Abstract
This chapter considers the monster as a rich site for conversations about posthumanism within medieval studies. While the Middle Ages comprise the thousand years prior to the advent of Humanism, similar kinds of taxonomizing and hierarchical thinking were at play. The prevalence of monsters, beings who trouble binaries and demonstrate the porosity of boundaries, suggests discomfort with these emergent anthropocentric discourses, and this chapter explores scholarship on the monsters who disrupted mainstream medieval thought. From the inhuman creatures in the Old English epic Beowulf to the widely read fourteenth century Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, monsters straddled the perceived boundaries between human and non-human, nature, and culture. Moreover, bestial creatures like werewolves and dog-headed saints suggested not only uncertainties about the differences between humans and non-human creatures but also that the non-human might model other ways of inhabiting the world. Similarly, monsters whose embodiments are akin – but not equivalent – to contemporary ideas about disability might provide the present other ways of thinking about embodied differences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbari, S. C. (2009). Idols in the East: European Representations of Islam and the Orient, 1100-1450. Cornell University Press.
Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Indiana University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
Cohen, J. J. (1996). Monster culture (seven theses). In J. J. Cohen (Ed.), Monster theory: Reading culture. University of Minnesota Press.
Cohen, J. J. (Ed.). (2012). Animal, vegetable, mineral: Ethics and objects. Oliphaunt Books.
Cohen, J. J. (2015). Stone: An ecology of the inhuman. University of Minnesota Press.
Crane, S. (2012). Animal encounters: Contacts and concepts in medieval Britain. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am (M.L. Mallet, Ed., D. Willis, Trans.). Fordham University Press.
Dinshaw, C. (2013). Ecology. In M. Turner (Ed.), A handbook of middle English studies (pp. 347–362). Wiley.
Estes, H. (2017). Anglo-Saxon literary landscapes: Ecotheory and the environmental imagination. Amsterdam University Press.
Garland-Thompson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. Columbia University Press.
Godden, R. H. (2016). Prosthetic ecologies: Vulnerable bodies and the dismodern subject in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Textual Practice, 30(7), 1273–1290.
Godden, R. H., & Mittman, A. S. (2019). Embodied difference: Monstrosity, disability, and the posthuman. In R. H. Godden & A. S. Mittman (Eds.), Monstrosity, disability, and the posthuman in the medieval and early modern world (pp. 3–31). Palgrave Macmillan.
Heng, G. (2018). The Invention of Race in the European Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.
Hsy, J. (2015). Disability. In D. Hillman & U. Maude (Eds.), Cambridge companion to the body in literature (pp. 24–40). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781107256668.003
Isidore of Seville. (2010). The eytmologies of Isidore of Seville (S. A. Barney, et al., Trans.). Cambridge UP.
Joy, E., & Dionne, C. (2010). Editor’s introduction. postmedieval, 1(1/2), 1–9.
Kinoshita, S., & McCracken, P. (2012). Marie de France: A critical companion. D.S. Brewer.
Leet, E. S. (2020). Writing companions: Toward a critical entanglement with the more-than-human world. postmedieval, 11(1), 3–11.
Marie de France. (2009). The Lais of Marie de France (R. Hanning & J. Ferrante, Trans.). Baker Academic.
McCracken, P. (2009). Translation and animals in Marie de France’s Lais. Australian Journal of French Studies, 46(3), 206–219.
McCracken, P. (2012). The floral and the human. In J. J. Cohen Cohen (Ed.), Animal, vegetable, mineral: Ethics and objects. Oliphaunt Books.
Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. (2000). Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. University of Michigan Press.
Mitchell, J. A. (2014). Becoming human: The matter of the medieval child. University of Minnesota Press.
Montroso, A. S. (2019). Dwelling underground in the book of John Mandeville: Monstrosity, disability, ecology. In R. H. Godden & A. S. Mittman (Eds.), Monstrosity, disability, and the posthuman in the medieval and early modern world (pp. 285–302). Palgrave Macmillan.
Montroso, A. S. (2020). “Skin black and wrinkled”: The toxic ecology of the Sibyl’s cave. postmedieval, 11(1), 91–101.
Oswald, D. M. (2010). Monsters, gender and sexuality in medieval english literature. D.S. Brewer.
Pearman, T. V. (2010). Women and disability in medieval literature. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pearman, T. V. (2016). Disability, blood, and liminality in Malory’s “Tale of the Sankgreal”. Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies, 10(3), 271–286.
Robertson, K. (2017). Nature speaks: Medieval literature and Aristotelian philosophy. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Rudd, G. (2007). Greenery: Ecocritical readings of late medieval English literature. Manchester University Press.
Salisbury, J. E. (2011). The beast within: Animals in the middle ages (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Salvera de Grave, J. J. (Ed.). (1891). Eneas, texte critique. Max Niemeyer.
Siewers, A. K. (2006). Landscapes of Conversion: Guthlac’s Mound and Grendel’s Mere as Expressions of Anglo-Saxon Nation-Building. In E. A. Joy & M. K. Ramsey (Eds.), The Postmodern Beowulf (pp. 199–257). West Virginia University Press.
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. (1992). (J. Winny, Ed. and trans.). Broadview Literary Texts.
Steel, K. (2011). How to make a human: Animals and violence in the middle ages. Ohio State University Press.
Steel, K. (2019). How not to make a human: Pets, feral children, worms, sky burial, oysters. University of Minnesota Press.
Stiker, H. J. (1997). A history of disability (W. Sayers, Trans.). University of Michigan Press.
The Beowulf Manuscript. (2010). (R.D. Fulk, Ed. and trans.). Harvard University Press.
The Book of John Mandeville. (2007). (T. Kohanski & C. David Benson, Eds.). Medieval Institute Publications.
Wallace, K. B. (2019). Grendel and Goliath: Monstrous superability and disability in the Old English corpus. In R. H. Godden & A. S. Mittman (Eds.), Monstrosity, disability, and the Posthuman in the medieval and early modern world (pp. 107–126). Palgrave Macmillan.
Weinreich, S. J. (2019). How a monster means: The significance of bodily difference in the Christopher cynocephalus tradition. In R. H. Godden & A. S. Mittman (Eds.), Monstrosity, disability, and the posthuman in the medieval and early modern world (pp. 181–207). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Montroso, A.S. (2022). Medieval Posthumanism. In: Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04957-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04958-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities