Abstract
This chapter examines British social realist cinema as a site of critical engagement with domestic welfare policy regimes, analyzing how representations of the intimate lives of vulnerable white working-class families—and single mothers in particular—are used to drive socialist polemics on the failings of the welfare state. This chapter begins by setting out a relationship between reproductive justice theory and the British welfare state. It first discusses the ways in which the founding principles of the post-war settlement (equitable access to housing, healthcare, education, and protections against poverty) represent potentially positive opportunities for the progression of reproductive justice, before examining the gradual dismantling of the welfare state in the late twentieth century and the damaging effects of post-2008 austerity policies on low-income families and single mothers. This chapter then turns to the work of preeminent British social realist filmmaker Ken Loach, focusing on two of his most publicly impactful UK-based works, (Cathy Come Home. 1966. Directed by Ken Loach. The Wednesday Play Series. BBC.) and I, Daniel Blake (2016), to explore their use of white working-class mother figures to corporealize direct critiques of contemporaneous welfare policymaking. The aims of this discussion are firstly to use an RJ framework to examine Loach’s social realist storytelling as a form of emotive critique of the dismantling of humanist resources for safe and dignified parenting, in which vulnerable white maternal bodies are specially mobilized to generate pathos, and secondly to critically evaluate the terms of these mobilizations, questioning the extent to which paternalistic, disempowering, or universalizing approaches are taken toward mothering women.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bazin, André. 1967. The evolution of the language of the cinema. In What is Cinema?, 23–40. Trans. Hugh Gray. Berkley: California University Press.
Benefits Street. 2014. Love Productions, Channel 4 Television Corporation.
Brooke, Stephen. 2011. Sexual Politics: Sexuality, Family Planning and the British Left from the 1880s to the Present Day. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Byrne, David. 2012. Idleness: “No longer a problem of industry”? Principles, practice and policy in the early twenty-first century. In Changing Directions of the British Welfare State, eds. Gideon Calder, Jeremy Gass and Kirsten Merrill-Glover, 98-122. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Calder, Gideon, Jeremy Gass, and Kirsten Merrill-Glover. 2012. Introduction. In Changing directions of the British welfare state, eds. Gideon Calder, Jeremy Gass and Kirsten Merrill-Glover, 1–14. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Cathy Come Home. 1966. Directed by Ken Loach. The Wednesday Play Series. BBC.
Clarke, John, and Janet Newman. 2012. The alchemy of austerity. Critical Social Policy 32.3: 299–319.
Cohan, Alvin. 1986. Abortion as a marginal issue: The use of peripheral mechanisms in Britain and the United States. In The New Politics of Abortion, eds. Joni Lovenduski and Joyce Outshoorn, 27–47. London: Sage.
Domokos, John et al. 2016. Meet the real Daniel Blakes. Guardian, October 21. www.theguardian.com/politics/video/2016/oct/21/meet-the-real-daniel-blakes-ken-loach-video.
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 2010. The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal 60.2: 251–275.
Foster, Dawn. 2016. It takes a special kind of arrogance to say the poverty in I, Daniel Blake is unrealistic. Guardian, October 28. www.theguardian.com/society/2016/oct/28/arrogance-poverty-social-housing-benefits-ken-loach-i-daniel-blake-unrealistic.
Franklin, Jane. 2019. Home economics: Home and care in neoliberal policy. In The New Politics of Home: Housing, Gender and Care in Times of Crisis, eds. Eleanor Jupp et al., 13–38. Bristol: Policy Press.
Gingerbread. 2013. Paying the Price: Single parents in the age of austerity. London: Gingerbread.
Hall, Martin. 2020. The future is past, the present cannot be fixed: Ken Loach and the crisis. In Cinema of Crisis: Film and Contemporary Europe, eds. Thomas Austin and Angelos Koutsourakis, 136–149. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hall, Stuart, et al. 1978. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.
Halper, Thomas. 2014. Trainspotters and bullet boys: Race and class in British underclass movies. City, Culture and Society 5.4: 11–20.
HC Deb. 1966. September 15, vol. 738.
HC Deb. 1971. June 16, vol. 819.
HC Deb. 2016a. October 31, vol. 616.
HL Deb. 2016b. November 30, vol. 777.
HC Deb. 2016c. December 2, vol. 617.
HC Deb. 2017. July 20, vol. 627.
Hill-Collins, Patricia. 1999. Producing the mothers of the nation: Race, class and contemporary US population policies. In Women, Citizenship and Difference, eds. Nira Yuval-Davis and Pnina Werbner, 118–127. London: Zed.
Hill, John. 2000. From the New Wave to “Brit-grit”: Continuity and difference in working-class realism. In British Cinema, Past and Present, eds. Justine Ashby and Andrew Higson, 249–260. London: Routledge.
Hill, John. 2011. Ken Loach: The Politics of Film and Television. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hindell, Keith, and Madeleine Simms. 1968. How the abortion lobby worked. Political Quarterly 39: 269–282.
I, Daniel Blake. 2016. Directed by Ken Loach. Sixteen Films.
Jensen, Tracey. 2014. Welfare commonsense, poverty porn and doxosophy. Sociological Research Online 19.3.
Jensen, Tracey, and Imogen Tyler. 2015. “Benefits broods”: The cultural and political crafting of anti-welfare commonsense. Critical Social Policy 35.4: 470–491.
Jensen, Tracey. 2018. Parenting the Crisis: The Cultural Politics of Parent-Blame. Bristol: Policy Press.
Jones, Susan. 2017. Words of wisdom: Texts, voice and justice in I, Daniel Blake. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education 24.4: 399–412.
Jupp, Eleanor. 2017. Families, policy and place in times of austerity. Area 49.3: 266–272.
Jupp, Eleanor, Sophie Bowlby, Jane Franklin, and Sarah Marie Hall. 2019. Introduction: The new politics of home. In The New Politics of Home: Housing, Gender and Care in Times of Crisis, eds. Eleanor Jupp et al, 1–12. Bristol: Policy Press.
Kaplan, E. Ann. 1983. Theories of melodrama: A feminist perspective. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 1.1: 40–48.
Kristeva, Julia. 1987. Stabat mater. In Tales of Love. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kuhn, Annette. 1999. Women’s genres: Melodrama, soap opera and theory. In Feminist Film Theory: A Reader, ed. Sue Thornham, 146-156. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ladybird, Ladybird. 1994. Directed by Ken Loach. Channel 4 Films, Film Four International, Parallax Pictures.
Lay, Samantha. 2007. Good intentions, high hopes and low budgets: Contemporary social realist filmmaking in Britain New Cinemas. Journal of Contemporary Film 5.3: 231–244.
Leigh, Jacob. 2002. The Cinema of Ken Loach: Art in the Service of the People. London: Wallflower Press.
Leggott, James. 2008. Nothing to do around here: British realist cinema in the 1970s. In Seventies British Cinema, ed. Robert Shail, 94–103. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Little Britain. 2003–2006. Created by Matt Lucas and David Walliams. BBC.
Lovenduski, Joni. 1986. Parliament, pressure groups, networks and the Women’s Movement: The politics of abortion law reform in Britain (1967-83). In The New Politics of Abortion, eds. Joni Lovenduski and Joyce Outshoorn, 49–64. London: Sage.
Luna, Zakiya, and Kristin Luker. 2013. Reproductive justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9: 327–352.
McKnight, George. 1997. Ken Loach’s domestic morality tales. In Agent of Challenge and Defiance: The Films of Ken Loach, ed. George McKnight. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Monk, Claire. 2000. Underbelly UK: The 1990s underclass film, masculinity and the ideologies of “new” Britain. In British Cinema, Past and Present, eds. Justine Ashby and Andrew Higson, 274–287. Routledge: London and New York.
Monroe, Jack. 2016. I am Daniel Blake—and there are millions more like me. Guardian, October 22. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/22/i-am-daniel-blake-millions-like-me-jack-monroe-ken-loach.
O’Brien, Nick. 2018. Administrative justice in the wake of I, Daniel Blake. Political Quarterly 89.1: 82–91.
Paget, Derek. 1999. Cathy come home and “accuracy” in British television drama. New Theatre Quarterly 15.1: 75–90.
Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1980. Reproductive freedom: Beyond “a woman’s right to choose.” Signs 5.4: 661–685.
Puzey, John. 2012. Squalor: Shifting boundaries: People, homes and the state since 1945. In Changing Directions of the British Welfare State, eds. Gideon Calder, Jeremy Gass, and Kirsten Merrill-Glover, 84–97. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Rose, Jacqueline. 2018. Mothers: An Essay on Love and Cruelty. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Ross, Loretta J., and Rickie Solinger. 2017. Reproductive Justice: An Introduction. Oakland: University of California Press.
Schoonover, Karl. 2012. Brutal Vision: The Neorealist Body in Postwar Italian Cinema. London: University of Minnesota Press.
Shaw, Sandra. 2012. Gender, continuity and change: Gender and welfare. In Changing Directions of the British Welfare State, eds. Gideon Calder, Jeremy Gass and Kirsten Merrill-Glover, 125–140. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Sheldon, Sally. 1997. Beyond Control: Medical Power and Abortion Law. London: Pluto.
Sorry We Missed You. 2019. Directed by Ken Loach. Sixteen Films.
Thane, Pat, and Tanya Evans. 2012. Sinners? Scroungers? Saints?: Unmarried Motherhood in Twentieth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tyler, Imogen. 2013. Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.
Watts, Joe. 2016. I, Daniel Blake: Iain Duncan Smith slams Ken Loach’s benefits sanctions film. The Independent, October 28. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/i-daniel-blake-iain-duncan-smith-ken-loach-response-criticism-benefits-sanctions-film-unfair-a7384306.html.
Webster, Wendy. 1998. Imagining Home: Gender, “Race,” and National Identity, 1945–64. London; Bristol: UCL Press.
Wilde, Alison. 2017. I, Daniel Blake. The Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 25.2: 189–192.
Witherow, Tom. 2017. Left-wing benefits film I, Daniel Blake is unfair, says man who runs the job centre it describes. The Mail Online, February 11. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4213976/I-Daniel-Blake-unfair-says-man-runs-centre.html.
Women’s Budget Group. 2012. The Impact on Women of the 2012 Budget. https://wbg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/The-Impact-on-Women-of-the-Budget-2012-FINAL.pdf. Accessed December 6 2021.
Young, Toby. 2016, 25 Oct. Why only lefties could go misty eyed at a movie that romanticises Benefits Britain. The Mail Online, October 25. www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3869182/Why-Lefties-misty-eyed-movie-romanticises-Benefits-Britain-says-TOBY-YOUNG.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oliver-Powell, M. (2022). Scroungers, Strivers, and Single Mothers: Reproductive Justice and the British Welfare State in Ken Loach’s Social Realism. In: Capo, B.W., Lazzari, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Reproductive Justice and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99530-0_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99530-0_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99529-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99530-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)