Skip to main content

The Right-Wing Populist Disruption in the Berlin Republic. Opportunity Structures and Success of the Alternative for Germany (AfD)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Legacy and Impact of German Unification

Part of the book series: New Perspectives in German Political Studies ((NPG))

Abstract

Different to all its neighboring countries, in Germany, seemed to be no ground for right-wing populist parties due to two main obstacles. First, because populism in Germany must operate in a historically encumbered environment, the media has developed a fear of contact with it which prevents any unconstrained debate and constantly exposes the right-wing parties to the risk of being linked with National Socialism. And, second, because of the stigmatization that would follow and thereby prevent the parties’ from establishing themselves as a political force. This has changed in the 2010s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The AfD’s radicalization was demonstrated in 2021 it suddenly demanding Germany leave the EU (“Dexit”) before the imminent German parliamentary elections.

  2. 2.

    The General Secretary of the CDU at that time, Peter Tauber said in 2014, the AfD would still be elected to one or two state legislatures and would then disappear from the political landscape (Tauber, 2014). The renowned researcher on populism Cas Mudde likewise judged that the AfD would “implode and would disappear as a relevant political power” (Mudde, 2004).

  3. 3.

    For example, a few months after Baden-Württemberg’s state legislative election in May 2016, a second AfD faction was formed. Furthermore, the AfD lost its coalition status in Lower Saxony in 2000.

  4. 4.

    Experiences in Austria show, that a single large coalition fuels the establishment of an extreme right party. The NPD which at that time had German nationalistic leanings also profited in Germany during the 1960s from such a Grand Coalition.

  5. 5.

    Infratest dimap survey for Brandenburg; https://wahl.tagesschau.de/wahlen/2019-09-01-LT-DE-BB/index.shtml; Saxony; https://wahl.tagesschau.de/wahlen/2019-09-01-LT-DE-SN/umfrage-ostdeutschland.shtml; and Thuringia; https://wahl.tagesschau.de/wahlen/2019-10-27-LT-DE-TH/index.shtml (all accessed 5 July 2021).

Literature

  • Bertelsmann-Stiftung. (2015). Sonderauswertung Islam des Religionsmonitors [Special Assessment of Islam by the Religion Monitor]. Gütersloh. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/Projekte/51_Religionsmonitor/Zusammenfassung_der_Sonderauswertung.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2021.

  • Betz, H.-J. (2001). Exclusionary populism in Austria, Italy and Switzerland. International Journal, 53(3), 393–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBN news. (2016, October 3). Germany suffers from (Interview with Björn Höcke). https://www1.cbn.com/hurdontheweb/archive/2016/03/10/video-interview-germany-suffers-from-a-guilt-cult. Accessed on 15 July 2021.

  • Cuperus, R. (2011). Der populistische Dammbruch. Die niederländischen Volksparteien unter Druck. In F. Wielenga and F. Hartleb (Eds.), Populismus in den Niederlanden und in Deutschland im Vergleich (pp. 163–178).

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, F., & Hartleb, F. (2007). Populism on difficult terrain: The right- and left-wing challenger parties in Germany. German Politics, 16(4), 434–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, F., & Ruhose, F. (2021). Der Einfluss der AfD auf die deutsche Koalitionslandschaft: Problem oder Chance für die etablierten Parteien? Zeitschrift Für Politik, 68(2), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Spiegel. (2019, April 2). Documents link AfD parliamentarian to Moscow. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/documents-link-afd-parliamentarian-to-moscow-a-1261509.html. Accessed on 5 July 2021.

  • Deutscher Bundestag. (2021). Beschlussempfehlung und Bericht des 1. Untersuchungsausschusses der 19. Wahlperiode, Berlin, 21. Juni 2021, Drucksache 19/30800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gisbers, T., & Peters, U. (2020). Abstimmungsverhalten der AfD im Bundestag. Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwyn, L. (1976). Democratic Promise: The Populist Movement in America. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambauer, V., & Mays, A. (2018). Wer wählt die AfD?—Ein Vergleich der Sozialstruktur, politischen Einstellungen und Einstellungen zu Flüchtlingen zwischen AfD-WählerInnen und der WählerInnen der anderen Parteien. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 12, 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartleb, F. (2004). Rechts- und Linkspopulismus. VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartleb, F. (2007). Populismus und Charisma. Zur elektoralen Erfolgs- und Mißerfolgsformel anhand zweier Beispiele in der bundesdeutschen Parteiendemokratie. In E. Jesse & H.-P. Niedermeier (Eds.), Politischer Extremismus und Parteien (pp. 147–168). Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartleb, F. (2020). Wie extrem ist die AfD? Die Verfassungsschutzanalyse über den radikalen „Flügel“. Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havertz, R. (2021). Radical right populism in Germany, AfD, Pegida and the identitarian movement. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerner, J. M. & Hobolt, S. (2017, September 29). The AfD succeeded in the German election by mobilizing non-voters on the right, Blog, London School of Economics. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/09/29/the-afd-succeeded-in-the-german-election-by-mobilising-non-voters-on-the-right/. Accessed on 8 July 2021.

  • Jesse, E. (2019). Das Aufkommen der Alternative für Deutschland ist kein Ausnahmefall mehr. In H. U. Brinkmann & I.-C. Panreck (Eds.), Rechtspopulismus in Einwanderungsgesellschaften (pp. 97–131). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. (1997). The Radical Right in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis, University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, J. (2006). Parteien im Wettbewerb. Zu den Wettbewerbschancen nicht-etablierter politischer Parteien im Rechtssystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Jürgen P. (2018). Biographisches Porträt: Björn Höcke. In Uwe Backes u.a. (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch Extremismus und Demokratie, Bd. 30, Nomos: Baden-Baden, pp. 191–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, C. (2018). The ‘Alternative for Germany’: The rise of right-wing populism at the heart of Europe. Politics, 38(3), 195–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leggewie, C. (1993). Die Stunde der Populisten. Auf dem Weg ins Fünfparteiensystem. In Jochen Buchholz (ed.), Parteien in der Kritik (pp. 52–83). Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucardie, P. (2000). Prophets, purifiers and prolocutors towards a theory on the emergence of new parties. Party Politics, 6(2), 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, J. (2020). „Salz in der Suppe“ oder „Klimakiller“? Empirische Befunde Zum Wandel Der Parlamentarischen Streitkultur Nach Dem Einzug Der AfD in Die Deutschen Landtage. Zeitschrift Für Parlamentsfragen, 51(3), 622–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, M., & Jost, P. (2020). Das Ende der Debattenkultur? Wie Die AfD Negativität Und Inzivilität in Den Bundestag Trägt Und Wie Die Anderen Parteien Darauf Reagieren. Zeitschrift Für Politik, 67(4), 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina Serrano, J. C. et al. (2019). The Rise of Germany’s AfD: A Social Media Analysis. 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllemann, J. (2003). Klartext. Für Deutschland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government & Opposition, 39(3), 541–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. (2018). The left party and the AfD. German Politics and Society, 36(1), 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patzelt, W. J. (2018). Mängel in der Responsivität oder Störungen in der Kommunikation? Deutschlands Repräsentationslücke Und Die AfD. Zeitschrift Für Parlamentsfragen, 49, 885–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedahzur, A., & Brichta, A. (2002). The Institutionalization of extreme right-wing charismatic parties: A paradox? Party Politics, 8(1), 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesthy, M., Mader, M., & Schoen, H. (2021). Why is the AfD so successful in Eastern Germany? An analysis of the ideational foundations of the AfD vote in the 2017 federal election. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 62, 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rütters, P. (2020). Die AfD in den Parlamenten—die zweite Runde. Zeitschrift Für Parlamentsfragen, 51(3), 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarrazin, T. (2010). Deutschland schafft sich ab. Deutsche Verlags Anstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, M., & Hartleb, F. (2022). Searching for the philosopher’s stone. Counter-strategies against populism. In M. Oswald (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Populism (pp. 665–685). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taguieff, P.-A. (2002). L’illusion populiste. Éditions Berg International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, P. (2014, September 6). AfD wird den Weg der Piraten gehen. In Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/tauber-afd-wird-den-weg-der-piraten-gehen-13138473.html. Accessed on 4 July 2021.

  • Vehrkamp, Robert (2019, March): A conflict line through Germany or a new East-West divide? Policy Paper. Bertelsmann-Stiftung. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/ZD_Einwurf_3_2019_EN.pdf. Accessed on 4 July 2021.

  • Vorländer, H., et al. (2018). PEGIDA and New Right-wing Populism in Germany. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Hartleb .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hartleb, F. (2022). The Right-Wing Populist Disruption in the Berlin Republic. Opportunity Structures and Success of the Alternative for Germany (AfD). In: Oswald, M., Robertson, J. (eds) The Legacy and Impact of German Unification. New Perspectives in German Political Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97154-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics