Abstract
Large-scale curriculum reforms are a central tool for developing education. A precondition for achieving reform goals is that those who are involved and affected by them, that is, the reform stakeholders, have sufficiently coherent and shared understanding of what needs to be changed and the direction in which the change should be steered. In this chapter, we propose a theoretical model of a shared and coherent theory of change in terms of curriculum and synthetize the results of a multimethod longitudinal systemic research project on the construction of the theory of change in the national core curriculum reform at state, district, and school levels in Finland. Results concerning the educational stakeholders’ theories of change as well as strategies they used to shape it are discussed in the light of the proposed model. Finally, we will conclude with providing a set of practical implications based on the synthesis and the proposed model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cantell, H. (2016). Sanotaanko oppiaineille hyvästit? Näkökulmia monialaisesta oppimisesta ja opetuksesta. In H. Cantell & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Kansankynttilä keinulaudalla (pp. 153–169). PS-kustannus.
Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sense-making: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hightower, A. M., Husbands, J. L., LaFors, J. R., Young, V. M., & Christopher, C. (2006). Building instructional quality: “Inside-out” and “outside-in” perspectives on San Diego’s school reform. In A. Harris & J. H. Chrispeels (Eds.), Improving schools and educational systems (pp. 129–185). Routledge.
Datnow, A., & Stringfield, S. (2000). Working together for reliable school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5(1–2), 183–204.
Deng, Z. (2012). School subjects and academic disciplines: The differences. In A. Luke, K. Weir, A. Woods, & M. Moroney (Eds.), Curriculum, syllabus design and equity: A primer and model (pp. 40–73). Routledge.
Desimone, L. (2006). Consider the source response differences among teachers, principals, and districts on survey questions about their education policy environment. Educational Policy, 20(4), 640–676.
Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486–516). Macmillan.
Finnish National Board of Education. (2014). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Publications 2016:5. Finnish National Board of Education.
Fullan, M. G. (1996). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(6), 420–423.
Fullan, M. G. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Goodlad, J. I. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. McGraw Hill.
Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (Eds.). (2009). Second international handbook of educational change. Springer.
Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice (6th ed.). SAGE.
Kivioja, A., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2018). Mikä on keskeistä hyvässä opetussuunnitelmaprosessissa? Kasvatus, 49(4), 310–325.
Lähdemäki, J. (2019). Case study: The Finnish national curriculum 2016—A co-created national education policy. In J. Cook (Ed.), Sustainability, human well-being, and the future of education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78580-6_13
Lasky, S., Datnow, A., & Stringfield, S. (2005). Linkages between federal, state and local levels in educational reform. In N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood, & D. Livingstone (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy (pp. 239–259). Springer.
Lingard, B. (2021). National curriculum making as more or less expressions of and responses to globalization. In M. Priestley, D. Alvunger, S. Philippou, & T. Soini (Eds.), Curriculum making in Europe: Policy and practice within and across diverse contexts (pp. 29–52). Emerald.
Ng, S. W. (2009). Why did principals and teachers respond differently to curriculum reform? Teacher Development, 13(3), 187–203.
Niemi, H. (2015). Teacher effectiveness in the European context with a special reference to Finland. In O. Tan & W. Liu (Eds.), Teacher effectiveness: Capacity building in a complex learning era (pp. 51–78). Cengage Learning.
OECD. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive summary. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
Palomäki, A., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2019). Reaching for a new culture of learning in schools – District-level work on the curriculum reform in Finland. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 5(2), 916–935.
Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2017). Large-scale curriculum reform in Finland – Exploring the interrelation between implementation strategy, the function of the reform, and curriculum coherence. The Curriculum Journal, 28(1), 22–40.
Priestley, M., Philippou, S., Alvunger, D., & Soini, T. (2021). Curriculum making: A conceptual framing. In M. Priestley, D. Alvunger, S. Philippou, & T. Soini (Eds.), Curriculum making in Europe: Policy and practice within and across diverse contexts (pp. 1–28). Emerald.
Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2018). Dynamic and shared sense-making in large-scale curriculum reform in school districts. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 181–200.
Salonen-Hakomäki, S., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2016). The way ahead for Finnish comprehensive school? Examining state-level school administrators’ theory of change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 671–691.
Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). Shared sense making strategies in curriculum reform: District level perspective. Improving Schools, 21(2), 111–126.
Soini, T., Pyhältö, K., & Pietarinen, J. (2021). Shared sense-making as key for large scale curriculum reform in Finland. In M. Priestley, D. Alvunger, S. Philippou, & T. Soini (Eds.), Curriculum making in Europe. Policy and practice within and across diverse contexts. Emerald.
Spillane, J. P. (1998). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 33–63.
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.
Sullanmaa, J., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2019a). Curriculum coherence as perceived by district-level stakeholders in large-scale national curriculum reform in Finland. The Curriculum Journal, 30(3), 244–263.
Sullanmaa, J., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2019b). Differences in state- and district-level stakeholders’ perceptions of curriculum coherence and school impact in national curriculum reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 210–226.
Sullanmaa, J., Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Pietarinen, J. (2019c). Trajectories of teachers’ perceived curriculum coherence in the context of Finnish core curriculum reform. Curriculum and Teaching, 34(2), 27–49.
Thijs, A., & van den Akker, J. (2009). Curriculum in development. SLO.
Tian, M., & Risku, M. (2019). A distributed leadership perspective on the Finnish curriculum reform 2014. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 229–244.
Timperley, H., & Parr, J. (2005). Theory competition and the process of change. Journal of Educational Change, 6(3), 227–251.
Venäläinen, S., Saarinen, J., Johnson, P., Cantell, H., Jakobsson, G., Koivisto, P., Routti, M., Väänänen, J., Huhtanen, M., Kauppinen, L., & Viitala, M. (2020). Näkymiä OPS-matkan varrelta: Esi- ja perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelmien perusteiden 2014 toimeenpanon arviointi. Publications No. 5:2020. Finnish Education Evaluation Centre. Retrieved from: https://karvi.fi/publication/nakymia-ops-matkan-varrelta-esi-ja-perusopetuksen-opetussuunnitelmien-perusteiden-2014-toimeenpanon-arviointi/
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sense-making. Organization Science, 16, 409–421.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sullanmaa, J., Tikkanen, L., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K. (2024). Building Shared and Coherent Theory of Change: Lessons Learned from Finnish Core Curriculum Reform. In: Trifonas, P.P., Jagger, S. (eds) Handbook of Curriculum Theory, Research, and Practice. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21155-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21155-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21154-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21155-3
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education