Abstract
The Sylvian corridor comprises the sylvian fissure and cistern. It’s the largest, most constant surgical landmark in the lateral surface of the brain. Its dissection allows separation of the fronto-parieto-temporal opercula and an easier access to the insula and basal cisterns of the brain by minimizing retraction and transgression through the brain parenchyma. The careful dissection and ample use of this corridor is the essential tool for the microsurgeon to manage a wide range of vascular and tumoral lesions of the brain and skull base. In this chapter we sought to detail the key anatomical aspects of these structures as well as explain the essential technique of sylvian fissure dissection.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Cerebral fissures are tight clefts between two lobes or hemispheres that are limited by the arachnoid membrane [1]. Cisterns are enlarged pockets within the arachnoid layer that fill the spaces where the brain folds itself [2]. Arachnoid cisterns are also formed around neurovascular structures such as cranial nerves and the cerebral vasculature [3]. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flows through these structures. Fissures and cisterns are anatomical pathways for the surgeon to reach deeper regions and a protective sheath for delicate structures [4]. The Sylvian fissure is continued medially with a wider space, the Sylvian cistern. These terms can sometimes be used indistinctly by some authors. To avoid confusion, we refer to both as the Sylvian corridor. The Sylvian corridor is a wide and versatile pathway that allows access to the basal cisterns and their contents, avoiding transgression of the parenchyma or minimizing brain retraction [5].
Furthermore, the insula, central core, and mesial temporal region can also be exposed [6]. Knowledge of anatomy is mandatory for the microsurgeon, and a sharp, clean, arachnoidal dissection is the way to open these spaces and gently “creep into” the depths of the brain to finally access a lesion that needs to be taken care of. This chapter will attend to the anatomical aspects of the Sylvian corridor and the microsurgical nuances relevant to this structure.
2 History
The lateral cerebral fissure of the brain was originally described around the mid-1600s. However, it is uncertain if the first description is attributed to Sylvius or his disciple, Thomas Bartholin. Interestingly, Girolamo Fabrici d’Acquapendente illustrated the fissure 40 years before Sylvius’s report, in Tabulae Pictae [7]. In the ‘60s, M.G. Yasargil led the transition from the lessons learned in H.G. Krayenbuhl’s laboratory into the operating theater [8,9,10,11,12], introducing the operative microscope [13, 14], and thus permitting microsurgical exploration of structures such as the Sylvian fissure [15]. This allowed for revolutionary development in the surgical treatment of cerebral diseases such as aneurysms, tumors, and deep sitting lesions [9, 11, 12, 16].
3 Anatomy of the Sylvian Corridor
The Sylvian fissure is a deep sulcus that separates the frontoparietal and temporal opercula. It carries the middle cerebral artery M1, M2, and M3 branches within its depths. The M4 branches emerge on either side of the fissure to reach the lateral surface of the cerebral hemisphere. The disposition of the fissure is complex, starting at the orbitofrontal surface of the brain, lateral to the anterior clinoid process, and extends laterally in the convexity at the level of the supramarginal gyrus [17] (Fig. 1).
Concerning the cranial anatomical landmarks, the fissure runs at the level of the anterior squamous suture. The anterior squamous point, represented by the junction of the sphenoid wing, frontal and temporal bones, is the topographical location of the anterior Sylvian point, which in turn, is the most important surgical reference of the fissure [18] (Fig. 2). The anterior Sylvian point divides the fissure in anterior and posterior rami [17].
The stronger arachnoidal adhesions between the frontoparietal operculum and the temporal operculum give place to a broader space, deeper to the former, referred to as the Sylvian cistern (Fig. 3). This cistern is divided into two compartments: a proximal or sphenoidal compartment that harbors the M1 segment of the MCA and the distal or operculoinsular compartment containing the M2 and M3 branches [19]. The sphenoidal compartment separates the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior perforated substance from the temporal lobe. The operculoinsular compartment separates the frontal, parietal, and temporal operculum laterally and the insular surface medially. Both compartments are communicated at the level of the limen insulae. Thus, when the operculoinsular compartment is dissected in the laboratory or the OR, the insular surface represents “the floor” of this cavity.
The insula resembles a shallow three-sided pyramid with its base facing medially and the pyramid’s tip being the insular apex. The short gyri are mostly located on the anterior facing side of the pyramid, while the long gyri represent the other two sides [20]. The shape of the insula is triangle-based anteriorly and with its tip pointing posteriorly. The anteroinferior angle of the insula is represented by the limen insulae [21]. The MCA’s insular branches (M2) run in the Sylvian cistern and reach the edges of the insula (topographically, the limiting sulcus), and they loop, continuing as the M3 (opercular) branches, that run distally until reaching the Sylvian fissure more superficially, where they emerge as the M4 (cortical) branches [22] (Fig. 4).
The operculum covers the insula. The two upper thirds lay under the frontal and parietal lobes, represented by the inferior frontal gyrus (F3), while the lower third is covered by the superior temporal gyrus (T1) [23]. Therefore, a coronal cross-section of the Sylvian fissure and cistern will have an inverted “Y-” or “T-" shaped disposition separating the three internal surfaces (Fig. 5). The Sylvian cistern entirely covers the superior surface of the temporal lobe. It is divided into two areas: anteriorly, the planum polare, posteriorly the planum temporale, and between both of them, the long oblique-running Heschl’s gyrus [24].
The inferior frontal gyrus at this level has multiple foldings, and three distinct segments can be recognized. Anteriorly: the pars orbitalis, which is continuous medially with the orbitofrontal cortex. The pars orbitalis is separated by the horizontal rami of the Sylvian fissure from the pars triangularis (named for its triangular shape, with its tip facing inferiorly). The pars triangularis marks the anterior limiting sulcus of the insula in the fissure depth and coincides with the anterior limit of the basal ganglia and frontal horn of the lateral ventricle. Posteriorly: the anterior ascending rami separates the latter from the pars opercularis. This is a “U-” shaped segment that contains the most inferior aspect of the precentral sulcus. These structures are easily recognizable and are useful surgical landmarks [25] (Fig. 6). Broca’s area usually resides in the superior half of the pars opercularis and the anterior half of the pars triangularis on the dominant hemisphere.
Across the fissure, and opposed to these structures, the superior temporal gyrus is mostly non-eloquent on its anterior part, but the posterior aspect of this convolution harbors Wernicke’s area close to the supramarginal gyrus. As mentioned before, the superior temporal gyrus is continuous medially with the cisternal or superior surface of the temporal lobe. The inferior frontal gyrus correlates with the planum polare anteriorly. The precentral gyrus, which is frequently continuous with the posterior half of the pars opercularis, is a good landmark to identify the most external aspect of Heschel’s gyrus. The postcentral gyrus and supramarginal gyrus are coincidental with the planum temporale [26] (Fig. 7). Wernicke’s area is usually seated at the level of the central lobule [27].
The superficial Sylvian veins are found in variable numbers, ranging from being absent in some cases to being a large venous complex with multiple veins of various sizes [28] (Fig. 8). However, the most common is to find 2–5 veins that typically drain anteriorly in the sphenoparietal sinus [29]. These veins are most frequently attached to the arachnoid over the fissure and run parallel to it, although they can be displaced inferiorly in some cases.
4 Indications
The Sylvian corridor might be the most versatile approach in the microsurgeon’s armamentarium (Fig. 9). When combined with the classic pterional craniotomy or extended variations of it [30, 31], this corridor can grant access to the sellar and parasellar regions [32], the anterior floor of the third ventricle via the lamina terminalis [33], the internal carotid artery and the carotid collar [34], the anterior clinoid process [35], the cavernous sinus [36], the interpeduncular cistern [37], the whole length of the middle cerebral artery [19], the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery and anterior communicating artery complex, the anterior perforated substance, the mesial temporal regions [26], the frontal and temporal horns of the lateral ventricle [38], the central core and basal ganglia [39], and the anterolateral surface of posterior fossa [40]. In addition, the sphenoidal compartment of the contralateral Sylvian cistern can be accessed as well from this corridor [41].
5 Surgical Technique
The “splitting” of the Sylvian fissure (Fig. 10) usually begins at the apex of the pars triangularis of the inferior frontal gyrus, the site where the brain parenchyma is most retracted and the arachnoid membrane can be incised safely [42, 43]. This landmark is known as the anterior Sylvian point [18]. The incision is carried out with a sharp instrument, either an arachnoid knife, micro scissors, or a number 11 blade, on the frontal side of the superficial temporal veins. These structures will be left attached to the temporal lobe to avoid damage by traction or the need to sacrifice them [19].
The arachnoid incision is wide enough to gently allow the bipolar forceps to spread the space between the temporal and frontal lobes. We recommend using small (0.5 mm) short non-stick bipolar forceps for the Sylvian fissure. The suction cannula can be used as a retractor as the arachnoid membranes are dissected. Using microscissors, the arachnoidal bands are cut, avoiding the vessels. Gentle counter traction with the suction cannula is useful to identify the avascular plane better to cut. It is advisable first to dissect in-depth, transitioning from the tight cleft of the fissure to the wider space of the Sylvian cistern. The dissection progresses gently until the M2 branches are identified. The “splitting” then continues proximally from “the inside to the outside,” which usually makes the job of separating both lobes easier, especially in tighter fissures [19].
There are small superficial veins that cross as a bridge from one lip of the operculum to the other. These can be coagulated and divided. Arteries should be preserved and dissected carefully and only then displaced to the corresponding lobe. Unlike veins, M3–M4 branches don’t cross over the fissure. They remain on their corresponding lobe. Any bleeding from small veins or pial vessels should be meticulously coagulated, and the field must be kept clean at all times. Gentle compression with cottonoids will usually stop any minor venous oozing without the need for bipolar coagulation. In the case of ruptured aneurysms, keeping a clean surgical field, and identifying the structures under the microscope, can be difficult. Copious irrigation with saline can help clean some of the clots in the arachnoid. Certain authors have mentioned the benefits of using fibrinolytic agents such as urokinase in irrigation [44]. These can be dangerous in the presence of ruptured aneurysms; therefore, the surgeon should use these agents with caution and preferably away from the rupture site. Again, identifying the M2 branches and dissecting the perivascular spaces will lead the way to the basal cisterns [45].
As the opening of the corridor progresses, the frontal and temporal lobes will begin to separate. The surgeon can help with the placement of a brain retractor. However, if the brain is relaxed and the head positioning has been achieved correctly, this might not be necessary. When the genu of the MCA has been reached at the level of the limen insulae, the surgeon might need to switch to longer instruments as the dissection now will become deeper following the horizontal trajectory of M1.
A deep venous branch draining the orbital surface of the frontal lobe can be encountered in the depth of the sphenoidal compartment of the cistern. This vein or veins will drain in the sphenoparietal sinus, and its preservation is recommended, especially if they are large. Full exposure is rarely needed for vascular lesions within the basal cisterns. However, distal MCA aneurysms or insular tumors will likely need a wider opening, extending from the pars triangularis proximally and distally, to reach the posterior Sylvian point [46]. This landmark is coincidental with the posterior tip of the insula. For full exposure of the insula, the dissection will need to reach the anterior, superior, and inferior limiting sulcus [39].
Working within the depth of the silvan fissure usually requires retraction of the operculum. However, this can damage the eloquent structures [47]. Therefore, soft, transient retraction, often changing pressure points and sparing it whenever possible, is recommended.
6 Conclusion
The Sylvian corridor is a versatile avenue used by microdissection of the Sylvian fissure and cistern. It will grant access to a wide range of subdural, subarachnoid, and intraparenchymal lesions. Careful dissection and deep knowledge of anatomy are of capital importance for safer and more successful surgeries.
References
Shafique S, Rayi A. Anatomy, head and neck, subarachnoid space. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
Adeeb N, Deep A, Griessenauer CJ, Mortazavi MM, Watanabe K, Loukas M, Tubbs RS, Cohen-Gadol AA. The intracranial arachnoid mater: a comprehensive review of its history, anatomy, imaging, and pathology. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29:17–33.
Lü J. Arachnoid membrane: the first and probably the last piece of the roadmap. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:127–38.
Lü J, Zhu X-L. Cranial arachnoid membranes: some aspects of microsurgical anatomy. Clin Anat. 2007;20:502–11.
Ngando HM, Maslehaty H, Schreiber L, Blaeser K, Scholz M, Petridis AK. Anatomical configuration of the sylvian fissure and its influence on outcome after pterional approach for microsurgical aneurysm clipping. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:129.
Ribas EC, Yağmurlu K, de Oliveira E, Ribas GC, Rhoton A. Microsurgical anatomy of the central core of the brain. J Neurosurg. 2018;129:752–69.
Collice M, Collice R, Riva A. Who discovered the sylvian fissure? Neurosurgery. 2008;63:623–8. discussion 238.
Yasargil MG. Significance of microsurgery in brain surgery. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1969;94:1496–7.
Yaşargil MG. Intracranial microsurgery. Clin Neurosurg. 1970;17:250–6.
Yaşargil MG. Possibilities and limitations of vascular surgery of the central nervous system. Bull Schweiz Akad Med Wiss. 1969;24:487–93.
Yaşargil MG. Intracranial microsurgery. Proc R Soc Med. 1972;65:15–6.
Krayenbühl HA, Yaşargil MG, Flamm ES, Tew JMJ. Microsurgical treatment of intracranial saccular aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1972;37:678–86.
Yaşargil MG, Krayenbühl H. The use of the binocular microscope in neurosurgery. Bibl Ophthalmol. 1970;81:62–5.
Krayenbühl H, Yasargil MG. The use of binocular microscopes in neurosurgery. Wien Z Nervenheilkd Grenzgeb. 1967;25:268–77.
Yasargil MG, Kasdaglis K, Jain KK, Weber HP. Anatomical observations of the subarachnoid cisterns of the brain during surgery. J Neurosurg. 1976;44:298–302.
Yasargil MG, Fox JL. The microsurgical approach to intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 1975;3:7–14.
Rhoton A. Rhoton’s cranial anatomy and surgical approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020.
Ribas GC, Ribas EC, Rodrigues CJ. The anterior sylvian point and the suprasylvian operculum. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18:E2.
Yasargil MG. Microneurosurgery, volume I: microsurgical anatomy of the basal cisterns and vessels of the brain, diagnostic studies, general operative techniques . . . considerations of the intracranial aneurysms. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.; 1984.
Bottan JS, Rubino PA, Lau JC, Macdougall KW, Parrent AG, Burneo JG, Steven DA. Robot-assisted insular depth electrode implantation through oblique trajectories: 3-dimensional anatomical nuances, technique, accuracy, and safety. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;18:278–83.
Guenot M, Isnard J, Sindou M. Surgical anatomy of the insula. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2004;29:265–88.
Türe U, Yaşargil MG, Al-Mefty O, Yaşargil DCH. Arteries of the insula. J Neurosurg. 2000;92(4):676–87. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.4.0676.
Tanriover N, Rhoton ALJ, Kawashima M, Ulm AJ, Yasuda A. Microsurgical anatomy of the insula and the sylvian fissure. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:891–922.
Wen HT, Rhoton AL, de Oliveira E, Cardoso AC, Tedeschi H, Baccanelli M, Marino R. Microsurgical anatomy of the temporal lobe: part 1: mesial temporal lobe anatomy and its vascular relationships as applied to amygdalohippocampectomy. Neurosurgery. 1999;45:549–91; discussion 591–2.
Muhammad S, Tanikawa R, Lawton M, Regli L, Niemelä M, Korja M. Microsurgical dissection of sylvian fissure-short technical videos of third generation cerebrovascular neurosurgeons. Acta Neurochir. 2019;161:1743–6.
Wen HT, Rhoton ALJ, de Oliveira E, Castro LHM, Figueiredo EG, Teixeira MJ. Microsurgical anatomy of the temporal lobe: part 2—sylvian fissure region and its clinical application. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:1–35. discussion 36.
Girvin JP. Temporal lobe surgery. In: Operative techniques in epilepsy surgery. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 125–63.
Aydin IH, Tüzün Y, Takçi E, Kadioğlu HH, Kayaoğlu CR, Barlas E. The anatomical variations of sylvian veins and cisterns. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1997;40:68–73.
Oka K, Rhoton ALJ, Barry M, Rodriguez R. Microsurgical anatomy of the superficial veins of the cerebrum. Neurosurgery. 1985;17:711–48.
Chiarullo M, Voscoboinik DS, Taccone WV, Lafata JM, Rubino P, Lambre J. Abordaje pterional: alcances y técnica quirúrgica. Rev Arg Neuroc. 2014;28:156–61.
Taccone WV, Chiarullo MD, Voscoboinik DS, Caviglia MR, Bustamante JL, Medina L. Abordaje Fronto-Orbito-Cigomático en Dos Piezas: Indicaciones y Técnica Quirúrgica. Rev Arg Neuroc. 2013;27:119–23.
Krisht AF, Tindall GT. Pituitary disorders: comprehensive management. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999.
Apuzzo ML. Surgery of the third ventricle. Neurology. 1988;38(5):829. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.38.5.829-b.
Seoane E, Rhoton ALJ, de Oliveira E. Microsurgical anatomy of the dural collar (carotid collar) and rings around the clinoid segment of the internal carotid artery. Neurosurgery. 1998;42:866–9.
Krisht AF, Hsu SPC. Paraclinoid aneurysms. Part 1: superior (true ophthalmic) aneurysms. Contemp Neurosurg. 2008;30:1–6.
Krisht AF, Kadri PAS. Surgical clipping of complex basilar apex aneurysms: a strategy for successful outcome using the pretemporal transzygomatic transcavernous approach. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:261–73.
Seoane E, Tedeschi H, de Oliveira E, Wen HT, Rhoton ALJ. The pretemporal transcavernous approach to the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns: microsurgical anatomy and technique application. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:891–9.
Ribas EC, Yagmurlu K, Wen HT, Rhoton AL. Microsurgical anatomy of the inferior limiting insular sulcus and the temporal stem. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(6):1263–73. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.JNS141194.
Potts MB, Chang EF, Young WL, Lawton MT. Transsylvian-transinsular approaches to the insula and basal ganglia: operative techniques and results with vascular lesions. Neurosurgery. 2012;70:824–34; discussion 834.
Kawase T, Toya S, Shiobara R, Mine T. Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery. J Neurosurg. 1985;63:857–61.
Rodríguez-Hernández A, Gabarrós A, Lawton MT. Contralateral clipping of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: rationale, indications, and surgical technique. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:114–6.
Cohen-Gadol AA. Atraumatic sylvian fissure split: nuances and pitfalls. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;18:217–24.
Tayebi Meybodi A, Borba Moreira L, Gandhi S, Preul MC, Lawton MT. Sylvian fissure splitting revisited: applied arachnoidal anatomy and proposition of a live practice model. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;61:235–42.
Tanikawa R. 2nd Rhoton Society Virtual Meeting and 8th International Zoomposium on Microneurosurgical Anatomy. Spec. Lect. Kamiyama’s Instruments Surgeries. 2020. https://stanford.cloud-cme.com/course/courseoverview?P=3000&EID=34898.
Tanikawa R. Less invasive cistemal approach and removal of subarachnoid hematoma for the treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. No Shinkei Geka. 2007;35:17–24.
Ribas GC, Yasuda A, Ribas EC, Nishikuni K, Rodrigues AJJ. Surgical anatomy of microneurosurgical sulcal key points. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:ONS177–210; discussion ONS210–1.
Safaee MM, Englot DJ, Han SJ, Lawton MT, Berger MS. The transsylvian approach for resection of insular gliomas: technical nuances of splitting the Sylvian fissure. J Neuro-Oncol. 2016;130:283–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rubino, P.A., Bottan, J.S., Arévalo, R. (2023). Surgical Anatomy of the Sylvian Fissure . In: Figueiredo, E.G., Rabelo, N.N., Welling, L.C. (eds) Brain Anatomy and Neurosurgical Approaches . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14820-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14820-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14819-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14820-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)