Skip to main content

Gendered Inconsiderations of Carceral Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Design

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

Of the 1.3 million women in the United States under criminal supervision in 2017, approximately 117,000 were housed in jails (The Sentencing Project, Incarcerated women and girls, 2019). The physical environment in which jail residents live drastically impacts their daily routines, accessibility to services, and feelings of safety and security. Considering most jails in the United States are binarily sex-segregated and house significantly more men than women, the gendered nature of these facilities is particularly apparent in the purposive design of these facilities. For women, the design of a facility may act as a barrier to getting their needs met because facilities are not constructed to specifically meet their needs which differ in number and types from the needs of men. Using a case study of one jail, this chapter will dissect how the carceral space, layout, and design of the facility makes it challenging to ensure the needs of women are met through connections to educational programming and health services. In this way, architectural decisions are direct reflections of the purposes and goals of a correctional facility (Wener, The environmental psychology of prisons and jails: Creating humane spaces in secure settings, 2012), which in this chapter is argued to be both non-rehabilitative in nature and gendered at its core.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term jail refers to a correctional facility where those individuals awaiting a trial or being held for minor crimes (i.e., misdemeanours) are confined.

  2. 2.

    Only one woman was low security-level among this group of women who had not completed a programme; the rest were high security-level women.

  3. 3.

    To designate residents as “keep separates” means to classify two women as needing to be kept away, physically, from one another due to various reasons such as being co-defendants, being in a relationship, or having been in an verbal argument or physical altercation.

  4. 4.

    In the jail of study, jail residents wear orange if they are considered high security-level.

References

  • Abram, K. M., & Teplin, L. A. (1991). Co-occurring disorders among mentally ill jail detainees: Implications for public policy. American Psychologist, 46(10), 1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.10.1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acoca, L. (1998). Defusing the time bomb: Understanding and meeting the growing health care needs of incarcerated women in America. Crime & Delinquency, 44(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128798044001005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J. (2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (3rd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J. (2015). The invisible woman: Gender, crime and justice (4th ed). Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085105282897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J., Lynch, S., & DeHart, D. (2016). Jail staff members’ views on jailed women’s mental health, trauma, offending, rehabilitation, and reentry. The Prison Journal, 96(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515605485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, B., & Brisman, B. (1991). A 5-year follow-up study of 117 battered women. American Journal of Public Health, 81(11), 1486–1489. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.81.11.1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, A. G., Mullings, J. L., & Marquart, J. W. (2008). Sexual assault in prison and beyond: Toward an understanding of lifetime sexual assault among incarcerated women. The Prison Journal, 88(3), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885508322443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders (p. 146). National Institute of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, L. (1981). Women and crime in America. Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D. M. (1997). Gendered organizational logic: Policy and practice in men’s and women’s prisons. Gender & Society, 11(6), 796–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, H. N., & Morash, M. (2010). The impact of network relationships, prison experiences, and internal transformation on women’s success after prison release. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670903435381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carp, S. V., & Davis, J. A. (1989). Design considerations in the building of women’s prisons. National Institute of Corrections, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, E. A., & Anderson, E. (2015). Prisoners in 2014. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ, 247282, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (2006). Patriarchy, crime, and justice: Feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M., & Eliason, M. (2006). From invisible to incorrigible: The demonization of marginalized women and girls: Crime. Media, Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659006061709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. G., Hebert, M. R., Rosengard, C., Rose, J. S., DaSilva, K. M., & Stein, M. D. (2006). Reproductive health care and family planning needs among incarcerated women. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 834–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of State Governments. (2005). Violence against women with mental illness. Consensus Project. Justice Center of the Council of State Governments, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, S., & Bloom, B. (2003). Gendered justice: Women in the criminal justice system. In B. Bloom (Ed.), Gendered justice: Addressing female offenders (pp. 1–14). Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, S. S., Bloom, B. E., & Rohnert Park, C. A. (2004, November). Creating gender-responsive services in correctional settings: Context and considerations. In American society of criminology conference, Nashville, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B., Hulley, S., & Wright, S. (2017). The gendered pains of life imprisonment. British Journal of Criminology, 57(6), 1359–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (1992). Women’s pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 2, 11–52. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/scws2&i=17

  • Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), 497–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dardel, J. (2013). Resisting ‘bare life’: Prisoners’ agency in the new prison culture era in Colombia. In D. Moran, N. MGill, & D. Conlon (Eds.), Carceral spaces: Mobility and agency in imprisonment and migrant detention (pp. 183–198). Ashgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Leon, G., & Jainchill, N. (1982). Male and female drug abusers: Social psychological status two years after treatment in a therapeutic community. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 9, 465–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (1999). What works for female offenders: A meta-analytic review. Crime & Delinquency, 45(4), 438–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drapalski, A. L., Youman, K., Stuewig, J., & Tangney, J. (2009). Gender differences in jail inmates’ symptoms of mental illness, treatment history and treatment seeking. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 19(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, E. (2001). Challenging behaviour: Analysis and intervention in people with severe intellectual disabilities. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, S. R., Paterniti, D. A., & Meyers, F. J. (2005). An approach to develop effective health care decision making for women in prison. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 8(2), 432–439. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2005.8.432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkin, G., Wellisch, J., Prendergast, M., Kilian, T., Hawke, J., & Natarajan, M. (1994). Drug treatment for women offenders: A systems perspective. U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazel, S., Bains, P., & Doll, H. (2006). Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: A systematic review. Addiction, 101(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01316.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedock, G., & Covington, S. S. (2017). Correctional programming and gender. In G. Fedock & S. S. Covington (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.89

  • Feinman, C. (1994). Women in the criminal justice system. ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G., Lewis, I., & Smith, C. (1990). Sexual abuse in a national survey of adult men and women: Prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaes, G. G., & McGuire, W. J. (1985). Prison violence: The contribution of crowding versus other determinants of prison assault rates. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(1), 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office, U. S. G. G. D. (1999). Women in prison: Issues and challenges confronting U.S. correctional systems (United States; Report GGD-00–22). UNT Digital Library; United States. General Accounting Office. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc293932/m1/1/

  • Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2008). Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Parents in prison and their minor children. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. L., Miranda, J., Daroowalla, A., & Siddique, J. (2005). Trauma exposure, mental health functioning, and program needs of women in jail. Crime & Delinquency, 51(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128704267477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, L. A., & Snell, T. L. (1999). Women offenders (p. 14). Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.ncjrs.gov/app/abstractdb/AbstractDBDetails.aspx?id=175688

  • Hills, H., Sigfried, C., & Ickowitz, A. (2004). Effective prison mental health services: Guidelines to expand and improve treatment. Mental Health Law & Policy Faculty Publications. https://nicic.gov/effective-prison-mental-health-services-guidelines-expand-and-improve-treatment

  • Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2003). The needs of women offenders. Women & Criminal Justice, 14(2–3), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v14n02_07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, D. J. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral treatment: An analysis of gender and other responsivity characteristics and their effects on success in offender rehabilitation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. G., & Stearns, C. A. (1995). Gender issues in the new generation jail. The Prison Journal, 75(2), 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates: (557002006–001). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/e557002006-001

  • Jessie, B. O. (2019). On the Patio: Serving time in a women’s correctional facility. Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Y. (2018). Just design: Healthy prisons and the architecture of hope. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51(3), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Y., Jordan, M., Wright, S., & Bendelow, G. (2019). Designing ‘healthy’prisons for women: Incorporating trauma-informed care and practice (TICP) into prison planning and design. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), 3818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karthaus, R., Block, L., & Hu, A. (2019). Redesigning prison: The architecture and ethics of rehabilitation. The Journal of Architecture, 24(2), 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koons, B. A., Burrow, J. D., Morash, M., & Bynum, T. (1997). Expert and offender perceptions of program elements linked to successful outcomes for incarcerated women. Crime & Delinquency, 43(4), 512–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128797043004007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Koss, P. G., & Woodruff, W. J. (1991). Deleterious effects of criminal victimization on women’s health and medical utilization. Archives of Internal Medicine, 151(2), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1991.00400020092019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahm, K. F. (2008). Inmate-on-inmate assault: A multilevel examination of prison violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(1), 120–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994 recent state reforms II: The impact of new fiscal and political realities: DOJ statistical studies. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 15, 58–65. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/fedsen15&i=60

  • Langan, N. P., & Pelissier, B. (2001). Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, P. K., Steffey, D. M., & Visher, C. A. (2009). Prisoner reentry experiences of adult males: Characteristics, service receipt, and outcomes of participants in the SVORI multi-site evaluation. RTI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, P. K., & Visher, C. A. (2009). The multi-site evaluation of SVORI: Summary and synthesis. RTI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritsen, J. L., Heimer, K., & Lynch, J. P. (2009). Trends in the gender gap in violent offending: New evidence from the national crime victimization survey. Criminology, 47(2), 361–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00149.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, C. H. (2000, September). Social integration and mental well-being among jail inmates. Sociological Forum, 15(3), 431–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, C. H., Barrick, K., Lattimore, P. K., & Visher, C. A. (2009). Prisoner reentry experiences of adult females: Characteristics, service receipt, and outcomes of participants in the SVORI multi-site evaluation. RTI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, C. H., & Lindquist, C. A. (1999). Health behind bars: Utilization and evaluation of medical care among jail inmates. Journal of Community Health, 24(4), 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. M., Fritch, A., & Heath, N. M. (2012). Looking beneath the surface: The nature of incarcerated women’s experiences of interpersonal violence, treatment needs, and mental health. Feminist Criminology, 7(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085112439224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. (1991). Difference and dominance: On sexual discrimination. Feminist legal theory (pp. 81–94). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaletta, P. R., Diamond, P. M., Faust, E., Daggett, D. M., & Camp, S. D. (2009). Estimating the mental illness component of service need in corrections: Results from the mental health prevalence project. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808330390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C. R. (1990). Black female homicide in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5(2), 176–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626090005002004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruschak, L. M., & Beck, A. J. (2001). Medical problems of inmates, 1997. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, D. S., Farabee, D., & Crouch, B. M. (1997). Early victimization, drug use, and criminality: A comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(4), 455–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCorkle, R. C., Miethe, T. D., & Drass, K. A. (1995). The roots of prison violence: A test of the deprivation, management, and “not-so-total” institution models. Crime & Delinquency, 41(3), 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P., Cochran, J. C., Siennick, S. E., & Bales, W. D. (2012). Prison visitation and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 29(6), 888–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messina, N., Burdon, W., Hagopian, G., & Prendergast, M. (2006). Predictors of prison-based treatment outcomes: A comparison of men and women participants. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 32(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. A., & Najavits, L. M. (2012). Creating trauma-informed correctional care: A balance of goals and environment. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 3(s1), 17246. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v3i0.17246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchelson, M. L. (2014). The production of bedspace: Prison privatization and abstract space. Geographica Helvetica, 69(5), 325–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D. (2013). Carceral geography and the spatialities of prison visiting: Visitation, recidivism, and hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(1), 174–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D., Jones, P. I., Jordaan, J. A., & Porter, A. E. (2020). Does nature contact in prison improve well-being? Mapping land cover to identify the effect of greenspace on self-harm and violence in prisons in England and Wales. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(6), 1779–1795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morash, M., Bynum, T. S., & Koons, B. A. (1998). Women offenders: Programming needs and promising approaches (p. 11). U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, K. M. (2013). Distinguished historical geography lecture: Carceral space and the usable past. Historical Geography, 41, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, C. (1995). The executive way: Conflict management in corporations. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, J. P., Jackson, E. W., Ellis, A. R., Amaro, H., Brown, V. B., & Najavits, L. N. (2005). Twelve-month outcomes of trauma-informed interventions for women with co-occurring disorders. Psychiatric Services, 56, 1213–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, I. L. (1984). Deceptions and realities of life in women’s prisons. The Prison Journal, 64(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhr, T. (1991). ATLAS/ti—A prototype for the support of text interpretation. Qualitative Sociology, 14(4), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumola, C. J. (2000). Incarcerated parents and their children (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report NCJ 182335). US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, I. H., & Johnson, B. L. (1994). The role of gender in a structured sentencing system: Equal treatment, policy choices, and the sentencing of female offenders under the United States sentencing guidelines symposium: Gender issues and the criminal law. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85(1), 181–221. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jclc85&i=191

  • Norland, S., & Shover, N. (1977). Gender roles and female criminality: Some critical comments. Criminology, 15(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1977.tb00050.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, M., & Andrews, G. J. (2019). The folding of sport space into carceral space: On the making of prisoners’ experiences and lives. The Canadian Geographer/le Géographe Canadien, 63(3), 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbis Partners. (2006). Women offender case management model (p. 66). National Institute of Corrections. https://nicic.gov/women-offender-case-management-model

  • Owen, B. (2005). Afterword: The case of the women. In The warehouse prison: Disposal of the new dangerous class (p. 318). Roxbury Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallot, J., Piacentini, L., & Moran, D. (2012). Gender, geography, and punishment: The experience of women in carceral Russia. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelissier, B. M., Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., Saylor, W. G., & Rhodes, W. (2003). Gender differences in outcomes from prison-based residential treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24(2), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S., & Harm, N. (1998). Women prisoners: A contextual framework. Women & Therapy, 20(4), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, S. (2005). Taming the shrew: Regulating prisoners through women-centered mental health programming. Critical Criminology, 13(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-004-6168-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. M. (2002). Women, prison, and crime (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. A., & Nolan, C. M. (2003). California state prisoners with children: Findings from the 1997 survey of inmates in state and federal correctional facilities. California State Library, California Research Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, N. (1990). Partial justice: Women, prisons and social control (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, G., Schneider, J., & Robinson-Sanford, K. P. (1996). Drug dependent women in boot camp programs: Practical considerations. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 14(2), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richie, B. E. (2001). Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: Findings from life history interviews. Crime & Delinquency, 47(3), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128701047003005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, C., Hobfoll, S. E., Lavin, J., Cameron, R. P., & Hulsizer, M. R. (2000). Stress, psychosocial resources, and depressive symptomatology during pregnancy in low-income, inner-city women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saar, M. S., Epstein, R., Rosenthal, L., & Vafa, Y. (2015). The sexual abuse to prison pipeline: The girls’ story. Georgetown Law, Human Rights Project for Girls, Ms. Foundation for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salina, D. D., Hill, J. L., Solarz, A. L., Lesondak, L., Razzano, L., & Dorenda, D. (2004). Feminist perspectives: Empowerment behind bars. In Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action (pp. 159–175). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salina, D. D., Lesondak, L. M., Razzano, L. A., & Parenti, B. M. (2011). Addressing unmet needs in incarcerated women with co-occurring disorders. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salina, D. D., Lesondak, L. M., Razzano, L. A., & Weilbaecher, A. (2007). Co-occurring mental disorders among incarcerated women: Preliminary findings from an integrated health treatment study. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 45(1–2), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, R. F., el-Bassel, N., Schinke, S. P., Gordon, K., & Nichols, S. (1991). Building skills of recovering women drug users to reduce heterosexual AIDS transmission. Public Health Reports, 106(3), 297–304. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1580245/

  • Sharkey, L. (2010). Does overcrowding in prisons exacerbate the risk of suicide among women prisoners? The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 49(2), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, D., & Van Hoven, B. (2009). The contamination of personal space: Boundary construction in a prison environment. Area, 41(2), 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. I., Bussey, J., Song, L. Y., & Lunghofer, L. (1995). The psychosocial issues of women serving time in jail. Social Work, 40(1), 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. L., & Morton, D. C. (1991). Survey of state prison inmates. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, V. J., Blount-Hill, K.-L., Evans, D., Ayers, D., & Allard, S. (2019). Architecture and correctional services: A facilities approach to treatment. The Prison Journal, 99(6), 748–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519877402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staton-Tindall, M., Royse, D., & Leukfeld, C. (2007). Substance use criminality, and social support: An exploratory analysis with incarcerated women. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 33(2), 237–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. (1993). National trends in female arrests, 1960–1990: Assessment and recommendations for research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(4), 411–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., Zhong, H., Ackerman, J., Schwartz, J., & Agha, S. (2006). Gender gap trends for violent crimes, 1980 to 2003: A UCR-NCVS comparison. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 72–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085105283953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, N. (2003). Space, place and movement as aspects of health care in three women’s prisons. Social Science & Medicine, 56(11), 2263–2275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1992). How men and women use language differently in their lives and in the classroom—ProQuest. The Education Digest, 57(6). https://search.proquest.com/openview/4820c8002938e0c4389396839440efd0/1.pdf?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=25066

  • Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., & McClelland, G. M. (1996). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women: I. Pretrial Jail Detainees. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53(6), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830060047007

  • The Sentencing Project. (2007). Women in the criminal justice system (Briefing Sheets, p. 10). The Sentencing Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Sentencing Project. (2019). Incarcerated women and girls (p. 6). https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/incarcerated-women-and-girls/

  • Tripodi, S. J., Bledsoe, S. E., Kim, J. S., & Bender, K. (2011). Effects of correctional-based programs for female inmates: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wener, R. (2012). The environmental psychology of prisons and jails: Creating humane spaces in secure settings. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women in Prison Project. (2008). Women in prison fact sheet (p. 4). Correctional Association of New York. https://www.correctionalassociation.org/recent-news

  • Zlotnick, C., Clarke, J. G., Friedmann, P. D., Roberts, M. B., Sacks, S., & Melnick, G. (2008). Gender differences in comorbid disorders among offenders in prison substance abuse treatment programs. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26(4), 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lindsay Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smith, L. (2023). Gendered Inconsiderations of Carceral Space. In: Moran, D., Jewkes, Y., Blount-Hill, KL., St. John, V. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Design. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11972-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11972-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11971-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11972-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics