Skip to main content

Reproductive and Disability Justice: Deaf Peoples’ Right to Be Born

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Reproductive Justice and Literature

Abstract

Who decides whose lives are worth living? In Karawynn Long’s piece of science fiction, “Of Silence and Slow Time” (1995), the government determines who is “defective” and “must be exterminated” through genetic intervention. This short story’s protagonist, Marina, is a Deaf woman who desires a deaf baby and works to covertly conceive one. In this dystopia, no deaf baby has been born in twenty-five years, illustrating how deaf communities lack the ability to determine their reproductive destiny, or the right to have a child like them. With the convergence of master narratives, legislation, and the development of CRISPR technology, Long’s dystopia portended the human rights and social justice issues facing Deaf peoples. Sheena McFeely’s life-writings manifest these issues as her family discusses CRISPR in relation to the endangerment of deaf communities. We present Long’s story as a counter-narrative that presaged our current realities while illustrating interlocking systems of oppression that prevent both reproductive and disability justice—examining how science fiction writers, bioethicists, policymakers, health care providers, and Deaf peoples have attempted to address this question about the value of our lives. Ultimately, we argue that reproductive justice is incomplete without disability justice and deaf peoples’ right to be born.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A&E. 2018. “Born this way presents: Deaf out loud.” https://www.aetv.com/specials/deaf-out-loud/cast.

  • Aviles, Sarah. 2012. Do you hear what I hear: The right of prospective parents to use PGD to intentionally implant an embryo containing the gene for deafness. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law 19.1: 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagenstos, Samuel R. 2020. Disability and reproductive justice. Harvard Law & Policy Review 14: 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, H-Dirksen L., and Joseph J. Murray. 2009. Reframing: From hearing loss to deaf gain. Deaf studies digital journal 1.1: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2014. Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, H-Dirksen L., Scott Simser, and Gael Hannan. 2013. Beyond ableism and audism: Achieving human rights for deaf and hard of hearing citizens. Canadian Hearing Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Alexander Graham. 1883. Memoir upon the formation of a deaf variety of the human race. A Paper Presented to the National Academy of Sciences at New Haven. https://archive.org/details/cihm_08831.

  • Benston, Shawna. 2016. CRISPR, a crossroads in genetic intervention: Pitting the right to health against the right to disability. Laws 5.5: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracher, Mark. 2013. Literature and Social Justice: Protest Novels, Cognitive Politics and Schema Criticism. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, Derek C., et al. 2020. Deaf intermarriage has limited effect on the prevalence of recessive deafness and no effect on underlying allelic frequency. PLoS ONE 15.11: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, Alison, and Steven Emery. 2014. The case for deaf legal theory through the lens of deaf gain. In Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, ed. H-Dirksen L. Bauman and J.J. Murray, 37–62. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Teresa Blankmeyer. 2014. Armchairs and stares: On the privation of deafness. In Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, ed. H-Dirksen L. Bauman & J.J. Murray, 3–22. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Reproductive Rights. 2017. “Shifting the frame on disability rights for the U.S. reproductive rights movement.” http://reproductiverights.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/10/Disability-Briefing-Paper-FINAL.pdf.

  • Chin, Nancy P., et al. 2013. Deaf mothers and breastfeeding: Do unique features of deaf culture and language support breastfeeding success? Journal of Human Lactation 29.4: 564–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jon. 2019. “Embattled Russian scientist sharpens plans to create gene-edited babies.” Science. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/10/embattled-russian-scientist-sharpens-plans-create-gene-edited-babies.

  • Couser, G. Thomas. 2002. Signifying bodies: Life writing and disability studies. In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, ed. Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann, and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, 109–117. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyranoski, David. 2019. Russian “CRISPR-baby” scientist has started editing genes in human eggs with goal of altering deaf gene. Nature 574.7779: 465–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaf Missions. “Children of deaf adults.” YouTube video, 2:52, February 25, 2019, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iULz4Qn79xA.

  • “Shay and Ivy: Beyond the kingdom empowers little girls and deaf families alike.” DeafNation Video, 11:11, June 1, 2015, https://deafnation.com/videos/archives/shay-and-ivy-beyond-the-kingdom-empowers-little-girls-and-deaf-families-alike/.

  • De Meulder, Maartje. 2014. The UNCRPD and sign language peoples. In UNCRPD Implementation in Europe, a Deaf Perspective, Article 29: Participation in Political and Public Life, ed. Annika Pabsch, 12–28. Brussels: European Union of the Deaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice. 2020. “Justice department reaches landmark agreement with Massachusetts department of children and family to address discrimination against parents with disabilities.” https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-reaches-landmark-agreement-massachusetts-department-children-and-families.

  • Disney Parks. “Unforgettable stories, the Mansfield family: Walt Disney world.” YouTube video, 1:30, March 1, 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StLmmsJGNQ8.

  • Dodell-Feder, David, and Diana I. Tamir. 2018. Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147.11: 1713–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doxen, Kevin, and Jodi Halpern. 2020. Focusing on human rights: A framework for CRISPR germline genome editing ethics and regulation. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63.1: 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Richard Clark. 2010. Toward a theory of deaf ethnos: Deafnicity ≈ D/deaf (hómaemon • homóglosson • homóthreskon). Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 15.4: 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Richard Clark, and Amy June Rowley. 2013. Audism: A theory and practice of audiocentric privilege. Humanity & Society 37.2: 101–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Steven D., Anna Middleton, and Graham H. Turner. 2010. Whose deaf genes are they anyway? The deaf community challenge to legislation on embryo selection. Sign Language Studies 10.1: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmail, Jennifer. 2013. Reading Victorian Deafness: Signs and Sounds in Victorian Literature and Culture. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farooq, Rimsha, et al. 2020. CRISPR/Cas9: Targeted genome editing for the treatment of hereditary hearing loss. Journal of Applied Genetics 61.1: 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Generations Ahead. 2009. “A disability rights analysis of genetic technologies: Report on a national convening of disability rights leaders.” http://www.redaas.org.ar/archivos-recursos/370-GenerationsAheadDisability.pdf.

  • Greenwald, Brian H. 2004. The real “toll” of A.G. Bell: Lessons about eugenics. In Genetics, Disability, and Deafness, ed. J. V. Van Cleve, 35–41. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Wyatte C., Leonard L. Levin, and Melissa L. Anderson. 2017. Language deprivation syndrome: A possible neurodevelopmental disorder with sociocultural origins. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 52.6: 761–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Raychelle L., and Summer C. Loeffler. 2015. Seizing academic power: Creating deaf counter narratives. Journal of ASL and Literature 5, [video publication]. https://raychelle.weebly.com/publications.html.

  • Hauser, Peter C., et al. 2010. Deaf epistemology: Deafhood and deafness. American Annals of the Deaf 154.5: 486–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsliff, Gaby, and Robin McKie. 2008. “This couple want a deaf child. Should we try to stop them?” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2008/mar/09/genetics.medicalresearch.

  • Huxley, Aldous. 1932. Brave New World. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Trevor. 2005. In one’s own image: Ethics and the reproduction of deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10.4: 426–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Sarah. 2020. “Why deaf people oppose using gene editing to ‘cure’ deafness.” Discover. https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/why-deaf-people-oppose-using-gene-editing-to-cure-deafness.

  • Kusters, Annelies, et al. 2015. On ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’: Exploring paradigms for achieving sign language peoples’ rights. MMG Working Papers 15.2: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusters, Annelies, Maartje De Meulder, and Dai O’Brien, Ed. 2017. Innovations in Deaf Studies: The Role of Deaf Scholars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Dominic. 2008. “Of course a deaf couple want a deaf child.” The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/dominic-lawson/dominic-lawson-of-course-a-deaf-couple-want-a-deaf-child-794001.html.

  • Long, Karawynn. 1995. Of silence and slow time. In Full Spectrum 5, eds. Tom Dupree, Jennifer Hershey, and Janna Silverstein, 132–150. New York City, NY: Bantam Spectra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Karawynn. 2012. Of silence and slow time. In Outcasts and Angels: The New Anthology of Deaf Characters in Literature, ed. Edna Edith Sayers, 248–266. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mand, Cara, et al. 2009. Genetic selection for deafness: The views of hearing children of deaf adults. Journal of Medical Ethics 35.12: 722–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlin, Marlee. “This is the Garcia family.” Facebook video, 0:53, September 1, 2018, https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2045977778786102.

  • Mazique, Rachel. 2017. Sign language peoples’ right to be born: The bioethical debate in Karawynn Long’s “of silence and slow time.” In Innovations in Deaf Studies: The Role of Deaf Scholars, ed. Annelies Kusters, Maartje De Meulder, and Dai O’Brien, 295–329. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Science fiction’s imagined futures and powerful protests: The ethics of “curing” deafness in Ted Evans’s The End and Donna Williams’s “When the Dead are Cured.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 14.4: 469–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFeely, Sheena. “About Sheena.” https://sheenamcfeely.com/about/.

  • ———. “A&E’s deaf out loud trailer.” Youtube video, 1:49, August 24, 2018, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cN1K4meQuA.

  • ———. “Deaf family talks about deaf cure.” YouTube video, 5:03, January 8, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gWbE91R8KM.

  • ———. “Deaf mother and deaf daughter talking about deaf cure.” YouTube video, 3:48, October 29, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iGBhXzR9xY.

  • ———. “Deaf out loud-our family.” YouTube video, 1:13, September 2, 2018, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OU1mLkX7Uvw.

  • Middleton, Anna. 2004. Deaf and hearing adults’ attitudes towards genetic testing for deafness. In Genetics, Disability, and Deafness, ed. J. V. Van Cleve, 127–147. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingus, Mia. “Disabled women and reproductive justice.” The pro-choice public education project. https://www.protectchoice.org/article.php?id=140.

  • Mutcherson, Kimberly M. 2009. Disabling dreams of parenthood: The fertility industry, anti-discrimination, and parents with disabilities. Law and inequality 27.2: 311–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Disability. 2012. Assisted reproductive technologies. Rocking the cradle: Ensuring the rights of parents with disabilities and their children, 805–948. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability. https://ncd.gov/publications/2012/Sep272012/.

  • Norlian, Allison. 2020. “How a viral video led to a deaf girl breaking barriers on Netflix.” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/allisonnorlian/2020/07/01/how-a-viral-video-led-to-a-deaf-girl-breaking-barriers-on-netflix/?sh=1784e932623f.

  • Padden, Carol, and Jacqueline Humphries. 2020. Who goes first? Deaf people and CRISPR germline editing. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63.1: 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, Michael Le. 2019. “Exclusive: Five couples lined up for CRISPR babies to avoid deafness.” New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2208777-exclusive-five-couples-lined-up-for-crispr-babies-to-avoid-deafness/.

  • Porter, Gerard, and Malcolm K. Smith. 2013. Preventing the selection of “deaf embryos” under the human fertilisation and embryology act 2008: Problematizing disability? New Genetics and Society 32.2: 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Dorothy and Sujatha Jesudason. 2013. Movement intersectionality: The case of race, gender, disability, and genetic technologies. Du Bois Review 10.2: 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Octavian E., and Jonathan Henner. 2017. The personal is political in The Deaf Mute Howls: Deaf epistemology seeks disability justice. Disability & Society 32.9: 1416–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Loretta. 2006. Understanding reproductive justice: Transforming the pro-choice movement. Off Our Backs 36.4: 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, Debran. 2004. The reproductive rights of “new medicine.” In The Boundaries of Her Body: The Troubling History of Women’s Rights in America. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, Marsha. 2013. Disability rights and selective abortion. In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by Lennard J. Davis, 87–99. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seek the World. “Codas Mother with Two Deaf Kids!” YouTube video, 6:16, September 13, 2018, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJEzNwtvBuE.

  • ———. “Deaf parents’ two years old girl, Octavia Burke, knows three languages.” YouTube video, 4:11, July 17, 2018, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57TJPYgsYKo.

  • Scully, Jackie Leach. 2008. Disability Bioethics: Moral Bodies, Moral Difference. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, Jackie Leach, and Teresa Blankmeyer Burke. 2019. “Russia’s CRISPR “deaf babies”: The next genome editing frontier?” Impact ethics: Making a difference in bioethics. https://impactethics.ca/2019/07/09/russias-crispr-deaf-babies-the-next-genome-editing-frontier/.

  • Shaffer, Bret. 2009. The right to life, the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, and abortion. Penn State International Law Review 28.2: 265–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sins Invalid. 2019. Skin, Tooth, and Bone: The Basis of Movement is Our People, a Disability Justice Primer. 2nd ed. Berkeley: Sins Invalid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove. 2014. Afterword: Implications of deaf gain, linguistic human rights for deaf citizens. In Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, ed. H-Dirksen L. Bauman and J.J. Murray, 493–502. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Linguistic genocide.” Encyclopedia. https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/linguistic-genocide.

  • Sluman, Daniel. 2017. Shove ten pounds of sugar in a seven pound bag. In Stairs and Whispers: D/deaf and Disabled Poets Write Back, ed. Sandra Alland, Khairani Barokka, and Daniel Sluman. Rugby, UK: Nine Arches Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeltzer, Suzanne C. 2007. Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 36.1: 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Annie G., et al. 2002. Deaf women: Experiences and perceptions of healthcare system access. Journal of Women's Health 11.8: 729–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, S. J., et al. 2002. Attitudes of deaf and hard of hearing subjects towards genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis of hearing loss. Journal of Medical Genetics 39.6: 449–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teather, David. 2002. “Lesbian couple have deaf baby by choice.” The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/apr/08/davidteather.

  • United Nations. 2006. “Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.” https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.

  • United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2005. “Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expression.” https://en.unesco.org/creativity/convention/texts.

  • United Nations General Assembly. 1946. “General assembly resolution 96 (I) of 11 December 1946 (the crime of genocide),” 188–189. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/res/96(I).

  • White, Edward. 2008. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [HL] Bill 70 of 2007–08. London: Library Research Publications. https://mbbnet.ahc.umn.edu/scmap/HFEAbill.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Mazique .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mazique, R., Panko, T.L., Cuculick, J.A. (2022). Reproductive and Disability Justice: Deaf Peoples’ Right to Be Born. In: Capo, B.W., Lazzari, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Reproductive Justice and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99530-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics