Abstract
Fruitfully approaching the problems of discoverability involves an important intermediate step, which concerns the role of abductive cognition, that is, reasoning to hypotheses and the logical models of it. To this aim, when engaged in formalizing abductive reasoning, it is extremely useful to see inferences adopting the more general concepts of input and output instead of those of premisses and conclusions, which are standardly used to characterize abduction in the syllogistic scheme of the fallacy of “affirming the consequent.” Indeed, from this perspective, abductive inferences can be first of all seen as related to logical processes in which input and output fail to hold each other in an expected relation, with the solution involving the modification of inputs, not that of outputs. Unfortunately, if input and output fail to hold each other in a “good” relation, very difficult is to solve the related abductive problem: discoverability is jeopardized. In this perspective – and given the fact that science produces and “maximizes” cognition through a process in which affirming truths implies negating truths–the analysis of abductive processes leads us to the emphasis on the importance of the following main aspects: “optimization of eco-cognitive situatedness,” “maximization of changeability” of both input and output, and high “information-sensitiveness.” It will be also illustrated that irrelevance and implausibility are not always offensive to reason, and so they can favor both discoverability and discovery. A final section will be devoted to a clarification of the strict relationship between diagnosticability, “affordances” – as environmental anchors that allow us to better exploit external resources – and abduction. Especially diagnosticability, but of course also discoverability, is of course related to the availability of the appropriate affordances.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aliseda, A. (1997). Seeking Explanations: Abduction in Logic, Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence. PhD thesis, Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation.
Aliseda, A. (2006). Abductive Reasoning. Logical Investigations Into Discovery and Explanation. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
Barés-Gómez, C., & Fontaine, M. (2021). Between sentential and model-based abductions. A dialogical approach. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 29(4), 425–446. Special Issue on “Formal Representations in Model-Based Reasoning and Abduction”, ed. by A. Nepomuceno, L. Magnani, F. Salguero, C. Barés-Gómez, & M. Fontaine.
Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2014). An epistemological analysis of gossip and gossip-based knowledge. Synthese, 191, 4037–4067.
Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating Reason: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/Edinburgh.
Brown, B., & Priest, G. (2004). Chunk and permeate, a paraconsistent inference strategy. Part I: The infinitesimal calculus. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 33(4), 379–388.
Cabrera, F. (2017). Can there be a Bayesian explanationism? On the prospects of a productive partnership. Synthese, 194(4), 1245–1272.
Cabrera, F. (2020). Does IBE require a “model” of explanation? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(2), 727–750.
Campos, D. G. (2011). On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation. Synthese, 180(3), 419–442.
Einstein, A. (2014). Relativity and the problem of space [1952]. In Ideas and Opinions (S. Bergmann, Trans., pp. 360–377). New York: Crown Publisher.
Estrada-González, L. (2013). Remarks on some general features of abduction. Journal of Logic and Computation, 232(1), 181–197.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against Method. London/New York: Verso.
Fontaine, M., & Barés-Gómez, C. (2019). Conjecturing hypotheses in a dialogical logic for abduction. In D. Gabbay, L. Magnani, W. Park, & A. Pietarinen (Eds.), Natural Arguments, A Tribute to John Woods (pp. 379–414). London: College Publications.
Gabbay, D. M., & Woods, J. (2005). The Reach of Abduction. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Gibson, A., & Bruza, P. (2021). Transepistemic abduction: Reasoning across epistemic domains. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 29(4), 469–482. Special Issue on “Formal Representations in Model-Based Reasoning and Abduction”, ed. by A. Nepomuceno, L. Magnani, F. Salguero, Barés-Gómez, M. Fontaine.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Hendricks, F. V., & Faye, J. (1999). Abducting explanation. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery (pp. 271–294). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Kakas, A., Kowalski, R. A., & Toni, F. (1993). Abductive logic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2(6), 719–770.
Kowalski, R. A. (1979). Logic for Problem Solving. New York: Elsevier.
Kuipers, T. A. F. (1999). Abduction aiming at empirical progress of even truth approximation leading to a challenge for computational modelling. Foundations of Science, 4, 307–323.
Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R. (2006). Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 15, 95–104.
Laland, K. N., & Sterelny, K. (2006). Perspective: Seven reasons (not) to neglect niche construction. Evolution. International Journal of Organic Evolution, 60(9), 4757–4779.
Livio, M. (2013). Brilliant Blunders: From Darwin to Einstein. Colossal Mistakes by Great Scientists That Changed Our Understanding of Life and the Universe. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Magnani, L. (1988). Epistémologie de l’invention scientifique. Communication and Cognition, 21, 273–291.
Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, Reason, and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Magnani, L. (2007). Morality in a Technological World. Knowledge as Duty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive Cognition. The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
Magnani, L. (2011). Understanding Violence. The Intertwining of Morality, Religion, and Violence: A Philosophical Stance. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
Magnani, L. (2015a). The eco-cognitive model of abduction. ’ now: Naturalizing the logic of abduction. Journal of Applied Logic, 13, 285–315.
Magnani, L. (2015b). Naturalizing logic. Errors of reasoning vindicated: Logic reapproaches cognitive science. Journal of Applied Logic, 13, 13–36.
Magnani, L. (2016). The eco-cognitive model of abduction. Irrelevance and implausibility exculpated. Journal of Applied Logic, 15, 94–129.
Magnani, L. (2017). The Abductive Structure of Scientific Creativity. An Essay on the Ecology of Cognition. Cham: Springer.
Magnani, L. (2019). AlphaGo, locked strategies, and eco-cognitive openness. Philosophies, 4(1), 8.
Magnani, L. (2021). Computational domestication of ignorant entities. Unconventional cognitive embodiments. Synthese, 198, 7503–7532. Special Issue on “Knowing the Unknown” (guest editors L. Magnani & S. Arfini).
Magnani, L. (2022). Discoverability. The Urgent Need of an Ecology of Human Creativity. Cham: Springer.
Mcauliffe, W. H. B. (2015). How did abduction get confused with inference to the best explanation? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 51(3), 300–319.
McJohn, S. M. (1993). On uberty: Legal reasoning by analogy and Peirce’s theory of abduction. Willamette Law Review, 29, 191–235.
Meheus, J., Verhoeven, L., Van Dyck, M., & Provijn, D. (2002). Ampliative adaptive logics and the foundation of logic-based approaches to abduction. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & C. Pizzi (Eds.), Logical and Computational Aspects of Model-Based Reasoning (pp. 39–71). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche Construction. The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Park, W. (2015). On classifying abduction. Journal of Applied Logic, 13, 215–238.
Park, W. (2017a). On Lorenzo Magnani’s manipulative abduction. In L. Magnani & T. Bertolotti (Eds.), Handbook of Model-Based Science (pp. 197 –213). Berlin: Springer.
Park, W. (2017b). Abduction in Context. The Conjectural Dynamics of Scientific Reasoning. Cham: Springer.
Peirce, C. S. (1866–1913). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Vols. 1–6, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.; Vols. 7–8, A. W. Burks, Ed. (1931–1958).
Pietarinen, A.-V. (2020). Abduction and diagrams. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 29(4), 447–468. Special Issue on “Formal Representations in Model-Based Reasoning and Abduction”, ed. by A. Nepomuceno, L. Magnani, F. Salguero, C. Barés-Gómez, & M. Fontaine.
Thom, R. (1988). Esquisse d’une sémiophysique. Paris: InterEditions. Translated by V. Meyer, Semio Physics: A Sketch. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley, 1990.
van Benthem, J. (2007). Abduction at the interface of logic and philosophy of science. Theoria, 60(22/3), 271–273.
Wells, A. J. (2002). Gibson’s affordances and Turing’s theory of computation. Ecological Psychology, 14(3), 141–180.
Windsor, W. L. (2004). An ecological approach to semiotics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 34(2), 179–198.
Woods, J. (2007). Ignorance and semantic tableaux: Aliseda on abduction. Theoria, 60(22/3), 305–318.
Woods, J. (2011). Recent developments in abductive logic. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42(1), 240–244. Essay Review of Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive Cognition. The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
Woods, J. (2013). Errors of Reasoning. Naturalizing the Logic of Inference. London: College Publications.
Woods, J. (2017). Reorienting the logic of abduction. In L. Magnani & T. Bertolotti (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science (pp. 137–150). Cham: Springer.
Zardini, E. (2014). Context and consequence. An intercontextual substructural logic. Synthese, 191, 3473–3500.
Acknowledgements
Research for this chapter was supported by the PRIN 2017 Research 20173YP4N3—MIUR, Ministry of University and Research, Rome, Italy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Magnani, L. (2023). Discoverability in the Perspective of the EC-Model of Abduction. In: Magnani, L. (eds) Handbook of Abductive Cognition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10134-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10135-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering