Skip to main content

Design Optimization of Induction Motor with FDB-Based Archimedes Optimization Algorithm for High Power Fan and Pump Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Applications with Advanced Machine Learning and Human-Centred Problem Design (ICAIAME 2021)

Abstract

Reducing the losses of electric motors is an important issue that should be emphasized among the measures to be taken to meet the increasing efficiency need in the industry. In this sense, when we look at the regulations published by the EU Energy Commission, we see that the efficiency levels of electric motors are increasing day by day. Finally, regulation no. 2019/1781 published by the European Union Energy Commission came into force on 1 July 2021 and the sale of industrial induction engines under performance class IE3 is prohibited. Various meta-heuristic research algorithms are used in squirrel cage induction motors (SCIM) design, which are known to be widely used in industry, to meet European Union Energy Commission determined efficiency values. In this study, a study to optimize the design of a 185 kW SCIM was carried out for use in line voltage fan and compressor applications. In order to obtain a motor in the IE3 efficiency class, which is the highest efficiency class defined in the IEC 60,034–30-1–2014 standard, the geometric dimensions of the motor have been optimized using the developed optimization algorithm, taking into account the minimum cost/maximum efficiency criterion. The Archimedes Optimization Algorithm (FDB-AOA) based on Fitness Distance Balance was used for the optimization process. During the optimization process, the MATLAB and ANSYS Maxwell software were run simultaneously to analyze the electromagnetic performance of the motor and the objective function. In order to verify the optimum model obtained as a result of experimental studies, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was carried out, the optimum model was verified and the analysis results were presented. The comparison results indicate that the optimum design of a 185 kW SCIM has been successfully achieved thanks to the FDB-AOA algorithm developed in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mirzaeva G, Sazdanoff L (2015) The effect of flux optimization on energy efficiency of induction motors in fan and pump applications. In: 2015 Australasian universities power engineering conference (AUPEC), September, IEEE, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vartanian R, Deshpande Y, Toliyat HA (2013) Performance analysis of a ferrite based fractional horsepower permanent magnet assisted SynRM for fan and pump applications. In: 2013 ınternational electric machines and drives conference, May, IEEE, pp 1405–1410

    Google Scholar 

  3. Widmer JD, Martin R, Kimiabeigi M (2015) Electric vehicle traction motors without rare earth magnets. Sustain Mater Technol 3:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  4. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1781/2019 (2019) Laying down ecodesign requirements for electric motors and variable speed drives pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, amending Regulation (EC) No 641/2009 with regard to ecodesign requirements for glandless standalone circulators and glandless circulators integrated in products and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 640/2009

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bourzac K (2011) The rare-earth crisis, MIT Technology Review 2011. (Available: http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/423730/the-rare-earth-crisis/)

  6. Duan Y, Ionel DM (2013) A review of recent developments in electrical machine design optimization methods with a permanent-magnet synchronous dr benchmark study. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 49(3):1268–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. More I (2017) Optimization of electric machine designs—part I. IEEE Trans Indust Electron 64(12):9717

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mallik S, Mallik K, Barman A, Maiti D, Biswas SK, Deb NK, Basu S (2017) Efficiency and cost optimized design of an induction motor using genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 64(12):9854–9863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das PP, Mahato SN (2016) Artificial Bee Colony based design optimization of a six-phase induction motor. In: 2016 2nd ınternational conference on control, ınstrumentation, energy and communication (CIEC), January, IEEE, pp 526–530

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rivière N, Villani M, Popescu M (2019) Optimisation of a high speed copper rotor induction motor for a traction application. In: IECON 2019–45th annual conference of the IEEE ındustrial electronics society, October, vol 1. IEEE, pp 2720–2725

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Q, Li G, Wang Q, Zhou R, Fang G, Xu W (2011) Optimization design of three-phase asynchronous motor based on multi-objective ant colony algorithm. In: 2011 ınternational conference on electrical and control engineering, September, IEEE, pp 2410–2413

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kahraman HT, Bakir H, Duman S, Katı M, Aras S, Guvenc U (2021) Dynamic FDB selection method and its application: modeling and optimizing of directional overcurrent relays coordination. Appl Intell 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wolpert DH, Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1(1):67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aarniovuori L, Lindh P, Kärkkäinen H, Niemelä M, Pyrhönen J, Cao W (2019) Analytical evaluation of high-efficiency induction motor losses. In: 2019 IEEE ınternational electric machines and drives conference (IEMDC), May, IEEE, pp 1501–1507

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aarniovuori L, Niemelä M, Pyrhönen J, Cao W, Agamloh EB (2018) Loss components and performance of modern induction motors. In: 2018 XIII ınternational conference on electrical machines (ICEM), September, IEEE, pp 1253–1259

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nogal Ł, Magdziarz A, Rasolomampionona DD, Łukaszewski P, Sapuła Ł, Szreder R (2021) The laboratory analysis of the thermal processes occurring in low-voltage asynchronous electric motors. Energies 14(8):2056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hashim FA, Hussain K, Houssein EH, Mabrouk MS, Al-Atabany W (2021) Archimedes optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Appl Intell 51(3):1531–1551

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahraman HT, Aras S, Gedikli E (2020) Fitness-distance balance (FDB): a new selection method for meta-heuristic search algorithms. Knowl-Based Syst 190:105169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aras S, Gedikli E, Kahraman HT (2021) A novel stochastic fractal search algorithm with fitness-Distance balance for global numerical optimization. Swarm Evol Comput 61:100821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guvenc U, Duman S, Kahraman HT, Aras S, Katı M (2021) Fitness-distance balance based adaptive guided differential evolution algorithm for security-constrained optimal power flow problem incorporating renewable energy sources. Appl Soft Comput 108:107421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Duman S, Kahraman HT, Guvenc U, Aras S (2021) Development of a Lévy flight and FDB-based coyote optimization algorithm for global optimization and real-world ACOPF problems. Soft Comput 25(8):6577–6617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Katı M, Kahraman HT (2020) Improving supply-demand-based optimization algorithm with FDB method: a comprehensive research on engineering design problems. J Eng Sci Design (JESD) 8(5):156–172

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liang J, Suganthan PN, Qu BY, Gong DW, Yue CT (2019) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2020 special session on multimodal multiobjective optimization. 201912, Zhengzhou University.https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31746.02247

  24. García S, Fernández A, Luengo J, Herrera F (2010) Advanced nonparametric tests for multiple comparisons in the design of experiments in computational intelligence and data mining: experimental analysis of power. Inform Sci 180(10):2044–2206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Derrac J, García S, Molina D, Herrera F (2011) A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 1(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burak Yenipinar .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yenipinar, B., Şahin, A., Sönmez, Y., Yilmaz, C., Kahraman, H.T. (2023). Design Optimization of Induction Motor with FDB-Based Archimedes Optimization Algorithm for High Power Fan and Pump Applications. In: Smart Applications with Advanced Machine Learning and Human-Centred Problem Design. ICAIAME 2021. Engineering Cyber-Physical Systems and Critical Infrastructures, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09753-9_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics