Abstract
Posthumanists of different stripes often view the Enlightenment as the pinnacle of humanist thought and use it as a negative foil to profile their posthumanist contentions. This chapter follows current research trends that paint a more complex picture of the relationship between the Enlightenment and posthumanism. The chapter suggests that a closer examination of this relationship reveals that Enlightenment thinkers and scientists prepared the terrain for critical posthumanism. To make the argument, the chapter first delineates more clearly the Enlightenment from humanism by juxtaposing the former’s critical impetus to the normative force of the latter. Subsequent sections examine specific instances where Enlightenment authors challenge central humanist conceits. The focus is on Immanuel Kant and the scientific, philosophical, and literary discourses that in the aftermath of Kant’s philosophy advance early notions of what today we would call embodiment, rethink human agency, promote environmental awareness, and redraw the borders between humans and animals as well as between the organic and the inorganic. The chapter concludes with reflections on how the age best known for its idealism was also no stranger to contemporary materialist contentions, and might even be able to enlighten postphenomenological discussions of technology and cybernetic concerns about digitization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T. (1973). The jargon of authenticity (K. Tarnowski and F. W. Evanston, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
Böhme, H. (2000). Historische Natur-Konzepte, ökologisches Denken und die Idee der Gabe. In P. Morris-Keitel & M. Niedermeier (Eds.), Ökologie und Literatur (pp. 7–21). Peter Lang.
Boyle, N. (2017). Embodied cognition: Goethe’s Farbenlehre as phenomenology. German Life and Letters, 70(4), 478–490.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity.
Carroll, J. (2017). Eighteenth-century departures from dualism: From mechanism and animism to vitalism and anthropology. German Life and Letters, 70(4), 430–444.
Colebrook, C. (2014). Death of the PostHuman: Essays on Extinction, Vol. 1. Open Humanities Press.
Connolly, W. E. (2013). The fragility of things: Self-organizing processes, neoliberal fantasies, and democratic activism. Duke University Press.
Emden, C. J. (2019). Agency without humans: Normativity and path dependence in the nineteenth-century life sciences. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 53–77). Bloomsbury.
Engler-Coldren, K., Knapp, L., & Lee, C. (2017). Embodied cognition around 1800: Introduction. German Life and Letters, 70(4), 413–422.
Fortmann, P. (2019). Brain matters in the German enlightenment: Animal cognition and species difference in Herder, Soemmerring, and Gall. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 37–52). Bloomsbury.
Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). Penguin.
Gilgen, P. (2019). Natural beauty: Intimations of the posthuman in Kant. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 127–144). Bloomsbury.
Halyes, N. K. (2017). The cognitive nonconscious and the new materialisms. In S. Ellenzweig & J. H. Zammito (Eds.), The new politics of materialism. History, philosophy, science (pp. 181–199). Routledge.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman. Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought. The power of the cognitive nonconscious. University of Chicago Press.
Heidegger, M. (1954). Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit. Mit einem Brief über den Humanismus (2nd ed.). Francke Verlag.
Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury.
Holland, J. (2019). Beyond death: Posthuman perspectives in Christoph Wilhelm Hufeland’s macrobiotics. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 269–285). Bloomsbury.
Janaway, C. (2002). Schopenhauer: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Kirkwood, J. W. (2019). Vertiginous systems of the soul. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 17–36). Bloomsbury.
Landgraf, E. (2019). Embodied phantasy: Johannes Müller and the nineteenth-century neurophysiological foundations of critical Posthumanism. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 79–101). Bloomsbury.
Landgraf, E., Trop, G., & Weatherby, L. (2019). Introduction: Posthumanism after Kant. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 1–13). Bloomsbury.
MacCormack, P. (2012). Posthuman ethics. Routledge.
Meillassoux, Q. (2010). After finitude. An essay on the necessity of contingency (R. Brassier, Trans.). Bloomsbury.
Meulders, M. (2010). Helmholtz. From enlightenment to neuroscience (L. Garey, Trans. and Ed.). MIT.
Millán, E. (2019). Protecting natural beauty from humanism’s violence: The healing effects of Alexander von Humboldt’s Naturgemälde. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 183–200). Bloomsbury.
Nancy, J.-L. (2017). The banality of heidegger (J. Fort, Trans.). Fordham University Press.
Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity.
Nietzsche, F. (1980). In G. Colli & M. Montinari (Eds.), Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe in 15. Bänden. de Gruyter.
Otis, L. (2007). Müller’s lab: The story of Jakob Henle, Theodor Schwann, Emil du Bois-Reymond, Hermann von Helmholtz, Rudolf Virchow, Robert Remak, Ernst Haeckel, and their brilliant, tormented advisor. Oxford University Press.
Pias, C. (2005). Analog, digital, and the cybernetic illusion. Kybernetes, 34(3–4), 543–550.
Protevi, J. (2013). Life, war, earth: Deleuze and the sciences. University of Minnesota Press.
Richardson, J. (2020). Nietzsche’s values. Oxford University Press.
Roden, D. (2015). Posthuman life: Philosophy at the edge of the human. Routledge.
Sharon, T. (2014). Human nature in an age of biotechnology: The case for mediated posthumanism. Springer.
Shaviro, S. (2009). Without criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics. MIT.
Shaviro, S. (2014). The universe of things: On speculative realism. University of Minnesota Press.
Smith, D. (2015). Rewriting the constitution: A critique of “postphenomenology”. Philosophy and Technology, 28, 533–551.
Soper, K. (2012). The humanism in posthumanism. Comparative Critical Studies, 9(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2012.0069
Strathausen, C. (2019). Kant and posthumanism. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 105–125). Bloomsbury.
Sullivan, H. I. (2016). Agency in the Anthropocene: Goethe, radical reality, and the new materialisms. In J. A. McCarthy, S. M. Hilger, H. I. Sullivan, & N. Saul (Eds.), The history of embodied cognition 1740–1920: The Lebenskraft-debate and radical reality in German science, music, and literature (pp. 285–304). Brill Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004309036_013
Thompson, E., & Varela, J. F. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(10), 418–425.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do. Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design (R. P. Crease, Trans.). Penn State University Press.
Vita-More N. (1983/2020). The transhumanist manifesto. https://humanityplus.org/transhumanism/. Accessed 2 Nov 2020.
Von Foerster, H., & Pörkens, B. (2008). Wahrheit ist die Erfindung eines Lügners. Gespräche für Skeptiker (8th ed.). Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag.
Weatherby, L. (2016). Transplanting the metaphysical organ: German romanticism between Leibniz and Marx. Fordham University Press.
Weatherby, L. (2019). Farewell to ontology: Hegel after humanism. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 145–164). Bloomsbury.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
Wundt, W. (1880). Grundzüge der Physiologischen Psychologie (12th ed.). Engelmann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Landgraf, E. (2022). Posthumanism and the Enlightenment. In: Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04957-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04958-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities