Skip to main content

Trends in Local Government Reforms: Case of Environmental Protection Authority

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Public Sector Reforms in Pakistan

Part of the book series: Public Sector Organizations ((PSO))

  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

The current chapter focuses on administrative reforms, notably LG reforms (1947–2019) in Pakistan and devolution of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from 2000 to 2019 in the four provinces of Pakistan. It highlights the implementation of administrative and financial powers devolved at the local level to bring democracy at the grassroots level. A mixed-method approach has been used. The devolution 2001 gave autonomy to the local level and a locally elected representative was made the head of district administration, management and development. Devolution is a process to facilitate the people and perk up the service delivery by supplying the service resources at the local level. But the formation of local governments in 2001 and their subsequent dissolution in 2010 had disturbed the real essence of devolution in Pakistan. In Pakistan’s scenario, decentralization is mostly internally driven and the military’s need to legitimize its control appears to be a prime reason behind the recurring attempts at LG reforms. The overall devolution program in Pakistan failed to deliver mainly because of LGs having no authority and funds at their disposal. In a nutshell, the functions of federal governments and finance were only deconcentrated with a shift to local governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, I. (2014). The Punjab under imperialism, 1885–1947 (Vol. 923). Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, W. (1999). World development report 1999/2000: Entering the 21st century. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, D. W. (1999). Exploring state–civil society collaboration: Policy partnerships in developing countries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(1_Suppl), 59–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, A., & Mohmand, S. K. (2003). Local government reforms in Pakistan: Legitimising centralisation or a driver for pro-poor change. Paper written for the “Pakistan Drivers of Pro-Poor Change”. Study conducted by Institute of Development Studies UK, Collective for Social Science Research, Karachi. DFID, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, A., Khwaja, A. I., & Qadir, A. (2006). Local government reforms in Pakistan: Context, content and causes. In D. Mookherjee & P. Bardhan (Eds.), Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: A comparative perspective (pp. 257–284). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M. (2004). Choosing one’s history wisely: Network governance and the question of institutional performance. In Proceedings, Centre for Local Governance Conference, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESCAP, U. (2006). What is good governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commissions for Asia and the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gant, G. F. (2006). The concept of development administration. In E. Otenyo & N. Lind (Eds.), Comparative public administration: The essential readings (Vol. 15, 1st ed., pp. 257–285). Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2010). Pakistan: Poverty reduction strategy paper. International Monetary Fund (Country Report), Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jadoon, M. Z. I., & Jabeen, N. (2017). Administrative reforms in Pakistan. In Public Administration in South Asia (pp. 439–451). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jalal, A. (1995). Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia: A comparative and historical perspective (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalia, S. (2019). Towards collaborative governance: The case of Pakistan. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, P., Narayan, A., & Vishwanath, T. (2003). The political economy of decentralization in Pakistan. Development Research Group, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimenyi, M. S. (2018). Devolution and development: Governance prospects in decentralizing states. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2014). Public administration and administrative reforms in Europe: An introduction in comparative public administration. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, N. (2009). The modern face of traditional agrarian rule: Local government in Pakistan. Development in Practice, 19(8), 997–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, N., & Rana, A. (2019). The history of local governance in Pakistan: What lessons to learn? Journal of International Politics, 1(3), 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manor, J. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralization. The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, Y., Talpur, M., & Murray-Ruest, H. (2000). Capacity building for participatory irrigation management in Sindh Province of Pakistan (Vol. 16). IWMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee, D. (1989). Zia’s military legacy. The Round Table, 78(310), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, S. M. (2019). The fiscal situation of local governments in Pakistan—The case of Punjab Shanzey Minhal Mustafa. Research Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • News, T (2015, April 12). Five years after 18th Amendement. The News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paracha, S. A. (2003). Devolution plan in Pakistan: Context, implementation and issues. Open Society Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2009). Structural change and public service performance: International lessons? Public Money & Management, 29(5), 285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quddus, S. A. (1981). Local self government in Pakistan. Vanguard Books Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa, S. (2016, December 30). Environment department failed to perform its duties in 2016. PakistanToday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa, S. (2018, October 2). EPA fails to update air quality monitoring stations ahead of smog season. PakistanToday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Gill, N. (2003). The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and planning C: Government and Policy, 21(3), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Herridge, R. (2002). Decentralisation—Does it deliver good governance and improved services?: The experience of Uganda: African Studies Centre, Coventry University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, K. (1992). Local government in South Asia: A comparative study (K. Siddiqui, Ed.). University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindh Local Governance Ordinance. (2001). Finance & Cooperation Department, Government of Sindh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, I. (1996). State society and identity: The British Punjab, 1875–1937. In G. Singh & I. Talbot (Eds.), Punjabi identity: Continuity and change (pp. 7–33). Manohar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, F., & Thaheem, M. J. (2018). Concession period of public private partnership projects: Industry–academia gap analysis. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(5), 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2013). Local Government Acts 2013 and province-local government relations. Retrieved August 21, 2017, from http://www.pk.undp.org/content/pakistan/en/home/library/hiv_aids/development-advocate-pakistan/local-government-acts-2013-and-province-local-government-relatio.html

  • Waseem, M. (1994). The 1993 elections in Pakistan. Vanguard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, A. (1999). The Pakistani voter: Electoral politics and voting behaviour in the Punjab. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, S. (1999). Entering the 21st century: World development report, 1999/2000 (Vol. 22). World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Ishtiaq Paul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paul, Z.I., Sial, M.A. (2022). Trends in Local Government Reforms: Case of Environmental Protection Authority. In: Zahra, A., Bouckaert, G., Zafar Iqbal Jadoon, M., Jabeen, N. (eds) Public Sector Reforms in Pakistan. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96825-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics