Skip to main content

Fuzzy TODIM for ELICIT Information

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (INFUS 2022)

Abstract

The available information in some decision situations may be vague or imprecise, and the involvement of human experts, who usually manage qualitative information, results essential to address the underlying uncertainty in such contexts. However, human decision-makers are rationally bounded, particularly when the decision processes involve risk and uncertainty. To model human stakeholders’ behavior in such situations, the TODIM method (Portuguese acronym for Interactive Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) based on the Prospect Theory was developed to address multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) situations. Even though the classic TODIM method was adapted to manage fuzzy information and, consequently, to model uncertainty by using linguistic labels, that proposal neglected the management of more complex linguistic expressions able to represent the experts’ hesitancy among several linguistic labels, which is quite common due to the increasing complexity of decision problems. Therefore, this contribution introduces a multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) model based on fuzzy TODIM dealing with Extended Comparative Linguistic Expressions with Symbolic Translation (ELICIT) values, which were recently proposed to model such hesitancy and perform precise computations without losing the interpretability of linguistic information.

This work is partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the Spanish National Project PGC2018-099402-B-I00, and the Postdoctoral fellow Ramón y Cajal (RYC-2017-21978), the FEDER-UJA project 1380637 and ERDF, by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities through a Formación de Profesorado Universitario grant (FPU2019/01203) and by the Junta de Andalucía, Andalusian Plan for Research, Development, and Innovation (POSTDOC 21-00461).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, C.: Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1), 1–9 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. García-Zamora, D., Labella, A., Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L.: Nonlinear preferences in group decision-making. extreme values amplifications and extreme values reductions. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36(11), 6581–6612 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gomes, L.F.A.M., et al.: An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 193(1), 204–211 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He, W., Dutta, B., Rodríguez, R.M., Alzahrani, A.A., Martinez, L.: Induced OWA operator for group decision making dealing with extended comparative linguistic expressions with symbolic translation. Mathematics 9(1), 20 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P.: Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. John Wiley & Sons (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, pp. 99–127. World Scientific (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Labella, A., Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L.: Computing with comparative linguistic expressions and symbolic translation for decision making: ELICIT information. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 28(10), 2510–2522 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martínez, L., Rodriguez, R.M., Herrera, F.: The 2-tuple Linguistic Model. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24714-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodríguez, R.M., Labella, A., Martínez, L.: An overview on fuzzy modelling of complex linguistic preferences in decision making. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 9, 81–94 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Inf. Sci. 241, 28–42 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-i. Inf. Sci. 8(3), 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy logic= computing with words. In: Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems 1, pp. 3–23. Springer (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1873-4_1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Álvaro Labella .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Labella, Á., García-Zamora, D., Rodríguez, R.M., Martínez, L. (2022). Fuzzy TODIM for ELICIT Information. In: Kahraman, C., Tolga, A.C., Cevik Onar, S., Cebi, S., Oztaysi, B., Sari, I.U. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. INFUS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 504. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09173-5_48

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics