Abstract
Recent research suggests that bills promoting gender equality are mainly pushed by female legislators. One of the hypotheses that has the greatest support on this issue is that when more women are elected to congresses the interest to legislate on issues related to gender equality increases as well. However, little is still known about this alleged connection, including biographical, partisan and ideological characteristics of the lawmakers committed to promoting gender-sensitive legislation. This work analyzes the Mexican Chamber of Deputies, a congress that has shown a significant increase in the percentage of female legislators worldwide. From an original database that includes more than 30 thousand pieces of legislation presented in the Chamber of Deputies between 1997 and 2019, this work analyses the possible incidence that institutional, partisan and biographical data can hold on the connection between descriptive and substantive representation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldez, L. (2004). Elected bodies: The gender quota law for legislative candidates in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29(2), 231–258.
Bárcena, S. (2013). Comportamiento parlamentario de las diputadas federales en la LVIII Legislatura. In L. Béjar Algazi (Eds.), ¿Quién, cómo y qué se legisla en México? (pp. 265–285). UNAM.
Bárcena, S. (2017). Involucramiento legislativo sin reelección: La productividad de los diputados federales en México, 1985–2015. Política y Gobierno, 24(1), 45–79.
Béjar Algazi, L. (2014). Cuando el ejecutivo es débil¿ Quién legisla en México? Política y gobierno, 21(2), 327–349.
Celis, K. (2006). Substantive representation of women: The representation of women’s interests and the impact of descriptive representation in the Belgian Parliament (1900–1979). Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 28(2), 85–114.
Celis, K., & Childs, S. (2012). The substantive representation of women: What to do with conservative claims? Political Studies, 60(1), 213–225.
Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., & Krook, M. (2014). Constituting women’s interests through representative claims. Politics & Gender, 10(2), 149–174.
Chaney, E. (1979). Supermadre: Women in politics in Latin America. University of Texas Press.
Childs, S., & Krook, M. (2008). Critical mass theory and women’s political representation. Political Studies, 56, 725–736.
Childs, S., & Krook, M. (2009). Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x.
Clayton, A., Josefsson, C., & Wang, V. (2017). Quotas and women’s substantive representation: Evidence from a content analysis of Ugandan Plenary Debates. Politics & Gender, 13(2), 276–304.
Cruz, Y. (2006). Prioridades legislativas de diputadas y diputados en la Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal, 1997–2005. In M. Huerta & E. Magar (coords.) Mujeres legisladoras en México: Avances obstáculos, consecuencias y propuestas. ITAM.
Dahlerup, D. (2006). The story of the theory of critical mass. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 511–522.
Dietz, M. G. (2003). Current controversies in feminist theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 399–431.
Dodson, D., & Carroll, S. (1991). Reshaping the agenda: Women in state legislatures. Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Franceschet, S. (2011). Gendered institutions and women’s substantive representation: Female legislators in Argentina and Chile. In M. Lena (Ed.), Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism (pp. 58–78). Palgrave Macmillan.
Frederick, B. (2010). Gender and patterns of roll call voting in the US Senate. In Congress & the Presidency, 37(2), 103–124. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/07343460903390711.
Jenkins, S. (2012). How gender influences roll call voting. Social Science Quarterly, 93(2), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00847.x.
Jones, M. P. (1997). Legislator gender and legislator policy priorities in the Argentine chamber of deputies and the United States house of representatives. Policy Studies Journal, 25, 613–629.
Kathelene, L. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policy-making: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 560–576.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportion on group life: Skewed sex ratios and response to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965–990.
Kerevel, Y. P., & Atkeson, L. R. (2013). Explaining the marginalization of women in legislative institutions. The Journal of Politics, 75(4), 980–992.
Lachenal, C., Toledo, C., Darkwah, A. K., & Prah, M. (2017). Women’s political representation as key to implementing domestic violence laws: An analysis of Ghana and Mexico. Comparative Evidence Papers, ELLA Programme. Retrieved December 20, 2020 from https://fundar.org.mx/mexico/pdf/CEPwomens.pdf.
Layton Atkinson, M., & Windet, H. (2019). Gender stereotypes and the policy priorities of women in congress. Political Behavior, 41(3), 769–789.
Lloren, A. (2015). Women’s substantive representation defending feminist interests or women’s electoral preferences?” The Journal of Legislative Studies, 21(2), 144–167.
Lovenduski, Joni. (2005a). Feminizing politics. Polity.
Mala, H., Marina, L., & Pablo, M. J. (2013). Does women’s presence change legislative behavior? Evidence from Argentina, 1983–2007. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 5(1), 95–125.
Manin, B., Przeworski, A., & Stokes, S. (1999). Democracy, accountability and representation. Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘Yes.’ Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657.
Osawa, K., & Yoon, J. (2019). Who represents women and why in the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(3), 437–458.
Phillips, A. (1996). Género y teoría democrática. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Pitkin, H. (1985). El concepto de representación. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Piscopo, J. M. (2011). Rethinking descriptive representation: Rendering women in legislative debates. Parliamentary Affairs, 64(3), 448–472.
Piscopo, J. (2014, July–December). Beyond hearth and home: Female legislators, feminist policy change, and substantive representation in Mexico. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 23(2), 87–110.
Reingold, B. (2000). Representing women: Sex, gender, and legislative behavior in Arizona and California. University of North Carolina Press.
Sawer, M. (2000). Parliamentary representation of women: From discourses of justice to strategies of accountability. International Political Science Review/Revue Internationale De Science Politique, 21(4), 361–380.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2006). Still supermadres? Gender and the policy priorities of Latin American legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 570–585.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2007). Women, quotas, and politics. In D. Dahlerup (Ed.), Politics & Gender, 3(2), 289–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X0700013X.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. (2012). Political power and women’s representation in Latin America. Oxford University Press.
Shevchenko, I. (2002). Who cares about women’s problems? Female legislators in the 1995 and 1999 Russian State. Dumas, Europe-Asia Studies, 54(8), 1201–1222.
Simon, D., & Palmer, B. (2010). The roll call behavior of men and women in the US house of representatives, 1937–2008. Politics & Gender, 6(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1000005X.
Swers, M. (2005). Connecting descriptive and substantive representation: An analysis of sex differences in cosponsorship activity. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(3), 407–433.
Taylor-Robinson, M. M., & Heath, R. M. (2003). Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? Women & Politics, 24(4), 77–101.
Thomas, S., & Welch, S. (1991). The impact of gender on activities and priorities of state legislators. The Western Political Quarterly, 44(2), 445–456.
Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. Oxford Univ. Press.
Urbinati, N. (2000). Representation as advocacy: A study of democratic deliberation. Political Theory, 28(6), 758–786.
Vega, A., & Firestone, J. M. (1995). The effects of gender on congressional behavior and the substantive representation of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20(2), 213–222.
Vidal-Correa, F. (2020). Transitioning from descriptive to substantive representation: A study of the Mexican congress. Acta Politologica, 12(3), 27–50.
Wängnerud, L. (2009). Women in parliaments: Descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 51–69.
Weldon, L. S. (2002). Beyond bodies: Institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policymaking. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1153–1174.
Williams, M. (1998). Voice, trust, and memory: Marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton University Press.
Xydias, C. V. (2007). Inviting more women to the party: Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation in Germany. International Journal of Sociology, 37(4), 52–66.
Zambrano, L. (1998). Participación y Representación Femenina en el Congreso. In A. Maria (Ed.), Elecciones y Democracia en Colombia, 1997–1998 (pp. 255–284). Universidad de los Andes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bárcena Juárez, S., López Díaz de León, M.F., de la Peña Sánchez, M.J. (2022). Women’s Substantive Representation in Legal Bills: Classifying and Applying Them to the Mexican Case. In: Vidal-Correa, F. (eds) Political Representation and Gender Equality in Mexico. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96713-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96713-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96712-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96713-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)