Skip to main content

Adaptation and Scandal in The Goldfinch

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Scandal of Adaptation

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture ((PSADVC))

Abstract

This chapter explores the adaptation network initiated by Carel Fabritius’s 1654 painting, which includes Donna Tartt’s 2013 bestselling novel and John Crowley’s 2019 film. For Newell, the initial play between trompe l’oeil and still life evident in Fabritius’s painting and developed in the critical discourse shapes the adaptation strategies of The Goldfinch(es) as well as their critical response. Each iteration generates an interpretive disconnect as audiences attempt to answer the question “What is it?” Debates over the generic categories that best describe the works reveal that the scandals present in The Goldfinch(es)’ adaptation network are those of adaptation studies in general, which likewise grapples with how to discuss adaptations as adaptations without having categories of “the thing” and “yet not the thing” overdetermine that discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    My goal here is not to suggest that trompe l’oeil and still life are exclusive genres, but rather to explore how the characteristics of trompe l’oeil or still life are emphasized in discussions of The Goldfinch.

  2. 2.

    Stone-Ferrier provides a comprehensive overview of critical positions on the question of display. See in particular paragraphs 7–11, pages 2–3, and notes 7 and 9, which I summarize here.

  3. 3.

    While still life and nature morte are used interchangeably, the French phrase, as Michael Petry points out, is more “suggestive of the layered symbolism of the genre and its poignant reminders of the transience of life and the ever-present threat of death” (6).

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to David A. Stivers, who offered invaluable feedback on early drafts of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Newell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Newell, K. (2023). Adaptation and Scandal in The Goldfinch. In: Leitch, T. (eds) The Scandal of Adaptation. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14153-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics