Abstract
Media Policy Studies is under-theorized, even as it has grown as a distinct sub-field in the larger canvas of communication and media studies in the West. In South Asia, barring empirical studies that seek to delve into media policies, much headway has not been made into theorizing the field. In such a scenario, theoretical impetus to this growing sub-field is but warranted. This chapter seeks to present a theoretical framework to the study of media policy, called the Deliberative Policy Ecology (DPE) Approach, in an effort to address this gap. The approach draws on ideas of deliberation as praxes of communication in politics and policymaking in bringing about “voice parity”, and on the idea of ecology as a heuristic device. The DPE Approach is placed in dialogue with the cosmopolitan approach to media governance that the editors of this volume present, in order to understand commonalities and divergences. Importantly, the DPE Approach contributes to a possible Sustainable Media Governance, especially as a Southern and decolonial approach to its study and praxes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The Centre for Culture, Media and Governance (CCMG) was set up in Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI), New Delhi, and is the only Centre that offers a course in Media Governance in India and the larger region.
- 2.
The very idea that a majority of the world could be hinged on the phrase, the “non-West” spoke of the primacy of the West in terms of linguistic connotation. I use it here to pinpoint and highlight the interventionist attitudes of the West, and not necessarily to buy into the defining of the rest of the world as the non-West.
- 3.
It is my contention that the subalterns have been speaking through acts of courage and subversive measures but are “unheard and hated”. This is a theoretical and conceptual framing that grants them their agency even in their silences by mobilizing this statement (Raghunath, 2022).
- 4.
One such effort in bringing together work on media policies in South Asia was a side-event organized at the annual conference of the International Association of Media and Communication Research (IAMCR), in 2021, by the Global Media Policy Working Group. An updated version of papers presented will be published as a special issue of the Journal of Digital Media and Policy (Intellect), in March 2022.
- 5.
These stakeholders are recognized by officiating actors like the state or funding agencies that facilitate media policy processes. Such actors are usually the more established and institutionalized representatives of civil society and other formalized actors.
- 6.
By “fluid identities”, I refer to those policy actors who are unrecognized or gain recognition over time, start off or masquerade as certain kinds of policy actors and evolve over time to assume divergent identities in the media policy space.
- 7.
In my previous work which developed the DPE Approach (Raghunath 2020), I speak of the policy ethnography at “deliberative sites”, where conversations and deliberations on various aspects of media policies take place. These could range from formal venues to informal spaces on the sidelines of more formal events.
References
Anderson, W.A. & Damle, S. (2018) The RSS: A View to the Inside. Penguin Viking.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.
Axford, B. (2013). Theories of Globalization. Polity Press.
Banerjee, P. (2020). Elementary Aspects of the Political: Histories from the Global South. Duke University Press.
Bayly, C.A. and Bayly, C.A. (2000). Empire and Information: Intelligence gathering and social communication in India, 1780–1870 (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Boczkowski, P., & Siles, I. (2014). Steps towards cosmopolitanism in the study of media technologies: Integrating scholarship on production, consumption, materiality, and content. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 560–571.
Chakrabarty, D. (2005). Provincialising Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.
Chakravartty, P., & Sarikakis, K. (2006). Media Policy and Globalization. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Couldry, N. (2010). Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Curran, J., & Park, M.J. (Eds.). (2000). De-Westernizing Media Studies. London: Routledge.
Dhoop, P & Dhoop, V. (2020). Raising the ‘Labour Question’ in a Deliberative Democracy, Economic and Political Weekly, 55 (51).
Dinesh, TB et al. (2012). Alipi: A framework for re-narrating web pages. Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, 1–4.
Dutta MJ. (2021). Neoliberal Governmentality and Low-Wage Migrant Labour in India and Singapore. Journal of Creative Communications, 16(2): 139–152.
Editorial, World Trade Organization Is Moving Too Slow for Comfort. Economic and Political Weekly, 56 (22).
Escobar, A. (2017). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
Ganter, S.A. & Ortega, F. (2019). The Invisibility of Latin American Scholarship in European Media and Communication Studies: Challenges and Opportunities of De-Westernization and Academic Cosmopolitanism. International Journal of Communication, 13 (2019), 68–91.
Ganter, S., & Löblich, M. (2021). Discursive Media Institutionalism: Assessing Vivien A. Schmidt’s Framework and Its Value for Media and Communication Studies. International Journal Of Communication, 15, 20.
Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46(1) Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination. 1–35.
Hearn, G. N., & Foth, M. (2007). Communicative Ecologies: Editorial Preface. Electronic Journal of Communication, 17(1–2), 2–6.
Holton, R. (2005). Making Globalisation. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Education.
Indian Village Assemblies: A Qualitative Analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 7416.
Innis, H. (1950). Empire and Communications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kaviraj, S. (2005). An Outline of a Revisionist Theory of Modernity. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes De Sociologie / Europäisches Archiv Für Soziologie, 46(3), 497–526.
Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press.
Massey, D. (1999). Power-geometries and the politics of space–time. Heidelberg: Department of Geography, University of Heidelberg.
McLaughlin, P. (2001). Toward an Ecology of Social Action: Merging the Ecological and Constructivist Traditions. Human Ecology Review, 8(2), 12–28.
McLuhan, M. (1962). Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. University of Toronto Press.
Mezzadra S., Rahola F. (2015) The Postcolonial Condition: A Few Notes on the Quality of Historical Time in the Global Present. In: Malreddy P.K., Heidemann B., Laursen O.B., Wilson J. (eds) Reworking Postcolonialism. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–335.
Moyo, L. (2020). The Decolonial Turn in Media Studies in Africa and the Global South. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Napoli, P. (2019). Social Media and the Public Interest. Columbia University Press.
Nigam, A. (2020). Decolonising Theory: Thinking Across Traditions. Bloomsbury.
Parthasarathy, R., & Rao, V. (2017). Deliberative Democracy in India. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 7995. World Bank, Washington, DC.
Perrault, T., Bridge, G., & McCarthy, J. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. London: Routledge.
Raghunath, P. (2020) Community Radio Policies in South Asia: A Deliberative Policy Ecology Approach. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Raghunath, P. (2022). ‘Hated Speech’ and the Costs of Freedom in India. Association for Progressive Communications.
Rahman, A. (2020). The politico-commercial nexus and its implications for television industries in Bangladesh and South Asia. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7–8), 1153–1174.
Rao V, Sanyal P. (2010) Dignity through Discourse: Poverty and the Culture of Deliberation in Indian Village Democracies. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science; 629(1): 146–172.
Rasul, A., & McDowell, S. D. (2014). Consolidation in the name of regulation: The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) and the concentration of media ownership in Pakistan. Global Media Journal—American Edition, 12(20).
Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Assessment, Revisions, and Implications for Scholars and Practitioners. In P. Sabatier & H. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (pp. 211–235). Boulder: Westview Press.
Samarajiva, R., & Shields, P. (1990). Integration, Telecommunication, and Development: Power in the Paradigms. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 84–105.
Sanyal, P., Rao, V. and Prabhakar, U., 2015. Oral democracy and women’s oratory competency in Indian Village Assemblies: A Qualitative Analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers.
Sass, J., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Deliberative Cultures. Political Theory, 42(1), 3–25.
Sen A. (2005). The Argumentative Indian. US: Penguin
Steward, J. (1955). Theory of Culture Change: The Methodology of Multilinear Evolution. University of Illinois Press.
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
Waisbord, S. (2015). De-Westernization and cosmopolitan media studies. In C. C. Lee (Ed.), Internationalizing “International Communication”, University of Michigan Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raghunath, P. (2022). Deliberative Policy Ecology Approach: Media Policy Studies from South Asia. In: Ganter, S.A., Badr, H. (eds) Media Governance. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05020-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05020-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05019-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05020-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)