Abstract
This contribution focuses on the graphic project Robert Hooke developed for the Royal Society in the mid-1660s, which resulted in his celebrated Micrographia, the illustrated volume of his microscopical investigations published at London in 1665. Hooke’s Micrographia stands out as the most notable example of the early Royal Society’s reformist project, notably for the role played by visual demonstration in explaining and divulging the new world unveiled by the microscope. The book was seen as a model of the Society’s experimentalism, and microscopical views of organic and inorganic bodies were presented as evidence of mechanisms operating at multiple levels in nature, though ultimately based on God’s power and wisdom. Hooke’s descriptions of his observations and the plates included in his Micrographia are relevant for understanding not only the cultural background in which the book was born and developed, but also the seventeenth-century debates over the theory of matter and the limits of purely mechanical explanations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anstey, Peter. 2002. Boyle on seminal principles. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33: 597–630.
Anstey, Peter. 2005. Experimental versus speculative natural philosophy. In The science of nature in the seventeenth century, ed. Peter Anstey and John A. Schuster, 215–242. Dordrecht: Springer.
Aubrey, John. 1898. Brief lives, 2 vols., ed. Andrew Clark. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bennett, Jim. 1986. ‘The mechanics’ and the mechanical philosophy. History of Science 24: 1–28.
Bennett, Jim. 2003. Hooke’s instruments. In London’s Leonardo. The life and work of Robert Hooke, eds. Jim Bennet, Michael Cooper, Michael Hunter, and Lisa Jardine, 63–104. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Birch, Thomas. 1756–1757. The history of the Royal Society of London for improving of natural knowledge…, 4 vols. London: printed for A. Millar.
Boas Hall, Marie. 1991. Promoting experimental learning. Experiment and the Royal Society (1660–1727). Cambridge/New York/Port Chester/Melbourne/Sydney: Cambridge University Press.
Boyle, Robert. 1999–2000. The works of Robert Boyle, 14 vols., eds. Michael Hunter and Edward B. Davis. London: Pickering & Chatto.
Charleton, Walter. 1654. Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana: or a fabrick of science natural, upon the hypothesis of atoms, founded by Epicurus, repaired by Petrus Gassendus, augmented by Walter Charleton. London: printed by T. Newcomb, for Thomas Heath.
Clericuzio, Antonio. 1998. The mechanical philosophy and the spring of air. New light on Robert Boyle and Robert Hooke. Nuncius 13: 69–75.
Clericuzio, Antonio. 2001. Gassendi, Charleton and Boyle on matter and motion. In Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories, eds. Christoph Lüthy, John E. Murdoch, and William R. Newman, 467–482. Leiden/Boston/Köln: Brill.
Clericuzio, Antonio. 2018. Gassendi and the English mechanical philosophers. Galilæana. Studies in Renaissance and Early Modern Science XV: 3–29.
Cooper, Michael. 2003. Hooke’s career. In London’s Leonardo. The life and work of Robert Hooke, eds. Jim Bennet, Michael Cooper, Michael Hunter, and Lisa Jardine, 1–62. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Davis, Edward B. 1994. Parcere nominibus: Boyle, Hooke and the rhetorical interpretation of Descartes. In Robert Boyle reconsidered, ed. Michael Hunter, 157–176. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dear, Peter. 1985. Totius in verba: Rethoric and authority in the early Royal Society. Isis 76: 145–161.
Dennis, Michael A. 1989. Graphic understanding: Instruments and interpretation in Robert Hooke’s Micrographia. Science in Context 3: 309–364.
Descartes, René. 1897–1913. Oeuvres de Descartes, 13 vols., eds. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: Cerf.
Digby, Kenelm. 1661. A discourse concerning the vegetation of plants…. London: printed by J.C.
Doherty, Meghan C. 2012. Discovering the “true form:” Hooke’s Micrographia and the visual vocabulary of engraved portraits. Notes and Records of the Royal Society 66: 211–234.
Ehrlich, Mark E. 1995. Mechanism and activity in the scientific revolution: The case of Robert Hooke. Annals of Science 52: 127–151.
Feingold, Mordechai. 2005. The origins of the Royal Society revisited. In The practice of reform in health, medicine and science, 1500–2000, ed. Margaret Pelling, 167–183. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Feingold, Mordechai. 2006. Robert Hooke: Gentleman of science. In Robert Hooke: Tercentennial studies, ed. Michael Cooper and Michael Hunter, 203–217. Burlington: Ashgate.
Frank, Robert G. 1980. Harvey and the Oxford physiologists. Scientific ideas and social interaction. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
Garber, Daniel. 2013. Remarks on the pre-history of the mechanical philosophy. In The mechanization of natural philosophy, ed. Daniel Garber and Sophie Roux, 3–26. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gascoigne, John. 1989. Cambridge in the age of enlightenment. Science, religion and politics from the restoration to the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gassendi, Pierre. 1649. Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogene Laertii. Lyon: apud Guillelmum Barbier.
Gassendi, Pierre. 1964–1994. Opera Omnia, 6 vols., Faksimile-Neudruck der Ausgabe von Lyon 1658 in 6 Bänden, mit einer Einleitung von Tullio Gregory, F. Frommann (G. Holzboog): Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.
Glanvill, Joseph. 1668. Plus ultra, or, the progress and advancement of knowledge since the days of Aristotle in an account of some of the most remarkable late improvements of practical, useful learning, to encourage philosophical endeavor…. London: printed for James Collins.
Greengrass, Mark, Michael Leslie, and Michael Hannon. 2013. The Hartlib papers. Published by The Digital Humanities Institute, University of Sheffield. https://www.dhi.ac.uk/hartlib/view?docset=main&docname=29_05_43. Accessed 23 June 2020.
Harwood, John T. 1989. Rhetoric and graphics in Micrographia. In Robert Hooke. New Studies, eds. Michael Hunter, Simon Schaffer, 119–147. Woodbridge, Suffolk: The Boydell Press.
Heyd, Michael. 1981. The reaction to enthusiasm in the seventeenth century: Towards an integrative approach. The Journal of Modern History 53: 258–280.
Heyd, Michael. 1995. Be sober and reasonable: the critique of enthusiasm in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. Leiden: Brill.
Hirai, Hirao. 2005. Le concept de semence dans les théories de la matière à la Renaissance. De Marsile Ficin à Pierre Gassendi. Thournout: Brepols.
Hooke, Robert. 1661. An attempt for the explication of the phænomena observable in an experiment published by the honourable Robert Boyle, Esq.; In the xxxv experiment of his epistolical discourse touching the aire.... London: printed by J.H. for Sam. Thomson.
Hooke, Robert. 1665. Micrographia, or some physiological descriptions of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses: with observations and inquiries thereupon. London: Printed by Jo. Martyn and Ja. Allestry.
Hunter, Michael. 1989a. Latitudinarianism and the ‘Ideology’ of the Royal Society: Thomas Sprat’s history of the Royal Society (1667) reconsidered. In Establishing the new science: The experience of the early Royal Society, ed. Michael Hunter, 45–71. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell Press.
Hunter, Michael. 1989b. Science and society in restoration England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunter, Michael. 1994. The Royal Society and its fellows (1660–1700), the morphology of an early scientific institutions, 2nd ed. Oxford: Alden Press.
Hunter, Michael. 2007. Robert Boyle and the early Royal Society: A reciprocal exchange in the making of Baconian science. British Journal for the History of Science 20: 1–23.
Hunter, Matthew C. 2013. Wicked intelligence: Visual art and the science of experiment in restoration London. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lennon, Thomas M. 1993. The battle of the gods and giants. The legacies of Descartes and Gassendi (1655–1715). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Meinel, Christoph. 1988. Early seventeenth-century atomism: Theory, epistemology and the insufficiency of experiment. Isis 79: 68–103.
Neri, Janice. 2011. The insect and the image: Visualizing nature in early modern Europe, 1500–1700. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Newman, William R., and Lawrence M. Principe. 2002. Alchemy tried in the fire: Starkey, Boyle and the fate of Helmontian chemistry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Oldenburg, Henry. 1665. An account of Mr. Hooks Micrographia, or the physiological descriptions of minute bodies, made by magnifying glasses. Philosophical Transactions 1: 27–32.
Oldenburg, Henry. 1965–1986. The correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 13 vols., eds. Alfred R. Hall and Marie Boas Hall. Madison, Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin Press.
Power, Henry. 1664. Experimental philosophy, in three books. London: printed by T. Roycroft for John Martin and James Allestry.
Purrington, Robert D. 2009. The first professional scientist: Robert Hooke and the Royal Society of London. Basel/Boston/Berlin: Birkhäuser Verlag AG.
Ricciardo, Salvatore. 2016. Robert Boyle. Un naturalista scettico. Brescia: Morcelliana.
Schaffer, Simon. 1987. Godly man and mechanical philosophers: Souls and spirits in restoration natural philosophy. Science in Context 1: 53–85.
Schuster, John A. 2000. Descartes opticien: The construction of the law of refraction and the manufacture of its physical rationales, 1618–29. In Descartes’ natural philosophy, ed. Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, and John Sutton, 258–312. London/New York: Routledge.
Shapin, Steven. 1989. Who was Robert Hooke? In Robert Hooke. New studies, eds. Michael Hunter and Simon Schaffer, 253–285. Woodbridge, Suffolk: The Boydell Press.
Simpson, A.D.C. 1985. Richard Reeve—the “English Campani”—and the origins of the London telescope-making tradition. Vistas in Astronomy 28: 357–365.
Sorbière, Samuel. 1664. Relation d’un voyage en Angleterre, où sont touchées plusieurs choses, qui regardent l’estat des sciences, et de la religion…. Paris: Louis Billaine.
South, Robert. 1697. Twelve sermons preached upon several occasions...The second edition, 2 vols. London: S. D.
Sprat, Thomas. 1667. The history of the Royal Society of London, for the improving of natural knowledge. London: printed by T.R. for J. Martin.
Waller, Richard. 1705. The life of Dr. Robert Hooke. In The posthumous works of Dr. Robert Hooke, ed. Richard Waller. London: Smith and Walford.
Wilson, Catherine. 1995. The invisible world: Early modern philosophy and the invention of the microscope. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wood, Paul B. 1980. Methodology and apologetics: Thomas Sprat’s “History of the Royal Society.” The British Journal for the History of Science 13: 1–26.
Wren, Christopher. 1750. Parentalia: or, memoirs of the family of the Wrens... chiefly of Sir Christopher Wren.... Compiled, by his Son Christopher, now published by his Grandson, Stephen Wren, Esq., With the Care of Joseph Ames. London: T. Osborn and R. Dodsley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ricciardo, S. (2023). Microscopy and Natural Philosophy: Robert Hooke, His Micrographia, and the Early Royal Society. In: Valleriani, M., Giannini, G., Giannetto, E. (eds) Scientific Visual Representations in History. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11317-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11317-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11316-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11317-8
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)