Skip to main content

Critical Posthumanism: An Overview

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism

Abstract

This initial overview maps critical posthumanism as a theoretical and self-reflective discourse that has been establishing itself over the last 20 years or so. While popular notions of posthumanism and the figure of the posthuman tend to focus on technology and its current dynamic of transforming the “human” into some “posthuman” or even “transhuman” state or species, critical posthumanism, in its attempt at a more rigorous and more “philosophical” undertaking, is concerned with what one might term the “ongoing deconstruction of humanism” and its premises: namely, humanism’s anthropocentrism, essentialism, exceptionalism, and speciesism. Critical posthumanism and its various denominations and spin-offs are therefore informed by a postanthropocentric ethics, politics, and ecology, and look toward complex notions of embodiment and of material entanglement between humans and a “more-than-human” world. This overview chapter discusses those aspects while also providing an analysis of the complex temporality at work in posthumanism. It evaluates the posthuman in terms of its past, present, and projected or “constructed” futures, by foregrounding the genealogical dimension of critical posthumanism. In doing so, it provides an illustration of the various meanings of “critical” and “critique” that are at work within posthumanist discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (Eds.). (2008). Material feminisms. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation) [1970]. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays, trans. B. Brewster, 121–73. New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anders, G. (2018). Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen 1: Über die Seele im Zeitalter der Zweiten Industriellen Revolution [1956]. C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badmington, N. (Ed.). (2000). Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badmington, N. (2003). Theorizing posthumanism. Cultural Critique, 53(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.20003.0017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badmington, N. (2006). Posthumanism. In S. Malpas & P. Wake (Eds.), The Routledge companion to critical theory (pp. 240–241). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1993). Mythologies [1957]. Trans. Annette Lavers. Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2008). What is genealogy? Journal of the Philosophy of History, 2(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1163/187226308X335958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, E., Brill, S., & Holmes, B. (Eds.). (2019). Antiquities beyond humanism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. (2016). Posthumanism. In K. Bruhn Jensen & R. T. Craig (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 1–8). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, A. (2011). Originary technicity: The theory of technology from Marx to Derrida. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions: On nomadic ethics. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, S., Joughin, J. J., Owen, D., & Walker, R. J. (Eds.). (2000). Inhuman reflections: Thinking the limits of the human. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callus, I., & J. Corby (2015). Editorial: Toward Countertextuality. CounterText: A Journal for the Study of the Post-Literary, 1(2), v–xi. https://doi.org/10.3366/count.2015.0013

  • Callus, I., & Herbrechter, S. (2007) Critical posthumanism or, the inventio of a posthumanism without technology. Subject Matters 3(2)/4(1): 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana, J., & Maisano, S. (Eds.). (2016). Renaissance posthumanism. Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Césaire, A. (2000). Discourse on colonialism [1972]. Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B. (2008). Posthuman metamorphosis: Narrative and systems. Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., & Rossini, M. (Eds.). (2017). The Cambridge companion to literature and the posthuman. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. J. (2003). Medieval identity machines. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency and politics. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T. (2008). Humanism (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. (2015). TechGnosis: Myth, magic, and mysticism in the age of information. North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1990). Some statements and truisms about neologisms, newisms, postisms, parasitisms, and other small seismisms [trans. A. Tomiche]. In D. Carroll (Ed.), The states of ‘theory’: History, art and critical discourse (pp. 63–94). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, J.-P. (2007). Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundations of nanoethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32(7), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310701396992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2018). Antebellum Posthuman: Race and materiality in the mid-nineteenth century. Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2012). Humanitarian reason: A history of present times. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felski, R. (2015). The limits of critique. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences [1966]. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988). In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2013) The subject of power [1982]. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Routledge, pp. 208–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, E. (2000). Perceiving animals: Humans and beasts in early modern English culture. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, E. (Ed.). (2004). Renaissance beasts: Of animals, humans, and other wonderful creatures. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, E. (2006). Brutal reasoning: Animals, rationality, and humanity in early modern England. Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, E., Gilbert, R., & Wiseman, S. (Eds.). (2002). At the borders of the human: Beasts, bodies and natural philosophy in the early modern period. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginn, F. (2018). Posthumanism. In L. Turner, U. Sellbach, & R. Broglio (Eds.), The Edinburgh companion to animal studies (pp. 413–429). Edinburgh University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E. P. (2002). Representations of the post/human: Monsters, aliens and others in popular culture. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. H. (Ed.). (1995). The cyborg handbook. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusin, R. (Ed.). (2015). The nonhuman turn. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusin, R. (Ed.). (2018). After extinction. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J., & Livingston, I. (Eds.). (1995). Posthuman bodies. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. (2017). Defiant Earth: The fate of humans in the anthropocene. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, C., & Gemenne, F. (Eds.). (2015). The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis: Rethinking modernity in a new epoch. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. (2000). Embodying technesis: Technology beyond writing. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as performer: Toward a posthumanist culture? A university masque in five scenes. Georgia Review, 31(4), 830–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (2005). My mother was a computer: Digital subjects and literary texts. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. (2012). How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. Trans. W. Lovitt. Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, U. K. (2016). The environmental humanities and the futures of the human. New German Critique, 43(2), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-3511847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S. (2009). Posthumanismus – Eine kritische Einführung. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S., & Callus, I. (Eds.). (2009). Cy-Borges: Memories of the posthuman in the work of Jorge Luis Borges. Bucknell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S., & Callus, I. (Eds.). (2012). Posthumanist Shakespeares. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch Hadorn, G., et al. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Z. I. (2013). Animal: New directions in the theorization of race and posthumanism. Feminist Studies, 39(3), 669–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, V. (Ed.). (2017). What if culture was nature all along? Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, E. (2014). The sixth extinction: An unnatural history. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landgraf, E., Torp, G., & Weatherby, L. (Eds.). (2019). Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern [1991]. Trans. C. Porter. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to maters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge [1979]. Trans. G. Bennington & B. Massumi. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1991). The inhuman: Reflections on time [1988]. Trans. G. Bennington & R. Bowlby. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1992). The postmodern explained to children: Correspondence 1982–1985. Power Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • More, M., & Vita More, N. (Eds.). (2013). The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future. Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2017). Humankind: Solidarity with nonhuman people. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1976). From: On truth and lies in the extra-moral sense [1873]. The portable Nietzsche. Ed. & trans. W. Kaufmann. Penguin, pp. 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pico della Mirandola, G. (2016). Oration on the dignity of man [1486). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H. (2019). Levels of organic life and the human: An introduction to philosophical anthropology [1928]. Ed. & trans. Millay Hyatt. Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postmedieval – A Journal of Medieval Cultural Studies (2010). Inaugural double issue “When Did We Become Post/Human”. 1(1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, N., & Sawday, J. (2000). (Eds.) The Renaissance computer: Knowledge technology in the first age of print. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation [1965]. Trans. D. Savage. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossini, M. (2006). To the dogs: Companion species and the new feminist materialism. Kritikos: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Postmodern Cultural Sound, Text and Image 3 (September). Available online at: https://intertheory.org/rossini. Accessed 16 Feb 2021.

  • Sawday, J. (2007). Engines of the imagination: Renaissance culture and the rise of the machine. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, K. (2011). How to make a human: Animals and violence in the middle ages. Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2008–2011). Technics and time. 3 vols [1994–2010]. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, E. (2004). Biomedia. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1989). The content of the form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (2003). Tropics of discourse: Essays in cultural criticism. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, D. (1995). Prosthesis. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (2007). Bring the noise: The parasite and the multiple genealogies of Posthumanism – Introduction to the new edition. In M. Serres (Ed.), The parasite (pp. xi–xxviii). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (n.d.) About Posthumanities. Series blurb. Available online at: https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/series/posthumanities#. Accessed 02 Dec 2020.

  • Wynter, S., & McKittrick, K. (2015). Unparalleled catastrophe for our species? Or, to give humanness a different future: Conversations. In K. McKittrick (Ed.), Sylvia Wynter: On being human as praxis (pp. 9–89). Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zylinska, J. (2018). The end of man: A feminist counterapocalypse. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Herbrechter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., de Bruin-Molé, M., Grech, M., Müller, C.J., Rossini, M. (2022). Critical Posthumanism: An Overview. In: Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3_66

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics