Skip to main content

Climate Change and Population Ethics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Philosophy ((HP))

  • 829 Accesses

Abstract

Population ethics is the subfield of philosophy that focuses on the moral aspects of how actions affect who exists in a particular population and what quality of life they have. The choices regarding what policies are adopted in response to climate change will affect the identities of those who exist in the future, the size of future populations, and the quality of life that future people will have. This chapter examines the nonidentity problem, various theoretical outlooks on population ethics, some recent policy proposals aimed at reducing fertility, and the relationship between population reduction and the impacts of climate change. After summarizing the relevant issues, the relevance of the discourse to climate policy is highlighted, and points of consensus and dissensus are noted. Disagreement on some of the key theoretical questions in population ethics is significant and poses a challenge for deriving meaningful conclusions about climate policy. Fortunately, emerging points of consensus on other aspects of climate policy and its relationship to population provide reasons to think moral decision-making about these matters is far from hopeless.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, M. R., Frame, D., Huntingford, C., Jones, C. D., Lowe, J., Meinshausen, M., & Meinhausen, N. (2009). Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth ton. Nature, 458(7242), 1163–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, D., Eby, M., Brovkin, B., Ridgwell, A., Cao, L., Mikolajewicz, U., Caldeira, K., Matsumoto, K., Munhoven, G., Montenegro, A., & Tokos, K. (2009). Atmospheric lifetime of fossil fuel carbon dioxide. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 37, 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius, G., Budolfson, M., & Spears, D. (2021). Does climate policy depend importantly on population ethics? Deflationary responses to the challenges of population ethics for public policy. In M. Budolfson, T. McPherson, & D. Plunkett (Eds.), Philosophy and climate change (pp. 111–136). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benatar, D. (2006). Better never to have been: The harm of coming into existence. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benatar, D. (2013). Still better never to have been: A reply to (more of) my critics. The Journal of Ethics, 17, 121–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benatar, D. (2015). The misanthropic argument for anti-natalism. In S. Hannon, S. Brennan, & R. Vernon (Eds.), Permissible Progeny?: The morality of procreation and parenting (pp. 34–59). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boonin, D. (2014). The non-identity problem and the ethics of future people. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J. (2012). Climate matters: Ethics in a warming world. W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budolfson, M., & Spears, D. (2021). Population ethics and the prospects for fertility policy as climate mitigation policy. The Journal of Development Studies, 57(9), 1499–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cafaro, P. (2022). Climate ethics and population policy: A review of recent philosophical work. WIREs Climate Change, 13(2), e748. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. (2012). Why the silence on population? In P. Cafaro & E. Crist (Eds.), Life on the Brink: Philosophers confront population (pp. 41–55). University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caney, S. (2020). Climate justice. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-climate/. Accessed 20 December 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, G., & Galor, O. (2017). Is faster economic growth compatible with reductions in carbon emissions? The role of diminished population growth. Environmental Research Letters, 12(1), 014003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/12/1/014003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, R. Y., Meissner, D., & MacAskill, W. (2022). Population ethics. In R. Y. Chappell, D. Meissner, & W. MacAskill (Eds.), An introduction to Utilitarianism. https://www.utilitarianism.net/population-ethics. Accessed 27 December 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conly, S. (2016). One child: Do we have a right to have more? Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2019). Time and the generations: Population ethics for a diminishing planet. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D. (2012). Creation ethics: Reproduction, genetics, and quality of life. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, R. (1989). The rights of future people. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 6(2), 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosseries, A., & Meijers, T. (2022). Animal population ethics. In G. Arrhenius, K. Bykvist, T. Campbell, & E. Finneron-Burns (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of population ethics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190907686.001.0001

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, H. (2017). Population axiology. Philosophy Compass, 12(11), e12442. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, H. (2019). Climate change and optimum population. The Monist, 102, 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanser, M. (2008). The metaphysics of harm. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 77(2), 421–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, T. (2019). The duty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the limits of permissible procreation. Essays in Philosophy, 20(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, T. (2020). The environmental impact of overpopulation: The ethics of procreation. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, T. (2023). Climate change. In E. Di Nucci, J. Lee, & I. A. Wagner (Eds.), The Rowman & Littlefield handbook of bioethics (pp. 381–391). Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob, D., Taylor, M., Bindi, M., Brown, S., Camilloni, I., Diedhiou, A., Djalante, R., Ebi, K. L., Engelbrecht, F., Guiot, J., Hijioka, Y., Mehrotra, S., Payne, A., Seneviratne, S. I., Thomas, A., Warren, R., & Zhou, G. (2018). 2018: Impacts of 1.5°C global warming on natural and human systems. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield (Eds.), Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/. Accessed 20 December 2022.

  • Hurka, T. (1983). Value and population size. Ethics, 93(3), 496–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In C. Field, V. Barros, D. von Dokken, K. Mach, M. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. Ebi, Y. Estrada, R. Genova, B. Girma, E. Kissel, A. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. Mastrandrea, & L. White (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lianos, P., & Pseiridis, A. (2016). Sustainable welfare and population size. Environmental, Development, and Sustainability, 18, 1679–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lougheed, K. (n.d.). Anti-natalism. In Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/anti-natalism/. Accessed 20 December 2022.

  • MacIver, C. (2015). Procreation or appropriation? In Permissible progeny?: The morality of procreation and parenting (pp. 107–128). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H. D., Gillet, N. P., Stott, P. A., & Zickfield, K. (2009). The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature, 459(7248), 829–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narveson, N. (1967). Utilitarianism and new generations. Mind, 76(301), 62–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolt, J. (2011). Nonanthropocentric climate ethics. WIREs. Climate Change, 2(5), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolt, J. (2015). Casualties as a moral measure of climate change. Climatic Change, 130(3), 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, B., Dalton, M., Fuchs, R., Jiang, L., Pachauri, S., & Zigova, K. (2010). Global demographic trends and future carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(41), 17521–17526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, B., Liddle, B., Jiang, L., Smith, K. R., Pachauri, S., Dalton, M., & Fuchs, R. (2012). Demographic change and carbon dioxide emissions. The Lancet, 380(9837), 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ord, T. (2020). The precipice: Existential risk and the future of humanity. Hachette Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall, C. (2012). Why have children? The ethical debate. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porritt, J. (2010). Population and climate change. New Internationalist 429 (January). https://newint.org/features/2010/01/01/climate-change. Accessed 22 May 2023.

  • Rieder, T. (2016). Toward a small family ethic: How overpopulation and climate change are affecting the morality of procreation. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sebo, J. (2022). Saving animals, saving ourselves: Why animals matter for pandemics, climate change, and other catastrophes. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Springmann, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Robinson, S., Garnett, T., Godfray, H. C. J., Gollin, D., Rayner, M., Vallon, P., & Scarborough, P. (2016). Global and regional health effects of future food production under climate change: A modelling study. The Lancet, 387(10031), 1937–1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. (2019). A planet of 3 billion: Mapping humanity's long history of ecological destruction and finding our way to a resilient future a global citizen's guide to saving the planet. Atlas Observatory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1986). The non-identity problem. Ethics, 96(4), 804–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2014). Quantitative risk assessment of the effects of climate change on selected causes of death. WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241507691. Accessed 20 December 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. (2001). Overconsumption and procreation: Are they morally equivalent? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18(2), 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeebe, R. (2013). Time-dependent climate sensitivity and the legacy of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(34), 13739–13744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuber, S., Venkatesh, N., Tännsjö, T., Tarsney, C., Stefánsson, H. O., Steele, K., Spears, D., Sebo, J., Pivato, M., Ord, T., Ng, Y., Masny, M., MacAskill, W., Lawson, N., Kuruc, K., Hutchinson, M., Gustafsson, J., Greaves, H., Forsberg, L., Fleurbaey, M., Coffey, D., Cato, S., Castro, C., Campbell, T., Budolfson, M., Broome, J., Berger, A., Beckstead, N., & Asheim, G. B. (2021). What should we agree on about the Repugnant conclusion? Utilitas, 33(4), 379–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trevor Hedberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hedberg, T. (2023). Climate Change and Population Ethics. In: Pellegrino, G., Di Paola, M. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0_64

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics