Abstract
Infections of the kidney and urinary tract are a common cause of morbidity, and sometimes mortality, especially in young women. The responsible pathogens include bacteria, viruses, protozoa, parasites, and fungi. The clinical nature of the infection can be different in the immunosuppressed, in the setting of kidney transplantation, and in other conditions, including vasculitis, glomerulopathy and cancer. Some infections can lead to systemic immune activation, which can in turn lead to kidney disease.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Haematuria
- Proteinuria
- Urinary tract infection
- UTI
- Bacterial infection
- Viral infection
- Fungal infection
- Pyelonephritis
- Acute kidney injury
- AKI
A 71-year old woman with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) secondary to diabetic nephropathy, maintained on twice-weekly haemodialysis (HD), was admitted for management of profuse rectal bleeding secondary to diverticulitis. She was catheterised and transfused with a unit of packed red cells. A week into her admission, she started vomiting and became listless. Her temperature and vital signs were normal. Urinalysis revealed a positive leukocyte esterase, and her urine bag and tubing acquired a purple colour (Fig. 14.1a). Urine samples obtained from the urine bag and urethral catheter did not have the purple coloration (Fig. 14.1b and c). The urethral catheter was removed and her urine cultured, yielding. Escherichia coli sensitive to Ceftazidime. She was treated with intravenous ceftazidime, with resolution of her symptoms, and a negative urine culture thereafter.
FormalPara Clinical Scenario 2An 11-year-old female, presented to the emergency department (ED) with a 2-week history of fever. For the previous 6 days, she had noted that her urine had become brown (sometimes referred to as “coke-coloured”) followed by a reduced urine output, and generalized body swelling. Two days before admission she had become short of breath, and a few hours before she attended the ED she had suffered a seizure. She had had a skin infection 3 weeks prior to her symptoms. On examination, she was pale, febrile, in respiratory distress, with an impaired state of consciousness, with a Glasgow coma score of 8/15. Her temperature was 37.8 °C, her respiratory rate 38 breaths/min, BP 160/110 mmHg, and pulse 110/min. She had significant bilateral pitting leg oedema. It was also noted that she had multiple bilateral hyperpigmented macular skin lesions. She had demonstrable ascites and fine bilateral crepitations. Catheterization revealed the brown urine, with a urine flow rate of 0.3 mL/kg/h. Urinalysis showed blood, protein, leukocytes, and microscopy revealed red cell casts. Blood results: Sodium: 122 mmol/L, potassium: 5.6 mmol/L, HCO3 12.4 mmol/L, chloride: 84.4, iCa: 1.01, BUN: 63.3 mmol/L, creatinine: 884 μmol/L, haemoglobin: 8.3 g/dL, leukocytosis with neutrophila of 78%; ESR: 125 mm/h and qualitative ASO titre: elevated/positive, C3: not available. Ultrasonography: kidneys measured 11 × 4 cm and 10.8 × 3.6 cm, with increased echogenicity and moderate obliteration of sinoparenchymal differentiation.
A diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) with hypertensive/uraemic encephalopathy secondary to post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (PSGN) was made.
She had 3 sessions of haemodialysis, IV furosemide, fluid restriction, amlodipine, IV Sultamicillin tosylate initially and later, oral amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium.
The patient was followed-up for 4 months; her kidney function improved to an eGFR of 96 mL/min/1.73 m2, although she continues to have dipstick haematuria.
Introduction
Infections cause kidney disease via diverse mechanisms, including by (1) direct tissue invasion; (2) indirectly by immune-mediated mechanisms which lead to glomerulonephritis; (3) acute kidney injury (AKI); (4) less common is nephrotoxic damage which occurs with medications and diagnostic procedures as part of patient management. The manifestations of disease depend on the patient’s health status/immune defense mechanisms, the micro-organism, and numerous genetic and environmental factors. The different microorganisms that will be discussed in this chapter are listed below:
-
Bacteria
-
1.
Direct Injury To The Kidney
-
Urinary tract infections
-
Reflux nephropathy
-
Mycobacteria
-
Tuberculosis
-
Leprosy
-
-
Leptospirosis
-
-
2.
Indirect or Immune-mediated Damage to the Kidney
-
Bacterial Infection-Related Glomerulonephritis
-
Post-Streptococcal GN (PSGN)
-
-
3.
Kidney Injury as part of Ongoing Sepsis
-
4.
Nephrotoxic Damage from Medications
-
1.
-
Viruses
-
Dengue
-
Hantavirus
-
Ebola
-
Parvovirus
-
Polyoma virus
-
Cytomegalovirus CMV
-
Varicella
-
Hepatitis viruses: HEV, HAV, HBV, HCV
-
Human immunodeficiency virus HIV
-
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 [SARS-CoV-2]
-
-
Protozoa and Parasites
-
Malaria
-
Schistosomiasis
-
-
Fungi
Bacterial Infections and Kidney Disease
A large number of bacterial infections cause kidney disease, via the mechanisms mentioned above; they include Gram-positive and negative cocci, Gram-positive and negative bacilli and coccobacilli, some not readily Gram-stained organisms such as Mycobacterium species and others like Mycoplasma pneumonia and Chlamydia pneumonia.
Mechanisms of Bacterial Infection-Related Kidney Diseases
Direct Injury to the Kidney
Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are very common and caused mainly by gram negative bacteria. They affect >150 million people each year worldwide; 40–50% of women and 5% of men will invariably have an episode of UTI at least once in their life [2]. The incidence is highest in adolescent and childbearing females, peaking during the years of maximum sexual activity (18–39 years) [3]; this age-group is 30 times more likely to have UTI than their male counterparts [4]. However, the incidence of UTI increases in men >60 years, mainly because of prostatic obstruction, and approaches the incidence of UTI in women.
Epidemiology: Though community-acquired uncomplicated UTIs account for most infections, the prevalence of healthcare-acquired UTIs ranges from 12.9% in the US and 19.6% in Europe to 24% in developing countries [5]. Predisposing factors such as age, health status, catheterization and immunosuppression determine the dynamics of the infection. For example, whereas non-catheterized persons are more likely to suffer UTIs caused by a single bacterial species, catheterization/structural abnormalities predispose to UTIs caused by multiple bacterial species. In Clinical Scenario 1, the patient had 4 risk factors for UTI: age, female gender, immunosuppression (immune paresis related to her diabetes mellitus and uraemia), and catheterization [1].
Bacteria ascend through the urethra to the bladder, initiating symptomatic or asymptomatic bacteriuria, and subsequently reach the kidneys to cause pyelonephritis (ascending infection). Less commonly, infection can arise from haematogenous spread (descending infection).
UTIs are classified using several criteria: They are categorized using complication status, as listed below and in Tables 14.1, 14.2, 14.3, 14.5, where management is outlined for each category.
Asymptomatic bacteriuria: Is defined as significant bacteriuria in a midstream urine (MSU) specimen in people with no relevant genitourinary symptoms, with uro-pathogens >105 CFU/mL in two consecutive samples in females, or a single sample in males [6, 7].
Uncomplicated UTIs: Consist of community-acquired cystitis (lower urinary tract infection with symptoms of dysuria, frequent and urgent urination and suprapubic pain) and pyelonephritis (infection of the renal parenchyma and pelvi-calyceal system with symptoms of fever and flank pain). Figure 14.2 and Table 14.1 outline an algorithm for management of uncomplicated UTIs [9].
Complicated UTIs: Infection associated with a structural/functional genitourinary tract anomaly or underlying diseases that increase risk of worse outcome [8]; such as: indwelling urinary catheters, urinary obstruction, anatomical abnormalities, peri-operative urinary tract infections, including kidney transplantation (Table 14.2).
Recurrent UTIs: Defined as at least three episodes of uncomplicated infection confirmed by urine culture over a 12-month period or 2 episodes over 6 months. They include lower and upper UTIs. The two types of recurrent UTI are:
Relapse—defined as recurrent UTI involving the same organism(s) after adequate therapy; and
Reinfection—defined as recurrent UTI caused by an infection that has been treated and subsequent repeat infection with the original bacteria or a second or new isolate [6]. Figure 14.3 illustrates an algorithm for management of recurrent UTIs [11].
Complications of UTIs include:
Urosepsis: Complicated and severe UTI occurring in the setting of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). It causes multiple organ dysfunction (acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury (AKI), and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC)). In 20–30% of patients with sepsis, the urinary tract is the source; the estimated global mortality rate for sepsis is about 30–40% [18]. The management of urosepsis is outlined in Table 14.2. Predisposing factors include urological anomalies, stones, urinary tract obstruction and, in male children, posterior urethral valves.
Other complications of UTI include kidney abscess, perinephric abscess, infected hydronephrosis/pyonephrosis, acute focal bacterial nephritis, emphysematous and xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis, and malakoplakia.
Reflux Nephropathy
Reflux nephropathy has replaced the term ‘Chronic pyelonephritis’, a term that has become obsolete.
Aetiology
Reflux nephropathy is a result of an abnormality at the uretero-vesical junction. The musculature of the lowermost part of the normal ureter prevents reflux of urine from the bladder into the ureter. Failure at the vesico-ureteric junction means that urine passes up the ureter on bladder emptying, and in some patients there is free reflux, even when the bladder is not contracting. This is known as vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR).
Background
Until the 1970s, reflux nephropathy was known as 'chronic pyelonephritis', and was thought to be a chronic progressive condition. It was also thought that each urinary infection was capable of producing a scar, and furthermore that reflux nephropathy caused hypertension. In the 1970s, Dr. Jean Smellie challenged the nephrological world to show that new scars could arise in adulthood: no such developing scars were found. It became clear that the scarring process took place mainly in the first 5 years of life, and that the change in kidney shape and the ‘development of scars’ during teenage years was simply the result of normal growth of the unaffected kidney tissue, thereby making the existing scarred elements more prominent.
Clinical Management
The abnormality is sometimes first detected in utero, when urine may be seen entering the foetal ureter during micturition. This will enable the neonatologist to take appropriate measures to prevent urinary infection in the neo-natal period.
A proportion of young children will present with a febrile illness that may not be recognised initially as a urinary tract infection. It is important to establish such a diagnosis, so that measures can be implemented to keep the urine sterile; this involves keeping the bladder empty. If a significant volume of urine refluxes up the ureter(s), there will inevitably be urine in the bladder after micturition (residual urine). One method in older children is to advise double micturition: the volume passed on the second occasion will give some idea of the scale of the reflux. If necessary, the bladder can be emptied again to be sure that the bladder is empty.
Investigations
VUR is diagnosed by the demonstration of backflow of urine into the upper renal tract(s). Historically, the diagnosis has been made by micturating cystourethrography, which provides good anatomical detail, but does require bladder catheterisation. For older children, indirect radionuclide cystography is preferable, as it does not require catheterisation.
Clinical Features in Adults
Typically in adults, the signs of reflux nephropathy will be found as an incidental finding on abdominal imaging: there will be one or more cortical scars overlying an anatomically distorted calyx, involving one kidney or both. In most cases the vesico-ureteric reflux will have remitted, and the urine will be sterile. In the absence of other factors (such as hypertension), the kidney function will remain relatively stable, and the number of adults requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is small. Chronic kidney disease in this setting tends to progress when there is significant proteinuria (secondary FSGS), when hypertension is not well controlled, or when UTIs continue to recur.
Practice Point 1 Congenital Abnormalities of the Kidneys and Urinary Tract [CAKUT]
CAKUT encapsulates the various congenital urinary tract abnormalities that—although arising in childhood—sometimes present in adulthood, including vesicoureteric reflux. They include duplex pelvi-calyceal systems, horseshoe kidney, pelvic kidney, mega-ureter, posterior urethral valves and a number of other uncommon disorders [19]
Mycobacterial Infections
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis (TB) has a world-wide distribution, but is especially common in developing countries. The highest incidence rates are in sub-Saharan Africa and in the region stretching from the Indian subcontinent to South-East Asia and the Western Pacific (Fig. 14.4). In 2018, ten million people became ill with TB; 1.5 million of them died [21]. The emergence of multi-drug resistant TB as a co-infection with HIV/AIDs has made TB a major public health challenge. Extra-pulmonary TB (ETB) is estimated to occur in 10–34% of patients who do not have HIV, compared to about 50–70% in patients with HIV/AIDs [22].
Kidney involvement occurs as part of a disseminated infection, or as localized genitourinary disease. The disease causes extensive papillary necrosis and cavities, destroying the kidney parenchyma, and extending to the collecting system, causing obstructive uropathy and kidney impairment. Management of genitourinary TB is outlined in Table 14.3. Glomerulopathy (like focal proliferative glomerulonephritis) and amyloidosis can occur from TB occurring in any part of the body [23]. Patients on KRT (haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and following kidney transplantation), and those on immunosuppressive therapy are particularly prone to TB infection.
Classical Uro-Genital Tuberculosis (UGTB)
Clinical Features
Uro-genital tuberculosis (UGTB), which is estimated to affect 6–8% of patients with TB, is easy to overlook. Systemic symptoms are uncommon. Often, lower urinary symptoms draw attention to the urinary tract, and typically there is pyuria, but no growth on culture using standard media—a so-called ‘sterile’ pyuria. Other reasons for the finding of a sterile pyuria are listed in Table 14.4.
The suspicion of TB may be aroused when the symptoms are not relieved by conventional antibiotics, however, there are sometimes suggestive symptoms - back, flank and suprapubic pain, macroscopic haematuria, frequency, and nocturia. Unlike newly-presenting TB, fever, weight loss and night sweats are unusual, and only a third of patients have an abnormal chest X-ray.
Investigations
Abdominal X-ray may show calcification, and urinary tract ultrasound is likely to show focal fibrosis and/or scarring—sometimes severe—as well as calcification in kidneys and bladder (thimble bladder).
Treatment
For newly presenting TB, the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends oral treatment for 6 months, commencing with 4 drugs, that should include rifampicin and isoniazid (Table 14.3). In patients with kidney dysfunction, careful attention needs to be taken regarding the dosing of the drugs prescribed.
Tuberculous Interstitial Nephritis
There have been a number of reports of interstitial nephritis with granuloma formation, and there has been a suspicion that TB has been responsible. Some patients have had TB elsewhere and hypersensitivity to tuberculin. An early report described three such patients [24]. More recently, it has become clear that such patients cannot reliably be distinguished from sarcoidosis, and it has been suggested that a trial of anti-tuberculous drugs can be justified [25].
End-Stage Kidney Disease
Once TB is recognized and treated, it is likely that kidney replacement therapy (KRT) can be avoided. There are very few data on the frequency of TB as a cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), but there is one report using data from the European Dialysis and Transplant Registry. Analysis of data from 5 years between 1984 and 1991 showed that the primary kidney diagnosis was classified as kidney TB [code 91] in 0.5–1.0% of patients starting KRT [26].
Leprosy
The incidence and prevalence of leprosy has been falling slowly over recent years but there has been little change in the global extent of the disease. It remains more or less confined to middle- and low-income countries, especially Brazil and the countries of the Indian sub-continent (Fig. 14.5).
Clinical Features
Kidney involvement is common in leprosy, and it is now clear that it is the multi-bacillary (lepromatous) form that is most closely associated with kidney disease. A study of 199 autopsies from Brazil showed that 144 [72%] had kidney lesions. Sixty-one of the 144 (42.4%) showed amyloidosis [28]. This included 36% of the lepromatous group but only 5% of the tuberculoid and borderline cases. It was noted that during flare-ups of erythema nodosa leprosum, the serum creatinine would tend to rise.
Silva et al. reported on 16 studies of kidney disease in patients with leprosy [29]. Excluding 10 studies where there was either no biopsy or fewer than five patients, there were 354 biopsies in 6 studies. All six mentioned amyloidosis as the prominent diagnosis; many of the patients described had proteinuria.
There are a few reports of glomerulonephritis among patients with leprosy but there is no consistent pattern, and such associations are as yet unproven.
Treatment
The WHO recommends a 3-drug regimen for multi-bacillary [lepromatous] leprosy - rifampicin, clofazamine and dapsone. The recommendation for pauci-bacillary leprosy [tuberculoid] is a 2-drug regimen - rifampicin and dapsone. Rifampicin and dapsone do not require dose reduction in patients with reduced GFR; for Clofazimine, the UK British National Formulary (BNF) states “Use with caution”.
Leptospirosis
Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease, which is re-emerging as an infectious disease of global public health importance. It affects approximately 1.03 million people annually and it is projected to rise further as extreme climatic conditions and global warming increase [30].
Leptospirosis Kidney Disease: Acute leptospirosis causes multiple organ dysfunction including AKI. A long-term follow-up study of leptospirosis AKI patients in Sri Lanka found that 9% of them developed an early stage of CKD [31], indicating that leptospirosis AKI can result in CKD/ESKD.
Asymptomatic carriers harbor the Leptospira spirochaete in the kidney where they colonize the proximal tubule resulting in chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis and fibrosis causing insidious progression to CKD. It is thus suggested that asymptomatic exposure to leptospira infection carries the risk for CKD. Histologic findings in leptospirosis kidney disease are tubulointerstitial nephritis, interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy. Proximal tubule dysfunction and hypokalaemia are seen also in adult male patients with leptospirosis. These bear a characteristic similarity to findings in CKD of unknown aetiology (CKDu), a form of CKD that clusters amongst farmers who work in hot dry climates. Table 14.3 outlines the diagnosis and management of leptospirosis.
Practice Point 2 Leptospirosis Kidney Disease and CKDu Overlap
Leptospirosis kidney disease and CKDu tend to affect similar populations in similar geographical regions. The similarity of their kidney pathologies has put leptospirosis as a priority candidate for some patients with CKDu. It is postulated that secondary injury from heat stress and dehydration worsens the kidney injury. Thus, leptospira infection causes primary kidney disease or acts as a CKD susceptibility factor.
Indirect or Immune-Mediated Damage to the Kidney
Indirect bacteria-related damage to the kidney occurs as inflammation of the glomerulus due to immune complex deposition. Infection related GN (IRGN) was previously known as postinfectious GN (PIGN); the prototype, poststreptococcal GN (PSGN) commonly occurs in children. PIGNs are mainly caused by streptococcal infections (28–47%), while staphylococcal and gram-negative infections account for 12–24% and 22%, respectively [32]. Other infections, such as bacterial endocarditis and shunt infections can also cause a PIGN.
Bacterial Infection-Related Glomerulonephritis (B-IRGN)
B-IRGN is described as kidney dysfunction from glomerular inflammation, with evidence of ongoing bacterial infection, unlike PSGN which occurs weeks after the infection. The incidence of IRGN, though decreasing, constitutes about 5% of all glomerular diseases [33]. It occurs more frequently in developing countries. It is commoner in adults, with much higher rates in the elderly and patients with diabetes. Other risk factors include malignancy, malnutrition, chronic infections (HIV and TB), and prosthetic heart valves. IRGN can result from infections occurring in any part of the body (skin, upper and lower respiratory tract, heart, urinary tract, bone). Many bacterial species can be involved, but staphylococcal species are more common in adults and the elderly.
The most common presentation is an acute nephritic syndrome, with or without impaired kidney function. B- IRGN has poorer prognosis than PSGN, and also has a poorer prognosis in adults than in children [32, 33]. Early detection and treatment of infections can prevent kidney involvement (Table 14.5).
Post-streptococcal GN (PSGN)
PSGN is diagnosed in a patient with antecedent streptococcal infection who presents with acute GN; for streptococcal sore-throat, the nephritis follows 7–15 days afterwards, while for skin infections 4–6 weeks after (see Clinical Scenario 2). PSGN is an immune-mediated GN triggered by immune-complex deposits in the sub-endothelium and mesangium comprising of bacterial antigens (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B).
The most common clinical manifestation is acute nephritic syndrome which lasts <2 weeks. Other less common manifestations are asymptomatic proteinuria, nephrotic syndrome or rapidly progressive GN. The prognosis in children is excellent, but in the elderly, there is an associated mortality of up to 20% [32]. The long-term prognosis is worse in patients who have persistent proteinuria >6 months. Clinical Scenario 2 illustrates a typical presentation of severe PSGN, in a patient in Nigeria, although many patients are seen with a less severe presentation. The management of PSGN is outlined in Table 14.5.
Kidney Injury as Part of Ongoing Sepsis
One of the commonest ways by which bacterial infections cause kidney dysfunction is through AKI, which occurs as part of multi-organ dysfunction following sepsis from any focus. About 20% of very ill patients have irreversible kidney injury from acute cortical necrosis and many more (40%) progress to CKD following incomplete recovery [34]. Often, these patients have pre-existing mild-moderate CKD from diverse causes. AKI incidence increases according to severity of sepsis, from 4.2% in mild sepsis to 22.7% in severe sepsis and rising to 52.8% in septic shock [35]. Table 14.3 outlines the management of sepsis/urosepsis.
Nephrotoxic Damage from Medications, Used in Patients with Infection
Drugs commonly cause kidney damage and drug-induced nephrotoxicity (DIN) occurs in 14%–26% and 16% of AKI in adult and paediatric populations respectively [36]. It is commoner in older patients, who are more likely to have diabetes and cardiovascular disease and are consequently exposed to several medications and diagnostic procedures that can harm the kidney. Antibiotics and other medications like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) useful in treatment of bacterial infections are known to be nephrotoxic. Table 14.6 shows the common mechanisms leading to drug-induced nephropathy and some implicated medications.
Factors that increase the risk of nephrotoxicity include intravascular volume contraction, age > 60 years, diabetes, use of multiple nephrotoxins, heart failure, sepsis, underlying kidney impairment.
Prevention, vigilance, recognition and early intervention are key to successful outcome [37]. Awdishu and Mehta proposed the 6R approach (Risk assessment, early Recognition, targeted Response, timely Renal support and Rehabilitation coupled with Research) for management of DIN [38]. Table 14.5 outlines the investigations and management of infection-related kidney damage due to nephrotoxic damage.
Viral Infections and the Kidney
Viral infections can cause kidney damage through direct viral invation, immune mediated damage, haemodynamic instability, haemolysis, rhabdomyolysis, and cytokine storm, amongst other mechanisms. Table 14.7 summarises the viruses associated with kidney damage, the mechanism of injury, typical kidney involvement and management of the condition.
Dengue Virus
Dengue virus (DV) infection causes widespread capillary leakage, dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS) resulting in ischaemic acute tubular necrosis. Direct viral cytopathic effects, and immune complex injury, haemolysis and rhabdomyolysis are other mechanisms of kidney disease [39]. Clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic urinary abnormalities to severe acute kidney injury(AKI) in native and allograft kidneys [40]. Proteinuria occurs in over 70%, whereas haematuria is less frequent in DHF. Kidney involvement occurs during acute infection, with detectable anti-DV antibodies and viral nucleic acid in plasma. AKI is more frequent in DHF and DSS and is associated high mortality. Kidney biopsy may reveal acute tubular necrosis, interstitial nephritis and various immune complex GN, as shown in Table 14.7. DV antigen may be detected in tubular epithelial cells [41]. Management is supportive with fluid resuscitation, control of metabolic derangements and management of coagulopathies. Kidney outcomes are good; however, proteinuria and haematuria may persist after recovery of AKI [42].
Hantavirus
Hantavirus(HV) infection is associated with increased vascular permeability and haemorrhage leading to organ dysfunction, with kidney involvement reported in 30–60% of cases, especially in hantavirus haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome(HFRS) [43]. Kidney disease occurs in the course of active infection from direct viral invasion of tubular epithelial cells, glomerular endothelial cells and podocytes [44]. Systemic inflammatory and immune complex deposition may also contribute to kidney disease. Oliguric AKI with haematuria and sub-nephrotic proteinuria, followed by polyuria is the usual clinical presentation in HFRS. Milder forms of kidney dysfunction may be seen in the other Hanta virus syndromes. Kidney histopathology shows acute haemorrhagic interstitial nephritis with mononuclear cell infiltrates (CD8+ T-lymphocytes and macrophages), tubular necrosis and congestion of peritubular capillaries, especially in the outer medulla [45]. Glomerular lesions have also occasionally been reported; (see Table 14.7). Management is mainly supportive with antipyretics, fluid resuscitation, control of electrolyte disorders, vasopressors and KRT when indicated. Kidney recovery is usual; however, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, hypopituitarism and chronic kidney disease of unknown aetiology have been reported in those who recover [46, 47].
Ebola Virus
Ebola infection is marked by uncontrolled viral replication, which results in excessive proinflammatory responses, endothelial dysfunction, and dysregulation of the coagulation cascade, haemorrhage and subsequently severe organ dysfunction. Viral invasion of tubular and endothelial cells, systemic complications of the infection, and bacterial and malarial super infection result in kidney involvement [48]. Acute kidney injury is the main manifestation in 20–50% of cases. AKI is multifactorial, as outlined in Table 14.7. Kidney biopsy is not routine for diagnosis; however, acute tubular necrosis and degeneration with interstitial oedema and mild cellular infiltrates have been reported on kidney histology [49]. Aggressive fluid resuscitation and usual care for AKI, including KRT is the mainstay of management, with particular consideration of staff safety [50].
Parvovirus
Symptomatic parvovirus B(PVB) infection occurs in 2–12% of patients in the first year of kidney transplantation, with 10% of these developing allograft dysfunction [51]. PVB kidney disease may also occur in native kidneys of immunocompetent individuals. Direct invasion of kidney tissue and immune-mediated kidney injury are the main disease mechanisms [52]. Acute nephritic syndrome with hypocomplementaemia, following a prodrome of rash, fever, and arthritis is frequent. Nephrotic syndrome or chronic kidney disease is seen in sub-acute infection; and aplastic crisis may follow the nephrotic syndrome in patients with sickle cell disease [53]. Endocapillary and mesangial proliferation with subendothelial deposits of C3 and IgG, suggestive of acute post-infectious glomerulonephritis is frequent on kidney histopathology [54]. Other histological lesions seen on kidney biopsy are shown in Table 14.7. Viral antigens are often present in blood and may be detectable in kidney tissue. Management is supportive; and is often combined with reduction of immunosuppression and administration of intravenous immunoglobulins in transplant recipients with persistent infection [55].
Polyoma Virus
Polyoma virus nephropathy (PVN), caused mainly by the BK virus, occurs in 1–10% of kidney transplants, causing graft loss in about 50% of these cases [56]. PVN is rare in native kidneys of non-kidney organ recipients. Viral replication in the kidney epithelium causes a tubulointerstitial nephritis [57]. The major risk factor for PVN is intense immunosuppression; however, patient, organ, viral and other immunity-related risk factors may play a role. Nephropathy follows viraemia, resulting from latent viruria [58]. PVN often presents as asymptomatic worsening of kidney function, and/or chronic graft dysfunction in the first year of transplantation. The diagnosis of PVN requires urine cytology, urine and plasma BK viral load and kidney biopsy. Viral inclusion bearing epithelial cells called ‘decoy cells’ may be present on urine cytology. Decoy cells ≥10/cytospin [59], a urine BK viral load >107 copies/mL and a plasma BK viral load >104 copies/mL [60, 61] are indicative of a presumptive diagnosis of PVN. Kidney biopsy remains the diagnostic gold standard. Three histological patterns of patchy tubulo-interstitial nephritis with varying degrees of viral cytopathic changes, interstitial inflammation, and in late stages, tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis are observed [62]. Three classes of PVN based on tissue replication load, and interstitial fibrosis(ci) score have been described [63]. Reduction of immunosuppression (IS) is the mainstay of management, with addition of antiviral agents in refractory cases. Various algorithms of stepwise and careful reduction of antimetabolites and calcineurin inhibitors are in use. Some antiviral agents, and fluoroquinolones and intravenous immunoglobulins may be useful in refractory PVN. Re-transplantation is possible after graft loss when the viral load becomes undetectable [64, 65].
Cytomegalovirus
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) nephropathy occurs in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals, and results from viral replication in kidney cells and immune complex mediated injury [66]. CMV infection is common after kidney transplantation, where it adversely affects graft and patient survival [67]; however, CMV nephropathy is rare, occurring in <1% of transplanted patients [68]. Kidney disease often occurs during acute systemic CMV illness, following reactivation of latent infection in the setting of intense immunosuppression, or less often during primary infection. The usual clinical manifestation is acute kidney injury with or without haematuria, and varying degrees of proteinuria. Nephrotic syndrome is infrequent. Diagnosis is based on the presence of viral cytopathic changes in kidney tissue, usually in the presence of CMV viraemia. A high viral load of >10,000 copies/mL seems to correlate with CMV nephropathy [69]. Kidney histopathology shows patchy acute or chronic peritubular pleomorphic mononuclear interstitial infiltrates with tubulitis; tubular epithelial cells are markedly enlarged with characteristic intranuclear eosinophilic inclusions (‘owl eye’ type inclusions). Viral particles may be seen in both the nuclei and cytoplasm of infected cells, and CMV is present on immunostaining [70]. Glomerular and vascular lesions may occur either in coexistence with tubulo-interstitial disease or in isolation (Table 14.7). Management of CMV nephritis in kidney allografts involves the use of antiviral agents, reduction of immunosuppression and use of immunomodulators [71] (Table 14.7). CMV nephritis is usually mild and self-limiting in immunocompetent patients.
Varicella Infections
Kidney involvement in varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection is rare and occurs essentially during primary infection in both native and allograft kidneys [72, 73]. Kidney disease is mediated through viral immune complex injury and dysregulation of complement activity [74, 75]. Clinical manifestations include acute glomerulonephritis syndromes, nephrotic syndrome, atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome, vasculitis and acute kidney injury. Kidney biopsy findings are shown in Table 14.7. Acyclovir, together with supportive care for kidney syndromes is usual care.
Hepatitis E Virus
Kidney disease, essentially glomerulonephritis (GN) is association with acute and chronic hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals [76]. Immune- mediated mechanisms and direct viral cytopathic effects may contribute to kidney damage [77]. A monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance presenting as light chain cast nephropathy was recently reported [78]. Acute kidney failure and the nephrotic syndrome are the usual clinical presentation. In kidney allograft recipients, HEV is associated with proteinuria and a decline in glomerular filtration rate [79]. The spectrum of lesions reported on kidney biopsy are shown in Table 14.7. Treatment is supportive, however in kidney allograft recipients, reduction in immunosuppression and use of ribavirin for 3–6 months are the mainstay of treatment.
Hepatitis A
Hepatitis A virus (HAV)-associated kidney disease occurs in both non-fulminant and fulminant disease, manifesting essentially as AKI with acute tubular necrosis as the main mechanism [80]. Immune-complex-mediated injury, and direct viral cytopathic effects are other suggested mechanisms of kidney pathology [81]. The diagnosis is based on laboratory evidence of infection, in the presence of clinical features consistent with any of the kidney syndromes. Kidney biopsy is rarely required for diagnosis, except with an atypical presentation. Oher mechanisms of AKI and histopathological findings are shown in Table 14.7. Management is supportive and aimed at improving kidney perfusion, and treating complications of kidney syndromes. Kidney recovery is frequent, even in dialysis-requiring AKI.
Hepatitis B Virus
Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated nephropathy remains frequent in HBV endemic zones, and occurs mainly with chronic HBV infection. Glomerulonephritis (GN) and polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) from immune-mediated and possible direct viral effects are the main presentations [82]. Consequences of severe liver disease may cause AKI [83]. GN may present with proteinuria, nephrotic syndrome, microscopic haematuria, hypertension or kidney impairment, with the latter unusual in children. HBV DNA, and serological markers of HBV infections are often present in serum, however HBV GN has been reported in HBsAg seronegative patients [84]. Hypocomplementaemia may exist with MPGN and PAN, whereas mixed cryoglobulinaemia is rare. MN, MPGN and MesPGN are the main histological patterns. MN is common in children whereas MesPGN is common in adults and may coexist with MN. Sub-epithelial, sub-endothelial and mesangial deposits of IgG with C3, IgA, IgM and C1q are frequent and immune complexes may contain HBsAg and HBeAg and HBcAg. Other forms of GNs have been reported in adults [85] (Table 14.7). Treatment is with antiviral nucleos(t)tide analogs(NAs). Immunosuppressive agents, pegylated interferon and plasma exchange maybe added to NAs in PAN and rapidly progressive GN [86], as shown in Fig. 14.6. Spontaneous remission is frequent in children with clearance of HBeAg whereas about a third of adults with HBV GN eventually develop chronic kidney failure [85].
Hepatitis C Virus
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) nephropathy is essentially immune complex mediated GN and vasculitis [87]. The pathological hallmark of HCV-GN is type I MGPN with or without type 2 mixed cryoglobuinaemia [33]. HCV GN presents as an acute nephritic syndrome, varying degrees of albuminuria or rapidly progressive GN, with presence of viral RNA and anti-HCV antibodies in serum. Cryoglobulinaemia occurs in 50–70% and it is associated will low early complement components (C4, C1q, CH50). Kidney histology typically shows MPGN with mononuclear, polymorphonuclear leucocyte infiltrates, and subendothelial deposits of IgG, IgM and C3 [88]. Other glomerular lesions and vascular lesions have been reported (Table 14.7). KDIGO has recommended the use of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV kidney disease, with the choice, dosage and duration of DAAs therapy based on HCV genotype, glomerular filtration rate, virologic response and possible drug interactions, as shown in Fig. 14.7 [89]. In addition to DAAs, it recommends the use of immunosuppressive agents (IS) with or without plasma exchange in case of a cryoglobulinaemic flare or nephrotic syndrome, with rituximab as first line IS for cryoglobulinaemic kidney disease.
HIV
Both acute and chronic kidney disease are common in the course of HIV infection. Mechanisms of kidney injury in the course of HIV infection vary from direct viral cytopathic effects, immune complex disease, and systemic complications of immunodepression and infection or their therapies [90, 91]. The diagnosis of kidney disease in an HIV-positive patient must therefore consider whether patient is combination anti-retroviral therapy (cART)-naïve or not, and whether there is an ongoing co-infection. HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and HIV immune complex disease (HIVICK) are the main kidney manifestations of HIV infection. HIVAN, the most frequent cause of kidney disease in HIV-positive individuals of African descent, results from the cytopathic effects of the virus on visceral and parietal epithelial cells [92]. cART-naïve African blacks with apolipoprotein-1 (APOL-1) G1/G2 variants are especially at risk [93, 94]. The lifetime risk of developing HIVAN in an untreated HIV-positive black patient is 2–10%, but the risk rises to 50% if the patient is homozygous for APOL-I variants [95]. HIVAN typically presents with varying degrees of proteinuria or the nephrotic syndrome with progressive kidney failure. Histologically, classic HIVAN is characterized by collapsing glomerulopathy and attendant tubulointerstitial disease including tubular microcyst formation, interstitial inflammation and tubular injury [91]. HIVICK represents a heterogenous group of proliferative immune-complex mediated GN occurring in a patient with active HIV infection without other possible aetiologies. HIVICK usually manifests as a nephritic or nephrotic-nephritic syndrome in the absence of coinfections such as HBV or HCV. Various proliferative GNs are seen on kidney histology in HIVICK with a post-infectious GN histological pattern observed in about 50% of cases [96]. Other podocytopathies, tubulointerstitial and vascular diseases have been reported in the setting of HIV infection, as shown in Table 14.7. Management involves viral suppression with cART, and measures to slow progression of chronic kidney disease. Recommendations on the screening, management and monitoring of kidney disease in HIV-positive individuals were published recently [91].
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 [SARS-CoV-2]
The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 has affected millions of people around the world, and kidney disease is increasingly recognized as one of its serious complications. A study of 710 hospitalized patients in Wuhan, China with COVID-19 showed that 44% had proteinuria and haematuria, and 26.7% had haematuria on admission. The prevalence of elevated serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen was 15.5% and 14.1%, respectively. AKI occurred in 5.1% and was associated with a four-fold increase in mortality [97]. A systematic review reported the incidence of AKI to be 8.9% in 6945 COVID-19 patients [98]. There was a higher risk of mortality (RR 3.08–4.19) in severe AKI (AKI Stage 3, or requiring KRT) was reported in a meta-analysis [99]. The proposed mechanisms of kidney injury are diverse, and include direct viral infection, effects on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, haemodynamic instability, coagulopathy and cytokine storm [100]. Histology of native and allograft kidney biopsies in 17 patients in New York, 15 of whom presented with AKI, and 9 with nephrotic range proteinuria, showed that 5/14 native kidneys had collapsing glomerulonephritis (cGN); 2 with membranous GN; one each with minimal change disease, lupus nephritis with crescents, anti-GBM nephritis; and 4 with acute tubular injury (Table 14.7). The 3 allograft biopsies showed acute T-cell mediated rejection, cortical infarction and acute tubular injury. Three patients with cGN (labelled as “COVAN”) and one with minimal change disease were shown to have APOL1 high-risk genotype [101]. In a study of 114 chronic haemodialysis patients from New York, intensive care unit (ICU) admission was required in 13.2% and 16.7% required mechanical ventilation with an overall mortality of 28%; of 86.7% of those requiring ICU, nearly 100% required mechanical ventilation [102].
Kidney transplant recipients appear to be at increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease and mortality rate of 28% was reported in one centre [103]. Treatment is supportive with supplemental oxygen, anticoagulation and dexamethasone for those requiring oxygen, with various agents under clinical trial (including remisidivir, tocilizumab). The vaccines against SARS Cov-2 have reduced the infection rates, severe infection, hospitalization and mortality. Randomised controlled trials to date have shown benefits of dexamethasone, tocilizumab, neutralizing antibodies, and remdesivir.
Protozoal and Parasitic Infections and the Kidney
Malaria
The World Health Organization (WHO) reported 228 million cases of malaria worldwide in 2018, 93% in Africa; 405,000 deaths were reported, 94% of which occurred in Africa [104]. Figure 14.8 shows the distribution of malaria worldwide [106]. The most vulnerable groups are young children, who have not yet developed immunity to malaria, and pregnant women, whose immunity has decreased with pregnancy. Malaria is transmitted by the bite of an infected Anopheles mosquito. There are four pathogenic species of malaria: Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae; P. falciparum causes the most severe disease with heaviest parasitaemia. The clinical presentation of severe disease is dehydration with hypotension, oliguria, severe anaemia and jaundice.
Kidney Disease with Malaria
Malarial nephropathies are reported in endemic areas, such as Southeast Asia, India, and Sub-Saharan Africa [107,108,109]. Histologic evidence shows the presence of acute tubular necrosis, interstitial nephritis and glomerulonephritis [110,111,112,113] (Table 14.8).
Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in severe malaria in less than 4.8% of cases, with clinical presentation of hypotension, oliguria, severe anaemia, jaundice, and hepatosplenomegaly and a high risk of mortality (15–45%) [107,108,109]. Risk factors for malarial AKI include delayed diagnosis, heavy parasitaemia, volume depletion, hyperbilirubinaemia, intravascular haemolysis, kidney ischaemia, sepsis, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), cytoadherence to endothelial cells, and microvascular sequestration [114]. Endothelial activation leads to the release of several cytokines, including thromboxane, catecholamines, endothelin and other inflammatory mediators, that are also implicated in the pathogenesis of malaria-associated kidney injury [114].
Immune system activation in malaria involves Th1 and Th2 responses [110]. When the Th2 response prevails (especially with infection by P. malariae), complement activation occurs, with immune complex deposition leading to glomerulonephritis. When Th1 response is predominant, acute interstitial nephritis and acute glomerulonephritis occur. Renal cortical necrosis has also been described in malaria, characterizing more severe kidney injury and is generally associated with non-recovery of kidney function and development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) [112]. Hepatic dysfunction also contributes to kidney disease in malaria: hyperbilirubinemia can lead to cast nephropathy, and AKI, and liver disease and its complications can also cause AKI (hepato-renal syndrome (HRS)) [111, 113, 115,116,117]. The principal pathogenic mechanisms of kidney disease in malaria are depicted in Fig. 14.9.
Diagnosis
Microscopy is the gold standard and preferred option for diagnosing malaria. In nearly all cases, examination of thick and thin blood films will reveal malaria parasites. Thick films are more sensitive than thin films for detecting low levels of parasitaemia.
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) are useful for diagnostic purposes, especially for diagnosing malaria in patients who have recently received antimalarial treatment and in whom blood films are transiently negative for malaria parasites. Commonly targeted antigens are histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2), which is specific for P. falciparum, and plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), which is present in all Plasmodium species [115, 116].
Treatment
The control and eradication of malaria demands a multifaceted approach, including insecticide spraying and insecticide-treated bed nets.
Close monitoring with rehydration, correction of hypoglycaemia (if present) and control of any seizures are important. If the patient remains oliguric after adequate rehydration, and kidney function continues to decline, then KRT (haemofiltration or haemodialysis, and if neither is available, peritoneal dialysis) should be implemented, especially for severe disease. Haemofiltration is more efficient, and is associated with a significantly lower mortality than peritoneal dialysis. When possible, refer the patient to a dialysis unit.
The current WHO-recommended first-line treatment for the majority of malaria cases is artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) (Table 14.9).
Schistosomiasis
Approximately 240 million people worldwide, living in poor communities without potable water and inadequate sanitation, are affected by schistosomiasis, which is prevalent in tropical and sub-tropical areas of the world (Fig. 14.10) [118], with 90% living in Africa. It is estimated that more than 200,000 deaths per year are due to schistosomiasis in sub-Saharan Africa. Table 14.10 depicts the geographical distribution of the different schistosomal species [119].
Clinical Features
The incubation period for patients with acute schistosomiasis is usually 2–12 weeks; many people are asymptomatic and have subclinical disease during both acute and chronic stages of infection. Acute infection (Katayama syndrome) may present with rash, fever, headache, myalgia, and respiratory symptoms. Eosinophilia is often present with hepato- and/or splenomegaly [120].
Clinical manifestations of chronic disease result from host immune responses to schistosomal ova. S. mansoni and S. japonicum ova most commonly lodge in the blood vessels of the liver or intestine and can cause diarrhoea, constipation, and blood in the stool. Chronic inflammation can lead to bowel ulceration, hyperplasia, and polyposis; and with heavy infections, may result in liver fibrosis and portal hypertension. S. haematobium ova tend to lodge in the urinary tract causing dysuria and haematuria. Chronic infections may increase the risk of bladder cancer. S. haematobium ova deposition has also been associated with damage to the female genital tract, causing female genital schistosomiasis. Central nervous system lesions are rare and due to ectopic deposition of ova in the spinal cord (S. mansoni or S. haematobium) or brain (S. japonicum) forming granulomas that act as space occupying lesions [121].
Kidney Disease
Glomerular disease occurs in 5–15% of those with S. mansoni infection [122], and has been described in 10–12% of autopsy studies [123]; proteinuria occurs in 20% of S. mansoni-infected patients [124]. Glomerular injury is due to the deposition of schistosomal antigens in the glomerulus and subsequent immune response [121]. The histopathological patterns described are mesangial proliferative GN, membranoproliferative GN, FSGS, proliferative GN and amyloidosis [122].
S. haematobium infections present with haematuria, with granuloma formation; if untreated, the disease may progress to bladder fibrosis, calcification, vesico-ureteric reflux and hydronephrosis, and CKD [120]; the risk of bladder cancer is increased. Rarely, glomerulopathy has been described with S. haematobium, with a case report of membranoproliferative GN [123].
Figure 14.11 describes the timelines associated with the pathogenesis and the different disease manifestations of schistosomiasis [124].
Diagnosis
Schistosomiasis is diagnosed by the detection of ova in stool (S. mansoni, S. japonicum, S. mekongi, and S. intercalatum) or urine (S. haematobium) specimens. Antibodies and/or antigens detected in blood or urine samples are also indicative of infection [119, 120].
Treatment
Infections with all major Schistosoma species can be treated with praziquantel (Table 14.11). Although a single course of treatment is usually curative, repeat treatment may be needed after 2 to 4 weeks to increase effectiveness [119].
Prevention and Control
The control of schistosomiasis is based on large-scale treatment of at-risk population groups, access to safe water, improved sanitation, education, and snail control. Preventive measures include avoiding contact with freshwater in disease-endemic countries.
The WHO strategy for schistosomiasis control focuses on reducing disease by periodic, targeted treatment with praziquantel of all at-risk population groups [119].
Fungal Infections and Kidney Disease
Fungal infections occur more commonly in hospitalized or immunocompromised patients; Table 14.12 outlines the major risk factors for fungal infections of the kidney. Most common organisms are Candida species [125]; less common fungi are filamentous fungi (Mucor, Aspergillus, Penicillium); and rare are endemic fungi (Blastomycosis, Histoplasmosis, Coccidioidomycosis). Patients who are symptomatic usually have urinary tract obstruction from masses of fungal elements (fungal balls). Angio-invasion by fungi may lead to numerous micro-abscesses in the kidney, and extensive kidney infarcts, leading to kidney dysfunction. Treatment with systemic antifungal agents, and surgical removal of the obstructing mass is usually required [126]. In extensive disease, mortality remains very high, especially with angio-invasive fungal infection with mucormycosis and aspergillus infections [127].
Conclusions
Kidney and urinary tract infections are associated with significant morbidity—and amongst vulnerable groups, mortality. The first clinical case describes a bacterial infection with E. Coli, and illustrates how clinical presentations with urinary tract infection may be unusual, but with appropriate clinical awareness, affected patients can be commenced on appropriate antibiotics early, and hence offered the best chance of a full recovery. The second clinical scenario illustrates the reversible nature of infection-related immune-mediated glomerulonephritis, which may present in a young female who is very unwell, confused and dialysis dependent.
References
Ndulue C, Jisike-Onuigbo N, Anyanor A, Ozuemba B, Osakwe A, Oguejiofor N, et al. SAT-459 purple urine bag syndrome in a Nigerian with gastrointestinal bleeding. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(3):S191–2.
Godaly G, Ambite I, Svanborg C. Innate immunity and genetic determinants of urinary tract infection susceptibility. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2015;28:88–96.
Medina M, Castillo-Pino E. An introduction to the epidemiology and burden of urinary tract infections. Ther Adv Urol. 2019;11:3–7.
Tan CW, Chlebicki MP. Urinary tract infections in adults. Singap Med J. 2016;57(9):485–90.
Tandogdu Z, Wagenlehner FM. Global epidemiology of urinary tract infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016;29:73–9.
NICE Guideline: urinary tract infection (lower): antimicrobial prescribing. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng109. Accessed 20 Apr 2020.
EAU Guidelines. Edn. Presented at the EAU annual congress Barcelona 2019. isbn:978-94-92671-04-2.
Smelov V, Naber K, Bjerklund Johansen KE. Improved classification of urinary tract infection: future considerations. Eur Urol Suppl. 2016;5:71–80.
Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, Wullt B, Colgan R, Miller LG, et al. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: a 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(5):e103–20.
Rubin RH, Shapiro ED, Andriole VT, Davis RJ, Stamm WE. Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of urinary tract infection. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15(suppl 1):S216–27.
Anger J, Lee U, Ackerman AL, Chou R, Chughtai B, Clemens JQ, et al. Recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: AUA/CUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2019;202:282–9.
NICE Guidance—Complicated urinary tract infections: ceftolozane/tazobactam. BJU Int. 2018;121:825–834.
NICE guideline: urinary tract infection (recurrent): antimicrobial prescribing. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng112. Accessed 20 Apr 2020.
Kulchavenya E. Best practice in the diagnosis and management of urogenital tuberculosis. Ther Adv Urol. 2013;5:143–51.
Pang Y, Shang Y, Lu J, Liang Q, Dong L, Li Y, et al. GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of urinary tuberculosis from urine specimens. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6181. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06517-0.
Cek M, Lenk S, Naber KG, Bishop MC, Johansen TEB, Botto H, et al. EAU guidelines for the management of genitourinary tuberculosis. Eur Urol. 2005;48:353–62.
Yang C-W. Leptospirosis renal disease: emerging culprit of chronic kidney disease unknown etiology. Nephron. 2018;138:129–36.
Qiang XH, Yu TO, Li YN, Zhou LX. Prognosis risk of urosepsis in critical care medicine: a prospective observational study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9028924, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9028924.
Neild GH, Thomson G, Nitsch D, et al. Renal outcome in adults with renal insufficiency and irregular asymmetrical kidneys. BMC Nephrol. 2004;5:12.
Global tuberculosis report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2019. https://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/. Accessed 20 Apr 2020.
Gonzalez OY, Teeter LD, Thanh BT, Musser JM, Graviss EA. Extrathoracic tuberculosis lymphadenitis in adult HIV seronegative patients: a population-based analysis in Houston, Texas, USA. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003;7:987–93.
Daher EF, Silva Junior GB, Guardao Barros EJ. Review: renal tuberculosis in the modern era. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88(1):54–64.
Mallinson WJW, Fuller RW, Levison DA, et al. Diffuse interstitial renal tuberculosis. An unusual cause of renal failure. QJM. 1981;198:137–48.
Oliveira B, Jayawardene S, Shah S. Single centre experience of granulomatous interstitial nephropathy; time for a new approach? Clin Kidney J. 2017;10:249–54.
Eastwood JB, Zaidi M, Maxwell JD, et al. Tuberculosis as primary renal diagnosis in end-stage uremia. J Nephrol. 1994;7:290–3.
Global leprosy update, 2016: accelerating reduction of disease burden. WHO Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2017;92(35):501–520.
Nakayama EE, Ura S, Fleury RN, Soares V. Renal lesions in leprosy: a retrospective study of 199 autopsies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(1):26–30.
Silva Junior GB, Daher EF, Pires Neto RJ, et al. Leprosy nephropathy: a review of clinical and histopathological features. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2015;57:15–20.
Torgerson PR, Hagan JE, Costa F, Calcagno J, Kane M, Martinez-Silveira MS, et al. Global burden of leptospirosis: estimated in terms of disability adjusted life years. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004122.
Herath NJ, Kularatne SA, Weerakoon KG, Wazil A, Subasinghe N, Ratnatunga NV. Long term outcome of acute kidney injury due to leptospirosis? A longitudinal study in Sri Lanka. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:398.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerulonephritis Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:139–274.
Prasad N, Patel MR. Infection-induced kidney diseases. Front Med. 2018;5:327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00327.
Schiffl H. Renal recovery from acute tubular necrosis requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective study in critically ill patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:1248–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfk069.
Lopes JA, Jorge S, Resina C, Santos C, Pereira A, Neves J, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis: a contemporary analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13:176–81.
Hoste EA, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, Cely CM, Colman R, Cruz DN, et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1411–23.
Naughton CA. Drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78(6):743–50.
Awdishu L, Mehta RL. The 6R’s of drug induced nephrotoxicity. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0536-3.
Lizarraga KJ, Nayer A. Dengue-associated kidney disease. J Nephropathol. 2014;3(2):57–62.
Nasim A, Anis S, Baqi S, Akhtar SF, Baig-Ansari N. Clinical presentation and outcome of dengue viral infection in live-related renal transplant recipients in Karachi, Pakistan. Transplant Infect Dis. 2013;5(15):516–25.
Jessie K, Fong MY, Devi S, Lam SK, Wong KT. Localization of dengue virus in naturally infected human tissues, by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(8):1411–8.
Méndez A, González G. [Dengue haemorrhagic fever in children: ten years of clinical experience]. Biomedica. 2003;23(2):180–193.
Jonsson CB, Figueiredo LTM, Vapalahti O. A global perspective on hantavirus ecology, epidemiology, and disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(2):412–41.
Krautkrämer E, Grouls S, Stein N, Reiser J, Zeier M. Pathogenic old world hantaviruses infect renal glomerular and tubular cells and induce disassembling of cell-to-cell contacts. J Virol. 2011;85(19):9811–23.
Ferluga D, Vizjak A. Hantavirus nephropathy. JASN. 2008;19(9):1653–8.
Miettinen MH, Mäkelä SM, Ala-Houhala IO, Huhtala HSA, Kööbi T, Vaheri AI, et al. Ten-year prognosis of Puumala hantavirus-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 2006;69(11):2043–8.
Gamage CD, Sarathkumara YD. Chronic kidney disease of uncertain etiology in Sri Lanka: are leptospirosis and Hantaviral infection likely causes? Med Hypotheses. 2016;91:16–9.
Prasad N, Novak JE, Patel MR. Kidney diseases associated with parvovirus B19, Hanta, Ebola, and dengue virus infection: a brief review. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2019;26(3):207–19.
Baseler L, Chertow DS, Johnson KM, Feldmann H, Morens DM. The pathogenesis of Ebola virus disease. Annu Rev Pathol. 2017;12:387–418.
Uyeki TM, Mehta AK, Davey RT, Liddell AM, Wolf T, Vetter P, et al. Clinical management of Ebola virus disease in the United States and Europe. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(7):636–46.
Zolnourian ZR, Curran MD, Rima BK, Coyle PV, O’Neill HJ, Middleton D. Parvovirus B19 in kidney transplant patients. Transplantation. 2000;69(10):2198–202.
Waldman M, Kopp JB. Parvovirus B19 and the kidney. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(Suppl 1):S47–56.
Wierenga KJ, Pattison JR, Brink N, Griffiths M, Miller M, Shah DJ, et al. Glomerulonephritis after human parvovirus infection in homozygous sickle-cell disease. Lancet. 1995;346(8973):475–6.
Leiri N, Hotta O, Taguma Y. Characteristics of acute glomerulonephritis associated with human parvovirus B19 infection. Clin Nephrol. 2005;64(4):249–57.
Liefeldt L, Buhl M, Schweickert B, Engelmann E, Sezer O, Laschinski P, et al. Eradication of parvovirus B19 infection after renal transplantation requires reduction of immunosuppression and high-dose immunoglobulin therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(10):1840–2.
Hirsch HH, Knowles W, Dickenmann M, Passweg J, Klimkait T, Mihatsch MJ, et al. Prospective study of polyomavirus type BK replication and nephropathy in renal-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(7):488–96.
Randhawa PS, Finkelstein S, Scantlebury V, Shapiro R, Vivas C, Jordan M, et al. Human polyoma virus-associated interstitial nephritis in the allograft kidney. Transplantation. 1999;67(1):103–9.
Hirsch HH, Brennan DC, Drachenberg CB, Ginevri F, Gordon J, Limaye AP, et al. Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplantation: interdisciplinary analyses and recommendations. Transplantation. 2005;79(10):1277–86.
Drachenberg CB, Beskow CO, Papadimitriou JC, Cangro CB, Rocca M, Klassen DK, et al. Human polyoma virus infected cells (PoVIC): incidence in renal biopsies (BX), urine cytology and correlation with clinical presentation. Transplantation. 1999;67(7):S217.
Hirsch HH. Human polyomavirus and papillomavirus infection and disease posttransplant. In: Transplant infections. Springer; 2016. p. 631–652.
Nankivell BJ, Renthawa J, Jeoffreys N, Kable K, O’Connell PJ, Chapman JR, et al. Clinical utility of urinary cytology to detect BK viral nephropathy. Transplantation. 2015;99(8):1715–22.
Drachenberg CB, Papadimitriou JC, Chaudhry MR, Ugarte R, Mavanur M, Thomas B, et al. Histological evolution of BK virus–associated nephropathy: importance of integrating clinical and pathological findings. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(8):2078–91.
Nickeleit V, Singh HK, Randhawa P, Drachenberg CB, Bhatnagar R, Bracamonte E, et al. The Banff working group classification of definitive polyomavirus nephropathy: morphologic definitions and clinical correlations. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(2):680–93.
Sawinski D, Goral S. BK virus infection: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30(2):209–17.
Hirsch HH, Randhawa P, AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013r;13(Suppl 4):179–88.
Cummins NW, Sohail MR. Cytomegalovirus, BK, and other viral infections of the kidney. In: Core concepts in parenchymal kidney disease. Springer; 2014. p. 229–240.
Helanterä I, Koskinen P, Finne P, Loginov R, Kyllönen L, Salmela K, et al. Persistent cytomegalovirus infection in kidney allografts is associated with inferior graft function and survival. Transpl Int. 2006;19(11):893–900.
Agrawal V, Gupta RK, Jain M, Prasad N, Sharma RK. Polyomavirus nephropathy and cytomegalovirus nephritis in renal allograft recipients. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53(4):672–5.
Posadas Salas MA, Thompson J, Kadian M, Ngo T, Bruner E, Self S. Cytomegalovirus renal infection: rare manifestation of a common post-transplant viral infection-a case series. Transpl Infect Dis. 2019;21(6):e13169.
Fogo A. Cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36(2):E7–8.
Ferreira AC, Navarro D. Cytomegalovirus nephropathy in the transplant patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36:777–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz194.
Kole AK, Roy R, Kole DC. An observational study of complications in chickenpox with special reference to unusual complications in an apex infectious disease hospital, Kolkata, India. J Postgrad Med. 2013;59(2):93–7.
Os I, Ström EH, Stenehjem A, Gudmundsdottir H, Langberg H, Draganov B, et al. Varicella infection in a renal transplant recipient associated with abdominal pain, hepatitis, and glomerulonephritis. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2001;35(4):330–3.
Zaki S, Bhongade S, Shanbag P. Acute glomerulonephritis following varicella infection. Indian J Nephrol. 2012;22(1):64. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.83753.
Condom P, Mansuy J-M, Decramer S, Izopet J, Mengelle C. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome triggered by varicella infection. ID Cases. 2017;9:89–90.
Bazerbachi F, Haffar S, Garg SK, Lake JR. Extra-hepatic manifestations associated with hepatitis E virus infection: a comprehensive review of the literature. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2016;4(1):1–15.
Pischke S, Hartl J, Pas SD, Lohse AW, Jacobs BC, Van der Eijk AA. Hepatitis E virus: infection beyond the liver? J Hepatol. 2017;66(5):1082–95.
Agrawal P, Kumar V, Kumar A, Sachdeva MUS, Malhotra P, Nada R. Monoclonal Gammopathy of renal significance triggered by viral E hepatitis. Indian J Nephrol. 2019;29(1):50–2.
Kamar N, Rostaing L, Izopet J. Hepatitis E virus infection in immunosuppressed patients: natural history and therapy. In: Seminars in liver disease. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2013. p. 62–70.
Andrievskaya M, Lenhart A, Uduman J. Emerging threat: changing epidemiology of hepatitis A and acute kidney injury. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2019;26(3):171–8.
Fan P-C, Chen Y-C, Tian Y-C, Chang C-H, Fang J-T, Yang C-W. Acute renal failure associated with acute non-fulminant hepatitis A: a case report and review of literature. Ren Fail. 2009;31(8):756–64.
Bhimma R, Coovadia HM. Hepatitis B virus-associated nephropathy. Am J Nephrol. 2004;24(2):198–211.
Kamimura H, Setsu T, Kimura N, Yokoo T, Sakamaki A, Kamimura K, et al. Renal impairment in chronic hepatitis B: a review. Diseases. 2018;6(2):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases6020052.
Li D, Gao G, Jiang H, Tang Z, Yu Y, Zang G. Hepatitis B virus-associated glomerulonephritis in HBsAg serological-negative patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27(1):65–9.
Lai K. Hepatitis-related renal disease. Futur Virol. 2011;6:1361–76.
Pipili C, Papatheodoridis G, Cholongitas E. Treatment of hepatitis B in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2013;84:880–5.
Gill K, Ghazinian H, Manch R, Gish R. Hepatitis C virus as a systemic disease: reaching beyond the liver. Hepatol Int. 2016;3(10):415–23.
Meyers CM, Seeff LB, Stehman-Breen CO, Hoofnagle JH. Hepatitis C and renal disease: an update 1. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(4):631–57.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes HCV Work Group. KDIGO 2018 clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hepatitis C in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2018;8(3):91–165.
Jotwani V, Atta MG, Estrella MM. Kidney disease in HIV: moving beyond HIV-associated nephropathy. JASN. 2017;28(11):3142–54.
Swanepoel CR, Atta MG, D’Agati VD, Estrella MM, Fogo AB, Naicker S, et al. Kidney disease in the setting of HIV infection: conclusions from a kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney Int. 2018;93(3):545–59.
Fabian J, Naicker S. HIV and kidney disease in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2009;5(10):591–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2009.141.
Kasembeli AN, Duarte R, Ramsay M, Mosiane P, Dickens C, Dix-Peek T, et al. APOL1 risk variants are strongly associated with HIV-associated nephropathy in black South Africans. JASN. 2015;26(11):2882–90.
Dummer PD, Limou S, Rosenberg AZ, Heymann J, Nelson G, Winkler CA, et al. APOL1 kidney disease risk variants: an evolving landscape. Semin Nephrol. 2015;35(3):222–36.
Kopp JB, Nelson GW, Sampath K, Johnson RC, Genovese G, An P, et al. APOL1 genetic variants in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and HIV-associated nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(11):2129–37.
Nobakht E, Cohen SD, Rosenberg AZ, Kimmel PL. HIV-associated immune complex kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12(5):291–300.
Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, et al. Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of COVID-19 patients. Kidney Int. 2020;97:829–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/kint.2020.03.005.
Chen YT, Shao SC, Hsu CK, et al. Incidence of acute kidney injury in COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and metanalysis. Crit Care. 2020;24:346. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03009-y.
Ali H, Daoud A, Mohamed MM, Salim SA, Yessayan L, Baharani J, et al. Survival rate in acute kidney injury superimposed COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ren Fail. 2020;42:393–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022x2020.17.
Batlle D, Soler MJ, Sparks MA, Hiremath S, South AM, Welling PA, et al., on behalf of the COVID-19 and ACE2 in Cardiovascular, Lung, and Kidney Working Group. Acute kidney injury in COVID-19: emerging evidence of a distinct pathophysiology. JASN. 2020;31:1380–1383. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020040419.
Kudose S, Batal I, Santoriello D, Xu K, Barasch J, Peleg Y, et al. Kidney biopsy findings in patients with COVID-19. JASN. 2020;31(9):2158–67. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020050744.
Fisher M, Yunes M, Mokrzycki MH, et al. Chronic hemodialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19—short-term outcomes in Bronx, New York. Kidney360. 2020;1(8):755–62. https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0003672020.
Akalin E, Azzi Y, Bartash R, et al. Covid-19 and kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2475–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2011117.
https://www.who.int/malaria/en/. Accessed 30 Apr 2020.
World malaria report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Global distribution of Malaria in 2018—CDC ‘Heat’ Map. https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/travellers/country_table/a.html
Barsoum RS. Malarial acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:2147–54.
Das BS. Renal failure in malaria. J Vector Borne Dis. 2008;45:83–97.
Manan JA, Ali H, Lal M. Acute renal failure associated with malaria. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2006;4:47–52.
Barsoum RS. Malarial nephropathies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:1588–97.
Kute VB, Trivedi HL, Vanikar AV, Shah PR, Gumber MR, Patel HV, et al. Plasmodium vivax malaria–associated acute kidney injury, India, 2010–2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:842–5.
Naqvi R. Plasmodium vivax causing acute kidney injury: a foe less addressed. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31:1472–5.
Bircan Z, Kervancioglu M, Soran M, Gonlusen G, Tuncer I. Two cases of nephrotic syndrome and tertian malaria in South-Eastern Anatolia. Pediatr Nephrol. 1997;11(1):78–9.
da Silva Junior GB, Pinto JR, Barros EJG, Geysa Farias GMN, De Francesco DE. Kidney involvement in malaria: an update. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2017;59:e53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946201759053.
Poti KE, Sullivan DJ, Dondorp AM, Woodrow CJ. HRP2: transforming malaria diagnosis, but with caveats. Trends Parasitol. 2020;36(2):112–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.004.
Plucinski MM, Candrinho B, Dimene M, Colborn J, Lu A, Nace D, et al. Assessing performance of HRP2 antigen detection for malaria diagnosis in Mozambique. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(9):e00875–919. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00875-19.
WHO Malaria Publications. Management of severe malaria. In: A practical handbook. 3rd ed. 2012. isbn:978-92-4-154852-6. https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241548526/en/
Ismail SA, Kamal W, Salem HK. Schistosoma prevalence world-wide. In: Schistosomiasis. 2016. isbn:978-1-944685-64-5. http://www.smgebooks.com/schistosomiasis/index.php#
World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/schistosomiasis/epidemiology/table3/en/. Accessed 2 May 2020.
CDC. www.cdc.gov/parasites/schistosomiasis. Accessed 2 May 2020.
da Silva Junior GB, Duarte DB, Barros EJ, De Francesco DE. Schistosomiasis-associated kidney disease: a review. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2013;3(1):79–84.
Barsoum RS. Schistosomal glomerulopathies. Kidney Int. 1993;44:1–12.
Seck SM, Sarr ML, Dial MC, Ka EF. Schistosoma hematobium-associated glomerulopathy. Indian J Nephrol. 2011;21(3):201–3. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.78076.
Barsoum RS, Esmat G, El-Baz T. Human schistosomiasis: clinical perspective. J Adv Res. 2013;4(5):433–44.
Fraser VJ, Jones M, Dunkel J, Storfer S, Medoff G, Dunagan WC. Candidemia in a tertiary care hospital: epidemiology, risk factors, and predictors of mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:414–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/clind/15.3.414.
Singh N. Trends in the epidemiology of opportunistic fungal infections: predisposing factors and the impact of antimicrobial use practices. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:1692–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/323895.
Badiee P, Hashemizadeh Z. Opportunistic invasive fungal infections: diagnosis & clinical management. Indian J Med Res. 2014;139:195.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Questions
Questions
-
1.
A 55 year old man presented to the emergency room with fever, non-productive cough, anosmia, muscle aches and fatigue for one day and sore throat for 3 days. He had been to his local pub 5 days previously. His temperature was 38.3 °C, BP 124/76, respiratory rate 28/min and oxygen saturation 88%. Chest radiograph was suggestive of bilateral lower lobe interstitial pneumonitis. Laboratory results revealed haemoglobin 13.3 g/dL; white cell count 4.1 × 109/L; lymphocyte count 1.3 × 109/L; blood glucose 12.2 mmol/L; serum creatinine 98 μmol/L; CRP 185 mg/L. Three days after admission he was breathless and transferred to ITU, his creatinine increased to 210 μmol/L.
What is the most likely cause of his illness?
-
A.
COVID-19
-
B.
Cytomegalovirus infection
-
C.
Staphylococcus infection
-
D.
Pneumococcus infection
-
E.
Malaria
Answer: A
A nasal swab PCR confirmed the diagnosis of COVID-19. He was admitted to the intensive care unit and commenced on intravenous fluids, high flow oxygen via a nasal cannula, enoxaparin 20 mg subcutaneously, dexamethasone 6 mg daily intravenously and insulin adjusted according to glucometer readings. He was transferred out of ICU after 5 days and continued to improve in hospital.
-
A.
-
2.
A 30 year old black woman, recipient of a deceased donor kidney transplant 3 months previously, was noted to have a decline in her baseline kidney function at a clinic visit. She had received antithymocyte globulin, high dose steroid induction therapy and was being maintained on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisolone. She had been noted to be CMV IgG positive while on dialysis. Her BP was130/60 mmHg, pulse 78/min and temperature 39 °C. Laboratory tests: haemoglobin 11.8 g/dL; WCC 3.1 × 109/L; platelet count 130,000; serum creatinine 180 μmol/L from a previous baseline of 110 μmol/L. Urine examination revealed 50 red cells/HPF and proteinuria of 0.5 g/day. Tacrolimus levels were between 5 and 15 ng/mL. She underwent a kidney biopsy.
Histology of the allograft biopsy showed a peritubular mononuclear interstitial infiltrate; some tubular cells had intranuclear inclusions.
What is the most likely diagnosis?
-
A.
Acute cellular rejection
-
B.
Acute antibody mediated rejection
-
C.
BK virus infection
-
D.
Cytomegalovirus infection
-
E.
Tacrolimus toxicity
Answer: D
CMV viral load was 15,000 copies/mL. She was treated with intravenous ganciclovir 5 mg/kg every 12 h for 14 days, and thereafter maintained on valganciclovir 900 mg daily for 30 days. MMF was discontinued, tacrolimus dose was optimized according to blood levels, and she continued with low dose prednisolone. Her serum creatinine stabilized at 125 μmol/L.
-
A.
-
3.
An 18-year old boy, recipient of a second (deceased donor) kidney transplant was noted to have an asymptomatic rise in his serum creatinine during a routine clinic visit 12 months after transplantation. He had received antithymocyte globulin, high dose steroid induction therapy and was being maintained on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisolone. He had been noted to be CMV IgG positive previously. He was noted to have haemoglobin 12.8 g/dL; WCC 5.1 × 109/L; platelet count 230,000; serum creatinine 220 μmol/L from a previous baseline of 120 μmol/L. Urine cytology showed epithelial cells with viral inclusions ‘decoy cells’, Allograft biopsy showed mononuclear interstitial inflammation, and some degree of tubulitis with basophilic changes of the tubular epithelium.
What is the most likely diagnosis?
-
A.
Acute cellular rejection
-
B.
Acute antibody mediated rejection
-
C.
BK virus infection
-
D.
Cytomegalovirus infection
-
E.
Tacrolimus toxicity
Answer: C
He had a urine BK load of 117 copies/mL and a serum BK viral load of 105 copies/mL. His MMF dose was halved, and tacrolimus trough levels lowered and he was treated with leflunomide 100 mg daily for 5 days and 40 mg daily thereafter until the virus was cleared. His kidney function gradually stabilized to around his baseline levels and surveillance for BKV is carried out on a monthly basis.
-
A.
-
4.
A 45 year old black man was recently diagnosed with HIV infection and referred to a Renal Clinic with proteinuria and renal dysfunction. He had minimal ankle oedema, BP 126/82 and had 3 g proteinuria/day. His serum albumin was 25 g/L, serum cholesterol 4.1 mmol/L, serum creatinine 188 μmol/L, eGFR 42.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, CD4 count 180 cells/mL, viral load 125,000 copies/mL. He underwent a kidney biopsy.
What is the most likely biopsy diagnosis?
-
A.
Crescentic glomerulonephritis
-
B.
Focal segmental glomerulonephritis
-
C.
Membranous glomerulonephritis
-
D.
Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis
-
E.
Minimal change disease
Answer: B
His kidney biopsy showed typical HIV associated nephropathy, with glomerular collapse, microcystic tubular dilatation and interstitial inflammation. He was commenced on Losartan 50 mg daily, and Abacavir 300 mg BD, Lamuvidine (3TC) 150 mg daily and Dolutegravir 50 mg daily. Avoid fixed dose combinations if GFR < 50 mL/min, and tenofovir if possible. His APOL1 genotype was not available.
-
A.
-
5.
A 25 year old man was admitted to the emergency room with a fever of 39.1 °C, and dehydration. He had been on a beach vacation in Mozambique 2 weeks previously. He was noted to have tachycardia of 100/min, BP 96/60 and was pale and had a 2 cm splenomegaly. His haemoglobin was 10.1 g/dL; white cell count 4.1 × 109/L; platelets 92,000; serum bilirubin 35 mmol/L; blood urea 32 mmol/L; serum creatinine 220 μmol/L.
What is the most likely cause of his acute kidney injury?
-
A.
Cytomegalovirus infection
-
B.
Epstein barr virus infection
-
C.
Malaria
-
D.
Pneumococcal infection
-
E.
Staphylococcus infection
Answer: C
A thin smear revealed the presence of tropozoites of P falciparum. He was commenced on intravenous fluids and therapy with artesunate 2.4 mg/kg intravenously immediately and 12 hourly for 24 h and thereafter switched to oral treatment with artemether-lumefantrine for 3 days. A blood smear at 72 h demonstrated that the parasitaemia had been eradicated and he made a a full recovery.
-
A.
-
6.
A 45 year old man, a visitor from Egypt, was hospitalized with abdominal distension. He had been an agricultural worker. He was noted to have hepatosplenomegly. Investigations showed dipstick proteinuria of 3+, and was measured to be 2.9 g/24 h; serum albumin 35 g/L; serum globulins 50 g/L; haemoglobin was 10.8 g/dL; white cell count 4.1 × 109/L; platelets 112,000; serum bilirubin 10 mmol/L; blood urea 5 mmol/L; serum creatinine 88 μmol/L. Ultrasound of the liver was suggestive of hepatic fibrosis, and was confirmed by fibroscan. A kidney biopsy showed membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.
What is the cause of the renal disease?
-
A.
Cytomegalovirus infection
-
B.
Hepatitis B infection
-
C.
HIV infection
-
D.
Malaria
-
E.
Schistosomiasis
Answer: E
A stool specimen showed the presence of schistosoma mansoni. He was treated with praziquantel and advised to avoid future schistosomal infection, and to return to his physician for review.
-
A.
-
7.
A 25 year old forest worker in the Democratic Republic of the Congo presented to the Emergency Department with 3 day history of headache, fever, shivering at night, muscle ache and joint pains. The headache was worst behind the eyes and he also mentioned shivering at night. His temperature was 40.0 °C with a BP of 100/60 and regular tachycardia of 120/min. By Day 4 he had developed a maculo-papular rash with patches of purpura. Haemoglobin 13.0 g/dL, WBC 4.0 × 109/L, platelets 80 × 109/L [normal: 150–400]. Creatinine 350 μmol/L with urea 40 mmol/L, eGFR 24 mL/min/1.73 m2. There was proteinuria 0.6 g/L and RBC 50–100/μL. Renal biopsy was not considered as it was felt that it would not influence treatment; furthermore it would add an unnecessary hazard for someone already at risk of bleeding.
What is the most likely diagnosis?
-
A.
COVID 19 infection
-
B.
Dengue fever
-
C.
Ebola virus infection
-
D.
Malaria
-
E.
Tuberculosis infection
Answer: B
He was diagnosed with Dengue fever and managed with supportive treatment and scrupulous attention to clinical signs, pulse, blood pressure and urine output replacing fluid as necessary but avoiding overload. There is unfortunately no specific treatment for dengue virus and as yet no vaccine.
-
A.
-
8.
An 18 year-old female presented with history of fever for 2 weeks, and the passage of brown urine for 6 days, generalized body swelling for 5 days followed by reduced urine output and breathlessness for 2 days. She had a seizure episode a few hours before presentation. She had noted skin infections 3 weeks preceding the above symptoms. On presentation, she had impaired consciousness (GCS 8/15) but recovered within a few hours. She was pale, with bilateral pitting leg oedema temperature of 37.8 °C, respiratory rate 38 breaths/min, pulse 110 bpm and BP 160/110 mmHg. Urinalysis showed blood, protein, and microscopy revealed red cell casts. Her blood tests showed sodium: 122 mmol/L, potassium: 5.6 mmol/L, HCO3: 12.4 mmol/L, chloride: 84.4, iCa: 1.01, BUN: 63.3 mmol/L, creatinine: 884 μmol/L, haemoglobin: 8.3 g/dL, leukocytosis with neutrophila of 78%.
What is the most likeley investigation which will help with diagnosis?
-
A.
ASO titre
-
B.
ANCA
-
C.
Hepatitis B serology
-
D.
Kidney biopsy
-
E.
Serum immunoglobulin
Answer: A
Her ESR was 125 mm/hr and qualitative ASO titre: elevated/positive
-
A.
-
9.
An 18 year-old female presented with history of fever for 2 weeks, red-brown coloured urine for 6 days, generalized body swelling for 5 days followed by reduced urine output and breathlessness for 2 days. She had a seizure episode a few hours before presentation. She had noted skin infections 3 weeks preceding the above symptoms. On presentation, she had impaired consciousness (GCS 8/15) but recovered within a few hours. She was pale, with bilateral pitting leg oedema temperature of 37.8 °C, respiratory rate 38 breaths/min, pulse 110 bpm and BP 160/110 mmHg. Urinalysis showed blood, protein, and microscopy revealed red cell casts. Her blood tests showed sodium: 122 mmol/L, potassium: 5.6 mmol/L, HCO3: 12.4 mmol/L, chloride: 84.4, iCa: 1.01, BUN: 63.3 mmol/L, creatinine: 884 μmol/L, haemoglobin: 8.3 g/dL, leukocytosis with neutrophila of 78%.
What is the most likely diagnosis?
-
A.
Haemolytic uraemic syndrome
-
B.
IgA nephritis
-
C.
Lupus nephritis
-
D.
Post infectious glomerulonephritis
-
E.
Polyarteritis nodosa
Answer: D
Her ESR was 125 mm/hr and qualitative ASO titre: elevated/positive
-
A.
-
10.
A 42 year old rural drainage engineer, living in Sao Paulo state in southern Brazil, presented to the Dermatology clinic giving a history of intermittent skin rash sometimes associated with a change in pigmentation. He was found to have heavy proteinuria and referred to the nephrologist. In recent months he had been feeling more tired than usual. He had a pale complexion. There was mild oedema of the ankles. Temperature: 36.5 °C, Haemoglobin 100 g/L, sodium 140 mmol/L, Potassium 5.3 mmol/L, bicarbonate 22 mmol/L, creatinine 216 μmol/L, albumin 23 g/L. Urine protein amounted to 10.5 g/24 h. An MSU revealed neither cells nor blood or glucose; the urine was sterile on culture. A repeat of the investigations a week later gave similar results.
What is the most likely diagnosis?
-
A.
Leptospirosis
-
B.
Systemic lupus erythematosus
-
C.
Nephropathy of tuberculoid leprosy
-
D.
Amyloidosis secondary to lepromatous leprosy
-
E.
Falciparum malaria
Answer: D Amyloidosis secondary to lepromatous leprosy
-
A.
A. Leptospirosis | Incorrect | Lack of fever, and no active urinary sediment |
B. Systemic lupus erythematosus | Incorrect | No joint pain, no fever, no significant urinary sediment |
C. Nephropathy of tuberculoid leprosy | Incorrect | Nephrotic syndrome not common in the tuberculoid form of leprosy |
D. Amyloidosis secondary to lepromatous leprosy with nephrotic syndrome | Correct | Frequency of amyloidosis in leprosy types: lepromatous [36%], tuberculoid and borderline [5%]. The nephrotic syndrome is a consequence of the amyloidosis. |
E. Falciparum malaria | Incorrect | No fever or other evidence of malaria |
Test your learning and check your understanding of this book’s contents: use the “Springer Nature Flashcards” app to access questions using https://sn.pub/cz9Cok. To use the app, please follow the instructions in Chap. 1.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Naicker, S., Eastwood, J.B., Ashuntantang, G., Ulasi, I. (2023). Infections and the Kidney. In: Banerjee, D., Jha, V., Annear, N.M. (eds) Management of Kidney Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09131-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09131-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09130-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09131-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)