Skip to main content
  • 389 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter assesses the research methods used to study LGBTQ+ families and the implications of current knowledge for applied social research, practice, and policy. To explore the dynamics of interpersonal family relationships and multiple family members, one must need the complexity in conceptualizing and designing research with these populations. Mainstream methodologies often constrain approaches to the study of normative families. The concept of LGBTQ+ families challenges scholars to interrogate what normative is, including the research methods used. This chapter considers social sciences methodologies to describe what research exists or should exist about non-normative families, revisiting methods to address current challenges and opportunities in studying LGBTQ+ families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, K. R. (2015). Other letters: Hidden diversity among LGBTQ. National Council on Family Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Gayou, J. L. (2003). Cómo hacer investigación cualitativa. Fundamentos y metodología. http://mayestra.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/bibliografc3ada-de-referencia-investigacic3b3n-cualitativa-juan-luis-alvarez-gayou-jurgenson.pdf

  • Badgett, M. V. L., Goldberg, N., Conron, K. J., & Gates, G. J. (2009). Best practices for asking questions about sexual orientation on surveys (SMART). The Williams Institute. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/smart-so-survey/

  • Baumle, A. K., & Compton, D. L. R. (2014). Identity versus identification: How LGBTQ parents identify their children on Census surveys. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biblarz, T. J., & Stacey, J. (2010). How does the gender of parents matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black+ lesbian+ woman≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59(5), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowleg, L., Huang, J., Brooks, K., Black, A., & Burkholder, G. (2003). Triple jeopardy and beyond: Multiple minority stress and resilience among Black lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7(4), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewaeys, A., Ponjaert, I., Van Hall, E. V., & Golombok, S. (1997). Donor insemination: Child development and family functioning in lesbian mother families. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 12(6), 1349–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S. R., & Makadon, H. J. (2017). If they don’t count us, we don’t count: Trump administration rolls back sexual orientation and gender identity data collection. LGBT Health, 4(3), 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2017.0073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbisiero, F. (Ed.). (2013). Comunità omosessuali: le scienze sociali sulla popolazione LGBT. FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbisiero, F. (2018). Dalla comunità omosessuale alla città arcobaleno: Lo spazio delle sessualità LGBT+. VOCI, 15, 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbisiero, F., & Monaco, S. (2021). Omosessuali contemporanei: Identità, culture, spazi, LGBT+. FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durso, L. E., & Gates, G. J. (2013). Best practices: Collecting and analyzing data on sexual minorities. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 21–42). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fedewa, A. L., Black, W. W., & Ahn, S. (2015). Children and adolescents with same-gender parents: A meta-analytic approach in assessing outcomes. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 11(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Few-Demo, A. L., Humble, A. M., Curran, M. A., & Lloyd, S. A. (2016). Queer theory, intersectionality, and LGBT-parent families: Transformative critical pedagogy in family theory. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, G. (2012). Family formation and raising children among same-sex couples. National Council of Family Relations, 51(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (2010). Studying complex families in context. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00680.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (2012). Gay dads: Transitions to adoptive fatherhood (Vol. 6). NYU Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (2013). “Doing” and “undoing” gender: The meaning and division of housework in same-sex couples. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2007). The division of labor and perceptions of parental roles: Lesbian couples across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(2), 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E., & Sayer, A. (2006). Lesbian couples’ relationship quality across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E., & Smith, J. Z. (2009). Perceived parenting skill across the transition to adoptive parenthood among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(6), 861–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1990). How marriages change. Depression and Aggression in Family Interaction, 75, 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R., Berkowitz, B., Blum, R., Bockting, W., Bradford, J., de Vries, B., & Makadon, H. (2011). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: Building a foundation for better understanding (Vol. 10, p. 13128). Institute of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzanka, P. R. (2019). Queer survey research and the ontological dimensions of heterosexism. Imagining Queer Methods, 84. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2016.0039

  • Hartwell, E. E., Serovich, J. M., Grafsky, E. L., & Kerr, Z. Y. (2012). Coming out of the dark: Content analysis of articles pertaining to gay, lesbian, and bisexual issues in couple and family therapy journals. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00274.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, S. G., Rostosky, S. S., & Riggle, E. D. (2011). Impact of marriage restriction amendments on family members of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A mixed-method approach. Journal of Social Issues, 67(2), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01702.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. J., Wang, E., & Turner, L. (2009). Traumatic events involving friends and family members in a sample of African American early adolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(3), 398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. L., & Benson, K. E. (2014). “It’s always the mother’s fault”: Secondary stigma of mothering a transgender child. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 10(1-2), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2014.857236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. W. (2006). “No way my boys are going to be like that!” Parents’ responses to children’s gender nonconformity. Gender & Society, 20(2), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205284276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M., Smith, C., & Roy, R. (1981). Lesbian mothers and their children: A comparative survey. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51(3), 545–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuvalanka, K. A., & Goldberg, A. E. (2009). “Second generation” voices: Queer youth with lesbian/bisexual mothers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(7), 904–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9327-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuvalanka, K. A., Weiner, J. L., & Mahan, D. (2014). Child, family, and community transformations: Findings from interviews with mothers of transgender girls. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 10(4), 354–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2013.834529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. A., & Grzanka, P. R. (2016). Applying intersectionality theory to research on perceived racism. In A. N. Alvarez, C. T. H. Liang, & H. A. Neville (Eds.), The cost of racism for people of color: Contextualizing experiences of discrimination (pp. 31–54). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, K. S., & Sayer, A. G. (2005). Using multilevel modeling in caregiving research. Aging & Mental Health, 9(3), 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., Fettro, M. N., & Lamidi, E. (2014). Child well-being in same-sex parent families: Review of research prepared for American Sociological Association Amicus Brief. Population Research and Policy Review, 33(4), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-014-9329-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masyn, K. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 551–611). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazrekaj, D., De Witte, K., & Cabus, S. (2020). School outcomes of children raised by same-sex parents: Evidence from administrative panel data. American Sociological Review, 85(5), 830–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420957249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. K., Kuvalanka, K. A., Catalpa, J. M., & Toomey, R. B. (2016). Transfamily theory: How the presence of trans* family members informs gender development in families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, T. (2013). Review: The Nuptial Deal: Same-sex marriage and Neoliberal Governance, by Jaye Cee Whitehead. American Journal of Sociology, 118(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaco, S. (2022). Italian same-sex parenting in times of COVID-19: Constructing parenthood on insecure grounds. Family Relations. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12640

  • Monk, J. K., & Nelson Goff, B. S. (2014). Military couples’ trauma disclosure: Moderating between trauma symptoms and relationship quality. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6(5), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. R. (2008). Gendered power relations among women: A study of household decision making in Black, lesbian stepfamilies. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. R. (2011). Invisible families: Gay identities, relationships, and motherhood among Black women. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. R., & Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, M. (2013). LGBT sexuality and families at the start of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, R. F., Kuvalanka, K. A., Blume, L. B., & Berkowitz, D. (2009). Queering “the family”. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 43–55). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. J. (2016). Parent’s sexual orientation and children’s development. Child Development Perspectives, 11, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, M. H., Rogers, S. J., Johnson, H. L., Banks, J., Seay, W. P., Tinsley, B. L., & Grant, A. W. (2013). If we ask, what they might tell: Clinical assessment lessons from LGBT military personnel post-DADT. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(2-3), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2013.744931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reczek, C., & Umberson, D. (2012). Gender, health behavior, and intimate relationships: Lesbian, gay, and straight contexts. Social Science & Medicine, 74(11), 1783–1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reczek, C., & Umberson, D. (2016). Greedy spouse, needy parent: The marital dynamics of gay, lesbian, and heterosexual intergenerational caregivers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(4), 957–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. T., & Muraco, J. A. (2013). The use of representative data sets to study LGBT-parent families: Challenges, advantages, and opportunities. In A. E. Goldberg & K. R. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-parent families: Innovations in research and implications for practice (pp. 343–356). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schacher, S. J., Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2005). Gay fathers expanding the possibilities for us all. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 1(3), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J461v01n03_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. Z., Sayer, A. G., & Goldberg, A. E. (2013). Multilevel modeling approaches to the study of LGBT-parent families: Methods for dyadic data analysis. In A. E. Goldberg & K. R. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-parent families: Innovations in research and implications for practice (pp. 307–323). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stover, C. M. (2014). Community based participatory research: The application and lessons learned from a study with LGB college students. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 8(4), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • The GenIUSS Group. (2014). Best practices for asking questions to identify transgender and other gender minority respondents on population-based surveys. The Williams Institute. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/geniuss-trans-pop-based-survey/

  • Thompson, L. (1992). Feminist methodology for family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/353271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., Thomeer, M. B., Kroeger, R. A., Lodge, A. C., & Xu, M. (2015). Challenges and opportunities for research on same-sex relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eeden-Moorefield, B., Few-Demo, A. L., Benson, K., Bible, J., & Lummer, S. (2018). A content analysis of LGBT research in top family journals 2000-2015. Journal of Family Issues, 39(5), 1374–1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X17710284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagaman, M. A. (2015). Changing ourselves, changing the world: Assessing the value of participatory action research as an empowerment-based research and service approach with LGBTQ young people. Child & Youth Services, 36(2), 124–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2014.1001064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, L., & Saperstein, A. (2015). New categories are not enough: Rethinking the measurement of sex and gender in social surveys. Gender & Society, 29(4), 534–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, T. A., Murry, V. M., Brody, G. H., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., Walker, C., & Ainette, M. G. (2007). Ethnic pride and self-control related to protective and risk factors: Test of the theoretical model for the strong African American families program. Health Psychology, 26(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.1.50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. D., & Miyashita, A. (2016). Sexual and gender diversity within the Black men who have sex with men HIV epidemiological category. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13(3), 202–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Corbisiero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Corbisiero, F. (2022). Social Research Methodologies to Understand LGBTQ+ Families. In: Gilley, B.J., Masullo, G. (eds) Non-Binary Family Configurations: Intersections of Queerness and Homonormativity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05367-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05367-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05366-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05367-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics