Skip to main content

Early CSS Innovations in Risk Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Safety and Security Science and Technology
  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter summarizes innovations in security risk and capability assessment frameworks and methodologies to directly support dynamic decision making, forge a convergence with S&T, operations, intelligence and policy, and inform investment priorities of the Canadian Safety and Security Program (CSSP). Using a thematic approach, this paper reviews how multiple innovations were adopted as “best practices” into the conceptual design, development and implementation of security risk assessment frameworks and methodologies in the CSSP. These include the: use taxonomies to foster key stakeholder ‘buy in’; leveraging architecture frameworks to drive tools, methods and rating schema; the formulation of scenario based approaches for assessing high consequence all hazards risks; and, the application of an integrated risk and capability gap assessment model to guide investment in public safety and security S&T. In the CSSP, the innovations in security risk assessment identified best practices and common tools that supported numerous strategies and S&T portfolios (e.g., CBRNE, Critical Infrastructure Protection, all hazards safety and security; defence infrastructure/military bases), where risk assessment expertise/capability improvements that were adopted by practitioners, interdisciplinary teams and decision makers. Underpinning these innovations were strong partnerships and community-based approaches that enabled a credible risk-informed decision support environment, with consistent/scalable approaches to analysis and decision making under conditions of uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hales (2016).

  2. 2.

    Friesen (2017).

  3. 3.

    Treasury Board Submission, February 21, 2012.

  4. 4.

    Department of National Defence/Canadian Armed Forces (DND/CAF) 2016–17 Report on Plans and Priorities (Ottawa: Department of National Defence, 2016), p. 50.

  5. 5.

    Treasury Board Submission, February 21, 2012, pp. 24–25.

  6. 6.

    Douglas (2006).

  7. 7.

    Goudreau (2009).

  8. 8.

    Chouinard et al. (2016).

  9. 9.

    Friesen et al. (2015).

  10. 10.

    Gratt (1989).

  11. 11.

    Personal correspondence Alain Goudreau.

  12. 12.

    Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) (2004).

  13. 13.

    There are guidelines that are kept on the Public Safety Canada website and can be accessed at: https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ll-hzrds-ssssmnt/index-en.aspx.

  14. 14.

    Lambe (2007).

  15. 15.

    For discussion, see: Bayne et al. (2013)

  16. 16.

    Verga (2007).

  17. 17.

    Verga (2012, p. 6).

  18. 18.

    See “Glossary of Terms,” QualiWare Center of Excellence. Accessed May 2022: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwikvJKN3sj3AhXCkIkEHbYyBSsQFnoECAgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoe.qualiware.com%2Fresources%2Fea3%2Fanintroductiontoea%2Fglossary-and-abbreviation-list%2F&usg=AOvVaw2v2-_pJWagqwtHsW0ZzN6-

  19. 19.

    DAOD 2011-0, Enterprise Architecture. Accessed May, 2022: https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/policies-standards/defence-administrative-orders-directives/2000-series/2011/2011-0-enterprise-architecture.html.

  20. 20.

    Friesen (2016).

  21. 21.

    Dube (2017).

  22. 22.

    Joyce (2010, p. ii).

  23. 23.

    Alexander (2000).

  24. 24.

    Hales and Race (2010).

  25. 25.

    S. K. Friesen, op cit.

  26. 26.

    See, Verga and Chouinard (2013).

  27. 27.

    See Baingo and Friesen (2020).

  28. 28.

    For discussion, see: I. Bayne, et al.

  29. 29.

    Giroux and Friesen (2014).

  30. 30.

    Friesen et al. (2013a).

  31. 31.

    The Technical Cooperation, JSA TP 3 (2003).

  32. 32.

    Goudreau et al. (2012).

  33. 33.

    For discussion, see: Hales and Chouinard (2011).

  34. 34.

    Defence Research and Development Canada (2013).

  35. 35.

    Friesen et al. (2013b)

  36. 36.

    Goudreau et al. (2012b).

  37. 37.

    Friesen (2020).

  38. 38.

    Hales et al. (2013).

References

  • Alexander D (2000) Scenario methodology for teaching principles of emergency management. In: Disaster prevention and management, vol 9, no 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Baingo D, Friesen SK (2020) Threat risk assessment implementation project: a summary of the methodology supporting the physical security of Canadian armed forces. Department of National Defense (CAF/DND) Infrastructure, DRDC-RDDC-2020-L226

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayne I, Duncan J, Mills B, Friesen SK, Goudreau A (2013) The federal all hazards risk assessment framework body of knowledge, vol 1: establishing an information baseline and way forward. DRDC CSS TR 2013-014

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouinard P, Masys A, Hales AD (2016) National critical infrastructure interdependency model: Way ahead. Defence Research and Development Canada, Centre for Security Science, Ottawa ON (CAN), DRDC-RDDC-2016-B010. Report date: 26 Apr 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) (2004) Enterprise risk management—Integrated framework executive summary

    Google Scholar 

  • Defence Research and Development Canada (2013) Regional capability-based planning methodology guidelines. Center for Security Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr. Douglas AJ (2006) Quantification issues in the consolidated risk assessment. In: Internal working paper 2006/AJD1. Operational Research Team, DRDD CSS Ottawa (Unpublished manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube G (2017) Architecture contribution to risk and evidence informed decision making within the Canadian safety and security program (CSSP) (U). DRDC Contract Report (CR) DRDC-RDDC-2017-C085

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen SK (2016) National risk profile architecture development (U). DRDC CSS Reference Document, DRDC-RDDC-2016-D069

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen SK (2017) The chemical, biological, radiological/nuclear explosive (CBRNE) consolidated risk assessment (CRA) rating tool guide (U). DRDC Reference Document, DRDC-RDDC-2017-D001

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen SK, Giroux G, Villeneuve A (2013a) Overview of the federal all hazards risk assessment (AHRA) automated application and capability assessment management system (CAMS) (U). DRDC CSS Technical Note TN 2013a-031

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen SK, Giroux G, Villeneuve A (2013b) Overview of the all hazard risk assessment (AHRA) automated application and capability assessment management system (CAMS). DRDC CSS TN 2013-031

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen SK, Bayne I, Donovan IR (2015) Developing a money laundering & terrorist financing risk assessment framework in Canada. Centre for Security Science Support for the process and methodology. Defence Research and Development Canada, Centre for Security Science, Ottawa ON, DRDC-RDDC-2015-R037

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen SK (2020) Incorporating a capability-based investment model to the emerging risk matrix for public safety. DRDC-RDDC-2020-B028

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux G, Friesen SK (2014) All hazards risk assessment transition project: report on capability assessment management system (CAMS) automation. DRDC-RDDC-2014-C35

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudreau A (2009) Section head—Risk assessment & capability integration risk assessment & capability integration, CAFC visit—01 April 2009, unclassified presentation

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudreau A, Chouinard P, Friesen SK (2012a) Capability-based model for public safety and security (U). Presentation to Public Safety Canada Executives, Ottawa, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudreau A, Chouinard P, Friesen SK (2012b) Capability based investment model for public safety and security. Unclassified presentation to Public Safety Canada, Ottawa ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratt LB, Chairman IWG Corporation (1989) The definition of risk and associated terminology for risk analysis. Prepared by the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) Committee for Definitions, San Diego, CA. https://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-5682-0_73?noAccess=true. Accessed May 2022

  • Hales D (2016) Emergent best practices in national risk assessment practices and process (U). DRDC Contract Report (CR) DRDC-RDDC-2016-C325

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales D, Race P (2010) Public security technical program planning scenario: final report. Defence R&D Canada, Centre for Security Science DRDC CSS CR 2010-10

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales D, Chouinard P (2011) Implementing capability based planning within the public safety and security sector: Lessons from the defence experience. Defence R&D Canada, Centre for Security Science, Technical Memorandum, DRDC CSS TM 2011-26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales D, Avis P, Friesen SK (2022). Exercise perseverance: capability assessment table top exercise after action report. DRDC CSS Technical Report TR2013-010. Accessed May 2022. http://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc140/p538062_A1b.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2016

  • Joyce H (2010) Thoughts on AHRA requirements and architecture. Unpublished Technical Note

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambe P (2007) Organising knowledge: taxonomies, knowledge and organisational effectiveness. Chandos Publishing, Oxford (quoted from Verga 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • The Technical Cooperation, JSA TP 3 (2003) Guide to capability-based planning, p 11. Accessed May 2022. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjfu7bR68j3AhWDPM0KHUqVCzsQFnoECBAQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hsdl.org%2F%3Fview%26did%3D461818&usg=AOvVaw0mEo50UcVl9NBcDponvgrD

    Google Scholar 

  • Verga S (2007) Intelligence experts group all-hazards risk assessment lexicon. DRDC-CSS-N-2007-001

    Google Scholar 

  • Verga (2012) A holistic, cross-government all hazards risk assessment. Defence Research and Development Canada, Centre for Security Science (DRDC CSS), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2012. Accessed May 2022. D69-26-2013-eng.pdf(publications.gc.ca)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verga S, Chouinard SP (2013) Preliminary results of the consolidated risk assessment to inform capability based planning in support of emergency planning for the Metro-Vancouver region. Defence R&D Canada, Centre for Security Science, Ottawa ONT (CAN), DRDC-CSS-LR-2013-047

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaye K. Friesen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Crown

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Friesen, S.K. (2023). Early CSS Innovations in Risk Analysis. In: Masys, A.J. (eds) Safety and Security Science and Technology. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21530-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics