Skip to main content

Locked in: Canadian Trade Policy and the Declining Liberal Order

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Canada and Great Power Competition

Part of the book series: Canada and International Affairs ((CIAF))

Abstract

The current liberal Rules-Based International Order (RBIO) is in decline. One symptom of this is the extent to which the US is changing its international strategies and its expectations of other countries in its battle with China for a hegemonic position in a new global context. The chapter argues that the consequences of this have been poorly recognized by middle powers like Canada. Canada’s steadfast commitment to rules-based trade, based on existing but rapidly eroding rules is demonstrated in our analysis of recent trade policy choices including the renegotiated NAFTA agreement (CUSMA) and a variety of new trade agreements. However, being ideationally locked into a set of rules that no longer bind the great powers as much as they may have done in the past may be counterproductive. In an increasingly mercantilist and conflictual international environment, the rules in question need to be rethought. In a brief concluding section, the chapter suggests that Canada’s interests may be better served by facilitating a more agile state, rather than a constrained one, rebalancing the rights and obligations of states and capital, and promoting trade and investment relationships that undo the historic injustices between the Global North and the Global South.

For very useful comments received on an earlier draft, we would like to thank the co-editors of the volume, and Stuart Trew, Scott Sinclair, Carlo Dade, and other participants at the workshop convened on 14 October 2021. Stephen McBride gratefully acknowledges funding from the Canada Research Chairs Programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Neo-mercantilism can be loosely defined as an approach to economic and trade policy that assumes international relationships are zero sum, in contrast to the win–win scenarios predicted by liberal trade theory. Consequently state policies are interventionist and directed to maximization of states’ wealth and power through measures designed to control the flow of trade and other economic activities.

  2. 2.

    The NAFTA text can be found in CCH 1994.

  3. 3.

    This is not the place for a detailed examination of the CUSMA—in some areas, such as the dairy industry and data protection, Canada lost ground; in others like Auto, it made gains. For the purposes of this chapter, though, it is the institutional provisions that are the focus.

References

  • Ahir, Hites, Nick Bloom, and Davide Furceri. 2021. “World Uncertainty Index.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinken, Antony J. 2021. “A Foreign Policy for the American People.” Speech March 3, Ben Franklin Room, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg Law. 2021. “Banks Seek Biden’s Aid After Trump’s 1,000-Sanctions-a-Year Pace.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Bublé, Courtney. 2021. “How Biden’s ‘Made in America’ Executive Order Could Impact Federal Contractors.” Government Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, Jesse. 2021. “White House Issues New Rules on ‘Buy American’ Waivers.” TheHill, June 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Global Affairs. 2019a. “Canada’s Inclusive Approach to Trade.” GAC, January 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Global Affairs. 2019b. “June 2020 Statement of the Ottawa Group: Focusing Action on Covid-19.” GAC, January 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Global Affairs. 2020. “2019 Consultation Report and FIPA Review.” GAC, February 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Global Affairs. 2021a. “Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement—Canadian Statement on Implementation.” Global Affairs Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Global Affairs. 2021b. “2021 FIPA Model—Summary of Main Changes.” GAC, May 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, Kevin. 2019. “Currency Wars Will Test the Global Economy’s Resilience.” Centre for International Governance Innovation, August 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, Steven, Robert Fife, and Laura Stone. 2018. “China Criticizes New North American Trade Deal.” The Globe and Mail, October 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIIT, Canada. Government of Canada. House of Commons. 2017. Evidence No. 92. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen the Right of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIIT, Canada. Government of Canada. House of Commons. 2020a. Evidence No. 4. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen the Right of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIIT, Canada. Government of Canada. House of Commons. 2020b. Evidence No. 6. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen the Right of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIIT, Canada. Government of Canada. House of Commons. 2020c. Evidence No. 7. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen the Right of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIIT, Canada. Government of Canada. House of Commons. 2020d. Evidence No. 10. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen the Right of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, Stephen. 1993. “Constitutionalizing the Canadian-American Relationship. Electronic Resource.” In Canada under Free Trade, ed. Mel Watkins and Duncan Cameron. Toronto, ON: J. Lorimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, Stephen. 2003. “Locked In? Canada’s External Constitution under Global Trade Governance.” American Review of Canadian Studies 33: 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02722010309481153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, David. 2016. “Globalized Localism: Canada’s Government Procurement Commitments under CETA.” Journal of Transnational Dispute Management, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, Laura. 2019. “Canada’s Global Trade Options—Is There a Plan B?” In Canada-US Relations: Sovereignty or Shared Institutions? ed. David Carment and Christopher Sands. Canada Among Nations 2019. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destler, I. M. 1998. “Congress, Constituencies, and U.S. Trade Policy.” In Constituent Interests and U.S. Trade Policies, ed. Alan Verne Deardorff and Robert Stern, 93–120. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.15469.

  • Doern, G. Bruce, and Brian W. Tomlin. 1991. Faith & Fear: The Free Trade Story. Toronto, Canada: Stoddart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felbermayr, Gabriel, Aleksandra Kirilakha, Constantinos Syropoulos, Erdal Yalcin, and Yoto V. Yotov. 2020. “The Global Sanctions Data Base.” European Economic Review 129: 103561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, David A. 2020. Important New Features in the USMCA. Houston: Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Jesse, Matthew Kronby, and Milso Barutciski. 2018. “Dispute Settlement in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.” Borden Ladner Gervais Legal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graz, Jean-Christophe. 2000. “The Future of Seattle and Back.” Studies in Political Economy 62: 17–24. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2000.11675239.

  • Grinspun, Ricardo, and Robert Kreklewich. 1994. “Consolidating Neoliberal Reforms: ‘Free Trade’ as a Conditioning Framework.” Studies in Political Economy 43: 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.1994.11675388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumiller, Jan-Augustin. 2014. Ex-ante versus ex-post assessments of the economic benefits of Free Trade Agreements: Lessons from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). No. 10. ÖFSE Briefing Paper. Vienna: Austrian Foundation for Development Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Geoffrey. 2019. “Cross-Border Energy Infrastructure: The Politics of Intermesticity.” In Canada Among Nations, ed. David Carment and Christopher Sands, 163–192. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05036-8_9.

  • Hanhimäki, Jussi M. 2021. Pax Transatlantica: America and Europe in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190922160.001.0001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanly, Ken. 2017. Op-Ed: Canada’s NAFTA Priorities Exclude Key Proportionality Clause. Digital Journal, August 16, sec. World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, Yuka. 2021. Biden Signs Buy American Order for Government Procurement. Wall Street Journal, January 25, sec. Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtslander, Cathy. 2018. “As If the USMCA Dairy Concessions Were Not Bad Enough….” bilaterals.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Debates, Canada. Government of Canada. Parliament. 2017. Official Report (Hansard). 148 vols. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen the Right of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivison, John. 2018. “Trudeau’s Claim of Victory in Trade Deal Is Hollow—Canada Was Played.” National Post, October 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Peter. 2021. “Opinion: Australia Bets Big on the U.S. with Submarine Deal.” The Globe and Mail, September 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirilakha, Aleksandra, Gabriel Felbermayr, Constantinos Syropoulos, Erdal Yalcin, and Yoto Yotov. 2021. The Global Sanctions Data Base: An Update that Includes the Years of the Trump Presidency. 2021–10. School of Economics Working Paper Series. LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukucha, Christopher J. 2018. “Neither Adapting Nor Innovating: The Limited Transformation of Canadian Foreign Trade Policy Since 1984.” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 24: 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2018.1463100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukucha, Christopher J. 2021. “Canada’s Trade Agenda.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Canada in International Affairs, ed. Robert W. Murray and Paul Gecelovsky, 393–411. Canada and International Affairs. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincicome, Scott, and Inu Manak. 2021. “Protectionism or National Security? The Use and Abuse of Section 232.” Policy Analysis (Cato Institute), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysenko, Dmitry, Elizabeth Schwartz, and Saul Schwartz. 2020. “Short-Term Effects of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement on Municipal Procurement in Canada.” Canadian Public Policy 46: 264–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2019-042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Laura. 2019. “Upsetting the Apple Cart? Implications of the NAFTA Re-negotiations for Canada–US Relations.” In Canada Among Nations, ed. David Carment and Christopher Sands, 193–213. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05036-8_10.

