Abstract
Artist residencies are key sites of artistic practice today, which open up processes of creation and career development to sociological study. Since the 1990s, these sites have proliferated globally, but have attracted no systematic research. Beginning from classic approaches to the sociology of cultural production, this chapter demonstrates the residency’s role as a site of creative autonomy, and one where social conventions are negotiated. Yet these approaches tend to neglect questions of what is made, as well as the hyper-mobility and technological mediation of art production today. Based on two interviews with young artists, we introduce “creative ecologies” as a term that captures the unstable and porous features of art production today, and the role that art objects play in stabilizing artistic careers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, V. D. (2021). Sociology of the Arts: Exploring Fine and Popular Forms (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
Artist Communities Alliance. (2021). Residencies. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from https://artistcommunities.org/residencies.
Banks, M., Gill, R. C., & Taylor, S. (2013). Theorizing Cultural Work: Labour, Continuity and Change in the Cultural and Creative Industries. Routledge.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity.
Becker, H. S. (1982). Art Worlds. University of California Press.
Becker, H. S., Faulkner, R. R., & Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (Eds.). (2006). Art from Start to Finish: Jazz, Painting, Writing, and Other Improvisations. University of Chicago Press.
de Bernard, M., Comunian, R., & Gross, J. (2021). Cultural and Creative Ecosystems: A Review of Theories and Methods, Towards a New Research Agenda. Cultural Trends, 31(4), 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2021.2004073
Blok, A., Farías, I., & Roberts, C. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory. Routledge.
Bonner, M. (2021). Help, I’m Old: What Is The TikTok Hype House and Who’s Even in It? Cosmopolitan. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a31086986/tiktok-hype-house/.
Born, G. (2010). The Social and the Aesthetic: For a Post-Bourdieuian Theory of Cultural Production. Cultural Sociology, 4(2), 1–38.
Born, G., & Barry, A. (2018). Music, Mediation Theories and Actor-Network Theory. Contemporary Music Review, 37(5–6), 443–487.
Bourdieu, P. (1993a). The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed. In R. Johnson (Ed.), The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, Trans. R. Nice. (pp. 29-73). Columbia: Columbia University Press, (Originally published in 1983).
Bourdieu, P. (1993b). The Production of Belief: Contribution to an Economy of Symbolic Goods. In R. Johnson (Ed.), The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, Trans. R. Nice. (pp.74-111). Columbia: Columbia University Press, (Originally published in 1977).
Bourdieu, P. (1996). The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Trans. S. Emanuel. Stanford: Stanford University Press, (Originally published 1992).
Bujdosó, Z., Benkö, B., & Patkós, C. (2021). The Role of Art Colonies in Local Development through the Example of Cered Art Colony. Ecocycles, 7(1), 14–18.
Burke, P. J., & McManus, J. (2009). ‘Art for a Few’: Exclusion and Misrecognition in Art and Design Higher Education Admissions. In National Arts Learning Network Research Report. National Arts Learning Network.
Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196–223). Routledge.
Catà Marlès, P. (2018). Towards the post-Digital in the Humanities? NACMM and Platform HARAKAT as Case Studies. In N. Rodríguez-Ortega (Coord.). Digital Humanities: Societies, Policies and Knowledge. Artnodes. No. 22: 25-35. UOC.
Catà Marlès, P. (2021). Moving Knowledge(s): Towards a Speculative Arab Art Residency Proto-history. Paper presented at “My Journey, Knowledge and Exchange,” The 2021 Saari Well Assembly of Residency Researchers, Hietamäki, Finland, 18-22 August 2021.
Childress, C. (2017). Under the Cover: The Creation, Production, and Reception of a Novel. Princeton University Press.
Clements, M. (2008). Crème de la crème: Highbrows, Lowbrows, Voractious Omnivores, High, Low, and Hi-Lo. In M. McGee (Ed.), Yaddo: Making American Culture. Columbia University Library.
Crückeberg, J. (2019). Künstlerresidenzen: Zwischen Cultural Diplomacy und Kulturpolitik. Springer VS.
DeNora, T. (2000). Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press.
DiMaggio, P. (1986). Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston. In P. DiMaggio (Ed.), Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint. Oxford University Press.
Domínguez Rubio, F. (2020). Still Life: Ecologies of the Modern Imagination at the Art Museum. Chicago University Press.
English, J. F. (2005). The Economy of Prestige: Prizes, Awards, and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Harvard University Press.
Falconer-Salkeld, B. (2005). The MacDowell Colony: A Musical History of America’s Premier Artists’ Community. Scarecrow Press.
Gano, G. M. (2020). The Little Art Colony and US Modernism: Carmel, Provincetown, Taos. Edinburgh University Press.
Gerber, A. (2017). The Work of Art: Value in Creative Careers. Stanford University Press.
Gielen, P. (2019). Time and Space to Create and to Be Human, A Brief Chronotope of Residencies. In T. Elfving, L. Alexander, L. Reijnen, & E. Stevens (Eds.), Contemporary Artist Residencies: Reclaiming Time and Space (pp. 39–52). Valizpp.
Harvie, J. (2013). Fair Play: Art, Performance and Neoliberalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Heinämaa, R. (2020). Konstsamfundet: Den finländska residensverksamheten i dag—nuläge och utvecklingsbehov [The art community: Finnish residency activities today—current situation and development needs]. Report made for Föreningen Konstsamfundet r.f. Available online [in Swedish]. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://konstsamfundet.fi/residensutredning
Hennion, A. (1989). An Intermediary between Production and Consumption: The Producer of Popular Music. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 14(4), 400–424.
Hennion, A. (1997). Baroque and Rock: Music, Mediators and Musical Taste. Poetics, 24(6), 415–435.
Hennion, A. (2001). Music Lovers: Taste as Performance. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(5), 1–22.
Hennion, A. (2007). Those Things That Hold Us Together: Taste and Sociology. Cultural Sociology, 1(1), 97–114.
Hennion, A., & Gomart, E. (1999). A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users. The Sociological Review, 47(1), 220–247.
Hennion, A., & Grenier, L. (2000). Sociology of Art: New Stakes in a Post-Critical Time. In S. R. Quah & A. Sales (Eds.), International Handbook of Sociology (pp. 341–356). Sage Publications.
Hennion, A., & Muecke, S. (2016). From ANT to Pragmatism: A Journey with Bruno Latour at the CSI. New Literary History, 47(2), 289–308.
Herrmann, C. (2019). Web Residencies—Künstlerförderung online. In Der digitale Kulturbetrieb (pp. 389–415). Springer Gabler.
Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2010). Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. Routledge.
Holden, J. (2015). The Ecology of Culture. Arts and Humanities Research Council. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://ahrc.ukri.org/documents/project-reports-and-reviews/the-ecology-of-culture/.
Iles, M. (2021). “(Re)conceptualising the Value of Residency Experiences.” Paper presented at “My Journey, Knowledge and Exchange,” the 2021 Saari Well Assembly of Residency Researchers, Hietamäki, Finland, 18-22 August 2021.
Kobyshcha, V. (2018). How Does an Aesthetic Object Happen? Emergence, Disappearance, Multiplicity. Cultural Sociology, 12(4), 478–498.
Kreplak, Y. (2019). Artworks in and as Practices: The Relevance of Particulars. In P. Sormani, G. Carbone, & P. Gisler (Eds.), Practicing Art/Science Experiments in an Emerging Field (pp. 142–163). Routledge.
Kunst, B. (2015). Artist at Work: Proximity of Art and Capitalism. Zero Books.
La Rosa, M. (2021). “The Ontology of Art Residencies: Hospitality and Gift-Exchange.” Paper presented at “My Journey, Knowledge and Exchange,” the 2021 Saari Well Assembly of Residency Researchers, Hietamäki, Finland, 18-22 August 2021.
Lang, F. (2019). Bourdieu, Latour and Rasha Abbas: The Uses of Actor-Network Theory for Studying the Field(s) of Cultural Production in the Middle East and North Africa. Cultural Sociology, 13(4), 428–443.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (2011). Reflections on Etienne Souriau’s Les différents modes d’existence. In G. Harman, L. Bryant, & N. Srnicek (Eds.), The Speculative Turn Continental: Materialism and Realism (pp. 304–333). re.press Australia.
Law, J. (2009). Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. In B. Turner (Ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 141–158). Blackwell.
Lehman, K. (2017). Conceptualising the Value of Artist Residencies: a Research Agenda. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 1(1), 9–18.
Lesage, D., Peeters, J., & Van Imschoot, M. (2006). Portret van de kunstenaar als resident. Etcetera, 24(104), 22–45.
Loots, Ellen (2012). An Exploration of an Organization Form: Artists’ Residences. Paper in development. This paper has been developed for the ACEI conference, Kyoto, Japan.
Lorenz, T. (2020). “Hype House and the Los Angeles TikTok Mansion Gold Rush.” New York Times. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=hype+house.
Lübbren, N. (2001). Rural Artists' Colonies in Europe, 1870-1910. Manchester University Press.
Marling, K. A. (1977). Introduction. In Woodstock, an American art colony 1902-1977. Vassar College.
Martin, C. G., García López, A., & Mazuecos Sánchez, B. (2018). Mecanismos de supervivencia en la carrera del artista sumergido. Arte y Políticas de Identidad, 19, 219–230.
McRobbie, A. (1998). British Fashion Design: Rag Trade or Image Industry? Routledge.
Mol, A. (2010). Actor-Network Theory: Sensitive Terms and Enduring Tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft, 50, 253–269.
Pinch, T., & Trocco, F. (2002). Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer. Harvard University Press.
Pinto, M. R., Viola, S., Onesti, A., & Ciampa, F. (2020). Artists Residencies, Challenges and Opportunities for Communities’ Empowerment and Heritage Regeneration. Sustainability, 1–20.
Ploegman, H., & Doulos, N. (2018). Unpacking Residencies: Situating the Production of Cultural Relations. Kunstlicht, 39(2), 1.
Prior, N. (2015). Bourdieu and Beyond. In I. K. Shepherd & K. Devine (Eds.), The Routledge Reader on the Sociology of Music (pp. 349–358). Routledge.
Roberts, K. S. (2019). Our Town, the MacDowell Colony, and the Art of Civic Mediation. American Literary History, 31(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajz025
Scharff, C. (2017). Gender, Subjectivity, and Cultural Work: The Classical Music Profession. Routledge.
Segran, E. (2015). Welcome to the Brave New World of the Corporate-Sponsored Artist. Fast Company. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://www.fastcompany.com/3043276/welcome-to-the-brave-new-world-of-the-corporate-sponsored-artist.
Siciliano, M. L. (2021). Creative Control: The Ambivalence of Work in the Culture Industries. Columbia University Press.
Stengers, I. (2005). Introductory Notes on an Ecology of Practices. Cultural Studies Review, 1(11), 183–196.
Strandvad, S.M., Tracy C. D., & Dunn, M. (2022): Mermaids as Market Creators: Cultural Entrepreneurship in an Emerging Practice. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779211046010
Swanson, F. J., Goodrich, C., & Dean Moore, K. (2008). Bridging Boundaries: Scientists, Creative Writers, and the Long View of the Forest. Front Ecol Environ, 6(9), 499–504.
Transartists. (n.d.-a). Fabrica. Retrieved September 9, 2021, from https://www.transartists.org/en/air/fabrica.
Transartists. (n.d.-b). Types of Residency Programs. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://www.transartists.org/en/types-residency-programmes.
Vargas de Freitas Matias, R. (2016). International Artists-in-Residence 1990–2010 Mobility, Technology and Identity in Everyday Art Practices. PhD dissertation Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä.
Villagordo, E., & Domergue, P. (2011). Au croisement des postures sociologique et artistique : la résidence d’artiste Processus/Découpe. [At the crossroads of sociological and artistic viewpoints: the artist residency Processus/Cutting]. Tracés, Revue de Sciences humaines, 11, 29–45.
Wilkie, A., & Farías, I. (2015). Studio Studies: Operations, Topologies & Displacements. Routledge.
Wohl, H. (2021). Bound by Creativity: How Contemporary Art is Created and Judged. The University of Chicago Press.
Yaneva, A. (2003). When a Bus Met a Museum: Following Artists, Curators and Workers in Art Installation. Museum & Society, 1(3), 116–131.
Zolberg, V. L. (1990). Constructing a Sociology of the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank University of Groningen Research Master’s students Lucia Affaticati, Agnes Bruinsma, Nora Leidinger, Chiara Serio, Louise Vanhee, and Chunzi Wu, who participated in a tutorial on Creative Work and Residencies, and among other important contributions, compiled a multilingual literature review that expanded the vision of this research. In addition, we are grateful to all participants in “My Journey, Knowledge and Exchange,” the 2021 Saari Well Assembly of Residency Researchers in Hietamäki, Finland, organized by the Kone Foundation. This gathering opened our eyes to the diversity of residency practices and the dynamism of current residencies research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roberts, K.S., Strandvad, S.M. (2022). Artist Residencies as Creative Ecologies: Proposing a New Framework for Twenty-First-Century Cultural Production. In: McCormick, L. (eds) The Cultural Sociology of Art and Music. Cultural Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11420-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11420-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11419-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11420-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)