Abstract
In the last decade, the development of a wide European Union approach to urban policy has reached a stronger stage of consolidation. However, the accomplishments of the EU Urban Agenda are highly dependent on decentralised styles of territorial governance, and domestic contexts can be detrimental of some of the intended changes. In Portugal, the European Cohesion Policy has been catalyst of important changes in public subregional governance, strengthening the role of intermunicipal coordination. Still, in the ongoing programming cycle, Territorial Pacts as chief instruments of Cohesion Policy delivering, at this level, coexist with municipal urban policy financing schemes (via municipal Strategic Plans of Urban Sustainable Development (PEDU), with a noticeable lack of coordination between them. If, as recognised, the enveloping of funds through Territorial Pacts has given preponderance to contractual relations over strategic planning exercises at intermunicipal level, the missing link with municipal strategic plans is eventually curtailing the potential of strategic territorial coordination at the subregional scale. The chapter addresses these issues by deepening the debate on relevant dimensions of subnational governance and by exploring the results so far produced by the PEDU’s financing scheme in the Centro Region of Portugal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This can be implemented through the so-called mainstream approaches (i.e., similar to other ESF Funds), a separate OP or a separate mixed priority axis, or through an ITI.
- 2.
PI 4.3 aims to promote energy efficiency and renewable energy use in public buildings and infrastructure.
- 3.
Dispatch 23,021/2007, of October 4, from the Office of the Secretary of State for Spatial Planning and Cities.
References
Atkinson, R. (2015). The urban dimension in cohesion policy: Past developments and future prospects. European Structural & Investment Funds Journal, 3(1), 21–31.
Bachtler, J., Berkowitz, P., Hardy, S., & Muravska, T. (2016). Introduction: Reassessing the performance and direction of EU Cohesion Policy in 2014–20. In J. Bachtler, P. Berkowitz, S. Hardy, & T. Muravska (Eds.), EU Cohesion Policy: Reassessing performance and direction (pp. 1–8). Routledge.
Bähr, C. (2008). How does sub-national autonomy affect the effectiveness of structural funds? Kyklos, 61(1), 3–18.
Baker, M., & Wong, C. (2013). The delusion of strategic spatial planning: What’s left after the Labour government’s English regional experiment? Planning Practice & Research, 28(1), 83–103.
Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. European Communities Brussels.
Campos, V. and Ferrão, J. (2015). O ordenamento do território em Portugal: uma perspectiva genealógica. ICS Working Papers.
Cavaco, C., Florentino, R., and Pagliuso, A. (2020). Urban policies in Portugal. In S. Armondi & S. D. G. Hurtado (Eds.), Foregrounding urban agendas. The new urban. The new urban issue in European experiences of policy-making (pp. 49–73). Springer.
Chamusca, P. (2021). Urban planning and policy in Portugal: an overview on the role of EU funds and guidelines. Urban Research & Practice, 1–22.
Cotella, G. (2019). The urban dimension of EU cohesion policy. In Territorial Cohesion (pp. 133–151). Springer.
DGT. (2015). Cidades Sustentáveis 2020 - Apuramento e ponderação dos resultados da consulta pública.
EC. (2015). Territorial agenda 2020 put in practice—enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of Cohesion Policy by a place-based approach. European Commission.
Faludi, A. (2016). EU territorial cohesion, a contradiction in terms. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(2), 302–313.
Ferreira, D. (2020). Espaço, justiça e políticas públicas: análise da Política POLIS XXI numa perspetiva de justiça espacial. Universidade de Lisboa.
Iese and Quaternair Portugal. (2010). Avaliação Global da Implementação do QREN (2007–2013)—Relatório Final. 30 de Agosto de 2010. Lisboa.
Igreja, J. and Conceição, P. (2021). The influence of EU policy on local governance and urban change. Evidence from Porto, Portugal. Urban Research & Practice, 14(4), 372–396.
Kroll, H. (2016). The policy challenge in smart specialisation: A common approach meets European diversity. In J. Bachtler, P. Berkowitz, S. Hardy, & T. Muravska (Eds.), EU Cohesion Policy: Reassessing Performance and Direction (pp. 115–126). Routledge.
Magone, J. (2006). The europeanization of Portugal (1986–2006). A Critical View. Nação e Defesa, 115(3), 9–28.
Marinetto, M. (2003). Governing beyond the Centre: A critique of the Anglo-Governance School. Political Studies, 51(3), 592–608.
McCann, P. (2015). The regional and urban policy of the European Union: Cohesion, results-orientation and smart specialisation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Medeiros, E., & Van Der Zwet, A. (2020). Evaluating integrated sustainable urban development strategies: A methodological framework applied in Portugal. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 563–582.
Nogueira, F.,Borges, M., and Wolf, J.-H. (2017). Collaborative decision-making in non-formal planning settings. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(5).
Polverari, L. and Bachtler, J. (2005). The contribution of European structural funds to territorial cohesion. The Town Planning Review, 76(1), 29–42.
Purkarthofer, E. and Humer, A. (2019). City-regional policies in the planning systems of Finland and Austria: National initiatives and European opportunities. Belgeo. Revue Belge de Géographie, (2).
Rio Fernandes, J. A., Teles, F., Chamusca, P., & Seixas, J. (2020). The power of the cities and the power in the cities: A multiscale perspective from Portugal. Boletín De La Asociación De Geógrafos Españoles, 87, 10.
Rosa, F. (2018). O Desenvolvimento Urbano Sustentável na Política de Coesão. Coleção Políticas and Territórios (Vol. No. WP02).
Rosa Pires, A. (2001). Breaking the ties with the master plan: Spatial strategic plans in Portugal. In L. Albrechts, J. Alden, & A. Rosa Pires (Eds.), The changing institutional landscape of planning (pp. 181–204). Ashgate.
Sielker, F. (2018). European spatial governance–towards a sectoralisation of spatial planning. Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law., 10(2), 126–139.
Sielker, F., Rauhut, D., & Humer, A. (2021). EU Cohesion Policy and European spatial governance: An introduction to territorial, economic and social challenges. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Silva, S. and Gonçalves, F. (2019). As recentes reformas do poder local em Portugal: Pretexto para uma reflexão sobre a autonomia local no século XXI. Revista Iberoamericana de Gobierno Local, (14).
Swianiewicz, P., Atkinson, R., and Baucz, A. (2011). Background report on the urban dimension of the Cohesion Policy post 2013. Informe Solicitado Por La Presidencia Polaca de La UE.
Teles, F. (2016). Local governance and intermunicipal cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tosics, I. (2016). Integrated territorial investment. A missed opportunity? In J. Bachtler, P. Berkowitz, S. Hardy, & T. Muravska (Eds.), EU Cohesion Policy: Reassessing performance and direction (pp. 284–296). Routledge.
Zwet, A. van der and Ferry, M. (2019). Integrated sustainable urban development strategies in the European union: Added value and challenges. In Territorial Cohesion (pp. 111–129). Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nogueira, F. (2023). European Urban Agenda: The Predicaments of Decentralised Coordinative Action. In: Teles, F., Rodrigues, C., Ramos, F., Botelho, A. (eds) Territorial Innovation in Less Developed Regions. Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20577-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20577-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20576-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20577-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)