Skip to main content

A Comparative Assessment of Gypsum and Magnesite Composites’ Air Resistance Modified by Secondary Resources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Networked Control Systems for Connected and Automated Vehicles (NN 2022)

Abstract

The purpose of this work is a comparative assessment of the resistance to alternating humidification and drying (air resistance) of modified pressed composites based on gypsum binder and magnesia cement. In order to increase the water and air resistance of small-piece gypsum and magnesite products manufactured by pressing, modifying fillers were introduced into the composition of molding mixtures as secondary resources. There are investigated changes in the physical and mechanical properties of pressed modified composites, as well as their durability indicators during cyclic tests for alternating humidification and drying. The studies have shown that the methods of gypsum and magnesia binders’ modification make it possible to obtain durable materials with increased water and air resistance by pressing. Gypsum and magnesite construction products become suitable for the construction of walls of low-rise buildings, as well as partitions in rooms with a humid indoor regime manufactured by pressing according to the proposed technologies. The chemical composition and the nature of the crystallization structure of modified gypsum composites cause their better resistance to alternating stresses during cyclic humidification and drying in contrast to magnesite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferronskaya AV (2008) Gypsum in low-rise construction. Publishing House of the Association of Construction Universities, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vaivad AYa (2011) Magnesia binders. Zinatne, Riga

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khalil AA, Tawfik A, Hegazy AA (2018) Plaster composites modified morphology with enhanced compressive strength and water resistance characteristics. Constr Build Mater 167:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitina NA, Revva IB, Ditts AA, Simonov D (2016) Waterproof magnesia binder for composite materials. Key Eng Mater 712:182–187. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.712.182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaklyugin AV, Kastornykh LI, Stupen NS, Kovalenko VV (2020) Press-formed composites with alternate wetting and drying resistance based on modified gypsum binder. Constr Mater 12:40–46. https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2020-787-12-40-46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferronskaya AV (2014) Durability of gypsum materials, products and structures. Stroyizdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garda-Trinanes P, Morgeneyer M, Casares J, Bao M (2012) Use of organic byproducts as binders in the roll compaction of caustic magnesia. Powder Technol 226:173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.04.039

  8. Domanskaya I, Bednyagin S, Fisher HB (2018) Water-resistant gypsum binding agents and concretes based thereof as promising materials for building green. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 177(1):12029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/177/1/012029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaklyugin AV, Stupen NS, Kastornykh LI, Kovalenko VV (2020) Dependence of water resistance of moulded materials containing air-setting binders on effective porosity. Proc Univ Invest Constr Real Estate 10(1):68–75. https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2020-1-68-75

  10. Li G, Yu H (2010) Influence of fly ash and silica fume on water-resistant property of magnesium oxychloride cement. J Wuhan Univ Technol-Mater Sci Ed 25:721–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-010-0079-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Petropavlovskaya VB, Zavadko MYu, Novichenkova TB, Petropavlovskiy KS (2021) The use of metakaolin and hydraulic removal ash in non-burnt gypsum composites. Constr Mater 8:11–17. https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2021-794-8-11-17

  12. Batova MD, Semenova YuA, Gordina AF (2021) Structure and properties of gypsum compositions with mineral dispersed courses. Constr Mater 10:49–53. https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2021-796-10-49-53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miryuk OA (2021) Magnesia compositions with technogenic fillers. J Phys Conf Ser 1967(1):012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1967/1/012054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Namsone E, Sahmenko G, Korjakins A, Shvetsova I (2021) Mechanical and thermal properties of magnesia binder based on natural and technogenic raw materials. Solid State Phenom 320:181–185. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.320.181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kastiukas G, Ruan S, Unluer C, Liang S, Zhou X (2019) Environmental assasment of magnesium oxychloride cement samples: a case study in Europe. Sustainability 11(24):6957. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaklyugin A, Stupen N, Kastornykh L, Kovalenko V (2020) Pressed composites based on gypsum and magnesia binders modified with secondary resources. Mater Sci Forum 1011:52–58. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1011.52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stupen N, Kaklyugin A, Kastornykh L, Kovalenko V (2021) Pressed magnesia composites with improved weather resistance properties. Mater Sci Forum 1043:27–35. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1043.27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stupen NS, Kaklyugin AV, Kastornykh LI, Kovalenko VV (2021) Using a magnesia binder to improve the airproof performance of molded composites. Monthly J Constr Archit 16(2):176–185. https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2021.2.176-185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bessonov I, Zhukov A, Efimov B (2022) Gypsum polymer materials in construction. In: Lecture notes in networks and systems, vol 247, pp 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80946-1_82

  20. Zyryanova VN, Lytkina EV, Ochur-Ool AP (2021) Improving water resistance of magnesium binding substances by the introduction of mineral fillers. Defect and Diffus Forum 410:790–798. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.410.790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nevsky VA (2012) Fatigue and deformability of concrete. University book, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Kaklyugin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kaklyugin, A., Stupen, N., Kastornykh, L., Kovalenko, V. (2023). A Comparative Assessment of Gypsum and Magnesite Composites’ Air Resistance Modified by Secondary Resources. In: Guda, A. (eds) Networked Control Systems for Connected and Automated Vehicles. NN 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 509. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11058-0_158

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics