Skip to main content

Analysis of the Spanish Urban Agenda from a Policy Transfer Perspective. Advancing to More Resilient Post-COVID Urban Areas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Identifying Models of National Urban Agendas

Abstract

This work aims to understand how the Spanish Urban Agenda (SUA), approved in 2019, is providing (or not) a urban policy for a better post-COVID urban future. The study analyses the SUA’s source, its evolution, and main features to understand the contribution it is making to the national urban policy framework. It explores the extent to which the SUA has been influenced by policy transfer dynamics from international bodies. The main conclusion is that the SUA is not as new as presented by the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda (MITMA), as it was based on previous work by the Ministry of Finance. In fact, it integrates recommendations made by the European Commission and its methodological approach—Urban Acquis—to sustainable urban development. However, the MITMA’s new leadership has drawn on the 2030 Agenda, which has helped shape the SUA’s content. In policy transfer terms, the SUA arises as a case of “hybridization”. Separately, the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on the SUA in terms of policy implementation. The Spain’s Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan—España Puede—provides for the first time funding for reinforcing its policy role in Spain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This represents around 13% of Spanish territory (Ministry of Public Works 2013).

  2. 2.

    Spain is a “quasi-federal” country. It is territorially organized in 17 regions—Comunidades Autónomas: two autonomous cities in the north of Africa (Ceuta and Melilla), 50 provinces, and 8124 municipalities. Among these, only 402 municipalities have over 20,000 inhabitants, while almost 90% have less than 5000 (SUA 2019, pp. 46–47).

  3. 3.

    More information at: https://unhabitat.org/es/node/4407.

  4. 4.

    More information at: https://unhabitat.org/programme/national-urban-policy.

  5. 5.

    The office of UN-Habitat Spain is in fact located in the building of the Ministry of Public Works and a formal collaboration agreement has existed since 2010.

  6. 6.

    More information about the SUA can be found at: https://www.aue.gob.es/.

  7. 7.

    More information can be found at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_20_1835.

  8. 8.

    More information about the call can be found at: https://www.mitma.gob.es/ministerio/proyectos-singulares/prtr/vivienda-y-agenda-urbana/programa_ayudas_proyecto_piloto_accion_local.

  9. 9.

    Sixteen municipalities of less than 5000 inhabitants; 24 municipalities between 5001 and 20,000 inhabitants; 21 municipalities between 20,001 and 50,000 inhabitants; 22 municipalities between 50,001 and 100,000 inhabitants; 20 municipalities between 100,001 and 300,000 inhabitants; 8 municipalities of more than 300,000 inhabitants; 10 local entities that involve the integration of a number of municipalities (e.g., provinces).

  10. 10.

    Boletín Oficial del Estado 213 de 2021: 3.

References

  • Agenda Urbana Española (2019). Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana. https://www.aue.gob.es/que-es-la-aue#Agenda_Urbana_Espanola

  • Alonso Ibáñez, R., S. De Gregorio Hurtado, and M. González Medina. 2020. Las Agendas Urbanas y el Gobierno de las Ciudades: Transformaciones, Desafíos e instrumentos. Madrid: Editorial Reus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R., and C. Rossignolo. 2009. An ‘explicit’ EU urban policy alter a ‘learning’ phase? Paper presented at the II European Urban Research Association Conference in Madrid (Spain), 4–6 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Cities and the ‘soft side’ of Europeanization: The role of urban networks. In The Europeanization of cities—Policies, urban change & urban networks, ed. A. Hamedinger and A. Wolffhardt, 193–206. Amsterdam: Techne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. 1998. Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy 18 (1): 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J., M. González Medina, M.A. Huete García, and S. De Gregorio Hurtado. 2020. Variegated Europeanization and urban policy: Dynamics of policy transfer in France, Italy, Spain and the UK. European Urban and Regional Studies 27 (3): 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, J., and G. Davis. 2001. Rediscovering implementation: Public sector contracting and human services. Australian Journal of Public Administration 60 (2): 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gregorio Hurtado, S. 2017. Is EU urban policy transforming urban regeneration in Spain? Answers from an analysis of the Iniciativa Urbana (2007–2013). Cities 60: 402–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. The EU urban policy in the period 2007–2013: Lessons from the Spanish experience. Regional Studies, Regional Science 5 (1): 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. A Green Deal for the urban age: A new role for cities in EU climate action. In The urban dimension of the European Green Deal, ed. H. Abdullah, 27–38. Barcelona: CIDOB.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gregorio Hurtado, S., and M. González Medina. 2019. Understanding the emergence of the Spanish Urban Agenda. Moving towards a new multi-level urban policy scenario? In Foregrounding urban agendas. The new urban issue in European experiences of policy making, ed. S. Armondi and S. De Gregorio Hurtado, 21–48. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gregorio Hurtado, S., and J. Ruiz Sánchez. 2021. Urban national policy in Spain? A diachronic critical review of four decades of Government action. In The modern guide to national urban policies in Europe, ed. V. Fedeli and K. Zimmermann, 216–244. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gregorio Hurtado, S., V. Do Santos Coelho, and A. Baatti Boulahia. 2021. La Europeización de la política urbana en España en el periodo 2014–2020. Análisis de las Estrategias de Desarrollo Urbano Sostenible Integrado (EDUSI). Cuadernos de Investigación Urbanística 134. http://polired.upm.es/index.php/ciur/issue/view/529/showToc.

  • Dolowitz, D.P., and D. Marsh. 2000. Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy making. Governance 13: 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurocities. 2021. Briefing note on the involvement of cities in the governance of National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRPs). Eurocities. https://eurocities.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Eurocities_Briefing2_NRRPs.pdf (consulted 30-10-2021).

  • FEMP, Federación Española de Municipios y Provincias. 2020. Guía Divulgativa Agenda Urbana Española. Madrid: FEMP. https://cdn.mitma.gob.es/portal-web-drupal/AUE/60-guia_divulgativa_aue.12.06.20.pdf (9-11-2021).

  • Fernández de Losada, A., and H. Abdullah, eds. 2021. Cities on the frontline: Managing the coronavirus crisis. Barcelona: CIDOB. https://www.cidob.org/en/publications/publication_series/cidob_report/cidob_report/cities_on_the_frontline_managing_the_coronavirus_crisis (consulted 2-11-2021).

  • Gleeson, B. 2011. Critical commentary. The urban age: Paradox and prospect. Urban Studies 49 (5): 931–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno de España. 2018. Plan de Acción para la implementación de la Agenda 2030. Hacia una Estrategia Española de Desarrollo Sostenible. http://www.exteriores.gob.es/Portal/es/SalaDePrensa/Multimedia/Publicaciones/Documents/PLAN%20DE%20ACCION%20PARA%20LA%20IMPLEMENTACION%20DE%20LA%20AGENDA%202030.pdf (consulted 10-12-2021).

  • ———. 2021. Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia. Madrid. Gobierno de España. https://planderecuperacion.gob.es/ (consulted 8-11-2021).

  • González Medina, M. 2018. Del enfoque integrado de desarrollo urbano sostenible de la Unión Europea al paradigma de la gobernanza urbana en España. In Retos del desarrollo urbano sostenible e integrado, ed. A. Ibáñez, 35–64. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Medina, M., and V. Fedeli. 2015. Exploring European urban policy: Towards an EU-national urban agenda? Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas 7 (14): 8–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González Medina, M., and M. Huete García. 2018. Procesos de agenda y políticas de desarrollo urbano: Centrando la cuestión. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas 20: 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P.M. 2011. Epistemic communities. In International encyclopedia of political science, ed. B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser, and L. Morlino, vol. 1, 788–791. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959636.n189.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Matters. 2020. The New Leipzig Charter. The transformative power of cities for the common good. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2020/12/12-08-2020-new-leipzig-charter-the-transformative-power-of-cities-for-the-common-good (consulted 16-12-2021).

  • Jordan, A., and D. Liefferink. 2003. The Europeanization of national environmental policy: A comparative analysis. Paper presented at the European Union Studies Association 8th Biennial International Conference, in Nashville (Tennessee, USA), March 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawulich, B.B. 2005. Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.2.466.

  • Kingdon, J.W. 1995. Agenda, alternatives and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Public Works. 2013. Áreas Urbanas +50. Información estadística de las Grandes Áreas Urbanas españolas 2012. http://www.fomento.gob.es/MFOM.CP.Web/handlers/pdfhandler.ashx?idpub=BAW013 (consulted 10-12-2021).

  • ———. 2018. Marco estratégico para orientar las políticas urbanas. Presentation in an event for debate and introduction of the Spanish Urban Agenda, in Madrid, April 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Agenda Urbana Española. Madrid: Ministerio de Fomento. https://apps.fomento.gob.es/CVP/handlers/pdfhandler.ashx?idpub=BAW061 (consulted 10-11-2021).

  • Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda. 2020. “Intervención del ministro de transportes, movilidad y agenda urbana, Jose Luis Ábalos”, en la presentación del nuevo ministerio. Press release 13-1-2020, Madrid: Ministerio de Transporte, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. Memoria justificativa del programa de ayudas para la elaboración de proyectos piloto de planes de acción locales de la agenda urbana española. Madrid: Ministerio de Transporte, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, A.J. 2002. An integrated approach to policy transfer and diffusion. Review of Policy Research 19 (2): 153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00269.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, M., S. De Gregorio Hurtado, and C. Lefèvre. 2012. National Policy Spain. In Second tier cities and territorial development in Europe: Performance, policies and prospects (SGPTD ESPON project). Scientific Report. ESPON, 173–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J., and A. Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. 2019. British policy-making and the need for a post-brexit policy style. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. 1991. What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy 11 (1): 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00004918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomàs, M. 2018. Modelos de gobernanza metropolitana. Barcelona: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/bitstream/10609/91326/3/Gobernanza%20metropolitana_M%C3%B3dulo%201_Modelos%20de%20gobernanza%20metropolitana.pdf (consulted 2-12-2021).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moneyba González Medina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

González Medina, M., De Gregorio Hurtado, S. (2022). Analysis of the Spanish Urban Agenda from a Policy Transfer Perspective. Advancing to More Resilient Post-COVID Urban Areas. In: Gelli, F., Basso, M. (eds) Identifying Models of National Urban Agendas . Comparative Studies of Political Agendas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08388-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08388-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08387-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08388-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics