Abstract
As shown by public opinion studies since the 1930s, modern public information and communication are destined to play an essential role in the shaping of a common space for political deliberation and representation. Since then it has been generally recognised that without information or access to the communication space, freedom of expression and other social rights tend to be violated. Indeed, the current quality of the democratic life of a society can be measured in terms of the vitality and diversity of its information system, even more so with the spread of what some authors call “media democracy”. The desire to become familiar with the conditions and parameters of the democratic organisation of mediation in theory and, above all, in empirical analysis, has been widely cultivated. To the point that political communication can be regarded as one of the most popular disciplines and objects of study in communicology research. As could not be otherwise, it has also been the persistent target of scathing criticism and academic debate, above all in relation to normative problems deriving from the need for social regulation and to the existing relationships of mutual dependence, directly or indirectly, between the social system and the public communication system. The ample scientific production in this respect has resulted in the observation of the different realities of political communication in terms of the effects, negative consequences and institutional dimensions of the phenomenology of mediatised democratic culture. While it has sidelined significant aspects such as emotions, imaginaries and representations of public culture and, for that matter, participation that facilitates or restricts the mediations of the cultural industries. In the digital age, this neglect of the subjective, experiential and reconstructionist aspects of mediation is currently highlighting the need for another approach. One that critically and specifically considers the aspects of reception, consumption and political production of the mediatised social realm and attempts to identify, in the broadest cultural sense of the word, the structural mutations that the communication industries promote in organisational models and contemporary forms of collective action, which, among other processes, make it easier to embark on new processes of participation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bourdieu, P. (1990 [1970]). Reproduction in education society and culture. Sage.
Echeverría, J. (1999). Los señores del aire. Telépolis y el tercer entorno. Editorial Destino.
Exeni, J. L. (2005). MediaMorfosis. Comunicación política e in/gobernabilidad en democracia. Plural-Fado.
Gardels, N. (2012, March 20). Medios sociales y democracia deliberativa. El País. https://elpais.com/elpais/2012/03/15/opinion/1331811901_336964.html
Harvey, D. (2013). Ciudades rebeldes. IAEN.
Hernández Busto, E. (2010, September 30). Memoria y olvido en la era de Internet. El País. https://elpais.com/diario/2010/09/30/opinion/1285797611_850215.html
Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
Lévy, P. (2004). Ciberdemocracia: ensayo sobre filosofía política. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC).
Mattelart, A. (2005). Sociedad de saber y control de la información y de la comunicación. https://docplayer.es/53452332-Comunicacion-y-la-critica-de-la-economia-politica.html
Mattelart, A. (2010). The globalisation of surveillance. Polity.
Mattelart, A. (2012). Historia de la Sociedad de la Información. Paidós.
Pérez Luño, A. E. (2004). ¿Ciberciudadani@ o Ciudadani@.com? Gedisa.
Ramonet, I. (2016). El imperio de la vigilancia. Clave Intelectual.
Sáez Vacas, F. (2011). Nativos digitales, inteligencia digital ¿Homo digitalis? Telos, 86, 6–8.
Sierra, F. (2019). Introducción a la Comunicología. ACCI.
Subirats, J. (2002). Los dilemas de una relación inevitable. Innovación democrática y tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación. In H. Cairo (Ed.), Democracia digital: límites y oportunidades (pp. 89–114). Editorial Trotta.
Tarkovsky, A. (1987). Sculpting in time: Reflections on the cinema. University of Texas Press.
Trías, E. (2010, September 25). Tiempo de cine. ABC. https://www.abc.es/20100925/opinion-la-tercera/tiempo-cine-20100925.html
Verdú, V. (2005). Yo y tú, objetos de lujo. El personismo: la primera revolución cultural del Siglo XXI. Debate.
Vitalis, A., & Mattelart, A. (2015). De Orwell al cibercontrol: 58. Gedisa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sierra Caballero, F. (2022). A Media Citizenry and Communication Policies: The Challenges of Information Democracy. In: Gómez Gutiérrez, J.J., Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Anchústegui Igartua, E. (eds) Democratic Institutions and Practices. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10808-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10808-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10807-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10808-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)