Skip to main content

Artist Residencies as Creative Ecologies: Proposing a New Framework for Twenty-First-Century Cultural Production

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Cultural Sociology of Art and Music

Part of the book series: Cultural Sociology ((CULTSOC))

  • 683 Accesses

Abstract

Artist residencies are key sites of artistic practice today, which open up processes of creation and career development to sociological study. Since the 1990s, these sites have proliferated globally, but have attracted no systematic research. Beginning from classic approaches to the sociology of cultural production, this chapter demonstrates the residency’s role as a site of creative autonomy, and one where social conventions are negotiated. Yet these approaches tend to neglect questions of what is made, as well as the hyper-mobility and technological mediation of art production today. Based on two interviews with young artists, we introduce “creative ecologies” as a term that captures the unstable and porous features of art production today, and the role that art objects play in stabilizing artistic careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, V. D. (2021). Sociology of the Arts: Exploring Fine and Popular Forms (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artist Communities Alliance. (2021). Residencies. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from https://artistcommunities.org/residencies.

  • Banks, M., Gill, R. C., & Taylor, S. (2013). Theorizing Cultural Work: Labour, Continuity and Change in the Cultural and Creative Industries. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art Worlds. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S., Faulkner, R. R., & Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (Eds.). (2006). Art from Start to Finish: Jazz, Painting, Writing, and Other Improvisations. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bernard, M., Comunian, R., & Gross, J. (2021). Cultural and Creative Ecosystems: A Review of Theories and Methods, Towards a New Research Agenda. Cultural Trends, 31(4), 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2021.2004073

  • Blok, A., Farías, I., & Roberts, C. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, M. (2021). Help, I’m Old: What Is The TikTok Hype House and Who’s Even in It? Cosmopolitan. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a31086986/tiktok-hype-house/.

  • Born, G. (2010). The Social and the Aesthetic: For a Post-Bourdieuian Theory of Cultural Production. Cultural Sociology, 4(2), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born, G., & Barry, A. (2018). Music, Mediation Theories and Actor-Network Theory. Contemporary Music Review, 37(5–6), 443–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993a). The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed. In R. Johnson (Ed.), The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, Trans. R. Nice. (pp. 29-73). Columbia: Columbia University Press, (Originally published in 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993b). The Production of Belief: Contribution to an Economy of Symbolic Goods. In R. Johnson (Ed.), The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, Trans. R. Nice. (pp.74-111). Columbia: Columbia University Press, (Originally published in 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Trans. S. Emanuel. Stanford: Stanford University Press, (Originally published 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bujdosó, Z., Benkö, B., & Patkós, C. (2021). The Role of Art Colonies in Local Development through the Example of Cered Art Colony. Ecocycles, 7(1), 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & McManus, J. (2009). ‘Art for a Few’: Exclusion and Misrecognition in Art and Design Higher Education Admissions. In National Arts Learning Network Research Report. National Arts Learning Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196–223). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catà Marlès, P. (2018). Towards the post-Digital in the Humanities? NACMM and Platform HARAKAT as Case Studies. In N. Rodríguez-Ortega (Coord.). Digital Humanities: Societies, Policies and Knowledge. Artnodes. No. 22: 25-35. UOC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catà Marlès, P. (2021). Moving Knowledge(s): Towards a Speculative Arab Art Residency Proto-history. Paper presented at “My Journey, Knowledge and Exchange,” The 2021 Saari Well Assembly of Residency Researchers, Hietamäki, Finland, 18-22 August 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, C. (2017). Under the Cover: The Creation, Production, and Reception of a Novel. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, M. (2008). Crème de la crème: Highbrows, Lowbrows, Voractious Omnivores, High, Low, and Hi-Lo. In M. McGee (Ed.), Yaddo: Making American Culture. Columbia University Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crückeberg, J. (2019). Künstlerresidenzen: Zwischen Cultural Diplomacy und Kulturpolitik. Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeNora, T. (2000). Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1986). Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston. In P. DiMaggio (Ed.), Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez Rubio, F. (2020). Still Life: Ecologies of the Modern Imagination at the Art Museum. Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • English, J. F. (2005). The Economy of Prestige: Prizes, Awards, and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer-Salkeld, B. (2005). The MacDowell Colony: A Musical History of America’s Premier Artists’ Community. Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gano, G. M. (2020). The Little Art Colony and US Modernism: Carmel, Provincetown, Taos. Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. (2017). The Work of Art: Value in Creative Careers. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielen, P. (2019). Time and Space to Create and to Be Human, A Brief Chronotope of Residencies. In T. Elfving, L. Alexander, L. Reijnen, & E. Stevens (Eds.), Contemporary Artist Residencies: Reclaiming Time and Space (pp. 39–52). Valizpp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvie, J. (2013). Fair Play: Art, Performance and Neoliberalism. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heinämaa, R. (2020). Konstsamfundet: Den finländska residensverksamheten i dag—nuläge och utvecklingsbehov [The art community: Finnish residency activities today—current situation and development needs]. Report made for Föreningen Konstsamfundet r.f. Available online [in Swedish]. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://konstsamfundet.fi/residensutredning

  • Hennion, A. (1989). An Intermediary between Production and Consumption: The Producer of Popular Music. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 14(4), 400–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A. (1997). Baroque and Rock: Music, Mediators and Musical Taste. Poetics, 24(6), 415–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A. (2001). Music Lovers: Taste as Performance. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(5), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A. (2007). Those Things That Hold Us Together: Taste and Sociology. Cultural Sociology, 1(1), 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A., & Gomart, E. (1999). A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users. The Sociological Review, 47(1), 220–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A., & Grenier, L. (2000). Sociology of Art: New Stakes in a Post-Critical Time. In S. R. Quah & A. Sales (Eds.), International Handbook of Sociology (pp. 341–356). Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A., & Muecke, S. (2016). From ANT to Pragmatism: A Journey with Bruno Latour at the CSI. New Literary History, 47(2), 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, C. (2019). Web Residencies—Künstlerförderung online. In Der digitale Kulturbetrieb (pp. 389–415). Springer Gabler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2010). Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, J. (2015). The Ecology of Culture. Arts and Humanities Research Council. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://ahrc.ukri.org/documents/project-reports-and-reviews/the-ecology-of-culture/.

  • Iles, M. (2021). “(Re)conceptualising the Value of Residency Experiences.” Paper presented at “My Journey, Knowledge and Exchange,” the 2021 Saari Well Assembly of Residency Researchers, Hietamäki, Finland, 18-22 August 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobyshcha, V. (2018). How Does an Aesthetic Object Happen? Emergence, Disappearance, Multiplicity. Cultural Sociology, 12(4), 478–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreplak, Y. (2019). Artworks in and as Practices: The Relevance of Particulars. In P. Sormani, G. Carbone, & P. Gisler (Eds.), Practicing Art/Science Experiments in an Emerging Field (pp. 142–163). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunst, B. (2015). Artist at Work: Proximity of Art and Capitalism. Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa, M. (2021). “The Ontology of Art Residencies: Hospitality and Gift-Exchange.” Paper presented at “My Journey, Knowledge and Exchange,” the 2021 Saari Well Assembly of Residency Researchers, Hietamäki, Finland, 18-22 August 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, F. (2019). Bourdieu, Latour and Rasha Abbas: The Uses of Actor-Network Theory for Studying the Field(s) of Cultural Production in the Middle East and North Africa. Cultural Sociology, 13(4), 428–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2011). Reflections on Etienne Souriau’s Les différents modes d’existence. In G. Harman, L. Bryant, & N. Srnicek (Eds.), The Speculative Turn Continental: Materialism and Realism (pp. 304–333). re.press Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2009). Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. In B. Turner (Ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 141–158). Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, K. (2017). Conceptualising the Value of Artist Residencies: a Research Agenda. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 1(1), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesage, D., Peeters, J., & Van Imschoot, M. (2006). Portret van de kunstenaar als resident. Etcetera, 24(104), 22–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loots, Ellen (2012). An Exploration of an Organization Form: Artists’ Residences. Paper in development. This paper has been developed for the ACEI conference, Kyoto, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, T. (2020). “Hype House and the Los Angeles TikTok Mansion Gold Rush.” New York Times. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=hype+house.

  • Lübbren, N. (2001). Rural Artists' Colonies in Europe, 1870-1910. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marling, K. A. (1977). Introduction. In Woodstock, an American art colony 1902-1977. Vassar College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. G., García López, A., & Mazuecos Sánchez, B. (2018). Mecanismos de supervivencia en la carrera del artista sumergido. Arte y Políticas de Identidad, 19, 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (1998). British Fashion Design: Rag Trade or Image Industry? Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2010). Actor-Network Theory: Sensitive Terms and Enduring Tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft, 50, 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T., & Trocco, F. (2002). Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M. R., Viola, S., Onesti, A., & Ciampa, F. (2020). Artists Residencies, Challenges and Opportunities for Communities’ Empowerment and Heritage Regeneration. Sustainability, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploegman, H., & Doulos, N. (2018). Unpacking Residencies: Situating the Production of Cultural Relations. Kunstlicht, 39(2), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, N. (2015). Bourdieu and Beyond. In I. K. Shepherd & K. Devine (Eds.), The Routledge Reader on the Sociology of Music (pp. 349–358). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. S. (2019). Our Town, the MacDowell Colony, and the Art of Civic Mediation. American Literary History, 31(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajz025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, C. (2017). Gender, Subjectivity, and Cultural Work: The Classical Music Profession. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Segran, E. (2015). Welcome to the Brave New World of the Corporate-Sponsored Artist. Fast Company. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://www.fastcompany.com/3043276/welcome-to-the-brave-new-world-of-the-corporate-sponsored-artist.

  • Siciliano, M. L. (2021). Creative Control: The Ambivalence of Work in the Culture Industries. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2005). Introductory Notes on an Ecology of Practices. Cultural Studies Review, 1(11), 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strandvad, S.M., Tracy C. D., & Dunn, M. (2022): Mermaids as Market Creators: Cultural Entrepreneurship in an Emerging Practice. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779211046010

  • Swanson, F. J., Goodrich, C., & Dean Moore, K. (2008). Bridging Boundaries: Scientists, Creative Writers, and the Long View of the Forest. Front Ecol Environ, 6(9), 499–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transartists. (n.d.-a). Fabrica. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from https://www.transartists.org/en/air/fabrica.

  • Transartists. (n.d.-b). Types of Residency Programs. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://www.transartists.org/en/types-residency-programmes.

  • Vargas de Freitas Matias, R. (2016). International Artists-in-Residence 1990–2010 Mobility, Technology and Identity in Everyday Art Practices. PhD dissertation Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villagordo, E., & Domergue, P. (2011). Au croisement des postures sociologique et artistique : la résidence d’artiste Processus/Découpe. [At the crossroads of sociological and artistic viewpoints: the artist residency Processus/Cutting]. Tracés, Revue de Sciences humaines, 11, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, A., & Farías, I. (2015). Studio Studies: Operations, Topologies & Displacements. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, H. (2021). Bound by Creativity: How Contemporary Art is Created and Judged. The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yaneva, A. (2003). When a Bus Met a Museum: Following Artists, Curators and Workers in Art Installation. Museum & Society, 1(3), 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, V. L. (1990). Constructing a Sociology of the Arts. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank University of Groningen Research Master’s students Lucia Affaticati, Agnes Bruinsma, Nora Leidinger, Chiara Serio, Louise Vanhee, and Chunzi Wu, who participated in a tutorial on Creative Work and Residencies, and among other important contributions, compiled a multilingual literature review that expanded the vision of this research. In addition, we are grateful to all participants in “My Journey, Knowledge and Exchange,” the 2021 Saari Well Assembly of Residency Researchers in Hietamäki, Finland, organized by the Kone Foundation. This gathering opened our eyes to the diversity of residency practices and the dynamism of current residencies research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Malou Strandvad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roberts, K.S., Strandvad, S.M. (2022). Artist Residencies as Creative Ecologies: Proposing a New Framework for Twenty-First-Century Cultural Production. In: McCormick, L. (eds) The Cultural Sociology of Art and Music. Cultural Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11420-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11420-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11419-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11420-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics