Abstract
In a global economy marked by accelerating processes of both economic integration and decoupling, policymakers of wealthy states, including those in the European Union (EU), are showing an increasing willingness to weaponize their economic power capabilities as integral parts of foreign and security policy-making. Yet, such growing geoeconomic ambitions are rarely accompanied by adequate reforms of the diplomatic structures underpinning them. In analyzing deficiencies of EU geoeconomic diplomacy through case studies pertaining to the EU’s of sanctions against Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine in early 2022 as well the development of a new EU anti-coercion instrument to counter coercive trade practice by its geoeconomic rivals such as China, this chapter proposes a number of reform initiatives to be considered at the domestic, European, and international levels: (i) a stronger cross-integration of EU member states’ ministries of foreign affairs and ministries of economics; (ii) the creation of EU-level “geoeconomic committees” integrating private actors in geoeconomic deliberations and decision-making; and (iii) a critical assessment by EU policymakers whether the looming disintegration of solidified global cooperation platforms, such as the G20, into Western and non-Western camps should be actively countered or not.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Further Reading
Abels, G. 2021. “The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Consultative Institutions in a Multichannel Democracy.” In The Institutions of the European Union, eds. D. Hodson, U. Puetter, S. Saurugger, and J. Peterson, 5th ed., 369–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Badel, L. 2010. Diplomatie et grands contrats: L’Etat français et les marchés extérieurs au XXe siècle. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
———. 2014. “Conflicting Identities: French Economic Diplomacy between the State and Companies in the Twentieth Century.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 25 (3): 432–52.
Baldwin, D.A. 1985. Economic Statecraft. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Blackwill, R.D., and J.M. Harris. 2016. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bollen, Y., F. De Ville, and J. Orbie. 2016. “EU Trade Policy: Persistent Liberalisation, Contentious Protectionism.” Journal of European Integration 38 (3): 279–94.
BusinessEurope. 2022. Towards an EU Anti-coercion Instrument—Feedback on the European Commission Proposal for a Regulation on the Protection of the Union and Its Member States from Economic Coercion by Third Countries. https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/position_papers/rex/2022-03-31_towards_an_eu_anti-coercion_instrument-feedback_on_european_commission_proposal.pdf.
Cooper, A.F. 2019. “The G20 Is Dead as a Crisis or Steering Committee: Long Live the G20 as Hybrid Focal Point.” South African Journal of International Affairs 26 (4): 505–20.
Crochet, V. 2022. “The EU Anti-Coercion Proposal: Legitimate Trade Instrument or Hidden ‘Economic’ Sanctions?” EU Law Live. https://issuu.com/eulawlive/docs/weekend_edition_96.
Drezner, D.W., H. Farrell, and A.L. Newman, eds. 2021. The Uses and Abuses of Weaponized Interdependence. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
EESC. 2020. REX Work Programme (October 2020–April 2023). https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/eesc-2020-05848-00-02-tcd-tra-en.docx.
European Commission. 2021a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the EuropeanEconomic and Social Committee and the Committeeof the Regions. “The European Economic and Financial System: Fostering Openness, Strength and Resilience” (COM/2021/32 final). EUR-Lex. https://eur‐lex.europa.eu/legal‐content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0032.
———. 2021b. “Inception Impact Assessment: Instrument to Deter and Counteract Coercive Actions by Third Countries.” https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12803-Trade-mechanism-to-deter-&-counteract-coercive-action-by-non-EU-countries_en.
———. 2021c. Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on Strengthening the EU’s Contribution to Rules-based Multilateralism (JOIN(2021) 3 final). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52021JC0003.
———. 2021d. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of the Union and its Member States from Economic Coercion by Third Countries (COM(2021) 775 final). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0775.
———. 2021e. “Strengthening the EU’s Autonomy—Commission Seeks Input on a New Anti-coercion Instrument [Press Release],” March 23. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_1325.
———. 2022a. “Enforcing Sanctions against Listed Russian and Belarussian Oligarchs: Commission’s ‘Freeze and Seize’ Task Force Steps Up Work with International Partners [Press Release],” March 17. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_1828.
———. 2022b. Overview of Sanctions and Related Tools. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/international-relations/restrictive-measures-sanctions/what-are-restrictive-measures-sanctions_en#guidance.
Gehrke, T. 2022. “EU Open Strategic Autonomy and the Trappings of Geoeconomics.” European Foreign Affairs Review 27 (2): 61–78.
Hackenbroich, J., and P. Zerka. 2021. “Economic Arm-twisting Is On the Rise. Europe Must Learn How to Resist It.” European Council on Foreign Relations, November 25. https://ecfr.eu/article/economic-arm-twisting-is-on-the-rise-europe-must-learn-how-to-resist-it/.
Hackenbroich, J., F. Medunic, and P. Zerka. 2022. “Tough Trade: The Hidden Costs of Economic Coercion.” European Council on Foreign Relations, February 1. https://ecfr.eu/publication/tough-trade-the-hidden-costs-of-economic-coercion/.
Leonard, M. 2021. “The Rule Maker Race.” Project Syndicate, December 31. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/us-eu-china-who-decides-global-rules-by-mark-leonard-2021-12.
Lohmann, S., and J. Vorrath, eds. 2021. International Sanctions: Improving Implementation through Better Interface Management. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Working Paper. https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/arbeitspapiere/WP_International_Sanctions.pdf.
Moraes, H. C., and M. Wigell. 2020. The Emergence of Strategic Capitalism: Geoeconomics, Corporate Statecraft and the Repurposing of the Global Economy. Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Working Paper. https://www.fiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/wp117_the-emergence-of-strategic-capitalism_final30092020.pdf.
Nephew, R. 2017. The Art of Sanctions: A View from the Field. New York: Columbia University Press.
Okano-Heijmans, M. 2011. “Conceptualizing Economic Diplomacy: The Crossroads of International Relations, Economics, IPE and Diplomatic Studies.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 6 (1–2): 7–36.
Olsen, K.B. 2020. “Diplomats, Domestic Agency and the Implementation of Sanctions: The MFAs of France and Germany in the Age of Geoeconomic Diplomacy.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (1–2): 126–54.
———. 2022a. “Diplomatic Realisation of the EU’s ‘Geoeconomic Pivot’: Sanctions, Trade, and Development Policy Reform.” Politics and Governance 10 (1): 5–15.
———. 2022b. The Geoeconomic Diplomacy of Economic Sanctions: Networked Practices and Sanctions Implementation. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Patey, L. 2021. How China Loses: The Pushback against Chinese Global Ambitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pop, V., S. Fleming, and J. Politi. 2022. “Weaponisation of Finance: How the West Unleashed ‘Shock and Awe’ on Russia.” Financial Times, April 6. https://www.ft.com/content/5b397d6b-bde4-4a8c-b9a4-080485d6c64a.
Rajghatta, C. 2022. “G20 = G10 + G10: India and U.S. Diverge on Russia Again.” Times of India, April 21. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/g20-g10-g10-india-and-us-diverge-on-russia-again/articleshow/90982557.cms.
Siddiqui, S. 2022. “Biden Meets Modi as U.S. Presses India over Russia.” Wall Street Journal, April 11. https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-meets-modi-as-u-s-presses-india-over-russia-11649697111.
Szczepański, M. 2022. Proposed Anti-coercion Instrument. European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/729299/EPRS_BRI(2022)729299_EN.pdf.
Tian, Y.L. 2021. “China Passes Law to Counter Foreign Sanctions.” Reuters, June 10. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-passes-law-counter-foreign-sanctions-2021-06-10/.
White House. 2022. Remarks by President Biden and Chancellor Scholz of the Federal Republic of Germany at Press Conference, February 7. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/02/07/remarks-by-president-biden-and-chancellor-scholz-of-the-federal-republic-of-germany-at-press-conference/.
Zarate, J. 2013. Treasury’s War: The Unleashing of a New Era of Financial Warfare. New York: PublicAffairs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Olsen, K.B. (2023). Geoeconomic Diplomacy: Reforming the Instrumentalization of Economic Interdependencies and Power. In: Hare, P.W., Manfredi-Sánchez, J.L., Weisbrode, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Diplomatic Reform and Innovation. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10971-3_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10971-3_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10970-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10971-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)