Abstract
In the business sector, digital transformation appears as a new paradigm that enables a profound transformation of business activities, processes, and models. Its relationship with SMEs has brought the academic world's attention in recent years; however, catastrophic events caused by COVID-19 impacted the development of the various world economies and thus the business sector. This article aims to assess the scientific structure of the digital transformation in SMEs, specifically when COVID-19 appeared and developed; through the Scopus database and the bibliometric software VOSviewer. The methodology used reports a systematic process comprising four phases: (i) Search Terms for the research field, (ii) Database and document selection, (iii) Database and document selection, and (iv) Analysis of the results. This last section showed the participation of 75 countries in 612 publications in a challenging environment for the SME caused by the Covid-19 continued digital transformation process focused on its business model, Industry 4.0, IoT, and Digital Innovation and Technology. This research contributes to broadening knowledge in Digital Transformation and its implications in times of pandemic.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
In recent decades, the phenomenon of digital transformation (DT) has been impacted by profound changes in almost all sectors of economies and at different organizational, operational, strategic, and management levels [1, 2]. These changes are in line with its definition, understood as the effects caused or influenced by the use of digital technology in human life in general and in organizations in particular [3, 4]. Thus shaping a new trend called Industries 4.0, related to the Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), and mobile computing [5, 6].
Digital transformation (DT) and its effects on organizations have been studied extensively due to its growing interest among academics and researchers [7]. Busulwa and colleagues find that the hotel and tourism industry has developed digital business capabilities to improve customer engagement, customer experience management, and hotel management [8]. Alenezi explores the effects of DT on various dimensions of the higher education system in its substantive functions of teaching, research, and engagement with society [9]. Vu and Hartley find that DT is the primary driver of labor productivity growth and recovery in the electricity sector in different economies [10].
Currently, companies are experiencing a disruption in their industries due to the rise of digital processes leading to a change in previously established structures and putting consolidated business models under pressure [11, 12]. Within this restructuring process, business innovation is essential in applying digital technologies to achieve the company’s goals and thus improve products, processes, and business models to create value [13, 14]. In addition, digitalization influences various business activities, namely technology acquisition and business models, and provides opportunities for collaboration between companies and building relationships with customers and employees [15, 16].
However, organizations face challenges in the digitalization process. For example, Parida and colleagues mention that the main challenge consists of value creation, delivery, and capture [17]. Furthermore, Eller and collaborators explain that Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face challenges in adopting new technologies regarding resources and management skills. However, these challenges could be overcome by developing the required skills (hard and soft), investing in digital technologies, and developing a detailed strategy and measurement plan [18]. On the other hand, Almeida, Santos, and Monteiro consider that a post-pandemic world will require creating a distance working model with high interactivity and cooperation that allow people to work in companies in another geographical area [19].
The presence of the Covid-19 pandemic has accelerated DT in society due to the rapid diffusion and application of information systems (IS) technologies and internet-based infrastructures [20]. SMEs play an essential role in the global economic context by representing approximately 90% of businesses and 40% of GDP in developing economies and generating two-thirds of the world's jobs [21]. The digital transformation had a remarkable effect on this type of company compared to other businesses due to their commercial dynamics and great importance in almost every country globally [22].
In this space, the questions arise: How has research on digital transformation in SMEs evolved during Covid-19 times? What is the intellectual structure of this field of study in Covid-19 times? This paper aims to answer these questions and thereby contribute to a better understanding of the effects of digital transformation on economies. At the same time, this study contributes to the reflection on the development of digital transformation in SMEs at the global and Latin American levels.
To achieve this purpose, we conducted a bibliometric analysis to explore the intellectual structure of this field. In this way, the characteristics and research areas of digital transformation in SMEs can be determined by quantitatively evaluating the existing academic literature [23, 24]. It also allows for identifying emerging research areas and collaboration between institutions and researchers [25]. Therefore, these analyses make it possible to evaluate the performance of scientific publications and map their structure by employing a two-dimensional network [26, 27].
The results show that the intellectual structure is related to dynamic capabilities in business model innovation—likewise, the impact of the pandemic on SMEs and their reactions. At the same time, there is abundant literature about the barriers and practices of smaller companies in their integration process to Industry 4.0, primarily through digitalization strategies for performance improvement.
The article is structured as follows. The second section develops the materials and methods, detailing the database used and the systematic data collection process. In the third section, the relevant results of this study, trends, and new lines of research. The fourth section discusses the primary relationships between the results obtained. Finally, the fifth section includes the conclusions and limitations of the study.
2 Materials and Methods
In recent years, the exploration and evaluation of scientific literature have been possible to resort to various review methods such as systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, and bibliometric analyses [23]. The latter, bibliometric analyses, provides insight into the intellectual structure of a research field by analyzing its scientific output through its performance and visualization of its structure [26, 27]. In addition, some researchers use this type of analysis to evaluate various fields of knowledge, such as management [28, 29], environment [30, 31], tourism [32, 33], and others.
This bibliometric analysis requires a systematic and rigorous process similar to systematic literature reviews to ensure its quality. These characteristics allow a four-stage methodological scheme:
2.1 Search Terms for the Research Field
Digital transformation describes the using technology that enables radical improvement in the business model, products, organizational structures, or performance [34, 35]. Under this conception, the terms: digital transformation, digital disrupt, digitalization, and digitization are the most commonly used to identify this field of study [2, 34]. When considering organizations, it is essential to analyze small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) as they play a vital role in global economic development by contributing to poverty reduction, income, and job creation, representing 90% of businesses [36, 37]. Therefore, it is necessary to explore this type of company’s various names, such as small and medium-sized businesses, small and medium enterprises, SMEs, and others [26]. Combining the terms “Digital Transformation” and “SMEs” allows for the construction of the required information base.
2.2 Database and Document Selection
Bibliometric studies require a reliable database, so Scopus was selected. The selection criteria are related to: (i) its broad coverage of publications in different areas of knowledge in terms of time and volume; (ii) high-quality standards such as CiteScore and SCImago Journal Rank; (iii) easy access to references, and (iv) data download and analysis tools [38,39,40].
The data was extracted in January 2022, using the topic search: TS ((TITLE-ABS-KEY (“digital transformation*”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“digital* disrupt*”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“digitalization”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“digitization”))) AND (((TITLE-ABS-KEY (“small business”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“medium business”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“small-sized firm”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“medium-sized firm”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“small and medium-sized business”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“SME”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“SMEs”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“small firm*”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“medium firm*”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“small enterprise*”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“medium enterprise*”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“small and medium enterprise*”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (“small and medium-sized enterprise*”)))). Resulting in 1004 records.
2.3 Selection Criteria, Data Processing, and Software Selection
The global economy and business have undergone drastic changes and devastating effects since the COVID-19 outbreak [37, 41]. For this reason, we have established the criterion of excluding the years prior to the pandemic outbreak (less than 2020) and 2022 as it is the current year. The result was 612 records. All available documents and languages are considered inclusion criteria.
The data obtained were downloaded in CSV format (comma-separated values) with bibliographic and citation information of the related scientific production (authors, titles, years, and sources, among others). This information was processed using two software packages:
-
Microsoft Excel: Allows pre-processing of data by checking outliers caused by omissions, errors, or duplication [42, 43]. Corrected for these errors, we obtained 612 records. Additionally, this software allows the analysis of the performance of various units of analysis such as authors, countries, and documents [27].
-
VOSviewer: Software that allows the visualization of the intellectual structure of the field of study by constructing a two-dimensional bibliometric network [44]. A network of co-occurrence of keywords allows the analysis of this structure, revealing existing topics and themes [24]. In addition, other bibliometric studies in various academic disciplines have used this software [45,46,47].
2.4 Analysis of the Results
Bibliometric analyses comprise two main approaches: performance analysis and science mapping [27]. The former allows the evaluation of the performance of scientific production and its impact. In contrast, the latter allows the observation of the dynamic aspects of the intellectual structure of the topic of study [48].
3 Results
3.1 Subject Area
There are 612 documents on Digital Transformation in SMEs between 2020 and 2021. Figure 14.1 shows the most important thematic areas that have enabled the development of this topic. Business, Management, and Accounting leads this academic field with 253 papers, with a business focus on topics related to digital transformation, such as business models [49, 50], smart technologies [51], absorptive capacity [50, 52], internationalization [53, 54], sustainability [55, 56], value creation [57, 58], and Industry 4.0 for SMEs [59, 60].
The second subject area corresponds to Computer Science with 252 publications, focused on the technological part of digital transformation, in topics such as digitalization [61, 62], data management [63], big data [64], data mining [65], digital technologies [66, 67], digital twin [68, 69], digital readiness [70], artificial intelligence [71, 72], Internet of Things (IoT) [73, 74], and cloud computing [66, 74], among others.
Furthermore, Fig. 14.1 exhibits other minor subject areas such as Engineering (16%), Decision Science (11%), and Social Science (8%) out of a total of 22 subject areas.
3.2 Type of Document and Language
Figure 14.2 shows the types of documents in the study area. Articles and Conference papers are the document types that account for most publications (86%). Articles occupy the first place with 313 documents, where the journal Sustainability is representative with 22 articles, and Conference paper with 217 documents. On the other hand, there are 217 Conference papers, with Procedia standing out (22 publications), followed by IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology and Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (with 17 documents each). Finally, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing with 11.
The dissemination of this scientific output is according to seven languages. English is the most representative, as it is the predominant language of scientific dissemination [38]. Other languages are German (24), Russian (4), Spanish (3), and other minor languages.
3.3 Scientific Production
The scientific output of Digital Transformation in SMEs in 2020 shows some highly cited papers despite being recent. These studies address SMEs’ background, consequences, advantages, and challenges due to digitalization in Industry 4.0 [61, 75,76,77]. Likewise, the role of the supply chain in the performance of smaller firms [51, 78] and the impact of digitalization on economic growth [62]. In addition, some articles examine the challenge faced by these companies due to the Covid-19 pandemic [79, 80].
In 2021, high-impact research explored the role of dynamic capabilities in business model innovation [50, 58] and the impact of the pandemic on SMEs and their reactions [22, 81, 82]. Similarly, some studies delve into the barriers and practices of smaller companies in their integration process into Industry 4.0 [67, 83, 84], primarily through the digitization strategy for performance improvement [53, 85, 86].
3.4 Countries Collaboration
Figure 14.3 shows the 75 countries that have contributed to the scientific production of Digital Transformation in SMEs during the last two years. In the top 10, there is a majority participation of European countries such as Germany, the Russian Federation, Italy, the United Kingdom, Portugal, Spain, Finland, and Austria. Therefore, the presence of Asian countries such as Indonesia and China. In 2020, these countries were more affected than others [87, 88].
Germany leads the field with 112 papers and 259 citations, collaborating with 23 different nations through 36 papers, with Austria, Spain, and the United Kingdom contributing the most with three papers each. Furthermore, it is worth noting that Germany's most impactful research has focused on the growth opportunities offered by digitalization and the strategies and process of digital transformation of SMEs in the framework of Industry 4.0 [50, 60, 89, 90].
On the other hand, Italy has the highest number of citations, which has achieved an average of 416 citations through 56 papers. These studies address the advantages of Industry 4.0 applications for sustainability [60, 76] and digital transformation in smaller companies [58, 61, 91]. The work of Erwin Rauch (affiliated with the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano) stands out, and he has contributed five research papers receiving 64 citations. Dominik T. Matt (Fraunhofer Italia Research) has also contributed to four publications. Both authors have conducted joint studies exploring Industry 4.0 in SMEs, its advantages, challenges, and requirements [76, 92, 93].
In Latin America, the COVID-19 outbreak emerged in the early 2020s, following Europe, soon becoming the center of the pandemic and registering the highest number of cases and deaths and significantly affecting the region's economy [94, 95]. Furthermore, some scholars explored the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the digital transformation of the enterprise [79, 82, 96], the integration of Industry 4.0 [97], and ERPs [98]. Therefore, some studies analyze the impacts on agriculture [80] and the wine industry [99].
3.5 Co-occurrence Author Keyword Network
Bibliometrics offers several tools to analyze the intellectual structure of an academic field, one of which is co-occurrence analysis. This analysis makes it possible to find connections between concepts using authors' keywords [100]. In this way, it facilitates the observation of relevant topics and research lines developed in the study of Digital Transformation and SMEs in Covid-19 times. Thus Fig. 14.4 shows the science map constructed through VOSviewer with 1380 keywords, in which 55 co-occur at least five times; therefore, the visualization has 55 nodes (relevant topics) and six clusters (lines of research).
Cluster 1 (red color) “SMEs in Covid-19” is located in the center of Fig. 15.4, consisting of 17 nodes with 432 occurrences. The studies belonging to this cluster focus on challenges, difficulties, and solutions for small and medium-sized enterprises [18, 60]. These studies cover different topics, such as implementation of Industry 4.0 [75], digitization process [101], digital economy [102], value creation [57, 58], supply chain [78], sharing economy [103], entrepreneurship process [104], sustainable development [105], and adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) [106]. In addition, many of these articles focus on different economic sectors such as manufacturing [77], food [58, 107], fintech [108], fashion [109], and tourism [110]. Other studies addressed the Covid-19 pandemic and its implication on the activities of SMEs [22, 111], as well as the approach to solutions involving digital transformation [105, 112,113,114].
Cluster 2 (green color) “Digitalization and Business models” consists of 10 nodes with 219 occurrences. In this cluster, the research addresses the effect of digitalization on business activities [110, 115, 116] and internationalization [117,118,119]. Furthermore, other scholars focus on the process and challenges of its implementation [120,121,122], even for the entrepreneurs [123]. Finally, several researchers studied the role of digitalization in the redesign of the business model [124, 125] and the resulting performance [126, 127].
Cluster 3 (blue color) “Industry 4.0” consists of 9 nodes with 188 occurrences. These studies explore Industry 4.0, its advantages [128, 129], the challenges and barriers in its application [61, 83], SMEs readiness [130, 131], execution of maturity models to assess the degree of implementation [132, 133], as well as its focus on sustainability [76, 134]. Similarly, this framework has been a reference for the design of business models [50], the adoption of artificial intelligence [71, 135], and the application of machine learning processes [136]. Likewise, several research projects have focused on the smart factory, the goal of digitalization in manufacturing [137, 138].
Cluster 4 (yellow color) “IoT” consists of 7 nodes with 96 occurrences. In this cluster, the studies explore the benefits of systems that target smart and connected devices via the internet. When these systems are from a B2C (business-to-consumer) perspective, this is known as the internet of things (IoT). This technology has a significant role in digital transformation studies due to its advantages in the enterprise's user-centered innovation process, especially in challenging times such as Covid-19 [81, 139]. Furthermore, different aspects concerning its adoption in SMEs have been examined [73, 140]. Meanwhile, when systems are from a B2B (business-to-business) perspective, it is referred to as the industrial internet of things (IIoT). Therefore, some studies focus on this concept for its applications in business [141] and because some scholars consider it an essential strategy for the digital transformation process [142, 143].
Cluster 5 (purple color) “Digital innovation and transformation” consists of 7 nodes with 183 occurrences. This cluster contains documents about digital innovation, and the process companies follow to adopt such an approach. This process of change is called digital transformation. These studies involve different mechanisms, such as digital innovation hubs (DIH) [144, 145], dynamic capabilities [58, 146], design thinking [147], and business process management (BPM) [90], among others. Similarly, some researchers have proposed frameworks to detail the digital transformation process of companies, the digital strategies involved [50, 148], as well as the evaluation of this process [149, 150] through the level of digital maturity [151, 152].
Cluster 6 (sky-blue color) “Digital Technology” consists of 5 nodes with 53 occurrences. This cluster comprises the keywords: digital technology, cloud computing, technology–organization–environment (TOE framework), enterprise resource planning (ERP), and information system (IS). The papers belonging to this cluster focus on how digital technologies transform SMEs' business processes [54, 91, 153]. In addition, some of these studies examine the opportunities of these digital technologies in the field of information systems, specifically in an ERP system [154, 155]. Also, the use of the TOE framework to analyze different digital technologies such as IoT [156] and cloud computing [66, 73].
4 Discussion
The study of the Digital Transformation of SMEs is necessary to approach it considering one of the important events for humanity, such as the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, this paper analyzes 612 documents published between 2020 and 2021 in seven languages and produced by 75 countries from five continents, mostly developing countries (Fig. 14.3). The top 10 contributing countries include 8 European and 2 Asian countries, which were affected at the onset of the pandemic and required digital transformations in their SME business activity [e.g., 80–82, 112, 157, 158, 159, 160]. This involved considerations in their business models [79], sustainability [22, 105, 161], supply chain [162], and purchasing processes [163]. As well as economic impacts on the labor market and human capital [164]. Latin America's participation in this field of study is less than the European and Asian continents, but with significant repercussions when studying the effects of the pandemic on the digital transformation of the company and its integration into the 4.0 industry [79, 82, 96, 97].
The use of the scientific map of co-occurrence of authors' keywords complemented the analysis of the intellectual structure (Fig. 14.4). The main topics addressed were the management of SMEs in times of COVID-19 (red cluster), digitalization and business models (green cluster), and Industry 4.0 (blue cluster). Other smaller clusters addressed IoT, Digital Innovation, and Technology.
This study addresses the intellectual structure of digital transformation in SMEs at the Covid-19 time to understand how the company sought to change its practices and activities at a turbulent time for humanity.
5 Conclusions
This research aimed to assess the scientific structure of digital transformation in SMEs, specifically when COVID-19 appeared and was developed, through a bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database and VOSviewer software. In addition, the present study reveals the cognitive structure of this topic developed thanks to the collaboration of 75 countries.
The results showed the supremacy of scientific production in the areas of Business, Management and Accounting, and Computer Science. Likewise, the high production of articles and conference papers. In addition, we highlight the outstanding participation of Germany and Italy in research dissemination. Furthermore, the co-occurrence author keyword network revealed 55 relevant topics and six lines of research comprising the intellectual structure of this area: the management of SMEs in times of COVID-19 (red cluster), digitalization and business models (green cluster), Industry 4.0 (blue cluster), IoT (yellow cluster), digital innovation and transformation (purple cluster), and digital technology (sky-blue cluster).
However, this study has some limitations: (i) The use of the Scopus database and not considering other databases such as Web of Science and Dimensions; (ii) Not considering the use of regional databases such as Latindex and Scielo. These limitations could omit critical information and contributions in this field of study. Nevertheless, these limitations may broaden the scope and breadth of the subject matter presented. Therefore, this study is a guide tool for academics and researchers related to digital transformation in SMEs.
Finally, it is worth noting that in the wake of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, academia has shown a high level of interest in the ravages of this disease in the economic sphere, with a particular focus on small and medium-sized enterprises, which are the main ones affected. Therefore, researchers have developed studies to explore the lessons, challenges, and effects of this pandemic to develop proposals and solutions for smaller companies to adapt to this new reality through digital transformation. In addition, however, there is a need to explore the possibility of expanding research in this area. The following are some lines of research that future studies could consider:
-
1.
Digital ecosystem for the work: Covid-19 has forced companies to adapt to new ways of working, which has increased the number of employees in the home office or under a hybrid system. This remote system is here to stay, so firms should guide their efforts toward developing and implementing digital workplaces adapted to the new reality and the needs of workers. Therefore, future research could contribute to exploring and developing these digital systems.
-
2.
Development of digital skills: In many countries, due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, governments have put in place mobility restrictions to contain the virus. However, this has led to a transformation in the way businesses and individuals communicate. Therefore, this situation has highlighted the importance of digital skills to cope with the crisis. For this reason, future research could direct its efforts toward exploring the different digital skills needed for different business conditions and developing a measurement framework for these skills.
-
3.
Innovation in smart technologies: SMEs have faced many challenges due to COVID-19. This pandemic has led to their adoption of smart technologies to continue operation and achieve sustainability. Therefore, future research could broaden the innovative technologies needed for enterprises from various economic sectors.
References
Matt, C.; Hess, T.; Benlian, A. Digital transformation strategies. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2015, 57, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5.
Vial, G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2019, 28, 118–144, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.
Kaplan, B.; Truex III, D.P.; Wastell, D.; Wood-Harper, A.T.; DeGross, J. Information Systems Research: Relevant Theory and Informed Practice; Springer Science, 2006.
Schallmo, D.; Williams, C.A.; Boardman, L. Digital transformation of business models-best practice, enablers, and roadmap. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2017, 21, doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961740014X.
Frank, A.G.; Mendes, G.H.S.; Ayala, N.F.; Ghezzi, A. Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 141, 341–351, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.014.
Zhu, X.; Ge, S.; Wang, N. Digital transformation: A systematic literature review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 162, 107774, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2021.107774.
Kraus, S.; Durst, S.; Ferreira, J.J.; Veiga, P.; Kailer, N.; Weinmann, A. Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2022, 63, 102466, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2021.102466.
Busulwa, R.; Pickering, M.; Mao, I. Digital transformation and hospitality management competencies: Toward an integrative framework. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 102, 103132, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHM.2021.103132.
Alenezi, M. Deep dive into digital transformation in higher education institutions. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 770, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI11120770.
Vu, K.; Hartley, K. Effects of digital transformation on electricity sector growth and productivity: A study of thirteen industrialized economies. Util. Policy 2022, 74, 101326, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JUP.2021.101326.
Skog, D.A.; Wimelius, H.; Sandberg, J. Digital disruption. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2018, 60, 431–437, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0550-4.
Linz, C.; Müller-Stewens, G.; Zimmermann, A. Radical business model transformation: Gaining the competitive edge in a disruptive world; Kogan Page Publishers, 2017; ISBN 0749480467.
Hendriarto, P. Understanding of the role of digitalization to business model and innovation: Economics and business review studies. Linguist. Cult. Rev. 2021, 5, 160–173, doi:https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1347.
Agostini, L.; Galati, F.; Gastaldi, L. The digitalization of the innovation process. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2019, 23, 1–12, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0330.
Rachinger, M.; Rauter, R.; Müller, C.; Vorraber, W.; Schirgi, E. Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2019, 30, 1143–1160, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0020.
Legner, C.; Eymann, T.; Hess, T.; Matt, C.; Böhmann, T.; Drews, P.; Mädche, A.; Urbach, N.; Ahlemann, F. Digitalization: Opportunity and challenge for the business and information systems engineering community. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2017, 59, 301–308, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0484-2.
Parida, V.; Sjödin, D.; Reim, W. Reviewing literature on digitalization, business model innovation, and sustainable industry: Past achievements and future promises. Sustainability 2019, 11, 391, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020391.
Eller, R.; Alford, P.; Kallmünzer, A.; Peters, M. Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 112, 119–127, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.004.
Almeida, F.; Duarte Santos, J.; Augusto Monteiro, J. The challenges and opportunities in the digitalization of companies in a post-COVID-19 world. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 2020, 48, 97–103, doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.3013206.
Dwivedi, Y.K.; Hughes, D.L.; Coombs, C.; Constantiou, I.; Duan, Y.; Edwards, J.S.; Gupta, B.; Lal, B.; Misra, S.; Prashant, P.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2020, 55, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211.
The World Bank World Bank SME Finance: Development news, research, data | World Bank.
Winarsih; Indriastuti, M.; Fuad, K. Impact of covid-19 on digital transformation and sustainability in small and medium enterprises (smes): A conceptual framework. 14th Int. Conf. Complex, Intell. Softw. Intensive Syst. CISIS 2020, held conjunction with 14th Int. Conf. Innov. Mob. Internet Serv. Ubiquitous Comput. IMIS 2020 2021, 1194 AISC, 471–476.
Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
Montalván-Burbano, N.; Velastegui-Montoya, A.; Gurumendi-Noriega, M.; Morante-Carballo, F.; Adami, M. Worldwide research on land use and land cover in the Amazon region. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6039, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116039.
Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J.; Davarzani, H. Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 162, 101–114, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003.
Sabando-Vera, D.; Yonfa-Medranda, M.; Montalván-Burbano, N.; Albors-Garrigos, J.; Parrales-Guerrero, K. Worldwide research on open innovation in SMEs. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 20, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010020.
Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J. Informetr. 2011, 5, 146–166, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002.
Faruk, M.; Rahman, M.; Hasan, S. How digital marketing evolved over time: A bibliometric analysis on scopus database. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08603, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08603.
Montalván-Burbano, N.; Pérez-Valls, M.; Plaza-Úbeda, J. Analysis of scientific production on organizational innovation. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2020, 7, 1745043, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1745043.
Della Corte, V.; Del Gaudio, G.; Sepe, F.; Luongo, S. Destination resilience and innovation for advanced sustainable tourism management: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12632, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212632.
Herrera-Franco, G.; Montalván-Burbano, N.; Carrión-Mero, P.; Bravo-Montero, L. Worldwide research on socio-hydrology: A bibliometric analysis. Water 2021, 13.
Flores-Romero, M.B.; Pérez-Romero, M.E.; Álvarez-García, J.; Del Río-Rama, M. de la C. Bibliometric mapping of research on magic towns of Mexico. Land 2021, 10, 852, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080852.
Herrera-Franco, G.; Montalván-Burbano, N.; Carrión-Mero, P.; Jaya-Montalvo, M.; Gurumendi-Noriega, M. Worldwide research on geoparks through bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1175, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031175.
Nadkarni, S.; Prügl, R. Digital transformation: A review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Manag. Rev. Q. 2021, 71, 233–341, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7.
Hess, T.; Matt, C.; Benlian, A.; Wiesböck, F. Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. In Strategic Information Management; Routledge, 2020; pp. 151–173. ISBN 0429286791.
Chege, S.M.; Wang, D. Information technology innovation and its impact on job creation by SMEs in developing countries: An analysis of the literature review. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2020, 32, 256–271, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1651263.
Eggers, F. Masters of disasters? Challenges and opportunities for SMEs in times of crisis. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 116, 199–208, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.025.
Martín-Martín, A.; Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; Delgado López-Cózar, E. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. J. Informetr. 2018, 12, 1160–1177, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002.
Baas, J.; Schotten, M.; Plume, A.; Côté, G.; Karimi, R. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant. Sci. Stud. 2020, 1, 377–386, doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019.
Pico-Saltos, R.; Carrión-Mero, P.; Montalván-Burbano, N.; Garzás, J.; Redchuk, A. Research trends in career success: A bibliometric review. Sustain. 2021, 13.
Donthu, N.; Gustafsson, A. Effects of COVID-19 on business and research. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 284–289.
Najmi, A.; Rashidi, T.H.; Abbasi, A.; Travis Waller, S. Reviewing the transport domain: An evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis. Scientometrics 2017, 110, 843–865, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2171-3.
León-Castro, M.; Rodríguez-Insuasti, H.; Montalván-Burbano, N.; Victor, J.A. Bibliometrics and science mapping of digital marketing. In Marketing and Smart Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies; Springer, Singapore, 2021; pp. 95–107.
Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
Payán-Sánchez, B.; Belmonte-Ureña, L.J.; Plaza-Úbeda, J.A.; Vazquez-Brust, D.; Yakovleva, N.; Pérez-Valls, M. Open innovation for sustainability or not: Literature reviews of global research trends. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1136, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031136.
Leyva-Díaz, J.C.; Batlles-delaFuente, A.; Molina-Moreno, V.; Sánchez Molina, J.; Belmonte-Ureña, L.J. Removal of pharmaceuticals from wastewater: Analysis of the past and present global research activities. Water 2021, 13, 2353, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/w13172353.
Morante-Carballo, F.; Montalván-Burbano, N.; Carrión-Mero, P.; Espinoza-Santos, N. Cation exchange of natural zeolites: Worldwide research. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7751, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147751.
Carrión-Mero, P.; Montalván-Burbano, N.; Morante-Carballo, F.; Quesada-Román, A.; Apolo-Masache, B. Worldwide research trends in landslide science. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9445, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189445.
Garzella, S.; Fiorentino, R.; Caputo, A.; Lardo, A. Business model innovation in SMEs: The role of boundaries in the digital era. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2021, 33, 31–43, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1787374.
Müller, J.M.; Buliga, O.; Voigt, K.-I. The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business models—A comparison between SMEs and large enterprises. Eur. Manag. J. 2021, 39, 333–343, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.002.
Nasiri, M.; Ukko, J.; Saunila, M.; Rantala, T. Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies. Technovation 2020, 96–97, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102121.
Mahmood, T.; Mubarik, M.S. Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2020, 160, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120248.
Denicolai, S.; Zucchella, A.; Magnani, G. Internationalization, digitalization, and sustainability: Are SMEs ready? A survey on synergies and substituting effects among growth paths. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 166, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120650.
Cassetta, E.; Monarca, U.; Dileo, I.; Di Berardino, C.; Pini, M. The relationship between digital technologies and internationalisation. Evidence from Italian SMEs. Ind. Innov. 2020, 27, 311–339, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1696182.
Isensee, C.; Teuteberg, F.; Griese, K.-M.; Topi, C. The relationship between organizational culture, sustainability, and digitalization in SMEs: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122944.
El Hilali, W.; El Manouar, A.; Janati Idrissi, M.A. Reaching sustainability during a digital transformation: A PLS approach. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 2020, 12, 52–79, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2019-0083.
Bordeleau, F.-E.; Mosconi, E.; de Santa-Eulalia, L.A. Business intelligence and analytics value creation in Industry 4.0: A multiple case study in manufacturing medium enterprises. Prod. Plan. Control 2020, 31, 173–185, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1631458.
Matarazzo, M.; Penco, L.; Profumo, G.; Quaglia, R. Digital transformation and customer value creation in Made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 642–656, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.033.
Ghobakhloo, M.; Iranmanesh, M. Digital transformation success under Industry 4.0: A strategic guideline for manufacturing SMEs. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2021, 32, 1533–1556, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-11-2020-0455.
Matt, D.T.; Modrák, V.; Zsifkovits, H. Industry 4.0 for smes: Challenges, opportunities and requirements; Palgrave Macmillan: Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy, 2020; ISBN 9783030254254 (ISBN); 9783030254247 (ISBN).
Zangiacomi, A.; Pessot, E.; Fornasiero, R.; Bertetti, M.; Sacco, M. Moving towards digitalization: A multiple case study in manufacturing. Prod. Plan. Control 2020, 31, 143–157, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1631468.
Myovella, G.; Karacuka, M.; Haucap, J. Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecomm. Policy 2020, 44, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856.
Omri, N.; Al Masry, Z.; Mairot, N.; Giampiccolo, S.; Zerhouni, N. Industrial data management strategy towards an SME-oriented PHM. J. Manuf. Syst. 2020, 56, 23–36, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.04.002.
Mohamed, M.; Weber, P. Trends of digitalization and adoption of big data analytics among UK SMEs: Analysis and lessons drawn from a case study of 53 SMEs. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 2020.
Topalović, A.; Azzini, A. Data Mining applications in SMEs: An Italian perspective. Bus. Syst. Res. 2020, 11, 127–146, doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2020-0031.
El-Haddadeh, R. Digital innovation dynamics influence on organisational adoption: The case of cloud computing services. Inf. Syst. Front. 2020, 22, 985–999, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09912-2.
Hopkins, J.L. An investigation into emerging industry 4.0 technologies as drivers of supply chain innovation in Australia. Comput. Ind. 2021, 125, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103323.
Beetz, J. Semantic digital twins for the built environment—A key facilitator for the European Green Deal? (Keynote). In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Digital Twins, SeDiT 2021; R., G.-C., J., D., G., A., C., F., Eds.; CEUR-WS: Rwth Aachen University, Design Computation, Schinkelstrasse65064, Germany, 2021; Vol. 2887.
Moller, D.P.F.; Vakilzadian, H.; Hou, W. Intelligent manufacturing with digital twin. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology, EIT 2021; IEEE Computer Society: Clausthal University of Technology (TUC), Germany, 2021; Vol. 2021-May, pp. 413–418.
Pirola, F.; Cimini, C.; Pinto, R. Digital readiness assessment of Italian SMEs: A case-study research. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2020, 31, 1045–1083, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-09-2018-0305.
Dumbach, P.; Liu, R.; Jalowski, M.; Eskofier, B.M. The adoption of artificial intelligence in SMEs—A cross-national comparison in German and Chinese healthcare. In Proceedings of the 2021 Joint Business Informatics Research Workshops and Doctoral Consortium, BIR-WS 2021; P., F., K., H., M., K., B., L., C., M., A., M., P., P., B., R., K., S., U., S., Eds.; CEUR-WS: Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany, 2021; Vol. 2991, pp. 84–98.
Schuster, T.; Waidelich, L.; Volz, R. Maturity models for the assessment of Artificial Intelligence in small and medium-sized enterprises. 13th PLAIS EuroSymposium Digit. Transform. PLAIS EuroSymposium 2021 2021, 429 LNBIP, 22–36.
Parra, D.T.; Guerrero, C.D. Decision-making IoT adoption in SMEs from a technological perspective. In Proceedings of the 15th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI 2020; A., R., B.E., P., F.G., P., M., del M.M., R., G., Eds.; IEEE Computer Society: Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga, Doctorado en Ingeniería, Bucaramanga, Colombia, 2020; Vol. 2020-June.
Liu, Y.; Ni, Z.; Karlsson, M.; Gong, S. Methodology for digital transformation with internet of things and cloud computing: A practical guideline for innovation in small-and medium-sized enterprises. Sensors 2021, 21, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165355.
Ingaldi, M.; Ulewicz, R. Problems with the implementation of industry 4.0 in enterprises from the SME sector. Sustain. 2020, 12, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010217.
Brozzi, R.; Forti, D.; Rauch, E.; Matt, D.T. The advantages of industry 4.0 applications for sustainability: Results from a sample of manufacturing companies. Sustain. 2020, 12, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093647.
Dutta, G.; Kumar, R.; Sindhwani, R.; Singh, R.K. Digital transformation priorities of India’s discrete manufacturing SMEs—A conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0. Compet. Rev. 2020, 289–314, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-03-2019-0031.
Ali, Z.; Gongbing, B.; Mehreen, A. Does supply chain finance improve SMEs performance? The moderating role of trade digitization. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2020, 26, 150–167, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2018-0133.
Priyono, A.; Moin, A.; Putri, V.N.A.O. Identifying digital transformation paths in the business model of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 104, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040104.
Rowan, N.J.; Galanakis, C.M. Unlocking challenges and opportunities presented by COVID-19 pandemic for cross-cutting disruption in agri-food and green deal innovations: Quo Vadis? Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141362.
Akpan, I.J.; Soopramanien, D.; Kwak, D.-H. Cutting-edge technologies for small business and innovation in the era of COVID-19 global health pandemic. J. Small Bus. Entrep. 2021, 33, 607–617, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1799294.
Klein, V.B.; Todesco, J.L. COVID-19 crisis and SMEs responses: The role of digital transformation. Knowl. Process Manag. 2021, 28, 117–133, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1660.
Stentoft, J.; Adsbøll Wickstrøm, K.; Philipsen, K.; Haug, A. Drivers and barriers for Industry 4.0 readiness and practice: Empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Prod. Plan. Control 2021, 32, 811–828, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1768318.
Amaral, A.; Peças, P. SMEs and Industry 4.0: Two case studies of digitalization for a smoother integration. Comput. Ind. 2021, 125, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103333.
Buer, S.-V.; Strandhagen, J.W.; Semini, M.; Strandhagen, J.O. The digitalization of manufacturing: investigating the impact of production environment and company size. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2021, 32, 621–645, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2019-0174.
Ardito, L.; Raby, S.; Albino, V.; Bertoldi, B. The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 44–56, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.022.
Pillai, S.; Siddika, N.; Hoque Apu, E.; Kabir, R. COVID-19: Situation of European countries so far. Arch. Med. Res. 2020, 51, 723–725, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.05.015.
Usman, M.; Ali, Y.; Riaz, A.; Riaz, A.; Zubair, A. Economic perspective of coronavirus (COVID‐19). J. Public Aff. 2020, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2252.
Schmitt, P.; Schmitt, J.; Engelmann, B. Evaluation of proceedings for SMEs to conduct I4.0 projects. In Proceedings of the 7th CIRP Global Web Conference, CIRPe 2019; F., D., N., K., Eds.; Elsevier B.V.: Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Ignaz-Schön-Straße 11, Schweinfurt, 97421, Germany, 2020; Vol. 86, pp. 257–263.
Fischer, M.; Imgrund, F.; Janiesch, C.; Winkelmann, A. Strategy archetypes for digital transformation: Defining meta objectives using business process management. Inf. Manag. 2020, 57, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103262.
Garzoni, A.; De Turi, I.; Secundo, G.; Del Vecchio, P. Fostering digital transformation of SMEs: A four levels approach. Manag. Decis. 2020, 58, 1543–1562, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2019-0939.
Matt, D.T.; Rauch, E. SME 4.0: The role of small-and medium-sized enterprises in the digital transformation. In Industry 4.0 for SMEs: Challenges, Opportunities and Requirements; Palgrave Macmillan: Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy, 2020; pp. 3–36 ISBN 9783030254254 (ISBN); 9783030254247 (ISBN).
Brozzi, R.; Rauch, E.; Riedl, M.; Matt, D.T. Industry 4.0 roadmap for SMEs: Validation of moderation techniques for creativity workshops. Int. J. Agil. Syst. Manag. 2021, 14, 276–291, doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2021.118064.
Caicedo-Ochoa, Y.; Rebellón-Sánchez, D.E.; Peñaloza-Rallón, M.; Cortés-Motta, H.F.; Méndez-Fandiño, Y.R. Effective reproductive number estimation for initial stage of COVID-19 pandemic in Latin American Countries. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 95, 316–318, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.069.
Lima, E.E.C.; Vilela, E.A.; Peralta, A.; Rocha, M.; Queiroz, B.L.; Gonzaga, M.R.; Piscoya-Díaz, M.; Martinez-Folgar, K.; García-Guerrero, V.M.; Freire, F.H.M.A. Investigating regional excess mortality during 2020 COVID-19 pandemic in selected Latin American countries. Genus 2021, 77, 30, doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-021-00139-1.
Oliveira, L.; Fleury, A.; Fleury, M.T. Digital power: Value chain upgrading in an age of digitization. Int. Bus. Rev. 2021, 30, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101850.
Machado, E.; Scavarda, L.F.; Caiado, R.G.G.; Thomé, A.M.T. Barriers and enablers for the integration of industry 4.0 and sustainability in supply chains of msmes. Sustain. 2021, 13, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111664.
de Farias, G.H.; Pedroso, M.A.T.C.; Gigante, R.L.; Vieira, H.E.M. The importance of for small and medium enterprises. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 5th NA International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IOEM 2020; IEOM Society: Facens University, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil, 2020.
Barragan-Quintero, R. V; Pareti, S.; Ovalle-Osuna, O.O. The impact of digitalization in the Latin American Wine Industry during the Covid-19 Pandemic. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Technology and Entrepreneurship, ICTE 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería Administrativas y Sociales, Baja California, Tecate, Mexico, 2021.
Zupic, I.; Čater, T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods 2015, 18, 429–472, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.
Kmecová, I.; Stuchlý, J.; Sagapova, N.; Tlustý, M. Sme human resources management digitization: Evaluation of the level of digitization and estimation of future developments . Polish J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 23, 232–248, doi:https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.14.
Jun, W.; Nasir, M.H.; Yousaf, Z.; Khattak, A.; Yasir, M.; Javed, A.; Shirazi, S.H. Innovation performance in digital economy: does digital platform capability, improvisation capability and organizational readiness really matter? Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2020-0422.
Soltysova, Z.; Modrak, V. Challenges of the sharing economy for SMEs: A literature review. Sustain. 2020, 12, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166504.
Chatterjee, S.; Chaudhuri, R.; Vrontis, D.; Basile, G. Digital transformation and entrepreneurship process in SMEs of India: A moderating role of adoption of AI-CRM capability and strategic planning. J. Strateg. Manag. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-02-2021-0049.
Bai, C.; Quayson, M.; Sarkis, J. COVID-19 pandemic digitization lessons for sustainable development of micro-and small-enterprises. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 1989–2001, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.035.
Naushad, M.; Sulphey, M.M. Prioritizing technology adoption dynamics among SMEs. TEM J. 2020, 9, 983–991, doi:https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93-21.
Reboud, S.; Lequin, S.; Tanguy, C. Digitalization of agri-food SME’s: Towards an evolution of business models and innovation processes . Innovations 2021, 64, 119–151, doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/inno.064.0119.
Adam, H. Fintech and entrepreneurship boosting in developing countries: A comparative study of India and Egypt. Stud. Comput. Intell. 2021, 974, 141–156.
Heim, H.; Hopper, C. Dress code: The digital transformation of the circular fashion supply chain. Int. J. Fash. Des. Technol. Educ. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2021.2013956.
Chudnovskiy, A.D.; Tsabolova, O.R.; Zhukova, M.A. Using the digitalization experience of small enterprises of the tourism and hospitality sector in Germany for development of the tourism infrastructure in Russia. Stud. Syst. Decis. Control 2021, 314, 369–376.
Zemtsov, S.P. Institutions, entrepreneurship, and regional development in russia . Zhournal Novoi Ekon. Assoc. /Journal New Econ. Assoc. 2020, 46, 168–180, doi:https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2020-46-2-9.
Guo, H.; Yang, Z.; Huang, R.; Guo, A. The digitalization and public crisis responses of small and medium enterprises: Implications from a COVID-19 survey. Front. Bus. Res. China 2020, 14, doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-020-00087-1.
Chen, J.; Lim, C.P.; Tan, K.H.; Govindan, K.; Kumar, A. Artificial intelligence-based human-centric decision support framework: An application to predictive maintenance in asset management under pandemic environments. Ann. Oper. Res. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04373-w.
Harianto, R.A.; Sari, P.N. Strategic digitalization of UMKM business as an alternative to survive the COVID-19 pandemic. Linguist. Cult. Rev. 2021, 5, 617–623, doi:https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS1.1446.
Dethine, B.; Enjolras, M.; Monticolo, D. Digitalization and SMEs’ export management: Impacts on resources and capabilities. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2020, 10, 18–34, doi:https://doi.org/10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1344.
Falentina, A.T.; Resosudarmo, B.P.; Darmawan, D.; Sulistyaningrum, E. Digitalisation and the performance of micro and small enterprises in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Bull. Indones. Econ. Stud. 2021, 57, 343–369, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1803210.
Hervé, A.; Schmitt, C.; Baldegger, R. Internationalization and digitalization: Applying digital technologies to the internationalization process of small andmedium-sized enterprises. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2020, 10, 28–40.
Westerlund, M. Digitalization, internationalization and scaling of online SMEs. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2020, 10, 48–57, doi:https://doi.org/10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1346.
Alekseieva, K.; Novikova, I.; Bediukh, O.; Kostyuk, O.; Stepanova, A. Technological orders’ change caused by the pandemics: Digitalization in the internationalization of technology transfer. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2021, 19, 261–275, doi:https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.22.
Boboshko, D.Y. Digitalization in small business tax administration. Lect. Notes Networks Syst. 2020, 115, 675–683.
Chhor, J.; Westermann, P.; Schmitt, R.H. Sustainable process digitalization in SME. ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetr. 2021, 116, 627–631, doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/zwf-2021-0141.
Hulla, M.; Herstätter, P.; Wolf, M.; Ramsauer, C. Towards digitalization in production in SMEs—A qualitative study of challenges, competencies and requirements for trainings. In Proceedings of the 54th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Ssystems, CMS 2021; D., M., Ed.; Elsevier B.V.: Institute of Innovation and Industrial Management, TU Graz, Kopernikusgasse 24/II, Graz, 8010, Austria, 2021; Vol. 104, pp. 887–892.
Olsson, A.K.; Bernhard, I. Keeping up the pace of digitalization in small businesses–Women entrepreneurs’ knowledge and use of social media. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2021, 27, 378–396, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2019-0615.
Apostolov, M.; Coco, N. Digitalization-based innovation–A case study framework. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 2021, 18, doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S021987702050025X.
Kumarasinghe, W.S.L.; Haleem, A. The impact of digitalization on business models with special reference to management accounting in small and medium enterprises in Colombo district. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2020, 9, 6654–6665.
van Tonder, C.; Schachtebeck, C.; Nieuwenhuizen, C.; Bossink, B. Business model innovation success in the fourth industrial revolution. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE 2021; F., M., M.D.F., F., I., S., A., R., Eds.; Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited: Department of Business Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, South Africa, 2021; pp. 1221–1228.
Simoes, A.C.; Rodrigues, J.C.; Ribeiro, S. Impacts on business models resulting from digitalization. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: INESC TEC, Centre for Enterprise Systems Engineering (CESE), Porto, Portugal, 2021.
Rymarczyk, J. The impact of industrial revolution 4.0 on international trade. Entrep. Bus. Econ. Rev. 2021, 9, 105–117, doi:https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090107.
Muhamad, M.Q.B.; Mohamad, S.J.A.N.S.; Nor, N.M. Navigating the future of industry 4.0 in Malaysia: A proposed conceptual framework on SMEs’ readiness. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2021, 8, 41–49, doi:https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2021.07.006.
Chonsawat, N.; Sopadang, A. Defining smes’ 4.0 readiness indicators. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1–30, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248998.
Castro, H.F.; Carvalho, A.R.F.; Leal, F.; Gouveia, H. Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness of Portuguese Companies. 1st Int. Conf. Prog. Digit. Phys. Manuf. ProDPM 2019 2020, 57–64.
Rafael, L.D.; Jaione, G.E.; Cristina, L.; Ibon, S.L. An Industry 4.0 maturity model for machine tool companies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2020, 159, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120203.
Steinlechner, M.; Schumacher, A.; Fuchs, B.; Reichsthaler, L.; Schlund, S. A maturity model to assess digital employee competencies in industrial enterprises. In Proceedings of the 54th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Ssystems, CMS 2021; D., M., Ed.; Elsevier B.V.: Fraunhofer Austria Research GmbH, Theresianumgasse 27, Vienna, 1040, Austria, 2021; Vol. 104, pp. 1185–1190.
Ndou, A.T.; Madonsela, N.S.; Twala, B. The era of digital technology: Analysis of factors contributing to economic growth and sustainability. In Proceedings of the 2nd African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEOM 2020; IEOM Society: Department of Quality and Operations Management, University of Johannesburg, Corner Kingsway and University Road, Auckland Park, South Africa, 2020; Vol. 59, pp. 1109–1123.
Bettoni, A.; Matteri, D.; Montini, E.; Gladysz, B.; Carpanzano, E. An AI adoption model for SMEs: A conceptual framework. In Proceedings of the 17th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2021; Elsevier B.V.: University of Applied Science and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland, 2021; Vol. 54, pp. 702–708.
Willenbacher, M.; Scholten, J.; Wohlgemuth, V. Machine learning for optimization of energy and plastic consumption in the production of thermoplastic parts in SME. Sustain. 2021, 13, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126800.
Trstenjak, M.; Opetuk, T.; Cajner, H.; Tosanovic, N. Process planning in industry 4.0-current state, potential and management of transformation. Sustain. 2020, 12, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12155878.
Le, C.H.; Le, D.T.; Arey, D.; Gheorghe, P.; Chu, A.M.; Duong, X.B.; Nguyen, T.T.; Truong, T.T.; Prakash, C.; Zhao, S.-T.; et al. Challenges and conceptual framework to develop heavy-load manipulators for smart factories. Int. J. Mechatronics Appl. Mech. 2020, 2, 209–216.
Fernandes, S. Which way to cope with covid-19 challenges? Contributions of the iot for smart city projects. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2021, 5, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5020026.
Pappas, N.; Caputo, A.; Pellegrini, M.M.; Marzi, G.; Michopoulou, E. The complexity of decision-making processes and IoT adoption in accommodation SMEs. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 131, 573–583, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.010.
Jiwangkura, S.; Sophatsathit, P.; Chandrachai, A. Industrial internet of things implementation strategies with HCI for SME adoption. Int. J. Autom. Smart Technol. 2020, 10, 153–168, doi:https://doi.org/10.5875/ausmt.v10i1.2108.
Cunha, B.; Hernández, E.; Rebelo, R.; Sousa, C.; Ferreira, F. An iiot solution for sme’s. 14th APCA Int. Conf. Autom. Control Soft Comput. Control. 2020 2021, 695 LNEE, 313–321.
Kumar, R.; Sindhwani, R.; Singh, P.L. IIoT implementation challenges: Analysis and mitigation by blockchain. J. Glob. Oper. Strateg. Sourc. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-08-2021-0056.
Crupi, A.; Del Sarto, N.; Di Minin, A.; Gregori, G.L.; Lepore, D.; Marinelli, L.; Spigarelli, F. The digital transformation of SMEs—A new knowledge broker called the digital innovation hub. J. Knowl. Manag. 2020, 24, 1263–1288, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0623.
Sassanelli, C.; Terzi, S.; Panetto, H.; Doumeingts, G. Digital innovation hubs supporting SMEs digital transformation. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Politecnico di Milano, Department of Economics, Management and Industrial Engineering, Milano, Italy, 2021.
Soluk, J.; Kammerlander, N. Digital transformation in family-owned Mittelstand firms: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2021, 30, 676–711, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1857666.
Pisoni, G. Going digital: case study of an Italian insurance company. J. Bus. Strategy 2021, 42, 106–115, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-11-2019-0225.
Peter, M.K.; Kraft, C.; Lindeque, J. Strategic action fields of digital transformation: An exploration of the strategic action fields of Swiss SMEs and large enterprises. J. Strateg. Manag. 2020, 13, 160–180, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-05-2019-0070.
Stich, V.; Zeller, V.; Hicking, J.; Kraut, A. Measures for a successful digital transformation of SMEs. In Proceedings of the 53rd CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, CMS 2020; R.X., G., K., E., Eds.; Elsevier B.V.: Institute for Industrial Management, FIR at RWTH Aachen University, Campus-Boulveard 55, Aachen, 52074, Germany, 2020; Vol. 93, pp. 286–291.
Yang, Z.; Chang, J.; Huang, L.; Mardani, A. Digital transformation solutions of entrepreneurial SMEs based on an information error-driven T-spherical fuzzy cloud algorithm. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102384.
North, K.; Aramburu, N.; Lorenzo, O.J. Promoting digitally enabled growth in SMEs: A framework proposal. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2020, 33, 238–262, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2019-0103.
Kääriäinen, J.; Kuusisto, O.; Pussinen, P.; Saarela, M.; Saari, L.; Hänninen, K. Applying the positioning phase of the digital transformation model in practice for smes: Toward systematic development of digitalization. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag. 2020, 8, 24–43, doi:https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm080402.
Shafigullina, A. V; Akhmetshin, R.M.; Martynova, O. V; Vorontsova, L. V; Sergienko, E.S. Analysis of entrepreneurial activity and digital technologies in business. Conf. Digit. Transform. Econ. Challenges, Trends New Oppor. 2018 2020, 908, 183–188.
Stojkic, Z.; Bosnjak, I.; Saravanja, L. The enchanting of information systems with digital technologies. In Proceedings of the 31st International DAAAM Virtual Symposium “‘Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation’;” B., K., Ed.; DAAAM International Vienna, 2020; Vol. 31, pp. 771–779.
Rakovic, L.; Duc, T.A.; Vukovic, V. Shadow it and ERP: Multiple case study in German and Serbian companies. J. East Eur. Manag. Stud. 2020, 25, 730–752, doi:https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2020-4-730.
Parra, D.T.; Talero-Sarmiento, L.H.; Ortiz, J.D.; Guerrero, C.D. Technology readiness for IoT adoption in Colombian SMEs. In Proceedings of the 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI 2021; A., R., R., G., F.G., P., J., M., Eds.; IEEE Computer Society: Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga, Doctorado en Ingeniería, Bucaramanga, Colombia, 2021.
Rodrigues, M.; Franco, M.; Sousa, N.; Silva, R. Covid 19 and the business management crisis: An empirical study in smes. Sustain. 2021, 13, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115912.
Abuhussein, T.; Barham, H.; Al-Jaghoub, S. The effects of COVID-19 on small and medium-sized enterprises: empirical evidence from Jordan. J. Enterprising Communities 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2021-0043.
Khalid, B.; Naumova, E. Digital transformation SCM in view of Covid-19 from Thailand SMEs perspective. In Global Challenges of Digital Transformation of Markets; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: KMITL Business School, King Mongkut’s Institute of technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand, 2021; pp. 49–66 ISBN 9781536198645 (ISBN); 9781536197549 (ISBN).
Sun, Y.; Zeng, X.; Zhao, H.; Simkins, B.; Cui, X. The impact of COVID-19 on SMEs in China: Textual analysis and empirical evidence. Financ. Res. Lett. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102211.
Mohammadian, H.D.; Wittberg, V.; Castro, M.; Bolandian, G. The 5thWave and i-Sustainability plus Theories as Solutions for SocioEdu Consequences of Covid-19. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Learning With MOOCS, LWMOOCS 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: University of Applied Sciences (FHM), Department of Business and Economics, Bielefeld, Germany, 2020; pp. 118–123.
Cai, M.; Luo, J. Influence of COVID-19 on manufacturing industry and corresponding countermeasures from supply chain perspective. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 2020, 25, 409–416, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-020-2206-z.
Dvorak, J.; Komarkova, L.; Stehlik, L. The effect of the COVID-19 crisis on the perception of digitisation in the purchasing process: Customers and retailers perspective. J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ. 2021, 13, 628–647, doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2020-0260.
Dvořák, M.; Rovný, P.; Grebennikova, V.; Faminskaya, M. Economic impacts of Covid-19 on the labor market and human capital. Terra Econ. 2020, 18, 78–96, doi:https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-4-78-96.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the research project of the ESPOL Polytechnic University: “Capital Intelectual, Innovación y Desempeño Empresarial en Ecuador” (Intellectual Capital, Innovation, and Business Performance in Ecuador) with code no. FCSH-GI-I2MAKER-20-2021, and the support of Centro de Investigaciones y Proyectos Aplicados a las Ciencias de la Tierra (CIPAT)—ESPOL Polytechnic University. The authors appreciate the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sabando-Vera, D., Montalván-Burbano, N., Yonfá-Medranda, M., Parrales-Guerrero, K. (2023). World Research and Intellectual Structure in Digital Transformation on SMEs in Covid-19 Times. In: Estrada, S. (eds) Digital and Sustainable Transformations in a Post-COVID World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16677-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16677-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16676-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16677-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)