Keywords:

1 Introduction

The popularity of laser-based directed energy deposition (DED) additive manufacturing is rapidly being increased, thanks to their capability of generating complex parts, which are hard to be accomplished using conventional manufacturing methods, as well as being occupied for repairing corroded or cracked surfaces, which increase the life-time high-value tools and dies [1].

Many researchers have exerted considerable efforts to characterize the influence of layer thickness upon the geometrical properties of DED processed structure. Mazumder et al. [2] found that the increase of layer thickness resulted in a rougher wall surface. In addition, Craig et al. [3] demonstrated that overbuilding of the proposed height was observed using a finer layer thickness, while using coarser layer thickness can lead to underbuilding.

2 Experimental

In this work, the laser DED technique was used to deposit AISI D2 tool steel powder onto a substrate of the same material. A detailed description for the experimental setup for the DED system, (i.e., process parameters and the dimensions of DED processed parts) is illustrated in Table 1. Three different layer thicknesses, with values of 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mm, were used for samples D1, D2, and D4, respectively, while the other process parameters were kept at constant values, as listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Set of process parameters.

The dimensional accuracy was evaluated using both a manual technique, using calipers, and a computational method, using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). CLSM was also used to examine the top and side surfaces roughness of the DED processed specimens.

3 Results

3.1 Dimensional Accuracy

The relation between height error and layer thickness is presented in Fig. 1. It was found that the use of lower layer thicknesses led to higher height error. This arose because of the deposition of a higher number of layers when using lower thickness, which ultimately leads to a greater degree of overbuilding (the as-printed height is higher than the designed one).

Fig. 1.
A bar graph of the height error in millimeters versus D 1, D 2, and D 3. The highest point is around 3.2 on D 1. The lowest point is around 2.2 on D 4.

Layer thickness effects upon measured height error.

3.2 Surface Roughness

As illustrated in Fig. 2, it was observed that the top surface roughness is significantly improved by decreasing the layer thickness. This could be attributed to the higher heat content at lower layer thickness, as a result of the deposition of a greater number of layers, and hence an increased number of heating cycles. This, in turn, leads to better solidification conditions which results in a reduced amount of partially adhered powder particles on the surface. However, in contrast, there was no significant trend for the impact of layer thickness upon the side surface roughness, with the minimum side surface roughness being obtained at layer thickness of 0.25 mm.

Fig. 2.
A bar graph for S a in mu meters versus D 1, D 2, and D 3. The highest, and the lowest point is around 32, 11 in D 1 for the side, top roughness.

The influence of the layer thickness upon the measured top and side surface roughness.

4 Conclusions

The present work has focused upon the effects of layer thickness upon the deposition height error and surface roughness of the DED processed samples. The following conclusions were obtained:

  • In terms of dimensional accuracy, it was found that the lower the layer thickness, the higher the height error. This arises because of the higher amount of deposited powder at lower layer thickness, compared to thicker ones.

  • The use of lower layer thickness does slightly reduce the surface roughness.