  • McBride, Stephen. 2003. “Quiet Constitutionalism in Canada: The International Political Economy of Domestic Institutional Change.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36: 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423903778603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, Stephen. 2006. “Reconfiguring Sovereignty: NAFTA Chapter 11 Dispute Settlement Procedures and the Issue of Public-Private Authority.” Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique 39: 755–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, Stephen. 2012. “The Scope and Limits of a Public–Private Hybrid: Dispute Settlement Under NAFTA Chapter 19.” New Political Economy 17: 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2010.540321.

  • McCarten, James. 2021. “U.S. Cabinet’s Ability to Award Buy American Exemptions ‘Strenuously Limited,’ Biden says.” CTV News, April 29, sec. Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John J. 2019. “Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order.” International Security 43: 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, Adrian, Barrie McKenna, and Stephanie Nolen. 2018. “From NAFTA to USMCA: Inside the tense negotiations that saved North American trade.” The Globe and Mail, October 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2021. OECD Services Trade Restrictiveness Index: Policy Trends up to 2021. Paris: OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, David. 2018. “Why USMCA Is More Than a Trade Pact.” The Globe and Mail, October 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, Christoph. 2020. “Novel Labour-Related Clauses in a Trade Agreement: From NAFTA to USMCA.” Global Labour Journal 11. https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v11i3.4228.

  • Sharma, Shalendra D. 2020. “Trump and the End of an Era? The Liberal International Order in Perspective.” The International Spectator 55: 82–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2020.1786927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, David, and David Ljunggren. 2021. “EXCLUSIVE Canada Says Proposed U.S. EV Tax Credit Could Harm Sector, Mulls Possible Challenge.” Reuters, October 22, sec. Americas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sills, Mark. 2018. “NAFTA 2.00: The End of Proportional Sharing of Energy Products Between the U.S. and Canada.” Pilot Law LLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, Scott. 2018a. Saving NAFTA Chapter 19: Was It worth it? Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, Scott. 2018b. Canada’s Track Record Under NAFTA Chapter 11: North American Investor-State Disputes to January 2018. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, Jim. 1993. Investment. In Canada under free trade, ed. Duncan Cameron, Mel Watkins, and University League for Social Reform, 151–172. Toronto: J. Lorimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, Hugh. 2019. “Opinion: Canada Should Engage with Taiwan and Others Given Our China Troubles.” The Globe and Mail, August 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Terence P. 2020. “China in the WTO—The U.S. View of China’s Compliance With Its Obligations.” Current Thoughts on Trade, March 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tienhaara, Kyla. 2019.”NAFTA 2.0: What are the Implications for Environmental Governance?” Earth System Governance 1: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100004.

  • Treat, Sharon. 2018. “New NAFTA” Imposes Hurdles to Delay and Weaken Public Protections. Minneapolis: Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trew, Stuart. 2018. “USMCA: Red Tape for Public Safety Regulators.” The Monitor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trew, Stuart, and Scott Sinclair. 2014. “Provincial and Minicipal Coverage.” In Making Sense of the CETA: An Analysis of the Final Text of the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, ed. Scott Sinclair, Stuart Trew, and Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood, 24–30. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unifor. 2019. “Unifor Encouraged by CUSMA Improvements.” Unifor National. December 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, Dave. 2021. “Dilkens Raises Concerns That Biden’s EV Credits Will Damage Canadian Auto Industry.” Windsor Star.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukins, Christopher R. 2021. Assessing the Trade Agenda for Government Procurement in the Biden Administration. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3801042. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen McBride .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McBride, S., Fry, N. (2022). Locked in: Canadian Trade Policy and the Declining Liberal Order. In: Carment, D., Macdonald, L., Paltiel, J. (eds) Canada and Great Power Competition. Canada and International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04368-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics