Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

No “Prêt à Porter” but a Multi-scalar Perspective of “Smart Cities”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management for Regional Policymaking

Abstract

We argue that there is no one-fits-all “smart city” recipe to address the sustainability and socio-economic challenges of our ever-urbanizing world. If smartness is the ability to deliver useful information to citizens and urban actors in order to adapt their behaviors and policies dynamically and interactively in view of a particular social, economic or environmental objectives, we here suggest that each city should not prioritize the same type of information and infrastructure. Because large cities are often seen as centers of innovation and modernity, it is very tempting for urban investors to propose, and for policy makers to follow these investment paths and develop information systems irrespective of the characteristics and size of the city. This potential mismatch may limit the uptake or the most relevant and useful information needed for a city to develop more sustainably and equally. We suggest that smart cities cannot ignore scaling effects nor the evident deviations to these laws. We hence propose to cross tabulate a smart city typology of infrastructure and information with a set of urban archetypes based on key dimensions of cities, including their spatial forms and extents but also their relative positioning within their regional setting, within the urban hierarchy and within their path-dependent trajectories. We see this cross-tabulation as a first step to anchor (big) data realities and smart city practices in geographic knowledge and urban complexity theory. We advocate that tailor-made smart city policies are necessary to monitor and manage cities given their geodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Rahman HM, Anas A (2004). Theories of systems of cities. In: Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2293–2339

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam A, Montero G, Finance O, Verhetsel A, Thomas I (2019) Revisiting urban models with information and communication technology data. Some examples of Brussels. In: Plaut P, Shach-Pinsly D (eds) Digital social networks and travel behaviour in urban environments, Ch 11. Routledge, London, pp 186–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Albino V, Berardi U, Dangelico RM (2015) Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J Urban Technol 22(1):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelidou M (2015) Smart cities: a conjuncture of four forces. Cities 47:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arribas-Bel D, Garcia-Lobez M-A, Viladecans-Marsal E (2019) Buidling(s and) cities: delineating urban areas with a machine learning algorithm. J Urban Econ:103217

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (1979) Progress, success and failure in urban modeling. Environ Plan A 11(8):863–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2005) Agents, cells, and cities: new representational models for simulating multiscale urban dynamics. Environ Plan A 37(8):1373–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2008) The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319:769–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2012) Building a science of cities. Cities 29:S09-S16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2013) Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialog Human Geogr 3(3):274–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2015) A perspective on city dashboards. J Reg Stud Reg Sci 2(1):29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, Portugali Y (2012) Smart cities of the future. Eur Phys J Special Topics 214(1):481–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudet-Michel S (2001) Un siècle de diffusion des services aux entreprises dans les systèmes urbains français, britannique et ouest-allemand. L’espace Géographique 30(1):53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry (1964) Cities as systems within systems of cities 1964. Papers Reg Sci 13(1):147–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry BJL, Horton F (1970) Geographical perspectives on urban systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry BJ, Lamb RF (1974) The delineation of urban spheres of influence: evaluation of an interaction model. Reg Stud 8(2):185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaud A (2004) The spatial organization of cities: deliberate outcome or unforeseen consequence? Escholarship.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt LM, Lobo J, Strumsky D, West GB (2010) Urban scaling and its deviations: revealing the structure of wealth, innovation and crime across cities. PLoS ONE 5(11):e13541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretagnolle A, Pumain D (2010) Simulating urban networks through multiscalar space-time dynamics (Europe and United States, 17th–20th centuries). Urban Studies 47(13):2819–2839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretagnolle A, Mathian H, Pumain D, Rozenblat C (2000) Long-term dynamics of European towns and cities: towards a spatial model of urban growth. Cybergeo, Eur J Geogr 131.https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.566

  • Bretagnolle A, Pumain D, Vacchiani-Marcuzzo C (2007) Les formes des systèmes de villes dans le monde. In: Mattéi M-F, Pumain D (dir) Données urbaines, vol 5, pp 301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK (2011) Lectures on urban economics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK, Thisse JF et al (1999) Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. Eur Econ Rev 43(1):91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P (2011) Smart cities in Europe. J Urban Technol 18(2):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso G, Peeters D, Cavailhès J, Rounsevell M (2007) Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model. Reg Sci Urban Econ 37(5):542–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruso G, Vuidel G, Cavailhès J, Frankhauser P, Peeters D, Thomas I (2011) Morphological similarities between DBM and a microeconomic model of sprawl. J Geogr Syst 13(1):31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty A, Wilson B, Kashem SB (2015) The pitfalls of regional delineations in land use modeling: implications for Mumbai region and its planners. Cities 45:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire P, Gornostaeva G (2002) Cities and regions: comparable measures require comparable territories. Cahiers De l’IAURIF 135(4):13–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark C (1951) Urban population densities. J Roy Stat Soc 114:375–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottineau C (2014) L’évolution des villes dans l;espace post-soviétique. Observation et modélisations (Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottineau C, Pumain D (coor) (2022) Cities at the core of inequalities. ISTE Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottineau C, Hatna E, Arcaute E, Batty M (2017) Diverse cities or the systematic paradox of urban scaling laws. Comput Environ Urban Syst 63:80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cura R, Cottineau C, Swerts E, Antonio Ignazzi C, Bretagnolle A, Vacchiani-Marcuzzo C, Pumain D (2017) The old and the new: qualifying city systems in the world with classical models and new data. Geogr Anal 49(4):363–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demazière C (2017) Le traitement des petites et moyennes villes par les études urbaines. Espaces et Sociétés 1:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derycke P-H, Huriot J-M, Pumain D (1996) Penser la ville. Anthropos-Economica, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dujardin C, Thomas I, Tulkens H (2007) Quelles frontières pour Bruxelles? Une mise à jour. Reflets et Perspectives de la vie Économique 46(2):155–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dujardin C, Selod H, Thomas I (2008) Unemployment and urban structure for young adults. The case of Brussels. Urban Studies 45(1):89–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham-Jones E, Williamson J (2008) Retrofitting suburbia: urban design solutions for redesigning suburbs. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton G (2021) Classifying locations and delineating space: an introduction. J Urban Econ April

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton G, Puga D (2000) Diversity and specialisation in cities: why, where and when does it matter? Urban Studies 37(3):533–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz S, See L, Carlson T et al (2019) Citizen science and the United nations sustainable development goals. Nat Sustain 2:922–930. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0390-3

  • Finance O, Cottineau C (2019) Are the absent always wrong? Dealing with zero values in urban scaling. Environ Plann B: Urban Anal City Sci 46(9):1663–1677

    Google Scholar 

  • Finance O, Swerts E (2020) Scaling laws in urban geography. Linkages with urban theories, challenges and limitations. In: Pumain D (ed) Theories and models of urbanization. Springer, Cham, pp 67–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M (1989) Urban economic theory: land use and city size. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garreau J (1991) Edge city: life on the new frontier. Doubleday/Anchor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • GHSL (2019) Global human settlement layer. https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/

  • Goodchild MF (2001) A geographer looks at spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2205, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D (1983) The boundary value problem in spatial statistical analysis. J Reg Sci 23:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P (2007) Delineating urban territories. Is this a relevant issue? In: Cattan N (ed) Cities and networks in Europe: a critical approach of polycentrism. John Libbey Eurotext, Paris, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamnett C (1996) Social polarisation, economic restructuring and welfare state regimes. Urban Studies 33(8):1407–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands RG (2008) Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City 12(3):303–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands RG (2015) Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 8(1):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C (2017) Spatial economy and the geography of functional economic areas. Environ Plann B: Urban Anal City Sci 44(3):486–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones J, Thomas I, Peeters D (2015) Forecasting jobs location choices by discrete choice models: a sensitivity analysis to scale and implications for LUTI models. REGION 2(1):67–93. https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v2i1.63

  • Joss S, Sengers F, Schraven D, Caprotti F, Dayot Y (2019) The smart city as global discourse: storylines and critical junctures across 27 cities. J Urban Technol 29(1):3–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil R (2017) Suburban planet: making the world urban from the outside in. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin R (2014) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. Geojournal 79(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin R (2015) Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 8:131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin R (2018) The realtimeness of smart cities. TECNOSCIENZA: Ital J Sci Technol Stud 8(2):19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzmann KR (2010) Medium-sized towns, strategic planning and creative governance. In: Albrechts L (ed) Making strategies in spatial planning. Dordrecht, Springer, pp 27–45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan MP (2012) How GIS can help address the uncertain geographic context problem in social science research. Ann GIS 18(4):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurini R (2022a) Semantic analysis of feedforward knowledge for regional policy making. In: Knowledge management for regional policymaking, Springer, pp 89–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurini R (2022b) Promises of artificial intelligence for urban and regional planning and policy making. In: Knowledge management for regional policymaking, Springer, pp 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Néchet F (2015) De la forme urbaine à la structure métropolitaine: une typologie de la configuration interne des densités pour les principales métropoles européennes de l’Audit Urbain, Cybergeo, 709

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemoy R, Caruso G (2020) Evidence for the homothetic scaling of urban forms. Environ Plann B: Urban Anal City Sci 47(5):870–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Louail T (2010). Comparer les morphogénèses urbaines en Europe et aux États-Unis par la simulation à base d’agents—Approches multi-niveaux et environnements de simulation spatiale (Doctoral dissertation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansuy M, Marpsat M (1991) Les quartiers des grandes villes: contrastes sociaux en milieu urbain. Economie et Statistique 245:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murgante B, Borruso G, Lapucci A (2009) Geocomputation and urban planning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. Geobooks, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr JB (2007) Spatial definitions of the city: four perspectives. Urban Stud 44(2):381–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601075059

  • Paulus F, Vacchiani-Marcuzzo C (2016) Knowledge industry and competitiveness: economic trajectories of French urban areas (1962–2008). In: Cusinato A, Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos A (eds) Knowledge-creating Milieus in Europe: firm cities, territories. Springer, pp 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisani F (2020) Smart about cities. UNESCO and Netexplo observatory, 239 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred AR (1977) City systems in advanced societies. Hutchison, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine Y (1996) La fin des certitudes, temps, chaos et les lois de la nature. Odile Jacob, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D (1997) Vers une théorie évolutive des villes. L’espace Géographique 2:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D (2004), Scaling laws and urban systems. Santa Fe Institute, Working paper no 04-02-002, 26 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D (2012) Urban systems dynamics, urban growth and scaling laws: the question of ergodicity. In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, Tan E (eds) Complexity theories of cities have come of age: an overview with implications to urban planning and design. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D (2017) Urban dynamics and geo-diversity: from theory to modeling. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 159:7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D (2018) An evolutionary theory of urban systems. In: Rozenblat C, Pumain D, Velasquez E (eds) International and transnational perspectives on urban systems. Advances in geographical and environmental sciences. Springer Nature, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D (ed) (2020) Theories and models of urbanisation. Lecture notes in morphogenesis. Springer, Cham (CH)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D, Moriconi-Ebrard F (1997) City size distributions and metropolisation. GeoJournal 43(4):307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D, Rozenblat C (2019) Two metropolisation gradients in the European system of cities revealed by scaling laws. Environ Plann B: Urban Anal City Sci 46(9):1645–1662

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D, Sanders L, Saint-Julien T (1989) Villes et auto-organisation. Economica, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D, Saint-Julien T, Cattan N, Rozenblat C (1992) The statistical concept of the town in Europe, Luxembourg. Eurostat, ISBN 92-826-4108-2, 91p

    Google Scholar 

  • Pumain D, Paulus F, Vacchiani-Marcuzzo C, Lobo J (2006) An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws. Cybergeo: Eur J Geogr 343. https://doi.org/10.4000//cybergeo.2519

  • Pumain D, Swerts E, Cottineau C, Vacchiani-Marcuzzo C, Ignazzi A, Bretagnolle A, Delisle F, Cura R, Lizzi L, Baffi S (2015) Multi-level comparison of large urban systems. Cybergeo: Eur J Geogr 706.https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.26730

  • Raciti SM, Hutyra LR, Rao P, Finzi AC (2012) Inconsistent definitions of “urban” result in different conclusions about the size of urban carbon and nitrogen stocks. Ecol Appl 22(3):1015–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro FL, Meirelles J, Ferreira FF, Neto CR (2017) A model of urban scaling laws based on distance dependent interactions. R Soc Open Sci 4(3):160926

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson C, Franklin R (2021) The sensor desert quandary: what does it mean (not) to count in the smart city? In: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson B (1973) Urban growth, an approach. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche S (2014) Geographic information science I: why does a smart city need to be spatially enabled? Prog Hum Geogr 38(5):703–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche S (2015) Geographic information science II: less space, more places in smart cities. Progress Human Geogr 40(4):565–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche S (2017) Geographic information science III: spatial thinking, interfaces and algorithmic urban places–toward smart cities. Prog Hum Geogr 41(5):657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat C (1995) Tissu d’un semis de villes européennes. Mappemonde 4:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat C (2020) Extending the concept for delineating large urban regions (LUR) for the cities of the world, Cybergeo. Eur J Geogr 954.https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.35411

  • Rozenblat C, Cicille P (2003) Les villes européennes, analyse comparative. DATAR—La Documentation française, 94 p. (2004: German translation Die Städte Europas: Eine vergleichende Analyse. BBR)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffers H, Komninos N, Pallot M, Trousse B, Nilsson M, Oliveira A (2011, May) Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In: The future internet assembly. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 431–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott AJ, Storper M (2015) The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory. Int J Urban Reg Res 39(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström O, Paasche T, Klauser F (2014) Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City 18(3):307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannier C, Thomas I (2013) Defining and characterizing urban boundaries: a fractal analysis of theoretical cities and Belgian cities. Comput Environ Urban Syst 41:234–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas I, Cotteels C, Jones J, Peeters D (2012) Revisiting the extension of the Brussels urban agglomeration: new methods, new data … new results? E-Belgeo (on-line), http://belgeo.revues.org/6074

  • Thomas I, Jones J, Caruso G, Gerber P (2018) City delineation in European applications of LUTI models: review and tests. Transp Rev 38(1):6–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Criekingen M, Bachmann M, Guisset C, Lennert M (2007) Towards polycentric cities: an investigation into the restructuring of intra-metropolitan spatial configurations in Europe. Belgeo. Revue Belge de Géographie 1:31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallée J (2017) Challenges in targeting areas for public action. Target areas at the right place and at the right time. J Epidemiol Comm Health 71(10):945–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanolo A (2013) Smartmentality: the smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies 51(5):883–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener M (1994) Operational urban models: state of the art. J Am Plann Assoc 60(1):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener M (2014) Land-use transportation interaction models. In: Fischer M, Nijkamp P (eds) Handbook of regional science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 741–758

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • West GB (2017) Scale: the universal laws of growth, innovation, sustainability, and the pace of life in organisms, cities, economies, and companies. Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • White R, Engelen G (2000) High-resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24(5):383–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickersham J (2000) Jane Jacob’s critique of zoning: from Euclid to Portland and beyond. BC Envtl Aff l Rev 28:547

    Google Scholar 

  • Yigitcanlar T, Kamruzzaman M, Foth M, Sabatini-Marques J, da Costa E, Ioppolo G (2019) Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature. Sustain Cities Soc 45:348–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanella A, Bui N, Castellani A, Vangelista L, Zorzi M (2014) Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet Things J 1(1):22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zdanowska N, Rozenblat C, Pumain D (2020) Evolution of urban hierarchies under globalisation in Western and Eastern Europe. Reg Statistics 10(2):1–23. https://doi.org/10.15196/RS100202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power: Barack Obama’s books of 2019. Profile books

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Luxembourg and Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

    Geoffrey Caruso

  2. University Paris I Pantheon Sorbonne and CNRS, Paris, France

    Denise Pumain

  3. CORE/LIDAM, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    Isabelle Thomas

Authors
  1. Geoffrey Caruso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Denise Pumain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isabelle Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise Pumain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Knowledge Systems Institute, USA and University of Lyon, Lyon, France

    Robert Laurini

  2. Programme Smart Cities & Data Analytics, Open University in the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands

    Peter Nijkamp

  3. Programme Smart Cities & Data Analytics, Open University in the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands

    Karima Kourtit

  4. LEAT, École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l’Etat, University of Lyon, Vaulx-en-Velin, France

    Louafi Bouzouina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Caruso, G., Pumain, D., Thomas, I. (2022). No “Prêt à Porter” but a Multi-scalar Perspective of “Smart Cities”. In: Laurini, R., Nijkamp, P., Kourtit, K., Bouzouina, L. (eds) Knowledge Management for Regional Policymaking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15648-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15648-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15647-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15648-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation