000). Overcoming the structure–agency divide in small business research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 6 (5), pp. 276–292.
Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. In A. S. Dil (ed.), The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen, pp. 325–339. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hill, R., and May, S. (2011). Exploring biliteracy in Māori-medium education: An ethnographic perspective. In. T. L. McCarty (ed.), Ethnography and Language Policy, pp. 161–183. New York: Routledge.
Hornberger, N. H. (1988). Bilingual Education and Language Maintenance. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.
Hornberger, N. H., and Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41 (3), pp. 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00083.x
Hult, F. M. (2007). Multilingual Language Policy and English Language Teaching in Sweden. Ph.D. Thesis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Hult, F. M. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, pp. 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2010.011
Hymes, D. (1964). Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist, 66 (6), pp. 1–34.
Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8 (2), pp. 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-009-9136-9
Johnson, D. C. (2012). Positioning the language policy arbiter: Governmentality and footing in the School District of Philadelphia. In J.W. Tollefson (ed.), Language Policies in Education: Critical Issues (2nd Edition). London and New York: Routledge.
Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy, 14 (3), pp. 221–243.
Johnson, D. C., and Ricento, T. (2013). Conceptual and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning: Situating the ethnography of language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, pp. 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2013-0002
Johnson, D. C., and Vernon, A. (forthcoming). Structure and agency in educational language policy. In F. Hult and B. Spolsky (eds.), Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Malden: Wiley.
Kaplan, R. B., Baldauf Jr., R. B., Liddicoat, A., Bryant, P., Barbaux, M.-T., and Pütz, M. (2000). Current issues in language planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 1 (1), pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200008668003
Karlsen, S., and Nazroo, J. Y. (2002). Agency and structure: The impact of ethnic identity and racism on the health of ethnic minority people. Sociology of Health and Illness, 24 (1), pp. 1–20.
King, K. A. (2001). Language Revitalization Processes and Prospects: Quichua in the Ecuadorian Andes. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Labov, W. (1982). Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society, 11 (2), pp. 165–201.
Leibowitz, A. H. (1984). The official character of language in the United States: Literacy requirements for immigration, citizenship, and entrance into American life. Aztlan, 15 (1), pp. 25–70.
Levinson, B. A. U., and Sutton, M. (2001). Introduction: Policy as/in practice—A sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy. In B. A. U. Levinson and M. Sutton (eds.), Policy as Practice: Toward a Sociocultural Analysis of Educational Policy, pp. 1–22. London: Ablex Publishing.
Liddicoat, A. J., and Taylor-Leech, K. (2021). Agency in language planning and policy. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22 (1–2), pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1791533
Lin, A. M. Y. (2015). Researcher positionality. In F. M. Hult and D. C. Johnson (eds.), Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide. Malden: Wiley.
Madison, D. S. (2012). Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
McCarty, T. (2002). A Place to be Navajo: Rough Rock and the Struggle for Self-Determination in Indigenous Schooling. London: Routledge.
McLaughlin, P., and Dietz, T. (2008). Structure, agency and environment: Toward an integrated perspective on vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 18 (1), pp. 99–111.
Menken, K. (2008). English Learners Left Behind: Standardized Testing as Language Policy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Menken, K., and García, O. (eds.) (2010). Negotiating Language Policies in Schools: Educators as Policymakers. New York: Routledge.
Mill, J. S. (1866). August Comte and Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mortimer, K. (2013). Communicative event chains in an ethnography of Paraguayan language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, pp. 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2013-0005
Mortimer, K., and Wortham, S. (2015). Analyzing language policy and social identification across Heterogeneous scales. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, pp. 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000269
Pérez-Milans, M. (2012). Beyond ‘safe-talk’: Institutionalization and agency in China’s English language education. Linguistics and Education, 23, pp. 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.11.001
Proietti, M., Pickston, A., Graffitti, F., Barrow, P., Kundys, D., Branciard, C., Ringbauer, M., and Fedrizzi, A. (2019). Experimental test of local observer independence. Science Advances, 5, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw9832
Ramanathan, V. (2006). Of texts and translations and rhizomes: Postcolonial anxieties and deracinations and knowledge constructions. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 3 (4), pp. 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427587clis0304_2
Ramanathan, V. (2011). Researching-texting tensions in qualitative research: Ethics in and around textual fidelity, selectivity, and translations. In. T. McCarty (ed.), Ethnography and Language Policy, pp. 255–270. New York and London: Routledge.
Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4 (2), pp. 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00111
Ricento, T., and Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30 (3), pp. 401–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587691
Rickford, J. R. (1999). The Ebonics controversy in my backyard: A sociolinguist’s experiences and reflections. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3 (2), pp. 267–275.
Roman, L. G. (1993). Double exposure: The politics of feminist materialist ethnography. Educational Theory, 43 (3), pp. 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1993.00279.x
Rubin, J. and Jernudd, B. H. (eds.) (1971). Can Language be Planned? Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice for Developing Nations. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.
Rubin, J., Jernudd, B. H., Das Gupta, J., Fishman, J. A., and Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Language Planning Processes. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8 (2), pp. 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 (4), pp. 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
Savski, K. (2020). Local problems and a global solution: Examining the recontextualization of CEFR in Thai and Malaysian language policies. Language Policy, 19 (4), pp. 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-019-09539-8
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spolsky and Shohamy. (2002). Editorial. Language Policy, 1, pp. 1–2.
Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community. London: Longman.
Tollefson, J. W. (2002). Introduction: Critical issues in educational language policy. In J. W. Tollefson (ed.), Language Policies in Education: Critical Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (ed.), An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method, pp. 42–59. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Tollefson, J. W. (2012). Language policy in a time of crisis and transformation. In J. W. Tollefson (ed.), Language Policies in Education: Critical Issues (2nd Edition), pp. 11–32. London and New York: Routledge.
Wiley, T. (1999). Comparative historical analysis of U.S. language policy and language planning: Extending the foundations. In T. Huebner and K. A. Davis (eds.), Sociopolitical Perspectives on Language Policy and Planning in the USA. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.
Wortham, S. (2005). Socialization beyond the speech event. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15 (1), pp. 95–112.
Wortham, S., and Reyes, A. (2015). Discourse Analysis Beyond the Speech Event. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnson, D.C. (2023). Critical Empirical Approaches in Language Policy and Planning. In: Epistemological and Theoretical Foundations in Language Policy and Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22315-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22315-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22314-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22315-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)