Abstract
Introduction: The global increase on the number of older adults leads to an increase in the demand for health services, which needs to adapt their care to the population. This adaptation involves empowerment, knowledge and autonomy, establishment of a partner relationship in the care and decision-making process, so that the quality and dignity of care for the older adults guaranteed. Primary health care should be made available as proximity services, in addition to investing in the continuous improvement of their practices, in which gerontotechnology has an essential contribution.
Objective: To answer the research question “What are the characteristics presented by age-friendly health units in the context of primary health care?”.
Method: The scoping review follows the Joanna Briggs Institute (2015) methodology and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) model.
Results: From the 22 articles analyzed, 7 main themes that characterize this issue resulted: 1. Information, education and communication; 2. Health care management systems; 3. Care management process taking into account most common geriatric syndromes; 4. Physical environment; 5. Transportation network; 6. Keeping older adults in their own context; 7. Health policies.
Conclusions: The characteristics of the age-friendly health centers recommended by the WHO allow bringing older people closer to the health care they need, enabling them to gain in health, well-being, as well as macro advantages in public health. The nurse should work in partnership with the older people, helping them to manage their health process and promoting Care-of-the-Self.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The aging of the world population is an inevitable and growing reality, which implies challenges and adaptations of health services. By 2020, the world population aged 60 and over exceeded 1 billion people, and by 2050 it is expected to reach 2.1 billion [1]. Health policies need to anticipate this trend and prepare health systems to be more adequate, effective, and accessible. They should focus on improving and meeting needs and preferences of older people, adapting health care to this population and providing outreach care, including primary health care, focusing on health promotion, monitoring and prevention of disabling and chronic conditions resulting from aging [2]. These services must be the first access to health care services for the older people. [3, 4].
According to a WHO study, the characteristics of an age-friendly primary health care encompass three dimensions: information, education and communication; health service management systems; and the physical environment [5]. Several authors agree that age-friendly care enables empowerment by increasing older people’s knowledge and autonomy so that they become involved and partners in their care process, ensuring the quality and dignity of care. Thus, it is recognized that the lower the barriers to access primary health care are, and the better the needs of people are met, health gains are obtained, and public health spending is substantially reduced. It is essential that these health centers also combine technology with gerontology, i.e., have the fundamentals of gerontotechnology in the context of a multidisciplinary intervention, which acts on the three levels of prevention to improve the quality of life of the older adults [6].
A preliminary search conducted in the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and CINAHL, revealed that there is no Scoping Review (published or in development) on Age-Friendly Primary Health Care. Thus, this review arises from the need to increase knowledge about the Age-Friendly Health Centers (AFHC) in order to contribute to the development of services that provide accessibility to care, health promotion, increased autonomy and involvement of older people in their own health process, promoting the Care-of-the-Self, and ensuring the quality of nursing care provided to older people and their families [7, 8].
2 Methods
2.1 Identifying the Research Question
The research question was formulated according to the Population, Concept and Context (PCC) terminology: What are the characteristics presented at age-friendly health care units in primary health care settings?
The aim of this research is to analyze and map the knowledge produced about the characteristics of age-friendly primary health care, intending to answer the following questions:
-
What are the characteristics of age-friendly primary health care centers identified in the studies?
-
How do they correspond to the WHO recommendations?
2.2 Research Strategy
The search was conducted on the EBSCOhost and Virtual Health Library platforms, in the databases: Cinahl Complete, Medline Complete, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MedicLatina, Nursing & Allied Health Collection: Comprehensive, LILACS and BDENF, with application of temporal filter starting in 2004. The identification, exclusion and eligibility of articles were carried out in different phases, taking into account the previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The search terms defined (Table 1) were grouped using Boolean operators, derived from the indexed language for the search in electronic databases.
The first phase of the search took place on May 8th, 2020, using the indexed language specific to each platform. Then, the results were sorted according to their relevance to the research question. In the last phase, the selected articles were manually analyzed in order to extract the relevant information to the research question.
2.3 Inclusion Criteria
In this study, we included the articles involved older adults living in the community and excluded the studies conducted in hospital settings. The search terms, the inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 2) were defined after reading the studies resulting from an empirical search in the main databases of the ESBCOhost platform on this topic.
2.4 Selection of Articles
The selection of studies was performed by two independent researchers, after analyzing the abstract of each article, keeping in mind the inclusion and exclusion criteria and the research objectives. The selection of articles to be included in this scoping review followed four steps: Identification, Analysis, Eligibility, and Inclusion. In the databases, 56 articles were identified, from which 7 articles were excluded, 4 in Mandarin language, 1 systematic review, 1 integrative review, and 1 repeated article. After reading the abstracts and applying the inclusion criteria, 30 articles were selected, but only 22 articles were included in our study (review) after the full text analysis.
2.5 Reviewing Process
The data extracted from the analyzed articles were presented in a table, following the Joanna Briggs Institute [9] methodology for scoping review. The analysis of the relevance of the articles as well as the extraction and synthesis of the data were performed by two independent reviewers.
2.6 Presentation of Data
The data collected from each article presented in Table 3, according to study reference, study population, context, type of study, objectives and WHO recommendations [1].
3 Results
After the analysis of the articles listed in the table above, we grouped the characteristics of the age-friendly health centers (AFHCs) into 7 main themes to characterize them:
-
1- Information, education, and communication: To guarantee an efficient communication, professionals have the responsibility to gather all the specific technical competences to respond to the needs of the older adults and their families, demonstrating communicational abilities, voluntarism, and availability, not practicing ageism [10,11,12, 14, 15]. Technological resources are used to expedite the transmission of information, for scheduling appointments and identifying needs [15]. The use of uniforms and badges, by all members of the team, is indispensable, so that all the users know to whom they should go [3]. Information regarding the medication regimen is essential to avoid any errors or pharmacological interactions [16]. Improving the health of the older adults involves health education and promotion of healthy lifestyles, appropriate to their individuality, adopting the partnership model of care.
-
2- Health care management systems: AFHC offer a complete, multifactorial assessment of the individuals’ needs, are responsible for having the resources available to support the development of their activities of daily living, provide all consultations, treatment, and complementary diagnostic tests so that all needs are met in a single visit, and resolve the problems of older people in a timely manner. [3, 12, 14, 17]. There is investment in chronic disease prevention and oral health care, avoiding long-term health system overload and achieving health gains [18, 19]. The articulation between public and private health care and between primary and differentiated health care is effective, and timely communication between all is ensured to improve the service provided to the older people and their families [20, 21].
-
3- Care management process considering most common geriatric syndromes: Nursing care and assistance with basic life activities are provided at the older person’s home, avoiding their institutionalization (unless this is their wish). Family members are considered part of the holistic dimension of the older person’s well-being and a target of care [22]. Health care professionals should provide health education, geriatric assessment, and an individualized care plan focused on health promotion, disease prevention, maintenance of autonomy and meaningful social interactions [17, 23]. It is important to understand the interaction between the person’s characteristics and the context in which they live, as well as how these are involved in their aging process [24].
-
4- Physical environment: When the AFHC are implemented near the community they serves, facilitates accessibility to the building in which care is provided, reducing the need for travel [14, 25]. Access to the exterior areas and to the interior of the building is facilitated and adapted to people with reduced mobility (parking spaces, access ramps); the circulation areas, waiting rooms, offices and bathrooms have ample structures that facilitate circulation with wheelchairs or other walking aid devices and/or the presence of a companion, are lit adequately, adapted for a safe circulation; the identification signs of the user circuit are visible, lit adequately, written with high contrast and also available in Braille [3, 11, 14, 17, 26]. In short, the physical space of the AFHC should be adapted to the specific needs of its public [12].
-
5- Transportation network: Age-friendly communities (AFHCs) offer good public transportation options that are adapted to the needs of the older adults, such as the use of oxygen tanks, walking aids, and are affordable, allowing the presence of a companion [3, 17, 25, 26]. Drivers of these services should take into account the population they transport thus adapting their driving style (avoid sudden braking, wait for people to be sat down before starting to drive) [3].
-
6- Keeping older adults in their own context: Maintaining residence in their home, or at least in their community, during the aging process is a factor that increases the quality of life of older people and their families [22, 27]. The use of home support from multidisciplinary teams and volunteer programs that ensure the psychological, cognitive, social, health, and well-being needs are met as well as support structures such as supermarkets, hairdressers, dry cleaners, etc. that allow older adults to maintain their autonomy [23, 24, 28]. However, the older person should be allowed to leave their home if they wish, and the community should provide those answers [29]. Residential care or nursing facilities for the older adults are established in the communities where older adults live, allowing them to remain in a familiar environment [14, 25]. AFHCs offer access to business and leisure, social interaction, good neighborhood, community involvement, transportation networks and public services [30].
-
7- Health Policies: Legislative bodies define policies that enable the active, productive and successful aging of their population, promoting self-sufficiency and independence of each older person, reducing age-related stigma, integrating active older people into the community [10, 14, 19, 22]. Health professionals, through their institutional representatives, contribute to the discussion of health policies and, to the improvement older adults` quality of life [16]. The government is responsible for the equitable distribution of resources and the creation of emergency plans, the definition of social and economic policies to protect older people in their access to financially viable and long-term housing, and the development of flexible retirement plans [10, 23, 26]. Research on aging and AFHCs are stimulated, and the result of these studies should be implemented in practice as soon as possible [19, 25].
4 Discussion
The results of this study are consistent with those defined by the WHO [5] and add further complementary guidelines for the identification of AFHCs. Regarding information, education and communication, there is evidence that shortcomings continue to occur, namely that older people feel that they are not heard. It has been found that health services often do not provide the quality of care expected by citizens [14]. From the point of view of the health care management system, some studies have shown that services are poorly prepared to meet the specific needs of older people, due to a lack of coordination of all actors involved in decision making, from public funding to human resource management, leadership, political decision-making and structural conditions [14]. The emergency and comprehensive assessment systems of older adults do not meet their real needs and should be improved and implemented effectively [23]. The physical environment is widely explored by the literature reviewed, identifying shortcomings such as: insufficient and inadequate public transportation to meet the needs of the older adults, namely, the access to their appointments, treatments and examinations; sidewalks too narrow and busy, constituting an added danger for people with altered mobility [3, 26]. The inequities in the resources available to the rural and urban population are often discussed, making it difficult for older adults to stay at home. Moreover, the level of interaction with the surrounding community varies according to factors such as gender, ethnicity, economic and social status, and level of education [30]. As for the issue of health policies, it is evidenced the responsibility of national and municipal governments to expedite the best practices, offer technical conditions and manage the process of making institutions and cities friendly to the older adults [16].
Throughout this review, we could conclude that this is a topic that raises global interest and that has been discussed since 2002, when the WHO published “Active Ageing: a policy framework”. Despite not being a recent theme, studies have indicated that there is still much to be done regarding the primary health care providing to the older adults and their families their real needs. Moreover, a repeated recommendation in many of the articles analyzed here is the dissemination of age-friendly practices in these health care institutions [3, 14, 15, 17].
The contribution of gerontotechnology to improve health responses to the needs of the older adults is implicit in the analyzed articles, demonstrating that many of the means that are already available to health professionals can be better used to respond more effectively to the older population that uses health care services. However, this issue cannot be solved by direct care alone, which is why health professionals must have a voice in policymaking, research, and training [3, 10, 12, 14, 16, 19]. Coordination of all health professionals and administrative staff is needed, as well as political involvement, not only from the Ministry of Health, but from the whole government that should prioritize the issue of age-friendly institutions and communities.
5 Conclusion
The complexity of older adults’ health care is a challenge for health workers, and it is increasingly important to constantly update knowledge to improve practices and meet the real needs and expectations of older people and their families. Nurses play a key role and should adapt their interventions to the specific needs of these individuals, namely using gerontotechnology to promote their holistic care and contributing to a sustainable health [6, 31]. In line with the strategy defined by the WHO, a new strategy to provide care to the older adults is necessary and pertinent, in which health promotion and disease management are privileged as opposed to an approach centered on cure. In the approach centered on the older person and their family members living in the community and guided by their life project, nurses should work in partnership with them, helping to manage their health process, contributing to their safety, continuity of care, and active and healthy aging, besides promoting Care-of-the-Self [7, 8].
It is hoped that this scoping review will contribute to knowledge regarding the characteristics of age friendly health centers, to critical analysis in this area, regarding to what is recommended by the WHO, and will allow us to understand the impact of age-friendly health centers on the promotion Care-of-the-Self for the older adults.
References
World Health Organization (2020): Decade of healthy ageing: baseline report. Geneve
Fonseca, C., De Pinho, G., Lopes, M., Marques, C., Garcia-Alonso, J.: The elderly nursing core set and the cognition of Portuguese older adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 20(1), 1–8 (2021)
Woo, J., Mak, B., Yeung, F.: Age-friendly primary health care: an assessment of current service provision for older adults in Hong Kong. Health Serv. Insights 6, 69–77 (2013)
Abdellatif, T., et al.: Dubai primary health care centers conformation to WHO age-friendly primary healthcare recommendations. Adv. Aging Res. 6, 83–92 (2017). https://www.scirp.org/pdf/AAR_2017101015355625.pdf
World Health Organization (2004): Towards Age-friendly Primary Health Care. Geneve. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43030/9241592184.pdf;jsessionid=D8ECD3EB64580751EC38DD787ECA9571?sequence=1
Graafmans, J.: The history and incubation of gerontechnology. Gerontechnology 1(1), 3–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826128898.0001
Gomes, I.: To Promote self-care: a partnership between the nurse and the elderly person. The construction of the partnership process in a context of vulnerability and dependency. New scholarly editions, Saarbrucken/Deutsche (2016)
Gomes, I.: Partnership of care in the promotion of the care-of-the-self: an implementation guide with elderly people. In: García-Alonso, J., Fonseca, C. (eds.) Gerontechnology III. IWoG 2020. Lecture Notes in Bioengineering. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72567-9_32
Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Khalil, H., Parker, D.: The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2015 - Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute (2015). https://nursing.lsuhsc.edu/JBI/docs/ReviewersManuals/Scoping-.pdf
Pelaez, M., Rice, M.: Primary health care and aging: edited proceedings of the consultative group meeting on geriatric training in primary health care. Calif. J. Health Promot. 2(3), 99–108 (2004). https://doi.org/10.32398/cjhp.v2i3.884
Hoontrakul, D., Sritanyarat, W., Nuntaboot, K., Premgamone, A.: Development of age-friendly primary health care: case study of one primary care unit. Thai J. Nurs. Res. 12(2), 131–141 (2008)
Kuo, R., Wu, Y., Hsu, T., Chen, L.: Improving outpatient services for elderly patients in Taiwan: a qualitative study. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 53(2), e209–e217 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2010.09.013
Fulmer, T., Li, N.: Age-friendly health systems for older adults with dementia. J. Nurse Pract. 14(3), 160–165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.09.001
Ssensamba, J., Mukuru, M., Nakafeero, M., Ssenyonga, R., Kiwanuka, S.: Health systems readiness to provide geriatric friendly care services in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 19(256), 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1272-2
Motsohi, T., Namane, M., Anele, A., Abbas, M., Kalula, S.: Older persons’ experience with health care at two primary level clinics in Cape Town, South Africa: a qualitative assessment. BJGP Open 4(3), 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101048
Cheung, B., Felfeli, T., Sorouri, K., Zewude, R.: The national seniors strategy: an opportunity for sustaining a healthy future for the aging population. Univ. Toronto Med. J. 93(1), 18–21 (2015). ISSN: 1913–5440
Alhamdan, A., Alshammari, S., Al-Amoud, M., et al.: Evaluation of health care services provided for older adults in primary health care centers and its internal environment: a step towards age-friendly health centers. Saudi Med. J. 36(9), 1091–1096 (2015). https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.9.11789
Ricciardi, W., Specchia, M., Marino, M.: Health of the elderlies and healthy aging: a challenge for Europe. Active Ageing Healthy Living 1(1), 1–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-425-1-1
Petersen, P., Kandelman, D., Arpin, S., Ogawa, H.: Global oral health of older people - call for public health action. Community Dent. Health 27(2), 257–268 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH
Lin, M., Chou, M., Liang, C., Peng, L., Chen, L.: Population aging and its impacts: strategies of the health-care system in Taipei. Ageing Res. Rev. 9(SUPPL.), S23–S27 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2010.07.004
Liggett, A., McKoy, M., Bradley, S., O’Brien, K., Dobschuetz, D., Lindquist, L.: Creating an age-friendly health system: lessons learned for the post-acute care setting. Jamda 21, B17–B18 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.01.053
Dalmer, N.: A logic of choice: problematizing the documentary reality of Canadian aging in place policies. J. Aging Stud. 48(1), 40–49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2019.01.002
Lee, C., Cho, B., Cho, Y., Park, Y.: Older adults’ perceptions of age-friendliness with an emphasis on community supports and health services in a city in South Korea. J. Korean Acad. Community Health Nurs. 30(2), 234–242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2019.30.2.234
John, D., Gunter, K.: EngAGE in community: using mixed methods to mobilize older people to elucidate the age-friendly attributes of urban and rural places. J. Appl. Gerontol. 35(10), 1–26 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464814566679
Doolan-Noble, F., Mehta, P., Waters, D., Baxter, G.: Supporting ageing well research: findings from a research priority setting exercise. Australas. J. Ageing 38(2), 136–143 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12615
Hancock, S., Winterton, R., Wilding, C., Blackberry, I.: Understanding ageing well in Australian rural and regional settings: applying an age-friendly lens. Aust. J. Rural Health 27(4), 298–303 (2018)
Lehning, A., Smith, R., Dunkle, R.: Age-friendly environments and self-rated health: an exploration of Detroit elders. Res. Aging 36(1), 1–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027512469214
Jiang, Q., Cohen, N., Marra, M., Woolf, K., Gilbride, J., Francis, S.: Community priorities for healthy eating in older adults. J. Nutrition Gerontol. Geriatr. 36(2–3), 75–91 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/21551197.2017.1365039
Rahman, M., Byles, J.: Older women’s patterns of home and community care use and transition to residential aged care: an Australian cohort study. Maturitas 131(1), 28–33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.10.004
Smith, R., Lehning, A., Dunkle, R.: Conceptualizing age-friendly community characteristics in a sample of urban elders: an exploratory factor analysis. J. Gerontol. Soc. Work 56(2), 90–111 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549369
Goes, M., Lopes, M., Oliveira, H., Fonseca, C., Marôco, J.: A nursing care intervention model for elderly people to ascertain general profiles of functionality and selfcare needs. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–11 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gomes, I.D., Sobreira, L.S., da Silva, L.V., de Souza, M.C.M.R., Karina, G., Souto, R.Q. (2022). Age-Friendly Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review. In: García-Alonso, J., Fonseca, C. (eds) Gerontechnology IV. IWoG 2021. Lecture Notes in Bioengineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97524-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97524-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97523-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97524-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)