Abstract
While Hungary has been the target of both journalistic and academic attention due to its anti-migrant attitudes since 2015, the racism which has targeted minority-Hungarians from the surrounding states as potential migrants to Hungary has been ignored as a topic of investigation. In this chapter, I contrast the racism targeting minority-Hungarians with that directed towards recent Middle Eastern asylum seekers. I argue that both (potential) migrant groups have been targets of welfare chauvinism. Although the two case studies presented here are different from each other, the trope of injustice runs consistently through them. A core assumption underlying both cases is the belief that immigration is unjust, and immigrants are depicted as ‘free-riders’ who are not entitled to receive social benefits due to not having adequately contributed to Hungary’s economy. By investigating these case studies, I provide insights into the intersections between migration, racism, and welfare.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bocskor, Á. (2018). Anti-immigration discourses in Hungary during the ‘Crisis’ year: The Orbán government’s ‘National Consultation’ campaign of 2015. Sociology, 52(3), 551–568.
Canveren, Ö., & Durakçay, F. A. (2017). The analysis of the Hungarian government’s discourse towards the migrant crisis: A combination of securitization and Euroscepticism. Yonetim Ve Ekonomi, 24(3), 857–876.
Fábián, A. (2005). Demokrácia a globalizáció korában, Budapest. Retrieved October 20, 2020, from http://publicatio.nyme.hu/876/1/FA_2003_Demokracia.pdf
Georgiou, M., & Zaborowski, R. (2017). Media coverage of the “refugee crisis”: A cross-European perspective. Council of Europe.
Harris, E. (2005). Moving politics beyond the state? The impact of European integration on the Hungarian minority in Slovakia. EWC/2005/01, Europe in the World Centre, University of Liverpool. Working paper. Retrieved January 5, 2021, from https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/media/livacuk/ewc/docs/moving-politics-beyond-the-state.pdf
Harris, E. (2007). Moving politics beyond the state: The Hungarian minority in Slovakia. Perspectives: Review of Central European Affairs, 28, 43–62.
Kafkadesk. (2018). Hungary extends “migration state of emergency” despite lack of threat. Retrieved September 11, 2020, from https://kafkadesk.org/2018/09/06/hungary-extends-migration-state-ofemergency-despite-lack-of-threat/
Kántor, Z. (2004). The concept of nation in the ECE “Status Laws.” Central European Political Science Review, 5(16), 29.
Kettley, C. (2003). Ethnicity, language and transition politics in Romania: The Hungarian minority in context. In F. Daftary & F., Grin (Eds.), Nation-building, ethnicity and language politics in transition countries (pp. 243–266). Central European University Press.
Kovács, E. (1998). From the Turul Bird to the image of the finance minister: The role of myths in the post-communist transition, Hungary 1988–1996. In Central Europe Institute TLA Budapest. http://www.ssees.ac.uk/kovacs1.htm
Kovács, M. M. (2006). The politics of dual citizenship in Hungary. Citizenship Studies, 10(4), 431–451.
Kulcsár, L. J., & Bradatan, C. (2007). Politics without frontiers: The impact of Hungarian domestic politics on the minority question in Romania. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40(3), 301–314.
Kulish, N. (2008, April 3). Kosovo heartens a Hungarian enclave in Romania. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/03/world/europe/03iht-journal.4.11653452.html
Lucarelli, S., & Fassi, E. (Eds.). (2017). The European migration system and global justice: A first appraisal. University of Oslo. Retrieved March 6, 2021, from http://www.globus.uio.no/publications/reports/2017/globus-report-1-online.pdf. https://doi.org/10.6092/unibo/amsacta/5673
Manevich, D. (2016). Hungarians share Europe’s embrace of democratic principles but are less tolerant of refugees, minorities. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/30/hungarians-share-europes-embrace-of-democratic-principles-but-are-less-tolerant-of-refugees-minorities/
Melegh, A. (2006). On the East-West slope: Globalization, nationalism, racism and discourses on Eastern Europe. Central European University Press.
Melegh, A. (2016). Unequal exchanges and the radicalization of demographic nationalism in Hungary. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 2(4), 87–108.
Melegh, A. (2018). Positioning in global hierarchies. In M. Moskalewicz & W. Przybylski (Eds.), Understanding Central Europe (pp. 25–31). Routledge.
Melegh, A., Vancsó, A., Hunyadi, M., & Mendly, D. (2019). Positional insecurity and the hegemony of radical nationalism: Migration and justice in the Hungarian media. The International Spectator, 54(3), 54–71.
Mészáros, A. (2019). Zum wortschatz der migrationsdebatte im spiegel der deutschen und der ungarischen presse. Deutscher Wortschatz–interkulturell, 13, 131.
Mészáros, E. L. (2020). The refugee crisis, the illiberal populist challenge and the future of the EU: Is illiberal democracy on the march? The case of Hungary. In K. Agnieszka, J. Misiuna, M. Pachocka, & A. Szczerba-Zawada (Eds.), Connecting the European Union of Shared Aims, Freedoms, Values and Responsibilities. Cedewu. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3718678
Mudde, C. (2007). A Fortuynist foreign policy. In C. S. Liang (Ed.), Europe for the Europeans: The foreign and security policy of the populist radical right (pp. 209–222). Routledge.
Niedermüller, P. (1999). Rethinking history: Time, past and nation in post-socialism. Focaal European Journal of Anthropology, 33, 25–36.
Orbán, V. (2014). The end of liberal democracy, Talk on 26 July 2014. Free Hungary.
Rheindorf, M., & Wodak, R. (2018). Borders, fences, and limits—Protecting Austria from refugees: Metadiscursive negotiation of meaning in the current refugee crisis. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2), 15–38.
Schöpflin, G. (2000). Discontinuity in Central and South-Eastern Europe. In C. Lord (Ed.), Central Europe: Core or periphery? (pp. 57–66). Copenhagen Business School Press.
Szalai, A., & Gőbl, G. (2015). Securitizing migration in contemporary Hungary. CEU Center for EU Enlargement Studies (Working Paper). https://cens.ceu.edu/sites/cens.ceu.edu/files/attachment/event/573/szalai-goblmigrationpaper.final.pdf
Szikra, D. (2018). Welfare for the wealthy: The social policy of the Orbán regime 2010–2017. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/budapest/14209.pdf
Thorleifsson, C. (2017). Disposable strangers: Far-right securitisation of forced migration in Hungary. Social Anthropology, 25(3), 318–334.
van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P., Houtman, D., de Koster, W., & Manevska, K. (2010). “Some are more equal than others”. Economic egalitarianism and welfare chauvinism in the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(4), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928710374376
van Der Waal, J., De Koster, W., & van Oorschot, W. (2013). Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? How welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.785147
van Oorschot, W., & Roosma, F. (2017). The social legitimacy of targeted welfare and welfare deservingness. In W. van Oorschot, F. Roosma, B. Meuleman, & T. Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare (pp. 3–33). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Warner, E. (2003). Unilateral preferences granted to foreign national minorities by a kin-state: A case study of Hungary’s status law. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 35, 379.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andits, P. (2022). The 23 Million Romanians, Igor, and the Others: Welfare State, Migration, and Racism in Hungary. In: Perocco, F. (eds) Racism in and for the Welfare State. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06071-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06071-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06070-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06071-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)