Skip to main content

Scroungers, Strivers, and Single Mothers: Reproductive Justice and the British Welfare State in Ken Loach’s Social Realism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Reproductive Justice and Literature
  • 640 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines British social realist cinema as a site of critical engagement with domestic welfare policy regimes, analyzing how representations of the intimate lives of vulnerable white working-class families—and single mothers in particular—are used to drive socialist polemics on the failings of the welfare state. This chapter begins by setting out a relationship between reproductive justice theory and the British welfare state. It first discusses the ways in which the founding principles of the post-war settlement (equitable access to housing, healthcare, education, and protections against poverty) represent potentially positive opportunities for the progression of reproductive justice, before examining the gradual dismantling of the welfare state in the late twentieth century and the damaging effects of post-2008 austerity policies on low-income families and single mothers. This chapter then turns to the work of preeminent British social realist filmmaker Ken Loach, focusing on two of his most publicly impactful UK-based works, (Cathy Come Home. 1966. Directed by Ken Loach. The Wednesday Play Series. BBC.) and I, Daniel Blake (2016), to explore their use of white working-class mother figures to corporealize direct critiques of contemporaneous welfare policymaking. The aims of this discussion are firstly to use an RJ framework to examine Loach’s social realist storytelling as a form of emotive critique of the dismantling of humanist resources for safe and dignified parenting, in which vulnerable white maternal bodies are specially mobilized to generate pathos, and secondly to critically evaluate the terms of these mobilizations, questioning the extent to which paternalistic, disempowering, or universalizing approaches are taken toward mothering women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bazin, André. 1967. The evolution of the language of the cinema. In What is Cinema?, 23–40. Trans. Hugh Gray. Berkley: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benefits Street. 2014. Love Productions, Channel 4 Television Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, Stephen. 2011. Sexual Politics: Sexuality, Family Planning and the British Left from the 1880s to the Present Day. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, David. 2012. Idleness: “No longer a problem of industry”? Principles, practice and policy in the early twenty-first century. In Changing Directions of the British Welfare State, eds. Gideon Calder, Jeremy Gass and Kirsten Merrill-Glover, 98-122. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, Gideon, Jeremy Gass, and Kirsten Merrill-Glover. 2012. Introduction. In Changing directions of the British welfare state, eds. Gideon Calder, Jeremy Gass and Kirsten Merrill-Glover, 1–14. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cathy Come Home. 1966. Directed by Ken Loach. The Wednesday Play Series. BBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, John, and Janet Newman. 2012. The alchemy of austerity. Critical Social Policy 32.3: 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohan, Alvin. 1986. Abortion as a marginal issue: The use of peripheral mechanisms in Britain and the United States. In The New Politics of Abortion, eds. Joni Lovenduski and Joyce Outshoorn, 27–47. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domokos, John et al. 2016. Meet the real Daniel Blakes. Guardian, October 21. www.theguardian.com/politics/video/2016/oct/21/meet-the-real-daniel-blakes-ken-loach-video.

  • Fineman, Martha Albertson. 2010. The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal 60.2: 251–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Dawn. 2016. It takes a special kind of arrogance to say the poverty in I, Daniel Blake is unrealistic. Guardian, October 28. www.theguardian.com/society/2016/oct/28/arrogance-poverty-social-housing-benefits-ken-loach-i-daniel-blake-unrealistic.

  • Franklin, Jane. 2019. Home economics: Home and care in neoliberal policy. In The New Politics of Home: Housing, Gender and Care in Times of Crisis, eds. Eleanor Jupp et al., 13–38. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerbread. 2013. Paying the Price: Single parents in the age of austerity. London: Gingerbread.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Martin. 2020. The future is past, the present cannot be fixed: Ken Loach and the crisis. In Cinema of Crisis: Film and Contemporary Europe, eds. Thomas Austin and Angelos Koutsourakis, 136–149. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart, et al. 1978. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halper, Thomas. 2014. Trainspotters and bullet boys: Race and class in British underclass movies. City, Culture and Society 5.4: 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HC Deb. 1966. September 15, vol. 738.

    Google Scholar 

  • HC Deb. 1971. June 16, vol. 819.

    Google Scholar 

  • HC Deb. 2016a. October 31, vol. 616.

    Google Scholar 

  • HL Deb. 2016b. November 30, vol. 777.

    Google Scholar 

  • HC Deb. 2016c. December 2, vol. 617.

    Google Scholar 

  • HC Deb. 2017. July 20, vol. 627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill-Collins, Patricia. 1999. Producing the mothers of the nation: Race, class and contemporary US population policies. In Women, Citizenship and Difference, eds. Nira Yuval-Davis and Pnina Werbner, 118–127. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, John. 2000. From the New Wave to “Brit-grit”: Continuity and difference in working-class realism. In British Cinema, Past and Present, eds. Justine Ashby and Andrew Higson, 249–260. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, John. 2011. Ken Loach: The Politics of Film and Television. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hindell, Keith, and Madeleine Simms. 1968. How the abortion lobby worked. Political Quarterly 39: 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I, Daniel Blake. 2016. Directed by Ken Loach. Sixteen Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Tracey. 2014. Welfare commonsense, poverty porn and doxosophy. Sociological Research Online 19.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Tracey, and Imogen Tyler. 2015. “Benefits broods”: The cultural and political crafting of anti-welfare commonsense. Critical Social Policy 35.4: 470–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Tracey. 2018. Parenting the Crisis: The Cultural Politics of Parent-Blame. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Susan. 2017. Words of wisdom: Texts, voice and justice in I, Daniel Blake. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education 24.4: 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, Eleanor. 2017. Families, policy and place in times of austerity. Area 49.3: 266–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, Eleanor, Sophie Bowlby, Jane Franklin, and Sarah Marie Hall. 2019. Introduction: The new politics of home. In The New Politics of Home: Housing, Gender and Care in Times of Crisis, eds. Eleanor Jupp et al, 1–12. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. Ann. 1983. Theories of melodrama: A feminist perspective. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 1.1: 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, Julia. 1987. Stabat mater. In Tales of Love. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Annette. 1999. Women’s genres: Melodrama, soap opera and theory. In Feminist Film Theory: A Reader, ed. Sue Thornham, 146-156. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ladybird, Ladybird. 1994. Directed by Ken Loach. Channel 4 Films, Film Four International, Parallax Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, Samantha. 2007. Good intentions, high hopes and low budgets: Contemporary social realist filmmaking in Britain New Cinemas. Journal of Contemporary Film 5.3: 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, Jacob. 2002. The Cinema of Ken Loach: Art in the Service of the People. London: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggott, James. 2008. Nothing to do around here: British realist cinema in the 1970s. In Seventies British Cinema, ed. Robert Shail, 94–103. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Little Britain. 2003–2006. Created by Matt Lucas and David Walliams. BBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovenduski, Joni. 1986. Parliament, pressure groups, networks and the Women’s Movement: The politics of abortion law reform in Britain (1967-83). In The New Politics of Abortion, eds. Joni Lovenduski and Joyce Outshoorn, 49–64. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, Zakiya, and Kristin Luker. 2013. Reproductive justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9: 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, George. 1997. Ken Loach’s domestic morality tales. In Agent of Challenge and Defiance: The Films of Ken Loach, ed. George McKnight. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, Claire. 2000. Underbelly UK: The 1990s underclass film, masculinity and the ideologies of “new” Britain. In British Cinema, Past and Present, eds. Justine Ashby and Andrew Higson, 274–287. Routledge: London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Jack. 2016. I am Daniel Blake—and there are millions more like me. Guardian, October 22. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/22/i-am-daniel-blake-millions-like-me-jack-monroe-ken-loach.

  • O’Brien, Nick. 2018. Administrative justice in the wake of I, Daniel Blake. Political Quarterly 89.1: 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paget, Derek. 1999. Cathy come home and “accuracy” in British television drama. New Theatre Quarterly 15.1: 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1980. Reproductive freedom: Beyond “a woman’s right to choose.” Signs 5.4: 661–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puzey, John. 2012. Squalor: Shifting boundaries: People, homes and the state since 1945. In Changing Directions of the British Welfare State, eds. Gideon Calder, Jeremy Gass, and Kirsten Merrill-Glover, 84–97. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Jacqueline. 2018. Mothers: An Essay on Love and Cruelty. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Loretta J., and Rickie Solinger. 2017. Reproductive Justice: An Introduction. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonover, Karl. 2012. Brutal Vision: The Neorealist Body in Postwar Italian Cinema. London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Sandra. 2012. Gender, continuity and change: Gender and welfare. In Changing Directions of the British Welfare State, eds. Gideon Calder, Jeremy Gass and Kirsten Merrill-Glover, 125–140. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, Sally. 1997. Beyond Control: Medical Power and Abortion Law. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorry We Missed You. 2019. Directed by Ken Loach. Sixteen Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thane, Pat, and Tanya Evans. 2012. Sinners? Scroungers? Saints?: Unmarried Motherhood in Twentieth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Imogen. 2013. Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Joe. 2016. I, Daniel Blake: Iain Duncan Smith slams Ken Loach’s benefits sanctions film. The Independent, October 28. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/i-daniel-blake-iain-duncan-smith-ken-loach-response-criticism-benefits-sanctions-film-unfair-a7384306.html.

  • Webster, Wendy. 1998. Imagining Home: Gender, “Race,” and National Identity, 1945–64. London; Bristol: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, Alison. 2017. I, Daniel Blake. The Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 25.2: 189–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witherow, Tom. 2017. Left-wing benefits film I, Daniel Blake is unfair, says man who runs the job centre it describes. The Mail Online, February 11. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4213976/I-Daniel-Blake-unfair-says-man-runs-centre.html.

  • Women’s Budget Group. 2012. The Impact on Women of the 2012 Budget. https://wbg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/The-Impact-on-Women-of-the-Budget-2012-FINAL.pdf. Accessed December 6 2021.

  • Young, Toby. 2016, 25 Oct. Why only lefties could go misty eyed at a movie that romanticises Benefits Britain. The Mail Online, October 25. www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3869182/Why-Lefties-misty-eyed-movie-romanticises-Benefits-Britain-says-TOBY-YOUNG.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa Oliver-Powell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oliver-Powell, M. (2022). Scroungers, Strivers, and Single Mothers: Reproductive Justice and the British Welfare State in Ken Loach’s Social Realism. In: Capo, B.W., Lazzari, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Reproductive Justice and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99530-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics