Abstract
This chapter examines the systemic tolerance of violence against women through qualitative interviews with professionals working in socio-legal settings in Singapore. We examine criminal justice and welfare professionals’ beliefs about the veracity of sexual assault claims at various stages of the investigative and victim support process. Our data reveals that different forms of sexual violence claims are rendered valid or invalid, “to-be-taken-seriously” or not, according to a series of gendered myths and stereotypes. Institutional routines and practices operate according to a set of assumptions regarding which accounts of sexual violence are endorsed because of which type of accounts are likely to succeed in court. This has two implications: firstly, victim accounts are continually interrogated to see whether they are believable and robust (i.e. whether their accounts are likely to “stand up” in court); and secondly, the principle of consent vis-à-vis the accounts given comes under considerable scrutiny. Crucially, this chapter argues that these socio-legal gendering modalities underpin a systemic tolerance of violence which, in the Singapore case, supports a particular regime of gender inequality. Challenging the structures of domination that underpin reproduction regimes and gender inequality are more likely to successfully transform the landscape on sexual violence than women’s “protection” in legalistic or criminal justice interventions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bucher, J. and M. Manasse. 2011. When Screams Are Not Released: A Study of Communication and Consent in Acquaintance Rape Situations. Women & Criminal Justice, 21 (2): 123–140.
Estrich, Susan. 1987. Real Rape. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Federici, Silvia. 2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. Autonomedia.
Fraser, N. 2016. Contradiction of Capital and Care. New Left Review 100.
Ganapathy, Narayanan. 2008. Policing Marital Violence in Singapore. Leiden: Brill.
Gunby, Clare, Anna Carline, and Caryl Beynon. 2012. Regretting it After? Focus Group Perspectives on Alcohol Consumption, Nonconsensual Sex and False Allegations of Rape. Social and Legal Studies 22 (1): 87–106.
Jessop, Bob. 2004. The Gender Selectivities of the State: A Critical Realist Analysis. Journal of Critical Realism 3 (2): 207–237.
Jordan, Jan. 2004. Beyond belief? Police, rape and women’s credibility. Criminal Justice 4 (1): 29–59.
Kelly, Liz. 2010. The (In)credible Words of Women: False Allegations in European Rape Research. Violence against Women 16 (12): 1345–1355.
Kelly, Liz, Jo Lovett, and Linda Regan. 2005. A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. London, England: Home Office.
Naffine. 2003. Who are Law’s Persons? From Cheshire Cats to Responsible Subjects. Modern Law Review, 66 (3): 317–490.
Oswin, Natalie. 2014. Queer time in global city Singapore: Neoliberal futures and the ‘freedom to love.’ Sexualities 17 (4): 412–433.
Pateman, C. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Quinlan, Andrea. 2016. Suspect Survivors: Police Investigation Practices in Sexual Assault Cases in Ontario, Canada. Women & Criminal Justice 26 (4): 301–318.
Radics, George. 2015. Section 377A in Singapore and the (De)Criminalization of Homosexuality. Reconstruction 15 (2): 1–29.
Rumney, Philip. 2006. False allegations of rape. Cambridge Law Journal 65 (1): 128–158.
Salehin, Ahmad, and Laura Vitis. 2019. Cruising, space and surveillance: Decolonizing sexuality in Singapore. Globalizations 17 (7): 1225–1240.
Saunders, C.L. 2012. The Truth, The Half-Truth, and Nothing Like the Truth: Reconceptualizing False Allegations of Rape. The British Journal of Criminology, 52 (6): 1152–1171.
Smart, C. 1992. The Woman of Legal Discourse. Social & Legal Studies, 1: 29–44.
Smart, C. 1993. Proscription, Prescription and the Desire for Certainty?: Feminist Theory in the Field of Law. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 13: 37–54.
Teo, Youyenn. 2009. Gender Disarmed: How Gendered Policies Produce Gender‐Neutral Politics in Singapore. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 34 (3): 533–558.
Teo, Youyenn. 2010. Shaping the Singapore family, producing the state and society. Economy and Society 39 (3): 337–359.
Teo, Youyenn. 2011. Neoliberal morality in Singapore: How family policies make state and society. New York, NY: Routledge.
Vogel, Lise. 2013. Marxism and the Oppression of Women. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Wheatcroft, Jacqueline M., and Sandra Walklate. 2014. Thinking differently about ‘False Allegations’ in Cases of Rape: The Search for Truth. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 3: 239–248.
Wong, Theresa, and Brenda S.A. Yeoh. 2003. Fertility and the Family: An Overview of Pro-natalist Population Policies in Singapore. Asian MetaCentre for Population and Sustainable Development Analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greener, J., Ooi, S. (2023). “Truth” and “Consent” in Sexual Violence Reporting in Criminal Justice and Legal Contexts in Singapore. In: Radics, G.B., Ciocchini, P. (eds) Criminal Legalities and Minorities in the Global South. Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17918-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17918-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17917-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17918-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)