Abstract
In this chapter, we look at the reasoning process called abduction as it happens in clinical reasoning, specifically, in diagnostics. Abduction is recognized as one of the most important forms of reasoning in studying relations between causes and effects, and often attributed to reasoning processes in scientific discoveries. Interestingly, abduction does not only play a role in scientific reasoning, but it is believed that people apply it in common everyday scenarios, for example, by detectives and judges. Yet there have been few attempts to document this form of reasoning in clinical interactions. Doctors apply abduction daily in their clinical practice, that is, in the attempt to diagnose their patients, and, as it will be seen, patients themselves use abductive reasoning to understand and explain their own symptoms. This chapter provides empirical evidence of the use of abductive inferential reasoning in clinical medicine, focusing on diagnosis as it happens in the moment of interaction between a doctor and their patient. The goal is not to document in a structured way the extent to which abductive inferential patterns appear in a typical doctor-patient interaction, but rather to illustrate that kind of interaction and mode of reasoning using real dialogues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Nasser, B. (2017). Medical expert systems survey. International Journal of Engineering and Information Systems (IJEAIS), 1(7), 218–224.
Anderson, D. R. (1986). The evolution of Peirce’s concept of abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 22(2), 45–164.
Bolton, J. W. (2015). Varieties of clinical reasoning. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(3), 486–489.
Campaner, R., & Sterpetti, F. (2022). Abduction, clinical reasoning, and therapeutic strategies. In L. Magnani (Ed.), Handbook of abductive cognition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_12-1
Chiffi, D., & Andreoletti, M. (2022). Abduction in prognostic reasoning. In: L. Magnani (Ed.), Handbook of abductive cognition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_11-1
Chiffi, D., & Zanotti, R. (2016). Fear of knowledge: Clinical hypotheses in diagnostic and prognostic reasoning. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23(5), 928–934.
Clark, C. C. (2002). Trust in medicine. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27(1), 11–29.
Consolandi, M., Martini, C., Reni, M., Arcidiacono, P. G., Falconi, M., Graffigna, G., & Capurso, G. (2020). COMMUNI. CARE (COMMUNIcation and patient engagement at diagnosis of PAncreatic CAncer): Study protocol. Frontiers in Medicine, 7, 134.
Denecker, M., Martens, B., & De Raedt, L. (1996). On the difference between abduction and induction: a model theoretic perspective. In ECAI96 workshop on abductive and inductive reasoning (pp. 1–7).
Douven, I. (1999). Inference to the best explanation made coherent. Philosophy of Science, 66, S424–S435.
Douven, I. (2021). Abduction. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition). URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/abduction/
Dragulinescu, S. (2016). Inference to the best explanation and mechanisms in medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 37, 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9365-9
Fann, K. T. (1970). Peirce’s theory of abduction. Martinus Nijhoff.
Festa, R., Crupi, V., & Giaretta, P. (2010). Forme di ragionamento e valutazione delle ipotesi nelle scienze mediche. In A. Pagnini (Ed.), Filosofia della medicina. Epistemologia, ontologia, etica (pp. 119–142). Carocci Editore.
Frankfurt, H. (1958). Peirce’s notion of abduction. Journal of Philosophy, 55, 593–596.
Haig, B. D. (2008). Scientific method, abduction, and clinical reasoning. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(9), 1013–1018.
Harman, G. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74, 88–95.
Klichowicz, A., Lippoldt, D. E., Rosner, A., & Krems, J. F. (2021). Information stored in memory affects abductive reasoning. Psychological Research, 85(8), 3119–3133.
Lipscomb, M. (2012). Abductive reasoning and qualitative research. Nursing Philosophy, 13(4), 244–256.
Magnani, L. (1997). Basic science reasoning and clinical reasoning intertwined: Epistemological analysis and consequences for medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2(2), 115–130.
Mirza, N. A., Akhtar-Danesh, N., Noesgaard, C., Martin, L., & Staples, E. (2014). A concept analysis of abductive reasoning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(9), 1980–1994.
Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Defending abduction. Philosophy of Science, 66, S436–S451.
Pfister, R. (2022). Towards a theory of abduction based on conditionals. Synthese, 200(3), 1–30.
Pietarinen, A. V., & Bellucci, F. (2014). New light on Peirce’s conceptions of retroduction, deduction, and scientific reasoning. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 28(4), 353–373.
Pinto, R. Z., Ferreira, M. L., Oliveira, V. C., Franco, M. R., Adams, R., Maher, C. G., & Ferreira, P. H. (2012). Patient-centred communication is associated with positive therapeutic alliance: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy, 58(2), 77–87.
Pitt, J. C. (Ed.). (1988). Theories of explanation. Oxford University Press.
Prasad, G. R. (2021). Enhancing clinical judgement in virtual care for complex chronic disease. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 27(3), 677–683.
Råholm, M. B. (2010). Abductive reasoning and the formation of scientific knowledge within nursing research. Nursing Philosophy, 11(4), 260–270.
Samuels, W. J. (2007). Adam Smith’s History of Astronomy argument: how broadly does it apply? And where do propositions which “sooth the imagination” come from? History of Economic Ideas, XV(2), 1–26
Smith, A. (1980 [1795]). History of astronomy. In W. P. D. Wightman, J. C. Bryce, & I. S. Ross (Eds.), The glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of adam smith, vol. 3: essays on philosophical subjects with Dugald Stewart’s account of Adam Smith
Stanley, D. E., & Campos, D. G. (2013). The logic of medical diagnosis. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 56(2), 300–315.
Stanley, D. E., & Nyrup, R. (2020, March). Strategies in abduction: Generating and selecting diagnostic hypotheses. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 45(2), 159–178. Oxford University Press.
Stanley, D. E., & Sehon, S. R. (2019). Medical reasoning and doctor-patient communication. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 25(6), 962–969.
Upshur, R. (1997). Certainty, probability and abduction: Why we should look to CS Peirce rather than Gödel for a theory of clinical reasoning. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 3(3), 201–206.
Vanstone, M., Monteiro, S., Colvin, E., Norman, G., Sherbino, J., Sibbald, M., … & Peters, A. (2019). Experienced physician descriptions of intuition in clinical reasoning: A typology. Diagnosis, 6(3), 259–268.
Veen, M. (2021). Creative leaps in theory: The might of abduction. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 26(3), 1173–1183.
Walton, D. (2004). Abductive reasoning. University of Alabama Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Appendix: Note on Data
Appendix: Note on Data
The data was collected between July 2021 and January 2022. An assistant recorded the interaction between patients and doctors. All dialogues have been completely anonymized due to the sensitivity of the data collected. All doctor-patient recordings were assigned a letter initial, in alphabetical order, and all patients are named in this chapter with the corresponding letter. Doctors are not named or identified in any way. All patients have given consent to the recordings and their use for research purposes, and the protocol was approved by the San Raffaele Hospital Ethical Committee. A copy of the authorization can be obtained from the author.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Martini, C. (2023). Abductive Reasoning in Clinical Diagnostics. In: Magnani, L. (eds) Handbook of Abductive Cognition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10134-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10135-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering